CH. 7 Synchronization Techniques for OFDM Systems

Similar documents
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)

Part 3. Multiple Access Methods. p. 1 ELEC6040 Mobile Radio Communications, Dept. of E.E.E., HKU

Local Oscillators Phase Noise Cancellation Methods

OFDM Transceiver with Gaussian and Alpha-Stable Noise. Presenter: Umber Noreen Supervisors: Ahcene Bounceur Laurent Clavier

Carrier Frequency Synchronization in OFDM-Downlink LTE Systems

Practical issue: Group definition. TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Components of a digital communication system

Single Carrier Ofdm Immune to Intercarrier Interference

The Effect of Carrier Frequency Offsets on Downlink and Uplink MC-DS-CDMA

CHAPTER 3 ADAPTIVE MODULATION TECHNIQUE WITH CFO CORRECTION FOR OFDM SYSTEMS

CH 7. Synchronization Techniques for OFDM Systems

Principles and Experiments of Communications

Simulative Investigations for Robust Frequency Estimation Technique in OFDM System

Decrease Interference Using Adaptive Modulation and Coding

Maximum-Likelihood Co-Channel Interference Cancellation with Power Control for Cellular OFDM Networks

MITIGATING CARRIER FREQUENCY OFFSET USING NULL SUBCARRIERS

Lecture 13. Introduction to OFDM

OFDM system: Discrete model Spectral efficiency Characteristics. OFDM based multiple access schemes. OFDM sensitivity to synchronization errors

Techniques for Mitigating the Effect of Carrier Frequency Offset in OFDM

Performance analysis of MISO-OFDM & MIMO-OFDM Systems

ENHANCING BER PERFORMANCE FOR OFDM

Clipping and Filtering Technique for reducing PAPR In OFDM

Outline / Wireless Networks and Applications Lecture 7: Physical Layer OFDM. Frequency-Selective Radio Channel. How Do We Increase Rates?

Receiver Designs for the Radio Channel

Chapter 5 OFDM. Office Hours: BKD Tuesday 14:00-16:00 Thursday 9:30-11:30

A New Data Conjugate ICI Self Cancellation for OFDM System

Multi-carrier Modulation and OFDM

Performance Evaluation of OFDM System with Rayleigh, Rician and AWGN Channels

ISSN: Page 320

S PG Course in Radio Communications. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Yu, Chia-Hao. Yu, Chia-Hao 7.2.

A Research Concept on Bit Rate Detection using Carrier offset through Analysis of MC-CDMA SYSTEM

Lecture 5: Simulation of OFDM communication systems

Experimenting with Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing OFDM Modulation

DIGITAL Radio Mondiale (DRM) is a new

Comparative Study of OFDM & MC-CDMA in WiMAX System

PAPR Reduction techniques in OFDM System Using Clipping & Filtering and Selective Mapping Methods

DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND OPTIMISATION OF 4X4 MIMO-OFDM TRANSMITTER FOR

Selected answers * Problem set 6

EC 551 Telecommunication System Engineering. Mohamed Khedr

Multi-Carrier Systems

SC - Single carrier systems One carrier carries data stream

Performance Evaluation of Wireless Communication System Employing DWT-OFDM using Simulink Model

A Comparative performance analysis of CFO Estimation in OFDM Systems for Urban, Rural and Rayleigh area using CP and Moose Technique

CARRIER FREQUENCY OFFSET ESTIMATION ALGORITHMS IN ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING SYSTEMS

S.D.M COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Design and Simulation of COFDM for High Speed Wireless Communication and Performance Analysis

Optimal Number of Pilots for OFDM Systems

Performance Analysis of OFDM for Different Digital Modulation Schemes using Matlab Simulation

Key words: OFDM, FDM, BPSK, QPSK.

OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) SIMULATION USING MATLAB Neha Pathak MTech Scholar, Shri am Institute of Technology

WAVELET OFDM WAVELET OFDM

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document.

2.

