RPAS Photogrammetric Mapping Workflow and Accuracy

Similar documents
Overview. Objectives. The ultimate goal is to compare the performance that different equipment offers us in a photogrammetric flight.

Phase One 190MP Aerial System

Validation of the QuestUAV PPK System

Aerial efficiency, photogrammetric accuracy

Introduction to Photogrammetry

sensefly Camera Collection

Jens Kremer ISPRS Hannover Workshop 2017,

ASPECTS OF DEM GENERATION FROM UAS IMAGERY

Phase One ixu-rs1000 Accuracy Assessment Report Yu. Raizman, PhaseOne.Industrial, Israel

Five Sensors, One Day: Unmanned vs. Manned Logistics and Accuracy

UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL RTK GPS SURVEYING

Geometry of Aerial Photographs

The drone for precision agriculture

IMAGE ACQUISITION GUIDELINES FOR SFM

Aerial Image Acquisition and Processing Services. Ron Coutts, M.Sc., P.Eng. RemTech, October 15, 2014

AIRPORT MAPPING JUNE 2016 EXPLORING UAS EFFECTIVENESS GEOSPATIAL SLAM TECHNOLOGY FEMA S ROMANCE WITH LIDAR VOLUME 6 ISSUE 4

Monitoring the vegetation success of a rehabilitated mine site using multispectral UAV imagery. Tim Whiteside & Renée Bartolo, eriss

VisionMap A3 Edge A Single Camera for Multiple Solutions

Volume 1 - Module 6 Geometry of Aerial Photography. I. Classification of Photographs. Vertical

Aerial photography: Principles. Frame capture sensors: Analog film and digital cameras

MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA EVALUATION BASED ON THE LATEST PHASE ONE TECHNOLOGY

Some Notes on Using Balloon Photography For Modeling the Landslide Area

White Paper Reaching 1 cm (0.4 in) drone survey accuracy

EnsoMOSAIC Aerial mapping tools

VisionMap Sensors and Processing Roadmap

Update on UltraCam and UltraMap technology

White Paper Reaching 1 cm (0.4 in) drone survey accuracy

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A New Approach for Coastal Habitat Assessment

The survey-grade mapping drone

Vexcel Imaging GmbH Innovating in Photogrammetry: UltraCamXp, UltraCamLp and UltraMap

Flood modelling and management. Glasgow University. 8 September Paul Shaw - GeoVision

UAS Photogrammetry Best Practices

HIGH RESOLUTION COLOR IMAGERY FOR ORTHOMAPS AND REMOTE SENSING. Author: Peter Fricker Director Product Management Image Sensors

White Paper Reaching 1 cm (0.4 in) drone survey accuracy

CSI: Rombalds Moor Photogrammetry Photography

The survey-grade mapping drone

NAVIGATION AND REMOTE SENSING PAYLOADS AND METHODS OF THE SARVANT UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM

Working with your Camera

2019 NYSAPLS Conf> Fundamentals of Photogrammetry for Land Surveyors

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II Aero Photo Europe Investigation

11/25/2009 CHAPTER THREE INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION (CONT D) THE AERIAL CAMERA: LENS PHOTOGRAPHIC SENSORS

MULTIPURPOSE QUADCOPTER SOLUTION FOR AGRICULTURE

CHARLES MONDELLO PAST PRESIDENT PDC ASPRS FELLOW

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC IIe

Deliverable 5-B: Review and Update on AURA System Requirements, Sensors, and Platforms Supplemental Report

MSB Imagery Program FAQ v1

EXAMPLES OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS PRODUCED FROM SPACE AND ACHIEVED ACCURACY CARAVAN Workshop on Mapping from Space, Phnom Penh, June 2000

Calibration Certificate

CALIBRATING THE NEW ULTRACAM OSPREY OBLIQUE AERIAL SENSOR Michael Gruber, Wolfgang Walcher

Geo-localization and Mosaicing System (GEMS): Enabling Precision Image Feature Location and Rapid Mosaicing General:

Remote Sensing Platforms

UltraCam and UltraMap An Update

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC III 27542

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Rochester Institute of Technology. Wildfire Airborne Sensor Program (WASP) Project Overview

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Experimental aerial photogrammetry with professional non metric camera Canon EOS 5D

PHOTOGRAMMETRY STEREOSCOPY FLIGHT PLANNING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DEFINITIONS GROUND CONTROL INTRODUCTION

Ground Control Configuration Analysis for Small Area UAV Imagery Based Mapping

High Resolution Sensor Test Comparison with SPOT, KFA1000, KVR1000, IRS-1C and DPA in Lower Saxony

Abstract Quickbird Vs Aerial photos in identifying man-made objects

Sample Copy. Not For Distribution.

