Texas A&M International University Finance & Administration Division 2000 Service Quality Survey Frequencies Background Information

Similar documents
Texas A&M International University Finance & Administration Division 1999 Service Quality Survey Background Information

Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Promoting learning and discovery through teamwork and excellence in facility management.

Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Promoting learning and discovery through teamwork and excellence in facility management.

Community Pharmacy Patient Questionnaire Results for Miltons Chemists

CITY OF MORDEN Results Report Customer Satisfaction Survey 2015

Graduate Survey 1. Colored Gemstones

Workforce and Governing Body Members Equality Information (incorporating the WRES progress report) For further information please contact:

ARMSTRONG ELEMENTARY S PTA POSTIONS

Baseline Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Promoting learning and discovery through teamwork and excellence in facility management.

Assessing and Monitoring Social Protection Programs in Asia and the Pacific

The World of Work. This is an survey, NOT a test. Place a check mark in the column that indicates your honest response for each of the items.

Report Gender Pay Gap. Our values

Research and Innovation in Science and Technology Project (P121842)

75 Steps to Start-Up Success

Project Administration Instructions

Southern Utah University Police Department Monthly Crime Report

WINCHESTER SCHOOL BOARD MEETING WINCHESTER SCHOOL LIBRARY OCTOBER 18, 2012

Handbook for ESL Peer Consultants

Codes of Conduct for Au Pairs and Host Families

Gender Pay Gap Reporting

Gender Pay Gap. Page 1

GENERAL TERMS. General Terms and Conditions. Adult courses Terms and Conditions. Terms and Conditions Work Placement

Whittard of Chelsea. Gender Pay Gap Reporting 2017

Glasgow School of Art

OFA Online Workshop Series WORK-STUDY. Training for Program Participants

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

2011 IPO Corporate IP Management Benchmarking Survey. November Intellectual Property Owners Association

Questionnaire for those who participated or are currently participating in an exchange program in Japan from

Lake Bluff Public Library Actions Taken in Response to Patron Satisfaction Survey Drafted: Eric Bailey, Library Director

MANAGING PEOPLE, NOT JUST R&D: FIVE COMPANIES EXPERIENCES

Call t o Artists. City of Coeur d Alene, Idaho Coeur d Alene Arts Commission

CERTIFIED, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS PAY SCHEDULE - 15TH MARKET PERCENTILE (Effective 1/6/2009) Base Salary

GAO. NASA PROCUREMENT Contract and Management Improvements at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Report to Congressional Requesters

Donor Survey. Title of your presentation. Questions may be referred to or

2017 Employment TWO-YEAR Report MBA

BUSINESS CLIENT QUESTIONNAIRE

BETWEEN MAY 11 AND JULY 31, 2016, LAC LA BICHE COUNTY UNDERTOOK A MUNICIPAL CENSUS TO DETERMINE THE COUNTY S POPULATION AND

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT

A procedure is required to insure that appropriate guidelines and techniques are followed and utilized by photographers.

VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE Local Board Meeting Minutes Minutes No. 245, May 19, 2011

How satisfied were you with the time it took to provide your prescription and/or any other NHS services you required?

Call t o Artis ts. City of Coeur d Alene, I daho Coeur d Alene Arts Commission

The Danish 3R Survey Knowledge, attitudes and experiences with the 3Rs among researchers involved in animal experiments in Denmark

Foreword. Simon Hunt Managing Director Oxford Policy Management

SPRING INTO AN INTERNSHIP. Career Services & Employer Relations

June 28, 2013 Revised Constitution of The Campus Programming Board of the New York Institute of Technology

S = {(1, 1), (1, 2),, (6, 6)}

1. REU Pre-survey. PRE REU Site Survey Please enter your address.

Tha Board O Ulster-Scotch 97th Board Meeting 31 March 2010 Ulster-Scots Agency Board Room Belfast

