EGS-CC. System Engineering Team. Commonality of Ground Systems. Executive Summary

Similar documents
European Ground Systems Common Core

GALILEO Research and Development Activities. Second Call. Area 1A. Statement of Work

ESA Iris Programme Analysis & definition of the Satellite System Operations. Briefing 28 July

ARTES 1 ROLLING WORKPLAN 2010

Technical Data Standards Development & Implementation

A Methodology for Effective Reuse of Design Simulators in Operational Contexts: Lessons Learned in European Space Programmes

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

General Support Technology Programme (GSTP) Period 6 Element 3: Technology Flight Opportunities (TFO)

Standardised Ground Data Systems Implementation: A Dream?

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

European GNSS Evolution

THE USE OF A SAFETY CASE APPROACH TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN DESIGN

EOSC Governance Development Forum 6 April 2017 Per Öster

Unit 5: Unified Software Development Process. 3C05: Unified Software Development Process USDP. USDP for your project. Iteration Workflows.

Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview

Software Maintenance Cycles with the RUP

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

The ESA SME Initiative

move move us Newsletter 2014 Content MoveUs has successfully finished the first year of the project!

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal

GALILEO Research and Development Activities. Second Call. Area 1B. Interference Detection Mitigation and Isolation.

QUALITY CHARTER FOR THE RESEARCHER S MOBILITY PORTAL

COMMITMENT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR THE RESEARCHER S MOBILITY PORTAL (ERACAREERS: )

Training and Verification Facilities CGS User Workshop. Columbus Training Facility Team

Identification number : Jean-Louis MARTINAUD. 1, Place Samuel de Champlain PARIS LA DEFENSE Cedex. Address

Rules of Usage for the BESSY II Electron Storage Ring and the BER II Neutron Source at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien and Energie GmbH

SDN Architecture 1.0 Overview. November, 2014

IV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity

The Preliminary Risk Analysis Approach: Merging Space and Aeronautics Methods

April 2015 newsletter. Efficient Energy Planning #3

PLATO Preliminary Requirements Review Technical Report

GALILEO Research and Development Activities. Second Call. Area 3. Statement of Work

Cover. DLR-ESA Workshop on ARTES-11. SGEO: Implementation of of Artes-11. Dr. Andreas Winkler

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

WIPO Development Agenda

GUIDE 75. Strategic principles for future IEC and ISO standardization in industrial automation. First edition

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal. Part 3B Product Development Plan

New approach for lighting Regulations

MERIL MAPPING OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE LANDSCAPE

A FRAMEWORK FOR PERFORMING V&V WITHIN REUSE-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

First MyOcean User Workshop 7-8 April 2011, Stockholm Main outcomes

Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions

Second MyOcean User Workshop 9-10 April 2013, Copenhagen Main outcomes

CGMS Agency Best Practices in support to Local and Regional Processing of LEO Direct Broadcast data for Achieving

CIVIC EPISTEMOLOGIES Civic Epistemologies: Development of a Roadmap for Citizen Researchers in the age of Digital Culture Workshop on the Roadmap

GALILEO JOINT UNDERTAKING

European Nuclear Education Network Association

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

Methodology for Agent-Oriented Software

Future Concepts for Galileo SAR & Ground Segment. Executive summary

Deliverable D6.3 DeMStack

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

GALILEO Research and Development Activities. Second Call. Area 3. Coordination of Galileo Research & Development activities.

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

Analysing Megatrends to Better shape the future of Tourism

Technology and Market Intelligence

USAEC Environmental Performance Assessment System (EPAS) Installation Cultural Resources Program Administrative Assessment SOP

1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.

ACHIEVING SPECTRUM HARMONISATION TO DELIVER CONNECTIVITY TO NEXT 1 BILLION Joaquin Restrepo, Chief of Outreach and Publication Services Division, BR/

National Standard of the People s Republic of China

City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY

GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

R5 Enlarge participation to the standardisation process. Mihai Calin

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

Towards an MDA-based development methodology 1

Benefits of Standardization in National Space Activities: ASI and the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS)

Zeinab El-Sadr Ministry of Scientific Research, Egypt CAASTNet Stakeholders Meeting, Dakar Senegal 25 th April 2012

EMITS: Improving Communication between ESA and Industry

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

WRC-19 Agenda Item HAPS. Ashwani Rana Head of Connectivity Policy, Facebook, South & Central Asia

UNIT-III LIFE-CYCLE PHASES

WM2015 Conference, March 15 19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

ZODIAC DATA SYSTEMS. ZODIAC AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS Zodiac Data Systems July 22,

Frequency Co-ordination: Advantages and Disadvantages

ClusterNanoRoad

Development of the Strategic Research Agenda of the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform

WHY DOES IT TAKE SO LONG TO DEPLOY NEW GROUND SEGMENT DATA

THE SPACE GENERATION CONGRESS 2012: Perspectives from University Students and Young Professionals in the Space Sector