Calibration Report. UC-SXp Version of Report:

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Digital Aerial Photography UNBC March 22, Presented by: Dick Mynen TDB Consultants Inc.

not to be republished NCERT Introduction To Aerial Photographs Chapter 6

Leica ADS80 - Digital Airborne Imaging Solution NAIP, Salt Lake City 4 December 2008

Acquisition of Aerial Photographs and/or Satellite Imagery

CALIBRATION OF OPTICAL SATELLITE SENSORS

AERIAL SURVEY TEST PROJECT WITH DJI PHANTOM 3 QUADROCOPTER DRONE

** KEYSTONE AERIAL SURVEYS R. David Day, Wesley Weaver **

UAV Technologies for 3D Mapping. Rolf Schaeppi Director Geospatial Solutions APAC / India

REMOTE SENSING WITH DRONES. YNCenter Video Conference Chang Cao

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data Acquisition for Damage Assessment in. Hurricane Events

Table of Contents. 1.Choosing your Camera. 2. Understanding your Camera Which Camera DSLR vs Compact...8

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

PNC Deployment and integration of cost-effective, high spatial resolution, remotely sensed data for the Australian forestry industry

Free Flight Mapping: Pix4Dcapture & dji Spark Jerry Davis, SFSU Institute for Geographic Information Science

LECTURE NOTES 2016 CONTENTS. Sensors and Platforms for Acquisition of Aerial and Satellite Image Data

Film Cameras Digital SLR Cameras Point and Shoot Bridge Compact Mirror less

PROPERTY OF THE LARGE FORMAT DIGITAL AERIAL CAMERA DMC II

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

ULTRACAM EAGLE MARK 3. One system for endless possibilities

Baldwin and Mobile Counties, AL Orthoimagery Project Report. Submitted: March 23, 2016

SMARTSCAN Smart Pushbroom Imaging System for Shaky Space Platforms

MONITORING RUBBLE-MOUND COASTAL STRUCTURES WITH PHOTOGRAMMETRY

The Z/I Imaging Digital Aerial Camera System

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

Dual Channel Waveform Processing Airborne LiDAR Scanning System for High-Point Density and Ultra-Wide Area Mapping

Dr. Achim Z i c k 1 e r JENOPTIK JENA GmbH, GDR 69 Jena, Carl-Zeiss-Platz 1

Reikan FoCal Aperture Sharpness Test Report

DIGITAL AERIAL SENSOR TYPE CERTIFICATION

Capture the invisible

USE OF IMPROVISED REMOTELY SENSED DATA FROM UAV FOR GIS AND MAPPING, A CASE STUDY OF GOMA CITY, DR CONGO

Advanced Optical Satellite (ALOS-3) Overviews

DISCO-PRO AG ALL-IN-ONE DRONE SOLUTION FOR PRECISION AGRICULTURE. 80ha COVERAGE PARROT SEQUOIA INCLUDES MULTI-PURPOSE TOOL SAFE ANALYZE & DECIDE

Airborne or Spaceborne Images for Topographic Mapping?

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF DIRECT GEOREFERENCING FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPLICATIONS ON SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL PLATFORMS

Transcription:

RPAS Photogrammetric Mapping Workflow and Accuracy Dr Yincai Zhou & Dr Craig Roberts Surveying and Geospatial Engineering School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Background RPAS category and operation regulations RPAS photogrammetric mapping workflow Factors affecting product accuracy Summary 1

Fixed Wing vs. MultiRotor Advantages Simple structure High speed Long duration Disadvantages High mechanical complexity Low speed Short flight time Disadvantages Large take-off & landing space Not able to hover Inflexibility to carry different sensors Advantages Vertical take-off and landing Flexibility with different sensors Able to hover and stare 2

Weight classes: micro: gross weight < 100 g very small: gross weight 0.1-2 kg small: gross weight 2-25 kg medium: gross weight of 25-150 kg large: gross weight >=150 kg RPA selection: Job nature mapping, 3D modelling or inspection Takeoff weight light weight, less risks Sensor s weight or size Investment budget 3

RPA Standard Operating Conditions (SOC): VLOS (visual line-of-sight) in daytime only Under 400ft (120m) AGL (above ground level) 30m away from people Not in prohibited or restricted area Not within 3NM (5.5km) of a controlled aerodrome Not over populated areas Only fly one RPA at a time *Details in Advisory Circular AC101-01 Operation category: Excluded RPA No ReOC or RePL required Included RPA ReOC & RePL required 4 OC Operator s Certificate, PL Pilot s Licence

Design flowchart to determine eligibility as an excluded RPA 5

6

ReOC Application 1. A company with ABN/ACN 2. An employee to obtain RePL 3. Nominate a chief pilot 4. Prepare an Ops manual (CASA template) 5. Apply for ReOC 6. Chief pilot skill assessment by CASA 7. ReOC granted 8. Chief pilot is responsible for all operations 8

