An Update on the Installation of the AO on the Telescopes

Similar documents
CHARA AO Calibration Process

AO INSTALLATION UPDATE THE TELESCOPE END

CHARA Collaboration Review New York 2007 CHARA Telescope Alignment

Proposed Adaptive Optics system for Vainu Bappu Telescope

Paper Synopsis. Xiaoyin Zhu Nov 5, 2012 OPTI 521

Potential benefits of freeform optics for the ELT instruments. J. Kosmalski

Cardinal Points of an Optical System--and Other Basic Facts

Ron Liu OPTI521-Introductory Optomechanical Engineering December 7, 2009

AgilOptics mirrors increase coupling efficiency into a 4 µm diameter fiber by 750%.

MAORY E-ELT MCAO module project overview

GMT Instruments and AO. GMT Science Meeting - March

Puntino. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for optimizing telescopes. The software people for optics

Aberrations and adaptive optics for biomedical microscopes

Lecture 4: Geometrical Optics 2. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Rays. Wavefronts. Aberrations. Outline

OPTINO. SpotOptics VERSATILE WAVEFRONT SENSOR O P T I N O

Payload Configuration, Integration and Testing of the Deformable Mirror Demonstration Mission (DeMi) CubeSat

Breadboard adaptive optical system based on 109-channel PDM: technical passport

Big League Cryogenics and Vacuum The LHC at CERN

Supplementary Materials

Large Submillimeter Atacama Telescope. A Strawman Concept

AgilEye Manual Version 2.0 February 28, 2007

VATT Optical Performance During 98 Oct as Measured with an Interferometric Hartmann Wavefront Sensor

High contrast imaging lab

SpotOptics. The software people for optics L E N T I N O LENTINO

Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain International Conference on Space Optics 7-10 October 2014 THE LAM SPACE ACTIVE OPTICS FACILITY

Why is There a Black Dot when Defocus = 1λ?

Wavefront sensor design for NGAO: Assumptions, Design Parameters and Technical Challenges Version 0.1

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Design parameters Summary

Infrared adaptive optics system for the 6.5 m MMT: system status

NGAO NGS WFS design review

Adaptive Optics for LIGO

Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics. Geometrical Approximation. Lenses. Mirrors. Optical Systems. Images and Pupils. Aberrations.

Optical Components for Laser Applications. Günter Toesko - Laserseminar BLZ im Dezember

Wavefront Sensing In Other Disciplines. 15 February 2003 Jerry Nelson, UCSC Wavefront Congress

Geometrical Optics for AO Claire Max UC Santa Cruz CfAO 2009 Summer School

Measurement of Beacon Anisoplanatism Through a Two-Dimensional, Weakly-Compressible Shear Layer

GRAVITY acquisition camera

OPAL. SpotOptics. AUTOMATED WAVEFRONT SENSOR Single and double pass O P A L

M1/M2 Ray Tracer. for High-Speed Mirror Metrology in the E-ELT. Ron Holzlöhner, 21 Sep 2016 European Southern Observatory (ESO)

DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM FOR THE UH HOKU KE`A OBSERVATORY ABSTRACT

Testing an off-axis parabola with a CGH and a spherical mirror as null lens

Applications of Optics

Calibration of AO Systems

Computer Generated Holograms for Optical Testing

Astro 500 A500/L-8! 1!

WaveMaster IOL. Fast and accurate intraocular lens tester

3.0 Alignment Equipment and Diagnostic Tools:

October 7, Peter Cheimets Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 60 Garden Street, MS 5 Cambridge, MA Dear Peter:

MALA MATEEN. 1. Abstract

PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE. Measurement of low-order aberrations with an autostigmatic microscope

WaveMaster IOL. Fast and Accurate Intraocular Lens Tester

Explanation of Aberration and Wavefront

Practical Flatness Tech Note

Effect of segmented telescope phasing errors on adaptive optics performance

Week IV: FIRST EXPERIMENTS WITH THE ADVANCED OPTICS SET

MAORY ADAPTIVE OPTICS

ADALAM Sensor based adaptive laser micromachining using ultrashort pulse lasers for zero-failure manufacturing

Industrial quality control HASO for ensuring the quality of NIR optical components

Design and Manufacture of 8.4 m Primary Mirror Segments and Supports for the GMT

Synopsis of paper. Optomechanical design of multiscale gigapixel digital camera. Hui S. Son, Adam Johnson, et val.

ECEN 4606, UNDERGRADUATE OPTICS LAB

Point Spread Function. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Confocal Aperture. Optical aberrations. Alternative Scanning Microscopy

AVOIDING TO TRADE SENSITIVITY FOR LINEARITY IN A REAL WORLD WFS

Use of Mangin and aspheric mirrors to increase the FOV in Schmidt- Cassegrain Telescopes

Predicting the Performance of Space Coronagraphs. John Krist (JPL) 17 August st International Vortex Workshop

!!! DELIVERABLE!D60.2!

