Appendix 5 Noise Technical Memorandum

Similar documents
2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper

MB th Street, San Francisco

King Mill Lambert DRI# 2035 Henry County, Georgia

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

State Road A1A North Bridge over ICWW Bridge

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT

1050 Page Mill Road Office Development

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

Subject: Ambient Noise Measurement, Creekside Park Project, Monte Rio, California

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

Virginia Avenue Tunnel (VAT) Reconstruction Noise Analysis Approach

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Demographics PROPERTY PROFILE 2016 DEMOGRAPHICS TRAFFIC COUNT

Appendix B: Noise Study

APPENDIX Q MSP 2020 Improvements EA Traffic Noise Proposed Roadway Improvements Memorandum

Diversion Analysis. Appendix K

Appendix D. Traffic Noise Analysis Report. I-94 St. Michael to Albertville Minnesota Department of Transportation

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF APRIL 29, 2013 MAY 05, 2013)

Noise Impact Analysis

Noise Impact Analysis. NW Bethany Boulevard Improvement Project NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. November Washington County.

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JUNE 30, 2014 JULY 06, 2014)

Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica

Appendix N. Haile Gold Mine EIS Supporting Information and Analysis for Visual Resources Assessment

Coastside Fire Protection District

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF JANUARY 27, 2014 FEBRUARY 2, 2014)

ARTHUR KILL 3. US Army Corps of Engineers NEW YORK DISTRICT NOISE MONITORING REPORT EASTERN SHORE (WEEK OF NOVEMBER 25, 2013 DECEMBER 01, 2013)

Attachment D: Nesting Bird Survey

Noise Study Report. Addendum. Interstate 10 Corridor Project. In the Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles

Appendix G. Visual Simulations and Illustrations

Frequently Asked Questions about Wireless Facilities on Wooden Utility Poles and Streetlight Poles

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Oakland Inner Harbor, ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

Noise Abatement Design Study Report Dulles Loop Project (Route 606 and Loudoun County Parkway) UPC 97529

Regional Interoperable Communications System

3.0 RELATED PROJECTS

Raging River Quarry. Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

Applying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only)

Environmental Noise Assessment Pa ia Relief Route Project Pa ia, Maui County, Hawaii

ALISO VIEJO RANCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PROJECT PHOTOMETRIC STUDY

Appendix F: Archaeology VEIRS MILL CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

SOUTH BAY CORPORATE CENTER

APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS

STATE STREET DOWNTOWN FREMONT FREMONT, CALIFORNIA RETAIL LEASED BY: SANDY BERRY

Staff Report. TO: Planning Commissioners DATE: September 5, 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. PROPOSED AMENDED MASTER PLAN AMENDED - H - ZONE Village of Ridgewood Bergen County, New Jersey

FARM TO MARKET 1103 OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC MEETING. FM 1103 I-35 to Rodeo Dr

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics acoustical study for the City of St. Petersburg.

BookletChart. Sacramento River Andrus Island to Sacramento NOAA Chart A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters

LIST OF AVAILABLE PROPERTIES AUGUST 2018

Memorandum. Dear Ms. Allen,

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM)

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA

LAND FOR SALE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY. St. Louis, Missouri JUNE 2017

Disclaimer for Review of Plans

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016

LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA

The Missouri Department of Transportation is proposing to amend the state's five-year Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

Chapter 7. Figures. The following good practices can help to maximize the effectiveness of figures in NEPA documents:

Applying for a Site Development Review

Service Recommendations

CONSTRUCTION NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT MAY 1 MAY 31, 2017

FINAL REPORT. On Project Supplemental Guidance on the Application of FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) APPENDIX K Parallel Barriers

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

South Orange County Reliability Enhancement Project

NETWORK CIRCLE SANTA CLARA CA

Background Noise Survey Report SANTA ISABEL WIND FARM PROJECT

Moorhead / Dilworth Fixed Route Expansion Study

Activity 1 A D V A N C E D H O M E W O R K 1

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

California Highway Patrol Reference Guide Southern California Monitoring Association

