Part 1. Midterm exam PS 30 November 2012

Similar documents
Homework 5 Answers PS 30 November 2013

INSTRUCTIONS: all the calculations on the separate piece of paper which you do not hand in. GOOD LUCK!

Student Name. Student ID

(a) Left Right (b) Left Right. Up Up 5-4. Row Down 0-5 Row Down 1 2. (c) B1 B2 (d) B1 B2 A1 4, 2-5, 6 A1 3, 2 0, 1

Game Theory. Vincent Kubala

ECO 199 B GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 B February 24 SEQUENTIAL AND SIMULTANEOUS GAMES. Representation Tree Matrix Equilibrium concept

ECON 282 Final Practice Problems

Game Theory. Vincent Kubala

Econ 302: Microeconomics II - Strategic Behavior. Problem Set #5 June13, 2016

Name. Midterm, Econ 171, February 27, 2014

Basic Game Theory. Economics Auction Theory. Instructor: Songzi Du. Simon Fraser University. September 7, 2016

final examination on May 31 Topics from the latter part of the course (covered in homework assignments 4-7) include:

Lecture #3: Networks. Kyumars Sheykh Esmaili

Homework answers IEE1149 Summer 2015

DECISION MAKING GAME THEORY

ECO 463. SimultaneousGames

SF2972 Game Theory Written Exam March 17, 2011

CS510 \ Lecture Ariel Stolerman

Games in Extensive Form

CSC304 Lecture 2. Game Theory (Basic Concepts) CSC304 - Nisarg Shah 1

Normal Form Games: A Brief Introduction

EC3224 Autumn Lecture #02 Nash Equilibrium

Spring 2014 Quiz: 10 points Answer Key 2/19/14 Time Limit: 53 Minutes (FAS students: Teaching Assistant. Total Point Value: 10 points.

Finance Solutions to Problem Set #8: Introduction to Game Theory

Simon Fraser University Fall 2014

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Dominance

Summary Overview of Topics in Econ 30200b: Decision theory: strong and weak domination by randomized strategies, domination theorem, expected utility

Simultaneous-Move Games: Mixed Strategies. Games Of Strategy Chapter 7 Dixit, Skeath, and Reiley

ECO 220 Game Theory. Objectives. Agenda. Simultaneous Move Games. Be able to structure a game in normal form Be able to identify a Nash equilibrium

Lecture 24. Extensive-Form Dynamic Games

Game Theory. (4) What would you choose if your partner chooses Heads? (5) What would you choose if your partner chooses Tails?

Minmax and Dominance

Sequential Games When there is a sufficient lag between strategy choices our previous assumption of simultaneous moves may not be realistic. In these

NORMAL FORM (SIMULTANEOUS MOVE) GAMES

(b) In the position given in the figure below, find a winning move, if any. (b) In the position given in Figure 4.2, find a winning move, if any.

U strictly dominates D for player A, and L strictly dominates R for player B. This leaves (U, L) as a Strict Dominant Strategy Equilibrium.

Chapter 13. Game Theory

Game Theory Lecturer: Ji Liu Thanks for Jerry Zhu's slides

February 11, 2015 :1 +0 (1 ) = :2 + 1 (1 ) =3 1. is preferred to R iff

Games. Episode 6 Part III: Dynamics. Baochun Li Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto

Economics 101 Spring 2017 Answers to Homework #1 Due Thursday, Feburary 9, 2017

MS&E 246: Lecture 15 Perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Ramesh Johari

Lecture 5: Subgame Perfect Equilibrium. November 1, 2006

Sequential games. Moty Katzman. November 14, 2017

Math Spring Operational Grade 5 PBA Item #11 Time on Chores M02372

Prisoner 2 Confess Remain Silent Confess (-5, -5) (0, -20) Remain Silent (-20, 0) (-1, -1)

Exercises for Introduction to Game Theory SOLUTIONS

Reading Robert Gibbons, A Primer in Game Theory, Harvester Wheatsheaf 1992.

Section Notes 6. Game Theory. Applied Math 121. Week of March 22, understand the difference between pure and mixed strategies.

