smb Doc 5802 Filed 02/19/19 Entered 02/19/19 15:05:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Similar documents
Case KLP Doc 1444 Filed 01/09/18 Entered 01/09/18 17:19:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 18

Case Document 123 Filed in TXSB on 06/23/17 Page 1 of 20

scc Doc 210 Filed 05/06/18 Entered 05/06/18 22:38:17 Main Document Pg 1 of 173

mew Doc 766 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 16:16:24 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

Case Document 134 Filed in TXSB on 09/23/16 Page 1 of 14

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H Defendants.

Jamie A. Levitt PARTNER EDUCATION BAR ADMISSIONS CLERKSHIPS PRACTICES

Case KLP Doc 2908 Filed 04/27/18 Entered 04/27/18 15:39:18 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 12

Who s On First? Understanding Insolvency. SFS Law Group Insolvency Insights. November 2008

FILED BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORDER

Case Document 326 Filed in TXSB on 04/03/17 Page 1 of 5

United States Postal Service Law Department OPINION OF THE BOARD. The Postal Service awarded MBD Maintenance, LLC, a contract for construction

EXPERT WITNESS AND LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES

mew Doc 3228 Filed 05/16/18 Entered 05/16/18 15:11:48 Main Document Pg 1 of 16

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Kryptonite Authorized Reseller Program

YOU MAY WIN ONCE FOR THE ABOVE PERFORMANCE. WINNERS ARE SELECTED AT RANDOM. PRIZES HAVE NO CASH VALUE.

Client s Statement of Rights & Responsibilities*

mew Doc 2823 Filed 03/13/18 Entered 03/13/18 15:59:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Policy on Patents (CA)

mew Doc 3698 Filed 07/31/18 Entered 07/31/18 17:36:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Melbourne IT Audit & Risk Management Committee Charter

Attorneys for Applicant Insurance Commissioner of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

ENIL has a national footprint and broadcast/airs the same under the brand name and registered trademark Radio Mirchi. Terms and Conditions

CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA JAMES M. MESSER CITY ATTORNEY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of

Kryptonite Authorized Seller Program

Intellectual Property

Stephen B. Selbst. Bankruptcy and Restructuring Engagements

Supplemental end user software license agreement terms

TOWNSQUARE MEDIA SING THE OCEACHFIRST BANK JINGLE OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5

Aperture Credentialing End User License Agreement

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

CONTRACT OF EMPLOYiMENT. between LULA MAE PERRY. and the PICKENS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION PICKENS COUNTY, GEORGIA

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

J. HENRY SCHRODER BANK & TRUST COMPANY N/K/A IBJ SCHRODER BANK & TRUST COMPANY TAT (E) (CR) - ORDER

THE ELEVEN LITTLE ROOSTERS GAME OFFICIAL RULES

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

STEP Code for Will Preparation in England & Wales

STEP CODE FOR WILL PREPARATION IN ENGLAND & WALES 2016 revision

Intellectual Property

JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT 9:00 A.M.

THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES ACT S.B.C. 2004, c. 42 as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

(1) Patents/Patentable means:

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

SECOND STATUS REPORT WITH RESPECT TO AVOIDANCE ACTIONS. Edward S. Weisfelner, as the Trustee of the LB Litigation Trust (the Trustee ), by his

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018

UNESCO and Juventus Photo Contest CONTEST RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Filing # E-Filed 04/14/ :22:58 AM

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE AND CONSENT LETTERS

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION FIDDLER S CREEK, LLC, et al.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

April 1, Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure

Terms and Conditions for the Use of the EZ-Reload by Card Facility

Screenplays will be judged based on their originality, writing ability, and a stellar understanding of the Military service.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern Bankruptcy Court Case No Amanda Alexx Giovanni- Adversary Proceeding. Document 1.

S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

Joseph Arellano Principal

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session

NOTES TO ASG 11 ASG FIRE EXPERTS ACCESS AGREEMENT

Xena Exchange Users Agreement

ALAN G. HEVESI, : Defendant. : DEPUTY CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GREGORY J. STASIUK of the Office of

mew Doc 1830 Filed 11/29/17 Entered 11/29/17 12:42:39 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

The Official Rules of the HRM s

Call in toll free at and use 7-Digit Access Code

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

Case 3:02-cv EBB Document 34 Filed 01/20/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff,

Medtronic Pro Bono Program Policy

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

Case Doc 2181 Filed 03/06/14 Entered 03/06/14 23:39:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8

Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

Policy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (

IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C

Case KG Doc 4819 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

DIRECTOR S ORDER NUMBER ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (2018) VIRGINIA LOTTERY S PAC-MAN PROMOTION FINAL RULES FOR OPERATION.