2016 CMP MONITORING AND CONFORMANCE REPORT

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR SALE INDUSTRIAL MULTI-TENANT LEASED INVESTMENT PROPERTY. Mollie Shea Dietsch 98,757 SF BUILDING ON 149,846 SF OF LAND

1840 Gateway Drive San Mateo, California

OFFICIAL NOISE MONITORING MONTHLY MONITORING REPORT SUMMARY CARNWATH ROAD RIVERSIDE (CARRR)

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner

AMES INDUSTRIAL PARK AND OFFICE PLAZA

Charlton/Oxford Route 20 Reconstruction Project

Pier ends as public destinations- a string of beacons: THE MARITIME MILE

Project: EIR for Carondelet High School Sports Complex

Buildings for Sale & Spaces for Lease

Oakland International Airport Master Plan Update

Appendix N. Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum

Final Environmental Assessment

Chapter 3. General Description Of Environmental Setting

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Traffic Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Technical Report for the North Meadows Extension to US 85 and Interstate 25

Study Description. November 29, Overpass Road Alternatives Public Workshop

Transcription:

Appendix 5 Noise Technical Memorandum

Memorandum Date: September 7, 206 Prepared For: From: Subject: Tania Sheyner and Devyani Jain, San Francisco Planning Department Elizabeth Scott, Noise Specialist Erin Efner, Project Manager Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results Introduction This memorandum discusses the existing noise environment in the vicinity of the proposed Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project (project), detailing the procedures utilized to conduct noise measurements in the project area and presenting the results of these measurements. Refer to Figure for the Project location, and Figure 2 for the Project site plan. Existing Noise Levels The existing ambient noise environment in the Project vicinity is characterized by vehicular traffic on Third Street but is also influenced by Muni buses and light rail trains, construction activities on adjacent parcels, and events at AT&T Park. Muni vehicles on the KT: K Ingleside/T Third Street line pass by the Project Site on Third Street approximately 266 times per weekday, which results in friction noise (i.e., noise from wheels on rails) and noise from warning horns. At the Project Site, construction noise is experienced due to heavy duty vehicles currently operating at surrounding parcels (such as the parcel to the west of the project site, west of 3 rd Street and north of Channel Street). Such noise is ongoing due to the development in the Mission Bay area. Noise at AT&T Park is generated by large cheering crowds and loudspeaker usage when baseball games or other events are occurring. Noise levels from all of these sources were captured in the 24 hour measurements conducted for the Project, the results of which are presented below, under the Noise Measurement Survey Methodology section. The San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) has developed a transportation noise map of the city, based on modeled baseline traffic volumes derived from the San Francisco County Transportation Authority Travel Demand Model and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Transit5.org. 205. Schedules and Route Maps KT Line. Available: <http://transit.5.org/schedules/index.aspx#m=s&m2=rail&cid=sf>. Accessed: November 6, 205.