Solution Concepts 4 Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies

Multiagent Systems: Intro to Game Theory. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium

Advanced Microeconomics (Economics 104) Spring 2011 Strategic games I

Rational decisions in non-probabilistic setting

Lecture 23. Offense vs. Defense & Dynamic Games

8.F The Possibility of Mistakes: Trembling Hand Perfection

4/21/2016. Intermediate Microeconomics W3211. Lecture 20: Game Theory 2. The Story So Far. Today. But First.. Introduction

Introduction Economic Models Game Theory Models Games Summary. Syllabus

Dynamic Games of Complete Information

Backward Induction and Stackelberg Competition

Unit 11: Linear Equations and Inequalities

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 3: Weak Dominance and Truthfulness

Computing Nash Equilibrium; Maxmin

Chapter 30: Game Theory

Mixed Strategies; Maxmin

Robust Algorithms For Game Play Against Unknown Opponents. Nathan Sturtevant University of Alberta May 11, 2006

Games of Perfect Information and Backward Induction

Terry College of Business - ECON 7950

DYNAMIC GAMES. Lecture 6

THEORY: NASH EQUILIBRIUM

Computational Methods for Non-Cooperative Game Theory

The extensive form representation of a game

Introduction to Game Theory

Stat 155: solutions to midterm exam

Introduction to Game Theory

Introduction to Auction Theory: Or How it Sometimes

LECTURE 26: GAME THEORY 1

ECON 312: Games and Strategy 1. Industrial Organization Games and Strategy

CSC304: Algorithmic Game Theory and Mechanism Design Fall 2016

Finite Mathematical Structures A

Game Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India August 2012

Economics 201A - Section 5

Introduction to Game Theory. František Kopřiva VŠE, Fall 2009

Lecture 6: Basics of Game Theory

Multiagent Systems: Intro to Game Theory. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

GAME THEORY: STRATEGY AND EQUILIBRIUM

Resource Allocation and Decision Analysis (ECON 8010) Spring 2014 Foundations of Game Theory

Introduction to Game Theory

Repeated Games. Economics Microeconomic Theory II: Strategic Behavior. Shih En Lu. Simon Fraser University (with thanks to Anke Kessler)

SF2972 GAME THEORY Normal-form analysis II

Domination Rationalizability Correlated Equilibrium Computing CE Computational problems in domination. Game Theory Week 3. Kevin Leyton-Brown

Advanced Microeconomics: Game Theory

Multiagent Systems: Intro to Game Theory. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

ECON 2100 Principles of Microeconomics (Summer 2016) Game Theory and Oligopoly

Weeks 3-4: Intro to Game Theory

Strategic Bargaining. This is page 1 Printer: Opaq

Chapter 15: Game Theory: The Mathematics of Competition Lesson Plan

Comp th February Due: 11:59pm, 25th February 2014

NORMAL FORM GAMES: invariance and refinements DYNAMIC GAMES: extensive form

CPS 570: Artificial Intelligence Game Theory

Transcription:

Last name First name Student ID number Part 1 Midterm exam PS 30 November 2012 This is a closed book exam. The only thing you can take into this exam is yourself and writing instruments. No calculators, computers, cell phones, etc. are allowed. Everything you write should be your own work. Cases of academic dishonesty will be referred to the Dean of Students office, which has the power to suspend and expel students. Partial credit will be given: math mistakes will not jeopardize your grade. Please show all steps of your work and explain what you are doing at each step. Correct answers alone are worth nothing without a clear and correct explanation of where the answers come from. Clarity and legibility are factors in the grade. This exam has four parts. Each part is weighted equally (12 points each). Each part is stapled separately (for ease in grading, since the parts are graded separately). Please make sure that your name and student ID number is on each part. If you have a question, raise your hand and hold up the number of fingers which corresponds to the part you have questions about (if you have a question on Part 2, hold up two fingers). If you need to leave the room during the exam (to use the restroom for example), you need to sign your name on the restroom log before leaving. You can only leave the room once. When the end of the exam is announced, please stop working immediately. The exams of people who continue working after the end of the exam is announced will have their scores penalized by 30 percent. Please turn in your exam to your TA. When you hand in your exam, please write your name down on the log. Please write all answers on this exam if you write on the reverse side of pages, please indicate this clearly. Good luck!

Part 1. Ann, Betty and Cindy are sisters who win a free ticket to Paris. Unfortunately, this ticket is just for two persons. Each person names the sister whom they want to go with. For example, Ann can name either Betty or name Cindy. Betty can name either Ann or Cindy. If two names match, those matched persons go to Paris together. For example, if Ann names Cindy and Cindy names Ann, then Ann and Cindy go to Paris together (Betty stays home). A person who does not match stays at home. If nobody matches, the sisters give the ticket to their parents and the three sisters stay at home. Say that a sister doesn t care about which sister she goes with. Each sister simply prefers going to Paris over staying at home. So a sister gets payoff 1 if she goes to Paris, and a sister gets payoff 0 if she stays at home. a. Model this as a strategic form game. For each sister, use the payoffs 0 or 1. (3 points) b. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game. (3 points)