Microsoft Trustworthy Computing 2013 Privacy Survey Results

Guide to Tier 4 Online Visa Application: Inside the UK Visa Immigration Support and Advice Advice from the VISA Team

K.R.N.SHONIWA Director of the Production Division Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency

2017 Committee Descriptions

Trafford CCG. CCG authorisation 360 o stakeholder survey report. Version 18 Internal Use Only Version 14 Internal Use Only

Texas Public School Finance

Name Position Telephone First contact. [redacted under

AU PAIR NEW ZEALAND Au Pair - Family Contract

Incentive Guidelines. Aid for Research and Development Projects (Tax Credit)

Inside or Outside the IP System? Business Creation in Academia. Scott Shane (CWRU)

Table 2. Assessment Climate Survey Responses

Gender pay gap reporting

Welcome. There s no more exciting time, and no more exciting place, to put your talents to work.

RTÉ Freedom of Information Disclosure Log Q3 (July-September 2017)

13/14 Recurent WTE's Financial Management Team Band 5 Assistant Mgt Accountant

University of Northampton. Graduate Leaders in Early Years Programme Audit Monitoring Report by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Gender Pay Gap Report - Overview

Amarillo College Emergency Notification Systems and Procedures

Pinewood Gender Pay Gap Report

Glue a photo of yourself here. Name:... School:... Class:...

SDEP Module 5-Dealing with Public Benefits. 1. SDEP Module Title

Pacific Library Partnership Grant Program. 1. Title of Project: Wearables for Wellness

7,725 survey participants

Retention evaluation materials for this judge

ST. JOHNS RIVER STATE COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES Palatka, Florida. Budget Workshop June 4, 2014

ADDING VALUE AS IN-HOUSE COUNSEL Law Department Reporting & Metrics

2008 INSTITUTIONAL SELF STUDY REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City of Maple Heights Special Council Meeting Minutes Maple Heights City Hall December 8, 2015

Appendix E Instructions for Scoring the KAP Survey

47th Annual Holiday Craft Fair

, -the of all of a probability experiment. consists of outcomes. (b) List the elements of the event consisting of a number that is greater than 4.

Mistakes to Avoid in Your Catering Business. With Rob Martin Recovering Caterer and Business Consultant

Now Education Guide to Supply Teaching

Redundancy Digesting the big news

1. Users may access Campus Transactions Dashboard by clicking the icon on the Home Page or via the Navigator menu.

Gender Pay Gap Report

RISE OF THE HUDDLE SPACE

EX25.6. Attachment E Consultation Issues & Responses

THE GOLF CLUB AT REDMOND RIDGE CLUB CARD PLAN No Initiation Fee and One Low Monthly Price for Year-Around Golf

NC State Engineering Career Fair FAQ s for Companies. How do I register for the Engineering Career Fair?

State College Area School District

CITY COMMENTS ON THE OMBUDSMAN S RECOMMENDATIONS

CENTER FOR ENERGY STUDIES LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY NEWSLETTER

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT

Equal Pay Review 2018

Redundancy Digesting the big news

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

Foreword Baljinder Kang

Managing the uncertainty of job loss.

None found, the nearest occupation listed is Multimedia Illustrator

Preceptor Workshop 11/28

Transcription:

Texas A&M International University Finance & Administration Division 2000 Service Quality Survey Frequencies Background Information Job Category Exec/Adm 31 23.7 23.8 23.8 Faculty 36 27.5 27.7 51.5 Clerical 42 32.1 32.3 83.8 Tech 15 11.5 11.5 95.4 Service 6 4.6 4.6 100.0 Years employed by TAMIU Less than 1 year 24 18.3 18.3 18.3 1-4 years 55 42.0 42.0 60.3 5-9 years 30 22.9 22.9 83.2 10-19 years 18 13.7 13.7 96.9 20-29 years 4 3.1 3.1 100.0 100.0 Gender Male 43 32.8 33.3 33.3 Female 86 65.6 66.7 100.0