ETSI TR V1.2.1 ( )

European Charter for Access to Research Infrastructures - DRAFT

EXPERIENCES OF IMPLEMENTING BIM IN SKANSKA FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1

OSRA Overarching Strategic Research Agenda and CapTech SRAs Harmonisation. Connecting R&T and Capability Development

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

SAUDI ARABIAN STANDARDS ORGANIZATION (SASO) TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE PART ONE: STANDARDIZATION AND RELATED ACTIVITIES GENERAL VOCABULARY

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DESIGN

Fiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines

International Forensic Services

Implementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions

Thierry Basset Jean-Paul Dudon Patrick Hugonnot (Thales Alenia Space, France) François Brunetti (DOREA, France)

SAOCOM-CS Mission and ESA Airborne Campaign Data

Model Based AOCS Design and Automatic Flight Code Generation: Experience and Future Development

Grundlagen des Software Engineering Fundamentals of Software Engineering

Why, How & What Digital Workplace

Coexistence of fixed and space services at 2 GHz

Communication and Dissemination in HORIZON 2020 European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation

Transcription:

System Engineering Team Prepared: System Engineering Team Date: Approved: System Engineering Team Leader Date: Authorized: Steering Board Date: Restriction of Disclosure: The copyright of this document is vested in the European Space Agency. This document may only be reproduced in whole or in part, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form, or by any means, with the prior permission of the Agency. Permission is hereby granted to the signatories of the European Ground Systems Common Core () Collaboration Agreement for use within their organisations.

System Engineering Team Page: 2 of 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 2 1.1 Scope... 2 2 Objectives of the Study... 3 2.1 Background for this activity... 3 2.2 Objectives of... 4 3 Study Team and Schedule... 5 4 Outputs of this Study Contract... 6 4.1 WP 2100: Domain Analysis... 6 4.2 WP 2200: Establish User Requirements... 6 4.3 WP 2300: Evaluate Implementation Technologies... 6 4.4 WP 2400: Analyse economic constraints... 6 4.5 WP 2500: Organisational & Industrial Issues... 7 5 Conclusions... 7 1 Introduction This document constitutes the executive summary report of the GSP Study "Commonality of Ground Systems for Operations and Development". More details on the study activities can be found in the Final Report, the final presentation and the output documents. 1.1 Scope The content of this final report is structured according to the following sections: Section 1: this introduction Section 2: includes on overview of the objectives of the study Section 3: presents the study team and schedule Section 4: provides a short description of the outputs of this study Section 5: comprises a conclusion on the study

System Engineering Team Page: 3 of 7 2 Objectives of the Study The objective of this study is the definition of a set of building blocks comprising a common core for both EGSE and Mission Control Systems which, together with a unified data model, meets the requirements of a community of stakeholders (Agencies and space industry) with respect to space craft checkout and operations. This common core is called (European Ground System - Common Core) The shall support the setup of Electrical Ground Support Equipments, Software Validation and Simulation Facilities as well as the Ground Segment for Spacecraft operations (Mission Control Systems, Science Operations Systems, Ground Stations etc.). The new common core shall take into account the needs for all domains and shall be maintainable as a configuration-controlled product for a long period (30 years). The main objectives of this study are to develop arguments to justify why indeed a set of building blocks comprising such an "" (EGSE and Mission Control System common Core) is a viable means to unify functional testing tools and mission control systems for the next generation of space missions. Accordingly, the tasks performed in this Study are: WP 2100: Perform a comprehensive domain analysis WP 2200: Establish User Requirements WP 2300: Evaluate Implementation Technologies WP 2400: Analyse the economic constraints of this undertaking WP 2500: Organisational & Industrial Issues A summary description of the tasks performed and results achieved are presented in the next section. 2.1 Background for this activity Within the European Space Industry there are many different systems for monitoring and control tasks used by companies/agencies for space system operations and Assembly Integration and Testing. Some of these systems are common to both operations and AIT, while some are specific. Often multiple systems are used during the system integration phase of a space system by different companies or at different levels (e.g. payload/system). Many of these existing systems have reached or are reaching their end of life. The systems are often using old software technologies and hardware platforms that are difficult to modernise. The maintenance and evolution costs are therefore becoming excessively complex with time. The compatibility/exchange of information with other systems is also often difficult leading to little synergy across missions and project phases. Given the difficulties mentioned above, during 2009-2010, the European Space Agency (ESA) discussed with large European System Integrators, including Astrium Satellites, Astrium Space Transportation, Thales Alenia Space (France and Italy) and OHB System, the possibility of a collaboration to develop a European Ground Systems Common Core () which would provide a common infrastructure to support space systems monitoring and control in pre- and postlaunch phases. The French and German national space agencies, CNES and DLR also signalled their desire to join the initiative and a Memorandum of Understanding was finalised for the development of the. It was agreed that this would be done in open competition according to ESA contract conditions and processes. This would lead to the adoption of the for institutional missions and then for commercial missions as well.