RPAS Optical Sensors RGB compact cameras RGB DSLR cameras NIR cameras Multispectral cameras Red edge 9

Image Distortion and Camera Selection Distortion caused by lens: Consumer-grade cameras large distortion Geometric-cameras small distortion and geometrically stable Distortion caused by moving camera: Electronic (rolling) shutter large distortion Focal plan (mechanical) shutter small distortion Leaf (mechanical) shutter no distortion (blurry?). Camera selection: Avoid rolling shutter Leaf shutter right choice Focal plan shutter for low speed flight 10

Project Planning Location (urban, rural or remote?) Site terrain, vegetation (rich texture on images?) Area of survey Google Earth KML Preferred time frame weather permits? Survey in standard operation conditions? Obtain permission from CASA required? Geometric accuracy requirement? GSD (ground sampling distance), terrain, flying height AGL? Site accessibility? Launch and landing area? Land owner consent GCPs (ground control point) required and survey accuracy? Flight planning. 12

Flight Planning (1) All photogrammetric measurements are based on overlapped images in order to obtain 3-dimensional object geometry 13 http://www.photogrammetrynews.com/2015/12/planning-of-aerial-photography-overlaps.html

Flight Planning (2) Check Can I Fly There? @ CASA.gov.au Apply for permission if the flights are not in SOC Weather permit (raining / windy)? Flight height / image resolution / GSD setup Image overlap lateral and longitudinal Time of the day to fly (image quality) Set drone safety features (eg return home, ceiling, geofence) Trained observer on site RPAS firmware and apps updated Pre-flight checklist ready GCP survey pre- or post- flight Post-flight checklist ready 14

Flight Planning (3) 15

Image Quality Control 1. RPAS ground speed (motion blur) 2. Flight height ( GSD and image coverage) 3. Oblique angle ( GSD and image coverage) 4. RPAS vibration (gimbal) 5. Camera and lens quality (image distortion) 6. Camera shutter speed (motion blur) 7. Camera sensor resolution (GSD) 8. Camera aperture (depth of field out of focus) 9. Light condition (sunny shadow, cloudy under exposure) 10. Surface reflection (coal stockpile under exposure) 11. Large elevation change (GSD variation affect matching) 12. Time of day to capture images (e.g. high wall shadow) 17

GSD variation due to oblique angle Same sensor size Different ground coverage Different GSD Vertical vs Oblique images 18

GSD variation due to terrain changes (1) 19

GSD variation due to terrain changes (2) Constant flight H above take-off location (120m) Different camera H above ground ΔH=80m (40m 120m) Large GSD variation: 2cm at hill top, 6cm at bottom No oblique images 20

large image overlaps improve product accuracy Parallel flight paths (normal overlaps 70%L & 70%) 21 Crossover flight paths (= very large overlaps)

Image format no effects on accuracy JPEG format images Raw (CR2) images NIR images RGB images 22

Windy condition affects accuracy Flight tracks off designed paths due to strong wind. Less matched feature points in some areas 23

Water surface Water surface cannot be mapped or precisely surveyed photogrammetrically 24

Multiple flights planning - By planning software - By mission areas - No gaps or with small overlaps 25

Camera shutter type effects Rolling shutter (Phantom3) Electronic 1 st curtain (Sony QX1) 26 Leaf shutter (Canon compact)

Point cloud RTK check string 500m Point cloud validation (1) 400m RTK (30 sec/epoch) check strings on hard surface areas 27

Point cloud validation (2) Single flight + Nadir images Flight H = 120 m GCPs = 6 Image overlaps = 80% Number of Images = 110 Point cloud RTK string points: o Mean = -6.0 cm o Standard deviation = ±5.7 cm 28

Point cloud validation (3) crossover flights + Nadir images Flight H = 80 m & 120 m GCPs = 6 Image overlaps = 80% Number of Images = 220 Point cloud RTK string points: o Mean = -5.6 cm o Standard deviation = ±5.4 cm 29

Point cloud validation (4) 2 flights + oblique images Flight H = 120 m GCPs = 6 Image overlaps = 80% Number of Images = 330 Point cloud RTK string points: o Mean = +2.0 cm o Standard deviation = ±4.8 cm 30

Summary The following aspects need to be considered for the best practice of conducting a RPAS aerial mapping project. Accuracy depends on GSD Optimal σ xy = ±1 GSD; σ z = ±1.5 GSD 70% Image overlaps 90% Number of GCPs 5 GCP survey @ RTK 30 epochs (best with bipod) Oblique Images improve accuracy significantly Time of the day = light cloudy or mid-day (less shadow) Large elevation variation = oblique images + variable flight H Use a gimbal to stabilise camera (reduce vibration blur) Slow ground speed (reduce motion blur) High resolution optical sensor (small GSD) Leaf shutter lens (avoid rolling shutter effects) High quality camera (less sensor or lens distortion) 31