Comparison of ML and SC for ICI reduction in OFDM system

Point-to-Point Communications

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Zaid Hayyeh Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

Study of the estimation techniques for the Carrier Frequency Offset (CFO) in OFDM systems

An Overview of MC-CDMA Synchronisation Sensitivity

TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. General project hints. Behavioral Model. General project hints, cont. Lecture 5. Required documents Modulation, cont.

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

EC 6501 DIGITAL COMMUNICATION UNIT - IV PART A

BER Analysis for MC-CDMA

BER Comparison of DCT-based OFDM and FFT-based OFDM using BPSK Modulation over AWGN and Multipath Rayleigh Fading Channel

Reduction of Frequency Offset Using Joint Clock for OFDM Based Cellular Systems over Generalized Fading Channels

Multipath can be described in two domains: time and frequency

Performance Analysis of Parallel Acoustic Communication in OFDM-based System

Performance Evaluation using M-QAM Modulated Optical OFDM Signals

PERFORMANCE OF CODED OFDM IN IMPULSIVE NOISE ENVIRONMENT

ANALYSIS OF BER AND SEP OF QPSK SIGNAL FOR MULTIPLE ANENNAS

Analysis of Interference & BER with Simulation Concept for MC-CDMA

MSK has three important properties. However, the PSD of the MSK only drops by 10log 10 9 = 9.54 db below its midband value at ft b = 0.

802.11a Synchronizer Performance Analysis (Simulation)

Fund. of Digital Communications Ch. 3: Digital Modulation

ELT Receiver Architectures and Signal Processing Fall Mandatory homework exercises

Frame Synchronization Symbols for an OFDM System

Performance of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing System Based on Mobile Velocity and Subcarrier

CAMPARATIVE BIT ERROR RATE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF 4G OFDM SYSTEM USING DIFFERENT MODULATION TECHNIQUE

Introduction to OFDM Systems

Wireless Medium Access Control and CDMA-based Communication Lesson 16 Orthogonal Frequency Division Medium Access (OFDM)

Performance Analysis of ICI in OFDM systems using Self-Cancellation and Extended Kalman Filtering

Performance Analysis of MIMO-OFDM based IEEE n using Different Modulation Techniques

System Implications in Designing a 60 GHz WLAN RF Front-End

Page 1. Overview : Wireless Networks Lecture 9: OFDM, WiMAX, LTE

By : Hamid Aminoroaya

ORTHOGONAL frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)

BER performance evaluation of conventional OFDM system and Wavelet Packet Modulator System in 4G LTE

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing & Measurement of its Performance

Cognitive Radio Transmission Based on Chip-level Space Time Block Coded MC-DS-CDMA over Fast-Fading Channel

3G long-term evolution

Effect of Oscillator Phase Noise and Processing Delay in Full-Duplex OFDM Repeaters

Digital modulation techniques

Chapter 4. Part 2(a) Digital Modulation Techniques

Combined Phase Compensation and Power Allocation Scheme for OFDM Systems

Lecture LTE (4G) -Technologies used in 4G and 5G. Spread Spectrum Communications

Pilot Aided Channel Estimation for MIMO MC-CDMA

UNIFIED DIGITAL AUDIO AND DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING SYSTEM USING ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (OFDM) SYSTEM

Fundamentals of OFDM Communication Technology

Noise Plus Interference Power Estimation in Adaptive OFDM Systems

The Optimal Employment of CSI in COFDM-Based Receivers

A Multicarrier CDMA Based Low Probability of Intercept Network

Transcription:

CH. 7 Synchronization Techniues for OFDM Systems 1

Contents Introduction Sensitivity to Phase Noise Sensitivity to Freuency Offset Sensitivity to Timing Error Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension l Time synchronization l Freuency synchronization Synchronization Using Special Training Symbols 2