Business Office How would you rate the services provided by the staff in the Accounts Payable section? Very Good 27 20.6 20.8 20.8 Good 47 35.9 36.2 56.9 Fair 22 16.8 16.9 73.8 Poor 11 8.4 8.5 82.3 N/A 23 17.6 17.7 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided by the Business Office concerning payment issues? Very Good 25 19.1 19.1 19.1 Good 47 35.9 35.9 55.0 Fair 27 20.6 20.6 75.6 Poor 13 9.9 9.9 85.5 N/A 19 14.5 14.5 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the services provided by the staff in the Travel section? Very Good 32 24.4 24.6 24.6 Good 45 34.4 34.6 59.2 Fair 15 11.5 11.5 70.8 Poor 5 3.8 3.8 74.6 N/A 33 25.2 25.4 100.0 How would you rate the customer service provided by the Cashiering Area?

Very Good 26 19.8 19.8 19.8 Good 58 44.3 44.3 64.1 Fair 25 19.1 19.1 83.2 Poor 7 5.3 5.3 88.5 N/A 15 11.5 11.5 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the services provided by the staff in the Cashier Section? Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 30 22.9 22.9 22.9 Good 55 42.0 42.0 64.9 Fair 24 18.3 18.3 83.2 Poor 7 5.3 5.3 88.5 N/A 15 11.5 11.5 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the Business Office staff. Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 27 20.6 20.6 20.6 Good 65 49.6 49.6 70.2 Fair 24 18.3 18.3 88.5 Poor 6 4.6 4.6 93.1 N/A 9 6.9 6.9 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the communication by the Business Office about policies, procedures and proper use of forms? Very Good 15 11.5 11.5 11.5 Good 53 40.5 40.5 51.9 Fair 41 31.3 31.3 83.2 Poor 10 7.6 7.6 90.8 N/A 12 9.2 9.2 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate the overall services provided by the Business Office.

Very Good 24 18.3 18.6 18.6 Good 71 54.2 55.0 73.6 Fair 21 16.0 16.3 89.9 Poor 6 4.6 4.7 94.6 N/A 7 5.3 5.4 100.0 Office of Human Resource How would you rate the efficiency of the HR staff in responding to questions and providing assistance regarding HR-related issues? Very Good 72 55.0 55.0 55.0 Good 50 38.2 38.2 93.1 Fair 8 6.1 6.1 99.2 Poor 1.8.8 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the effectiveness of the HR recruiting efforts in attracting adequate applicants? Very Good 27 20.6 20.8 20.8 Good 40 30.5 30.8 51.5 Fair 24 18.3 18.5 70.0 Poor 6 4.6 4.6 74.6 N/A 33 25.2 25.4 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided concerning benefits? Very Good 53 40.5 40.5 40.5

Good 65 49.6 49.6 90.1 Fair 10 7.6 7.6 97.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.3 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the clarity and comprehensibility of the benefits communicated throughout the year? Very Good 48 36.6 36.6 36.6 Good 63 48.1 48.1 84.7 Fair 15 11.5 11.5 96.2 Poor 2 1.5 1.5 97.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.3 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate how useful the staff development workshops offered by Texas A&M International University are to you. Very Good 36 27.5 27.5 27.5 Good 47 35.9 35.9 63.4 Fair 12 9.2 9.2 72.5 Poor 6 4.6 4.6 77.1 N/A 30 22.9 22.9 100.0 100.0 Do you feel you have adequate opportunity to attend staff development workshops on campus? Yes 91 69.5 72.2 72.2 No 30 22.9 23.8 96.0 D 1.8.8 96.8 E 4 3.1 3.2 100.0 Total 126 96.2 100.0 Missing 5 3.8 Where do you receive most of your information about HR-related topics?