View Terms and Conditions: Effective 12/5/2015 Effective 6/17/2017

WIN YOUR CANADIAN FAMILY ADVENTURE WITH THE LAUGHING COW CONTEST

Filing # E-Filed 02/17/ :19:19 PM

FINAL FANTASY XV ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK SIGNED BY YOKO SHIMOMURA ( Game ) - Members Rewards Raffle (the "Sweepstakes")

Transcription:

Pg 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, et al CASE NO: 18-35672 CHAPTER 11 (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: SUNEDISON, INC., et al. CASE NO: 18-35672 CHAPTER 11 (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION IN RE: OLD ANR, LLC, et al. CASE NO: 19-00302 (KRH) MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDING MEDIATOR S NOTICE TO COURT The Court-ordered mediation commenced on February 7, 2019. I report: 1. The United States Trustee, McKinsey, the Mar-Bow entities, and Westmoreland Coal each appeared at mediation, and each proceeded with the mediation. Attendance by other entities was optional, and no other entities participated. All parties spent extensive time conferring with me both before and during the mediation. Extensive discussions continued after February 7, 2019 as well. I report to you that all parties complied with your respective orders and participated in good faith. 2. McKinsey and Mar-Bow have not reached a settlement. They have agreed to suspend the mediation, with my renewed involvement as a mediator, as appropriate from time-to-time. Subject to any contrary orders, I have agreed to that proposal. 3. I am pleased to report that the United States Trustee and McKinsey have reached a definitive settlement of all issues between those parties. Based on my observations, the proposed settlement between the United States Trustee and McKinsey resolves the parties good faith disputes concerning the application of 1 / 8

Pg 2 of 8 Bankruptcy Rule 2014. A copy of the definitive term sheet is attached as Exhibit A. I anticipate that the motion to approve the settlement will be filed shortly. 4. I am also pleased to inform you that McKinsey and Westmoreland have reached a definitive agreement. A copy of their agreement is attached as Exhibit B. I anticipate that a motion seeking implementation and approval of that agreement will be filed shortly. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Marvin Isgur 2 / 8

Pg 3 of 8 EXHIBIT A 3 / 8

Pg 4 of 8 MEDIATED SETTLEMENT TERM SHEET BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM AND THE MCKINSEY ENTITIES 1. McKinsey 1 will pay: a. $5 million to the reorganized debtors in the Alpha cases. b. $5 million to the reorganized debtors in the SunEdison cases. c. $5 million to the bankruptcy estate in the Westmoreland cases. 2. The payments identified in Paragraph 1 will be distributed in accordance with the terms of the confirmed plans in those cases or other applicable law. If any of the $15 million is distributed to McKinsey, it will be refunded by McKinsey to the distributing party. 3. The United States Trustee Program will release all claims against McKinsey (and all of its agents, directors, officers, attorneys and employees acting on its behalf, solely with respect to actions taken in the course and scope of their duties with McKinsey regarding disclosures in the cases referenced below), and refrain from instituting, directing or maintaining any contested matter, adversary proceeding, or miscellaneous proceeding, or participating in any contested matter, miscellaneous proceeding, or adversary proceeding by a third party (except that the United States Trustees may participate in an action to the extent ordered by a court provided that the United States Trustees may not seek such a court order formally or informally), against McKinsey in which: (a) it is alleged that McKinsey failed to (i) make full and complete disclosure under applicable law; or (ii) fully comply with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014; or (b) any remedy is sought that would be barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel principles if McKinsey had (i) made full and complete disclosures in accordance with applicable law; and (ii) fully complied with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014. For the avoidance of doubt, with respect to paragraph 3(b) above, (x) in the event of: (i) fraud or a material misrepresentation on the record that would have rendered McKinsey not disinterested in any of these bankruptcy cases or that would otherwise have disqualified McKinsey from retention, or (ii) a material omission of fact that if made on the record would have rendered McKinsey not disinterested in any of these bankruptcy cases or that would otherwise have disqualified McKinsey from retention, (y) the United States Trustee Program may pursue appropriate relief including seeking disqualification, and McKinsey reserves all rights to object to such relief. 1 For purposes of this Settlement Term Sheet, McKinsey means, collectively, McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services U.S., LLC. 4 / 8