Introduction [1] An OFDM receiver has to perform two synchronization tasks: l l Time synchronization to find out symbol boundaries and the optimal timing instant to minimize the effects of ISI (Inter-symbol interference) and ICI (Inter-carrier interference) Freuency synchronization to estimate and correct for the carrier freuency offset of a received signal Ø Ø The sub-carriers are perfectly orthogonal only in the case where the transmitter and the receiver both use exactly the same freuency. Therefore, any freuency offset causes ICI in an OFDM receiver. In addition to the freuency offset, the phase noise of an oscillator also degrades the performance of a receiver. In a single carrier system, the phase noise and freuency offset only give a degradation in the SNR. However, the phase noise causes ICI as well as SNR degradation in an OFDM receiver. The sensitivity to phase noise and freuency offset is one of the main disadvantages of OFDM. 3

Sensitivity to Phase Noise [1] Phase Noise: Distortion in the phase of the carrier generated by a local oscillator due mainly to the thermal noise of a transistor. The power spectral density of phase noise is sometimes modeled by Lorentzian spectrum whose single-sided spectrum S s (f) is S s 2 /( p f ) ( f ) = 1 + f / l 2 2 fl and the double-sided spectrum S d (f) is given by S d ( f ) 1/( p f ) = 1 + f - f / f l 2 2 c l f l : - 3dB linewidth of the oscillator signal f c : carrier freuency Phase noise causes two error components in OFDM; the common phase error that is common to all sub-carriers and the random phase error. The common phase error causes ICI, while the random phase error increases noise component. 4

Sensitivity to Phase Noise (cont.) Fig. 7.1 Phase noise power spectral density (PSD) with - 3dB linewidth of 1Hz and a -100dB c /Hz density at 100 khz offset. 5

Sensitivity to Phase Noise (cont.) Degradation in the SNR caused by phase noise is given by b D phase : - 3dB one-sided bandwidth of the power density spectrum T: FFT interval 11 E @ 4 pbt 6ln10 N The SNR degradation due to phase noise is proportional to bt. s o Fig. 7.2 SNR degradation vs. 3dB bandwidth of the phase noise spectrum for (a) 64QAM (E s /N o = 19dB), (b) 16QAM (E s /N o = 14.5dB), (c) QPSK (E s /N o = 10.5dB). 6

Sensitivity to Freuency Offset [1] If there is a freuency offset in OFDM systems, the number of cycles in the FFT interval is no more integer, thereby resulting in ICI. Degradation in SNR caused by a freuency offset is approximated as D fre @ 10 3ln10 ( pdft ) 2 E N s o Fig. 7.3 SNR degradation vs. normalized freuency offset for (a) 64QAM (E s /N o = 19dB), (b) 16QAM (E s /N o = 14.5dB), (c) QPSK (E s /N o = 10.5dB). 7

Sensitivity to Timing Error [1] OFDM is relatively robust to the timing error; if there is no multi-path, the symbol timing offset can vary over a guard interval without causing any ICI or ISI. However, there exists an optimal timing instant for the best possible multipath resistance. Fig. 7.4 Example of an OFDM signal showing the earliest and latest possible timing instants. 8

Sensitivity to Timing Error (cont.) Looking at Fig. 7.4, we can see that as the timing changes, the phases of the sub-carriers change. The relation between the phase i of i-th sub-carrier and the timing offset is given by j = 2p t i fi j For an OFDM system with the FFT size of N and sub-carrier spacing of 1/T, a timing delay of one sampling interval of T/N causes a significant phase shift of 2 p ( N -1) / N between the first and the last sub-carriers. Therefore, in a coherent OFDM receiver, channel estimation should be performed to estimate and correct for these phase shifts. Figure 7.5 shows an example of the QPSK constellation of a received OFDM signal with 48 sub-carriers, an SNR of 30dB, and a timing offset eual to 1/16 of the FFT interval T. The timing offset translates into a phase offset of a multiple of 2p/16 between the sub-carriers. Because of these phase offsets, the QPSK constellation points are rotated to 16 possible points on a circle. t 9

Sensitivity to Timing Error (cont.) Fig. 7.5 Constellation with a timing error of T/16 before (a) and after (b) phase correction. 10