Hr Home Page 7 5.3 5.4 5.4 HR News & Views 62 47.3 47.7 53.1 Direct contact with HR staff 48 36.6 36.9 90.0 Other 12 9.2 9.2 99.2 E 1.8.8 100.0 How would you rate the effectiveness of the HR News & Views in communicatiing news and information about HR-related issues? Very Good 47 35.9 35.9 35.9 Good 64 48.9 48.9 84.7 Fair 16 12.2 12.2 96.9 Poor 2 1.5 1.5 98.5 N/A 2 1.5 1.5 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the timeliness of news and information you receive in the HR News & Views? Very Good 43 32.8 33.1 33.1 Good 67 51.1 51.5 84.6 Fair 15 11.5 11.5 96.2 Poor 2 1.5 1.5 97.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.3 100.0 When I receive the HR News and Views I, Read it right away 65 49.6 50.0 50.0 Take it home 13 9.9 10.0 60.0 File it in my to read file 30 22.9 23.1 83.1 Scan and file for future reference 18 13.7 13.8 96.9 Do not read it 4 3.1 3.1 100.0

How would you rate the HR News and Views on length of overall newsletter/articles and readability? Too short 14 10.7 10.9 10.9 Just right 109 83.2 84.5 95.3 Too Long 6 4.6 4.7 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided by HR regarding Leave Policies? Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 48 36.6 36.6 36.6 Good 57 43.5 43.5 80.2 Fair 11 8.4 8.4 88.5 Poor 1.8.8 89.3 N/A 14 10.7 10.7 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided by HR regarding Time Cards? Very Good 39 29.8 30.0 30.0 Good 44 33.6 33.8 63.8 Fair 12 9.2 9.2 73.1 Poor 1.8.8 73.8 N/A 34 26.0 26.2 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided by HR regarding Leave and/or compensatory time balances?

Very Good 39 29.8 30.0 30.0 Good 55 42.0 42.3 72.3 Fair 11 8.4 8.5 80.8 Poor 7 5.3 5.4 86.2 N/A 18 13.7 13.8 100.0 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the Office of Human Resources staff. Very Good 67 51.1 51.1 51.1 Good 51 38.9 38.9 90.1 Fair 12 9.2 9.2 99.2 Poor 1.8.8 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate the overall services provided by the Office of Human Resources. Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 57 43.5 43.8 43.8 Good 58 44.3 44.6 88.5 Fair 14 10.7 10.8 99.2 Poor 1.8.8 100.0 Purchasing How would you rate the communication by Purchasing about purchasing policies, procedures, and proper use of forms? Very Good 26 19.8 19.8 19.8 Good 42 32.1 32.1 51.9 Fair 23 17.6 17.6 69.5

Poor 14 10.7 10.7 80.2 N/A 26 19.8 19.8 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate how efficiently your purchase orders are being processed. Very Good 29 22.1 22.1 22.1 Good 36 27.5 27.5 49.6 Fair 24 18.3 18.3 67.9 Poor 9 6.9 6.9 74.8 N/A 33 25.2 25.2 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the Purchasing department staff. Very Good 33 25.2 25.2 25.2 Good 37 28.2 28.2 53.4 Fair 28 21.4 21.4 74.8 Poor 8 6.1 6.1 80.9 N/A 25 19.1 19.1 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate the overall services provided by the purchasing Department. Very Good 34 26.0 26.0 26.0 Good 43 32.8 32.8 58.8 Fair 18 13.7 13.7 72.5 Poor 12 9.2 9.2 81.7 N/A 24 18.3 18.3 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the response time given to your request(s)? Very Good 49 37.4 37.7 37.7 Good 53 40.5 40.8 78.5 Fair 9 6.9 6.9 85.4