c. Now, assume that Ann does not want go to Paris with Betty. Ann thinks Betty will only go shopping in Paris instead of visiting museums and experiencing its diverse culture. So Ann would rather stay at home than go to Paris with Betty. But Ann still prefers going to Paris with Cindy rather than staying at home. Also, Betty does not want to go to Paris with Cindy. Betty thinks Cindy is too picky and always complains about something. So Betty would rather stay at home than go to Paris with Cindy. Betty still prefers going to Paris with Ann rather than staying at home. Cindy really cares about her parents. For Cindy, the best thing is if her parents get the ticket. Cindy also prefers staying at home over going to Paris because she enjoys spending time at home with her parents. If she goes to Paris, Cindy is indifferent between Ann and Betty as her partner. Model this as a strategic form game. For each sister use the payoffs 1 (best), 0 (second-best), or 1 (worst). (2 points) d. Make a prediction in this game using the iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies. (2 points) e. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game. (2 points).

Last name First name Student ID number Part 2

Part 2. Consider the following extensive form game. 1 A B 2 2 W X Y Z 6,5 8,4 5,2 1 F G 7,3 4,1 a. Represent this as a strategic form game. (3 points) b. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game. (2 points)

c. Find all subgame perfect Nash equilibria of the game. We write the game again for convenience. (2 points) 1 A B 2 2 W X Y Z 6,5 8,4 5,2 1 F G 7,3 4,1

Now change the game slightly so that the payoff 7 is now the payoff 7 c. The new game is below. 1 A B 2 2 W X Y Z 6,5 8,4 5,2 1 F G 7 c,3 4,1 d. Fill in the table below. (2 points) If then the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium is/are: c = 0 c = 2 c = 4

Here is the game again. 1 A B 2 2 W X Y Z 6,5 8,4 5,2 1 F G 7 c,3 4,1 e. For most values of c, there is only one subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. For example, if c = 0, there is only one subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. However, for some special value(s) of c, there exists more than one subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Find all such special value(s) of c. For each special value of c, find all subgame perfect Nash equilibria. (3 points)

Last name First name Student ID number Part 3

Part 3. Consider the following game. left right up 4, 2 3, 5 down 3, 4 5, 3 a. Find all (pure strategy or mixed strategy) Nash equilibria of this game. (2 points) b. Now change the game by doubling all payoff numbers. Write down this new game and find all (pure strategy or mixed strategy) Nash equilibria. Do the Nash equilibria change when all payoff numbers are doubled? If so, show how they change. If not, explain why they do not. (2 points)

c. Now go back to the original game and say that all payoffs are multiplied by k, where k is a positive number (k > 0). Thus we have the following game. (For example, when k = 2, all payoff numbers are doubled.) left right up 4k, 2k 3k, 5k down 3k, 4k 5k, 3k Do the (pure strategy or mixed strategy) Nash equilibria you found in part a. change when k changes? If so, show how they change. If not, explain why they do not. (4 points)

d. Now say that we have the original game and we multiply k to person 1 s payoffs when she plays up and we multiply k to person 2 s payoffs when he plays left. Again, k is a positive number (k > 0). Thus we have the following game. left right up 4k, 2k 3k, 5 down 3, 4k 5, 3 Note that if k is very large (for example, if k = 10) then up strongly dominates down and left strongly dominates right. What is the largest k such that there exists a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this game (in other words, a Nash equilibrium in which at least one person mixes)? (4 points)

Last name First name Student ID number Part 4

Part 4. Two people play the game of Battleship on a board with five squares, as shown below. Player 1 fires a missile into one of the five squares. She has five possible strategies. The following are two examples. Player 2 places a battleship on the board. The battleship occupies two adjacent squares and can be oriented vertically or horizontally. He has five possible strategies. The following are two examples. If player 1 s missile lands where player 2 s battleship is, then player 1 wins: player 1 gets payoff 1 and player 2 gets payoff 0. If player 1 s missile misses player 2 s battleship, then player 2 wins: player 1 gets payoff 0 and player 2 gets payoff 1. For example, here is a situation in which player 1 wins. Here is a situation in which player 2 wins. (turn to next page)

a. Represent this game as a strategic form game. (4 points) b. Use the method of iterative elimination of strongly or weakly dominated strategies. You should be able to reduce it down to a 2 2 game (a game in which player 1 has two strategies and player 2 has two strategies) by trying out different orders of elimination. Please write down the order of elimination. (4 points)

c. Write down the remaining 2 2 game and find all (pure strategy and mixed strategy) Nash equilibria of this 2 2 game. (4 points)