System Engineering Team Page: 4 of 7 The first phase for implementing this new kernel is subject of this study contract. 2.2 Objectives of The objectives of the European Ground Systems Common Core () is to develop a common infrastructure to support space systems monitoring and control during all mission phases including pre- and post-launch phases for all mission types. This is expected to bring a number of benefits, including: The seamless transition from spacecraft Assembly, Integration and Testing (AIT) to mission operations, thus maximising synergy across all mission phases Enable overall cost reductions by sharing development, sustaining and maintenance of a single infrastructure across organisations Facilitate cost and risk reduction when implementing space projects through the provision of a stable common infrastructure which can be easily tailored for the needs of a specific mission and/or organisation Enable the modernization of legacy EGSE and MCS systems Enable the exchange of ancillary implementations across organizations The objectives of the are therefore very ambitious and the main system features include: Support of all mission types and phases Open, component based, service oriented architecture Generic and extensible functionality Binary compatibility Layered implementation Clear separation between generic M&C functions (kernel) and specific features of the controlled system (adaptation layer) Configurable level of operations abstraction Standardised interfaces Technology isolation Long term maintainability High performance and scalability

System Engineering Team Page: 5 of 7 3 Study Team and Schedule The study work was performed by an industrial team comprising Astrium GmbH Space Transportation (Astrium ST), Astrium Satellites, Thales-Alenia France & Italy and OHB System (see Fig. 3.1). The study schedule is shown in the Figure 3.2. for Operations and Development Astrium ST WP 1100, WP 2300 Astrium Satellites WP 2200, WP 2400 OHB WP 2100 Thales Alenia WP 2200, WP 2400, WP 2500 EGS CC System Engineering Team Figure 3.1: Study Team and Work-share Figure 3.2: Study Schedule

System Engineering Team Page: 6 of 7 4 Outputs of this Study Contract 4.1 WP 2100: Domain Analysis The objective of this task was to analyze reference and applicable docs analyze user domains to achieve the goals of the common core identify and justify functions in or out-of scope 4.2 WP 2200: Establish User Requirements Following the Domain Analysis, the User Requirements have been established after an extensive sequence of reviews and workshops with the involvement of stakeholders from Agencies and LSI contractors of the European Space Industry. The Use Cases have been derived from the usage domains The Functional User Requirements address the functions which belong to the EGS- CC functional scope. The functional requirements include in its current issue 743 requirements. The Non-Functional User Requirements address the constraints and guidelines to be applied for the development of the system, complementing the functional specification. The non-functional requirements include in its current issue 256 requirements. The User Requirements contained in the functional and non-functional requirements specifications have been imported into the DOORS database. The UML Model provides a repository of consistent engineering data for the EGS- CC, including the Functional Requirements, the Non-Functional Requirements, the Use Cases and the Glossary 4.3 WP 2300: Evaluate Implementation Technologies The evaluation of suitable technologies for the was performed in four steps: 1. Identify the technology domains 2. Identify the evaluation criteria based on FURPS+ 3. Perform an assessment of candidate technologies and associated products 4. Definition of a technology assessment roadmap, and a technology stack for the Run Time environment. 4.4 WP 2400: Analyse economic constraints The work package focused on providing a cost model for the common software to support later management decisions, and was conducted in three steps: 1. Identification and definition of the cost elements, and cost benefits. 2. Workshop #3: discussion with stakeholders from the Space Industry and Agencies who had had responsibility over significant development projects

System Engineering Team Page: 7 of 7 3. Consolidation of cost model with Steering Board. 4.5 WP 2500: Organisational & Industrial Issues After re-allocation of the work package content, a security requirements analysis has been performed in three steps: 1. Security requirements in and ESA EGOS documentation. 2. Security requirements in requirements and CNES ISIS documentation. 3. Establishment of consolidate security requirements for. 5 Conclusions The first and main conclusion from this study work is that the development of the is feasible and beneficial as shown by the outputs of this study. With the completion of this commonality study a solid baseline has been established for the next phase (Phase B) of the by providing this data set: User Requirements: use cases, functional requirements, non-functional requirements including the DOORS database and the UML Model Domain Analysis Technology Assessment Security requirements analysis Cost Model The primary goal being the definition of a new generation of ground systems commonly understood and agreed by the European Space Industry and Agencies could be achieved thanks to the engaged work by the study team and the associated System Engineering team. The workshops and reviews have been supported not only by the study team and SET, but also involving important stakeholders from industry and agencies. The level of detail reached in the output documentation is very high (in total 998 functional and nonfunctional requirements). All domains have been analysed and taken into account. Technologies for development and implementation have been analysed with important feedback from the industry (LSI's, SME's and operators). Special emphasis was spent on the analysis of security requirements to be prepared for applications of this new generation of ground systems outside the space business. The results of the cost analysis and workshop have already been used to prepare for the next phases towards the realization of the new ground system infrastructure based on.