Poor 1.8.8 86.2 N/A 18 13.7 13.8 100.0 How would you rate the quality and selection of supplies being stocked in Central Stores? Very Good 37 28.2 28.5 28.5 Good 56 42.7 43.1 71.5 Fair 18 13.7 13.8 85.4 Poor 1.8.8 86.2 N/A 18 13.7 13.8 100.0 How would you rate the response time given to your request(s)? Very Good 48 36.6 36.9 36.9 Good 45 34.4 34.6 71.5 Fair 15 11.5 11.5 83.1 Poor 1.8.8 83.8 N/A 21 16.0 16.2 100.0 How would you rate the quality of finished product from the Print Shop? Very Good 44 33.6 33.8 33.8 Good 47 35.9 36.2 70.0 Fair 20 15.3 15.4 85.4 Poor 3 2.3 2.3 87.7 N/A 16 12.2 12.3 100.0

How would you rate the system used by the Mail Room to handle special requests? Very Good 42 32.1 32.6 32.6 Good 46 35.1 35.7 68.2 Fair 10 7.6 7.8 76.0 Poor 2 1.5 1.6 77.5 N/A 29 22.1 22.5 100.0 How would you rate the accuracy and timeliness of the mail distribution? Very Good 41 31.3 31.8 31.8 Good 56 42.7 43.4 75.2 Fair 18 13.7 14.0 89.1 Poor 3 2.3 2.3 91.5 N/A 11 8.4 8.5 100.0 How would you rate the notification process used to advise you that a package has arrived for you in Receiving? Very Good 47 35.9 36.2 36.2 Good 50 38.2 38.5 74.6 Fair 15 11.5 11.5 86.2 Poor 5 3.8 3.8 90.0 N/A 13 9.9 10.0 100.0

How would you rate the communication by this area about procedures for the issue/transfer of University property and reporting stolen, damaged, or lost University Property? Very Good 25 19.1 19.4 19.4 Good 32 24.4 24.8 44.2 Fair 24 18.3 18.6 62.8 Poor 10 7.6 7.8 70.5 N/A 38 29.0 29.5 100.0 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the Suppport Services staff. Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 54 41.2 41.5 41.5 Good 58 44.3 44.6 86.2 Fair 11 8.4 8.5 94.6 N/A 7 5.3 5.4 100.0 Please evaluate the overall services provided by Support Services. Very Good 51 38.9 38.9 38.9 Good 60 45.8 45.8 84.7 Fair 11 8.4 8.4 93.1 N/A 9 6.9 6.9 100.0 100.0 Budget/Payroll/Grants & Contracts How would you rate the manner in which the annual budget process is currently being administered? Very Good 16 12.2 12.4 12.4

Good 19 14.5 14.7 27.1 Fair 21 16.0 16.3 43.4 Poor 11 8.4 8.5 51.9 N/A 62 47.3 48.1 100.0 How would you rate the level of participation extended to you in the budget process? Very Good 12 9.2 9.2 9.2 Good 17 13.0 13.1 22.3 Fair 20 15.3 15.4 37.7 Poor 17 13.0 13.1 50.8 N/A 64 48.9 49.2 100.0 How would you rate the length of time allotted for the annual budget preparation? Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 11 8.4 8.5 8.5 Good 15 11.5 11.5 20.0 Fair 24 18.3 18.5 38.5 Poor 15 11.5 11.5 50.0 N/A 65 49.6 50.0 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided concerning the annual budget process and/or other budget information? Very Good 15 11.5 11.5 11.5 Good 13 9.9 10.0 21.5 Fair 14 10.7 10.8 32.3 Poor 14 10.7 10.8 43.1

N/A 74 56.5 56.9 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided concerning your payroll check and/or other payroll information? Very Good 48 36.6 36.6 36.6 Good 52 39.7 39.7 76.3 Fair 14 10.7 10.7 87.0 Poor 1.8.8 87.8 N/A 16 12.2 12.2 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the clarity and comprehensibility of the information on your payroll stub? Very Good 49 37.4 38.0 38.0 Good 49 37.4 38.0 76.0 Fair 13 9.9 10.1 86.0 Poor 5 3.8 3.9 89.9 N/A 13 9.9 10.1 100.0 How would you rate the manner in which payroll checks are distributed to you? Very Good 64 48.9 49.2 49.2 Good 46 35.1 35.4 84.6 Fair 5 3.8 3.8 88.5 Poor 1.8.8 89.2 N/A 14 10.7 10.8 100.0