Time Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension [1] Because of the cyclic prefix, the first T G seconds part of each OFDM symbol is identical to the last part. This property can be exploited for both timing and freuency synchronization, as shown below. Fig. 7.6 Synchronization using the cyclic prefix. The correlation output can be written as T G ò x( t) = r( t + t ) r ( t + T + t ) dt 0 * 11

Time Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension (cont.) (a) (b) Fig 7.7 Example of correlation outputs for eight OFDM symbols with 192 sub-carriers for Fig. 7.7(a) and 48 sub-carriers for Fig. 7.7(b) both having a 20% guard time. 12

Time Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension (cont.) Both figures clearly show eight peaks for the eight different symbols. There are different level of undesired correlation side-lobes: l The correlation of two independent random data seuences is random and its standard deviation is related to the number of samples. l Because the number of independent samples is proportional to the number of sub-carriers, Fig. 7.7(a) shows the better correlation characteristic. Therefore, the cyclic extension correlation techniue is only effective when a large number of sub-carriers are used, preferably more than 100. In order to enhance the correlation characteristic, specially designed training symbols can be used. 13

Fre. Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension [1] The input signal r(t) that consists of an OFDM signal and additive Gaussian noise is given by r( t) = s( t) exp( j2 pd ft) + n( t) where Df is the freuency offset error, the signal power is P and the noise spectral density is N o. The freuency offset estimator multiplies the signal by its delayed and conjugated version such that { p }{ p } * y t r t r t T s t j ft n t s t T j f t T n t T * ( ) = ( ) ( + ) = ( )exp( 2 D ) + ( ) ( + )exp( 2 D ( + )) + ( + ) = s t - j D ft + n t s t + T - j D f t + T 2 * ( ) exp( 2 p ) ( ) ( )exp( 2 p ( )) * * + n ( t + T ) s( t)exp( j2 pd ft) + n( t) n ( t + T ) The first term is the desired output component with a phase eual to the phase drift over a T second interval. The freuency offset is estimated by averaging y( t) over an interval T G and then estimating the phase of y( t). 14

Fre. Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension (cont.) The maximum-likelihood estimate of the freuency offset is fˆ 1 Im ( ) = tan ç - 2pT è Re y( t) ø æ 1 y t ö - For averaging over K symbols, the standard deviation is given by s f @ 1 1 1 2 pt K( E / N ) T / T s o G s 15

Fre. Synchronization Using the Cyclic Extension (cont.) Fig. 7.8 Freuency estimation error normalized to the sub-carrier spacing. Solid lines are calculated; dotted lines are simulated. (a) T G /T s =1, (b) T G /T s = 0.2, (c) T G /T s = 0.1. 16

Synchronization Using Special Training Symbols [1] The synchronization techniue based on cyclic extension is particularly suited to tracking in a circuit-switched connection, where no special training signals are available. For packet transmission, however, there is a drawback because an accurate synchronization needs an averaging over a large number (>10) of OFDM symbols. Furthermore, for high rate packet transmission, the synchronization time needs to be as short as possible, preferably a few OFDM symbols only. To achieve this, special OFDM training symbols can be used for which data content is known to the receiver. Figure 7.9 shows a block diagram of a matched filter that can be used to correlate the input signal with the known OFDM training signal. From the correlation peaks in the matched filter output signal, both symbol timing and freuency offset can be estimated. Note that the matched filter correlates with the OFDM time signal, before performing an FFT in the receiver. 17

Synchronization Using Special Training Symbols (cont.) T : sampling interval, c i : matched filter coefficients Fig. 7.9 Matched filter for a special OFDM training symbol. 18

Synchronization Using Special Training Symbols (cont.) Unuantized input signal case 7.10 7 19

References 1. R. V. Nee and R. Prasad, OFDM for Wiress Multimedia Communications, Artech House Publishers, 2000. 2. L. Hanjo, M. Munster, B. J. Choi, T. Keller, OFDM and MC-CDMA for Broadband Multi-User Communications, WLANs, and Broadcasting, John and Wiley, 2003. 20