Pg 5 of 8 The release will apply in the following bankruptcy cases (including any jointly administered cases pertaining to the listed cases): Westmoreland Coal Company, Case No. 18-35672 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.); SunEdison, Inc., Case No. 16-10992 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y); Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Case No. 15-33896 (Bankr. E.D. Va.); The Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., Case No. 01-11490 (Bankr. D. Del.); UAL Corporation, Case No. 02-48191 (Bankr. N.D. Ill.); Mirant Corp., Case No. 03-46590 (Bankr. N.D. Tex.); Lyondell Chemical Company, Case No. 09-10023 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.); Harry & David Holdings, Inc., Case No. 11-10884 (Bankr. D. Del.); AMR Corp., Case No. 11-15463 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.); AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc., Case No. 12-36495 (Bankr. E.D. Va.); Edison Mission Energy, Case No. 12-49219 (Bankr. N.D. Ill.); NII Holdings, Inc., Case No. 14-12611 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.); SRC Liquidation, LLC (f/k/a The Standard Register Company), Case No. (Bankr. D. Del.); and GenOn Energy, Inc., Case No. 17-33695 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.). 4. McKinsey will release all claims against the United States Trustee Program and all of its current and former employees, including all claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412, based on the United States Trustee Program s investigation and prosecution of claims arising out of or pertaining to the adequacy of McKinsey s disinterestedness or disclosures in the cases referenced in paragraph 3. 5. The United States Trustee Program reserves all rights to object to McKinsey s disinterestedness or its retention in the Westmoreland case on any grounds other than the adequacy of its past retention related disclosures in the cases referenced in paragraph 3. The existing objection by the United States Trustee is resolved by this Agreement, without prejudice to the rights of the United States Trustee to assert any issue in any new objection that might be filed. 6. McKinsey will request the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to defer consideration of McKinsey s retention application until after McKinsey has made additional disclosures 2 in the Westmoreland case. The United States Trustee will consent to the requested extension. 2 McKinsey will file an appropriate motion before the Bankruptcy Court in which the continuance is requested. 5 / 8

Pg 6 of 8 7. This Settlement Term Sheet will be filed of record in the SunEdison, Alpha and Westmoreland bankruptcy cases. Thereafter, the Settlement Term Sheet will be incorporated into a proposed agreed order filed in, and subject to the approval of each of the United States Bankruptcy Courts for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. 8. Among other things, the final document will include the United States Trustee Program s usual and customary language concerning the preservation of all other rights by the United States, the right to share information with other agencies of the United States, and an acknowledgement that the agreement set forth herein does not impact the rights of non-parties. 9. Neither this Settlement Term Sheet nor the final documentation will constitute an admission of liability, wrongdoing or misconduct by McKinsey, its employees, officers, directors or agents. 6 / 8

Pg 7 of 8 EXHIBIT B 7 / 8

Pg 8 of 8 MEDIATED TERM SHEET BETWEEN WESTMORELAND COAL AND MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANFORMATION SERVICES U.S, LLC 1. Westmoreland has requested that McKinsey continue to serve as its financial advisor in the Westmoreland bankruptcy cases. McKinsey has agreed to do so, subject to appropriate approval by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. 2. Westmoreland and McKinsey believe that McKinsey has provided unvarnished and independent advice to Westmoreland in these cases. Although Westmoreland has received allegations that McKinsey has conflicted interests, Westmoreland has observed no conflict and believes that it has received unconflicted advice. 3. McKinsey has requested that Westmoreland file a motion with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas asking that the Court defer consideration of McKinsey s retention pending the following: a. The adoption by McKinsey of a protocol for a review of its connections in bankruptcy cases to assure that McKinsey s disclosures in these cases is full, complete, and in compliance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014. b. The application of the protocol by McKinsey in this case to allow the preparation of revised disclosures. c. Westmoreland s review of the revised disclosures to determine whether, in Westmoreland s view, McKinsey may serve under 11 U.S.C. 327. d. The filing of the revised disclosures by McKinsey. Westmoreland has agreed to the request in this paragraph 3. 4. McKinsey has informed Westmoreland of McKinsey s settlement with the United States Trustees Program. Westmoreland fully supports the settlement. 8 / 8