How are you being paid? Bi-weekly 64 48.9 49.6 49.6 Monthly 64 48.9 49.6 99.2 E 1.8.8 100.0 How would you rate your satisfaction with the method (biweekly/monthly) in which you are being paid? Very Good 63 48.1 48.5 48.5 Good 49 37.4 37.7 86.2 Fair 12 9.2 9.2 95.4 Poor 5 3.8 3.8 99.2 N/A 1.8.8 100.0 How would you rate the assistance provided concerning proposals, financial status, reporting, monitoring, and completion of grant reports? Very Good 7 5.3 5.5 5.5 Good 16 12.2 12.6 18.1 Fair 11 8.4 8.7 26.8 Poor 8 6.1 6.3 33.1 N/A 85 64.9 66.9 100.0 Total 127 96.9 100.0 Missing 4 3.1 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the Office of Budget/Payroll/Grants and Contracts. Very Good 31 23.7 24.4 24.4 Good 55 42.0 43.3 67.7

Fair 11 8.4 8.7 76.4 Poor 3 2.3 2.4 78.7 N/A 27 20.6 21.3 100.0 Total 127 96.9 100.0 Missing 4 3.1 Please evaluate the overall services provided by the Office of Budget/Payroll/Grants and Contracts. Very Good 28 21.4 22.0 22.0 Good 56 42.7 44.1 66.1 Fair 11 8.4 8.7 74.8 Poor 4 3.1 3.1 78.0 N/A 28 21.4 22.0 100.0 Total 127 96.9 100.0 Missing 4 3.1 Computer and Telecommunication Services Was the response to your service request(s) by CTS staff? Very Good 28 21.4 21.5 21.5 Good 52 39.7 40.0 61.5 Fair 28 21.4 21.5 83.1 Poor 17 13.0 13.1 96.2 N/A 5 3.8 3.8 100.0 How would you rate the solution or outcome of CTS service request(s)? Very Good 30 22.9 22.9 22.9 Good 48 36.6 36.6 59.5

Fair 36 27.5 27.5 87.0 Poor 12 9.2 9.2 96.2 N/A 5 3.8 3.8 100.0 100.0 How would you rate the communication by CTS regarding its services? Very Good 29 22.1 22.1 22.1 Good 55 42.0 42.0 64.1 Fair 29 22.1 22.1 86.3 Poor 15 11.5 11.5 97.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.3 100.0 100.0 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the CTS staff. Very Good 38 29.0 29.0 29.0 Good 57 43.5 43.5 72.5 Fair 26 19.8 19.8 92.4 Poor 7 5.3 5.3 97.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.3 100.0 100.0 Please rate the overall services provided by CTS. Very Good 31 23.7 23.7 23.7 Good 56 42.7 42.7 66.4 Fair 31 23.7 23.7 90.1 Poor 10 7.6 7.6 97.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.3 100.0 100.0 Physical Plant How would you rate the response time given to your service request(s)?

Very Good 30 22.9 23.1 23.1 Good 56 42.7 43.1 66.2 Fair 22 16.8 16.9 83.1 Poor 8 6.1 6.2 89.2 N/A 14 10.7 10.8 100.0 Is the solution to your service requests what you requested or handled in a manner satisfactory to you? Very Good 37 28.2 28.7 28.7 Good 57 43.5 44.2 72.9 Fair 17 13.0 13.2 86.0 Poor 5 3.8 3.9 89.9 N/A 13 9.9 10.1 100.0 How would you rate the cleanliness of the campus facilites? Very Good 49 37.4 37.7 37.7 Good 58 44.3 44.6 82.3 Fair 14 10.7 10.8 93.1 Poor 5 3.8 3.8 96.9 N/A 4 3.1 3.1 100.0 How would you rate the attractiveness/maintenace of the campus landscaping? Very Good 58 44.3 44.6 44.6