S S T S un ht T F r H Nor th P oint P ublic H ousing B an H 0 FULTON HAYES HAIGHT Pacific Ocean FELL MARIN City C ollege of S an SAN FRANCISCO GEARY G R O V E S T Project Location TURK ELLIS 3 GOLDEN GATE AVE MCALLIER 2TH LEAVENWORTH TH 80 0 3 SAN MATEO 3 M A R K E T S T 0TH JONES 9TH 3 280 TAYLOR 8TH 880 680 7TH Telegraph Hill CONTRA COA 6TH Coit Tow er 580 ALAMEDA SANTA CLARA 5TH FOLSOM Pier 23 BROADWAY 4TH JACKSON M A R K E T S T T OW N S E N D S T 7 T H S T Pier 9 Pier 7 WASHINGTON MONTGOMERY BATTERY MISSION 3RD DAVIS HOWARD BRANNAN ier 7 Pier 5 Pier 3 D R U M M S T FREMONT H A R R IS O N S T South of Market C H A N N E L Pier S T Mission Bay EUART MAIN SPEAR 2ND 2ND 3RD Project Site Pier 2 K I N G S T Mission Creek THE EMBA R C A DERO 4TH AT&T Park 3 R D S T Pier 32 Pier 34 Pier 36 Pier 38 4 T H S T T E R R Y A F R A N CO IS B L V D. Pier 24 Pier 26 Pier 28 Pier 30 Pier 40 South Beach Harbor China Basin Pier 48 80 Pier 50 Pier 52 Pier 54 Bay Bridge 80 4 4 4 4 84 83 47'30" 82 8 4TH 5TH 6TH MISSION S VAN NESS F LO R I D A S T B R YA N T S T 7 T H S T OWEN 6TH 6TH Pier 64 Central Basin 4 80 S T C H U R C H S T S an tro us D O L O R E S S T Graphics 00336.3 (3-2-207) J E R S E Y S T 7TH 8TH 9TH 2 22ND 23RD Source: USGS, 202. Mission District H A R R IS O N S T -0 U S 8 T H S T 9 T H S T Potrero Hill W I S C O N S I N S T 26T H S T T E X A S S T 2 I N D I A N A S T T E N N E S S E E S T I L L I N O I S S T 3 R D 2 0T H S T Central Waterfront 2 3 R D S T 2 4 T H S T 55 552 553 554 000mE 25' 2 2000 FOLSOM 0 20TH 20TH Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project EIR Case No. 203.0208E 280 0 Pier 68 Pier 72 Pier 70 0.25 Miles A rm y Pier 80 0.50 Figure Project Site Location 4 79 37 45' 22 22' 30" 000m N

3W MISSION BAY BLOCK NUMBERS P 2 3E 3W 3E 4W 4E 3W 5 Graphics 00336.3 (3-2-207) P6 6W PARCEL P20 8 9 9A P9 6E 7W 7E 0 0A 0 00 200 400 Seawall Lot 337 Associates, LLC, 206. Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project EIR Case No. 203.0208E Figure 2 Project Site and Surrounding Land Uses

Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results September 7, 206 Page 4 of 0 Traffic Noise Model. 2 The DPH map indicates the modeled L dn noise on each street in the city. As shown on the map, the Project Site experiences L dn noise from transportation sources in the 55 to 59 range in areas that are farthest from Third Street; L dn noise is in the 70 to 74 range near Third Street. 3 Noise Sensitive Land Uses Noise sensitive land uses are generally defined as locations where people reside or areas where unwanted sound could adversely affect the use of the land. Noise sensitive land uses typically include single and multi family residential areas, health care facilities, lodging facilities, and schools. Existing noise sensitive land uses in the Project vicinity are shown in Table and illustrated in Figure 3. Table. Existing Noise Sensitive Land Uses in the Project Vicinity Land Use Distance from Project Site Location Existing Sensitive Receptors. Residential uses 00 to 250 feet to the west Mission Bay Block Nos., 2, 3W, 4W, 5,, 2E/W 2. Residential uses 650 feet to the west Mission Bay Block Nos. N3A, N3A 2, N3A 3, N4A, N4A 2, N4A 3 3. Residential uses 400 feet to the south Mission Bay Block Nos. 0, 0A. 4. Residential uses 500 feet to the southwest Mission Bay Block No. 7W 5. Modern Family Education Childcare 600 feet to the west Mission Bay Block No. 3E 6. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Cardiovascular Research Institute 900 feet to the south Mission Bay Block Nos. 7AB, 7C 7. Residences and onsite day care 400 feet to the northwest Mission Bay Block No. N2 2 8. Family house 450 feet to the southwest Mission Bay Block No. 7E 9. Mercy housing/residential condos 600 feet and 880 feet west Mission Bay Block Nos. 3E/W 2 San Francisco Department of Public Health. No date. San Francisco Response to Noise Problems. Available: <https://www.sfdph.org/dph/eh/noise/noiseresponse.asp>. Accessed: March 9, 206. 3 San Francisco Department of Public Health. 2008. Transportation Noise Map 2008. Available: <https://www.sfdph.org/dph/files/ehsdocs/ehsnoise/transitnoisemap.pdf>. Accessed: March 9, 206.