Good 48 36.6 36.9 81.5 Fair 14 10.7 10.8 92.3 Poor 6 4.6 4.6 96.9 N/A 4 3.1 3.1 100.0 How would you rate the communication by Physical Plant about its services and procedures? Very Good 35 26.7 26.9 26.9 Good 53 40.5 40.8 67.7 Fair 26 19.8 20.0 87.7 Poor 8 6.1 6.2 93.8 N/A 8 6.1 6.2 100.0 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the Physical Plant staff. Very Good 54 41.2 41.5 41.5 Good 53 40.5 40.8 82.3 Fair 10 7.6 7.7 90.0 Poor 8 6.1 6.2 96.2 N/A 5 3.8 3.8 100.0 Please evaluate the overall services provided by Physical Plant. Very Good 46 35.1 35.4 35.4 Good 58 44.3 44.6 80.0 Fair 16 12.2 12.3 92.3 Poor 5 3.8 3.8 96.2

N/A 5 3.8 3.8 100.0 University Police Department How would you rate the level of safety on campus? Very Good 39 29.8 30.2 30.2 Good 53 40.5 41.1 71.3 Fair 26 19.8 20.2 91.5 Poor 11 8.4 8.5 100.0 How would you rate the accessibility and visibility of the Police Officers to the University community? Very Good 24 18.3 18.6 18.6 Good 49 37.4 38.0 56.6 Fair 32 24.4 24.8 81.4 Poor 24 18.3 18.6 100.0 How would you rate the response time given to calls from the University community? Very Good 25 19.1 19.4 19.4 Good 37 28.2 28.7 48.1 Fair 21 16.0 16.3 64.3 Poor 18 13.7 14.0 78.3 N/A 28 21.4 21.7 100.0

Does the University Police Department's escort service provide a useful service to you? Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Yes 23 17.6 17.7 17.7 No 12 9.2 9.2 26.9 Have never used 93 71.0 71.5 98.5 E 2 1.5 1.5 100.0 Does the University Police Department's motor assistance program provide a useful service to you? Yes 35 26.7 26.9 26.9 No 10 7.6 7.7 34.6 Have never used 84 64.1 64.6 99.2 E 1.8.8 100.0 How would you rate the communication by the Police department about its services? Very Good 16 12.2 12.3 12.3 Good 48 36.6 36.9 49.2 Fair 26 19.8 20.0 69.2 Poor 20 15.3 15.4 84.6 N/A 20 15.3 15.4 100.0 Have you received the "Personal Awareness" pamphlets?

Yes 75 57.3 60.0 60.0 No 50 38.2 40.0 100.0 Total 125 95.4 100.0 Missing 6 4.6 Have you received the "Safety and Security" pamphlet? Yes 84 64.1 67.2 67.2 No 41 31.3 32.8 100.0 Total 125 95.4 100.0 Missing 6 4.6 Have you received the pamplet "You Deserve An Environment Free From Sexual Harassment: It's the Law"? Yes 89 67.9 70.6 70.6 No 37 28.2 29.4 100.0 Total 126 96.2 100.0 Missing 5 3.8 Please evaluate the courtesy and professionalism of the university Police Department staff. Very Good 41 31.3 32.5 32.5 Good 47 35.9 37.3 69.8 Fair 19 14.5 15.1 84.9 Poor 19 14.5 15.1 100.0 Total 126 96.2 100.0 Missing 5 3.8 Please evalute the overall services provided by the University Police Department. Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Very Good 40 30.5 31.7 31.7

Good 46 35.1 36.5 68.3 Fair 20 15.3 15.9 84.1 Poor 20 15.3 15.9 100.0 Total 126 96.2 100.0 Missing 5 3.8