D N 4 5 TH N W TO SE LEGEND Project Site AT&T PARK LT- Long-Term Measurement Location IR G IN K D 2, 0 LT- 9 PIER 48 FO UR 2 TH CHANNEL EL N AN 5 G E ID BR G Graphics 00336.3 (3-22-207) 7 MISSION BAY BLVD SOUTH 6 Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project EIR Case No. 203.0208E LVD 9 3 NORTH SB 8 MISSION BAY BLVD POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS Roadway Segments COI MERRIMAC 7 3 4 RAN CHINA BASIN 6 MISSION ROCK A. F LO N LT-4 RY LT-2 THIRD, 8 TER 20 PIER 50 LONG BRIDGE FOURTH H C LT-3 EXIING SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Residential apartments/condos 2 Residences 3 Residences 4 Residences 5 Modern Education Family Childcare 6 The UCSF Cardiovascular Research Institute 7 The UCSF Sports Medicine Center 8 Residential condos 9 KidAdmit daycare 0 On-site daycare Family House 2 UCSF hospital 3 University Childcare at Mission Bay 4 Mixed Use Commercial/Residential 5 Bessie Carmichael Elementary School 6 Fei Tian Academy of the Arts California 7 Live Oak School 8 Daniel Webster Elementary School 9 Jefferson O Program & International Studies Academy 20 Floating homes 0 0 2 00 200 400 Image: Google Inc. 206. Google Earth Pro, Version 7. Mountain View, CA. Accessed: 2-22-206. Figure 3 Noise Measurement Locations

Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results September 7, 206 Page 6 of 0 In addition to the existing noise sensitive land uses listed in Table, future development in the Mission Bay area in both the near and long term will result in new noise sensitive land uses being located in the Project vicinity. Residential development on lots west and southwest of the Project Site could result in residences being located adjacent to the site at a closest distance of approximately 00 feet from the Project Site. Noise Measurement Survey Methodology To quantify existing ambient noise levels in the Project area, long term, multi day ambient noise measurements were conducted between August 27 and September, 205, at four locations on and around the Project Site. Meters were secured to poles or trees at each location at approximately 0 feet above ground level. Measurement locations were selected to capture 24 hour noise levels in areas that are sensitive to noise throughout the day, such as residences. Long term monitoring was conducted using a Piccolo Integrating SLM. This is a Type 2 instrument, as defined in ANSI specification S.4 984 and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) publications 804 and 65. The long term measurement locations are identified in Figure 3. Photographs of each installed long term meter are included in Appendix A. Because of ongoing construction in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site, the weekday noise levels shown in the table below are most likely elevated relative to normal ambient noise levels when construction is not occurring. Pile driving at the parcel immediately to the west of the project site (00 feet away, west of 3 rd Street and north of Channel Street [the proposed Block and SOMA Hotel]) was occurring during the weekday noise measurements, resulting in high levels of noise. Because pile driving would be occurring for several months, it was not possible to conduct the noise survey during daytime hours without the inclusion of the noise from pile driving. As a result, L dn levels measured during the week most likely represent a worst case scenario with respect to existing noise at the Project Site because pile driving and other construction activities will not continue indefinitely. Traffic noise on roadways surrounding the Project Site, primarily Third Street, was also a main contributor to the ambient noise environment. In addition, noise from the Muni KT line was present throughout the Project Site during the noise survey. Noise Measurement Survey Results To assess average 24 hour noise levels (with the inclusion of noise from baseball games), long term, multi day measurements were conducted to be consistent with land use compatibility standards, which are specified in terms of L dn. These long term measurements help to characterize the overall noise environment in the project area from noise sources such as baseball games at AT&T Park, traffic, public transportation and pedestrians. Note that during the measurement period (i.e., August 27 to September, 205), baseball games occurred on the following dates at the following times: Friday, August 28, 205, at 7:5 p.m. Saturday, August 29, 205, at :05 p.m. Sunday, August 30, 205, at :05 p.m. Table 2 summarizes the results of the noise measurement survey, and the complete dataset of measured noise levels are included in Appendix A.

Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results September 7, 206 Page 7 of 0 Table 2. Noise Level Measurements at Selected Locations on and around the Project Site Site Site Description Primary Noise Sources LT China Basin Park Pile driving and other construction noise on weekdays Vehicle traffic on Third Street and Terry A. Francois Boulevard Noise during baseball games on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday 24 hour (Ldn) Noise Fri. 8/28 a Lmax Lmin 24 hour (Ldn) Noise Measured Noise Levels by Date Sat. 8/29 b Lmax Lmin 24 hour (Ldn) Noise Sun. 8/30 c Lmax Lmin 24 hour (Ldn) Noise Mon. 8/3 d Lmax Lmin 76.0 98.6 77.5 78.5 00.4 69.8 74.4 99.6 70.8 74.3 02.4 73. LT 2 South Side of Project Site Pile driving and other construction noise on weekdays Vehicle traffic on Third Street and Mission Rock Street Vehicles and crowd noise in Parking Lot A Fire engine noise from San Francisco Fire Station No. 4 Light rail noise 65.6 84. 67.0 63.9 88.9 64.0 64.6 84.3 66.0 66.9 89.7 65. LT 3 In front of the Channel Mission Bay Apartments on Channel Street Pile driving and other construction noise on weekdays Vehicle traffic on Third Street and Channel Street Light rail noise 79.3 05.8 78.5 74.2 03.6 77. 73.0 99.9 78.7 83.4 05.4 8.9 LT 4 In front of the Strata Apartments on Mission Rock Street Pile driving and other construction noise on weekdays Vehicle traffic on Third Street and Mission Rock Street 68.6 97.2 7.0 65.7 88.9 70.4 64.0 97.0 69.4 66.9 9.8 72.4 Notes: Noise measurements collected by ICF International. For the complete dataset of measured noise levels, please refer to Appendix 4.F. a A baseball game occurred on this day at 7:5 p.m., during the 24 hour measurement. b A baseball game occurred on this day at :05 p.m., during the 24 hour measurement. c A baseball game occurred on this day at :05 p.m., during the 24 hour measurement. d No baseball game occurred during the measurement on this day. Note that while some concerts occur at AT&T Park, there are only a few (~2 3) per year; as such, these events are not considered to substantively contribute to the background noise levels in the project vicinity (as compared to the frequently occurring baseball games).

Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results August 24, 206 Page 8 of 0 As shown in Table 2, average (L dn ) noise levels in the vicinity of the Project range from approximately 64 dba Ldn to 84 dba Ldn, depending on location and on what nearby activities (construction, baseball games, etc.) occurred during the measurement. Figures 4 through 7 show the 24 hour data from each site graphically, and depict the variance in noise levels that occur through the day at each measurement location. Figure 4. LT 24 hour Noise Data

Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results August 24, 206 Page 9 of 0 Figure 5. LT 2 24 hour Noise Data Figure 6. LT 3 24 hour Noise Data

Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed Use Project EIR Noise Survey Methods and Results August 24, 206 Page 0 of 0 Figure 7. LT 4 24 hour Noise Data As seen in Figures 4 through 7, measurements LT and LT 3, located closer to both AT&T Park and to the current construction and pile driving activities occurring north of Channel Street and west of 3 rd Street, had higher average noise levels than LT 2 and LT 4 which are located further away from this active construction area and further away from AT&T Park. An analysis of how the project would affect the noise environment is discussed in Section 4.F, Noise, of the Draft EIR.