Phys 2310 Mon. Oct. 16, 2017 Today s Topics. Finish Chapter 34: Geometric Optics Homework this Week

Wavefront Sensor for the ESA-GAIA Mission

FABRICATION OF MIRROR SEGMENTS for the GSMT

Vision Research at. Validation of a Novel Hartmann-Moiré Wavefront Sensor with Large Dynamic Range. Wavefront Science Congress, Feb.

For rotationally symmetric optical

1.6 Beam Wander vs. Image Jitter

OPTICAL IMAGING AND ABERRATIONS

Eric B. Burgh University of Wisconsin. 1. Scope

Modeling the multi-conjugate adaptive optics system of the E-ELT. Laura Schreiber Carmelo Arcidiacono Giovanni Bregoli

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Department. 2.71/2.710 Final Exam. May 21, Duration: 3 hours (9 am-12 noon)

Manufacture of 8.4 m off-axis segments: a 1/5 scale demonstration

Reference and User Manual May, 2015 revision - 3

Fiber Optic Communications

AY122A - Adaptive Optics Lab

Optical design of a high resolution vision lens

Wavefront sensing for adaptive optics

EE119 Introduction to Optical Engineering Fall 2009 Final Exam. Name:

Active Optics and Wavefront Sensing at the Upgraded 6.5-meter MMT

Nature Methods: doi: /nmeth Supplementary Figure 1. Schematic of 2P-ISIM AO optical setup.

Optimization of coupling between Adaptive Optics and Single Mode Fibers ---

Option G 2: Lenses. The diagram below shows the image of a square grid as produced by a lens that does not cause spherical aberration.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. 2.71/2.710 Optics Spring 14 Practice Problems Posted May 11, 2014

Hartmann wavefront sensing Beamline alignment

EE119 Introduction to Optical Engineering Spring 2002 Final Exam. Name:

Development of a Low-order Adaptive Optics System at Udaipur Solar Observatory

Aberrations of a lens

MMTO Technical Memorandum #03-1

Optical System Design

Shaping light in microscopy:

MRO Delay Line. Performance of Beam Compressor for Agilent Laser Head INT-406-VEN The Cambridge Delay Line Team. rev 0.

LUCI1/2 AO commissioning: status and prospects

There is a range of distances over which objects will be in focus; this is called the depth of field of the lens. Objects closer or farther are

12.4 Alignment and Manufacturing Tolerances for Segmented Telescopes

Transcription:

An Update on the Installation of the AO on the Telescopes Laszlo Sturmann

Overview Phase I WFS on the telescopes separate WFS and DM in the lab (LABAO) Phase II (unfunded) large DM replaces M4

F/8 PAR M4 F/4 PAR OPTICAL LAYOUT IMAGE ACQUISITION WFS BEACON CAROUSEL FOLD MIRROR M5

The breadboards have been installed in all six domes. The old system have been reinstalled to keep the array operational while the rest of the hardware is being built.

S2 board Testbed

Mechanical parts are being manufactured in the GSU machine shop by Peter G. Walker Dwayne Torres and Samuel Mayberry

controller Green ready to be installed Yellow just about finished Red after yellows

Actuators F/8 - xyz F/4 - xyz Collimator - xyz Lenslet - WFS - xyz Light source xyz,lid Dichroic - Carousel rotation, elevation Beacon Fold -,lid We have already used up all 15 channels in the controller

NETWORK RS-485 15-CHANNEL ACTUATOR CONTROLLER/DRIVER TELESCOPE COMPUTER RS-485 INTERFACE SELECT G3A RELAY ACT 1 HUT RELAY ACT 2 RELAY ACT 3 finder RELAY ACT 4 ACQ RELAY RELAY ACT 5 ACT 6 RELAY ACT 15 Lin R256 CONTROLLER DRIVER

NETWORK ACT 1 LS 1 LS 2 LS N ACT N MULTI-CHANNEL ACTUATOR CONTROLLER/DRIVER TELESCOPE COMPUTER LONG SHIFT REGISTERS INSTEAD OF 4-bit DEMULTIPLEXER RS-485 INTERFACE RS-485 Lin R256 CONTROLLER DRIVER M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8

Focusing the Telescope The Past M2 TAS 1. TAS focused on a star 2. Telescope focused by translating M2

Focusing the Telescope The Future Using one of the WFS. WFS needs calibration. The beacon, after focusing, can provide a flat wavefront for the WFS. How to focus the beacon? The simplest is putting a Hartmann mask above M5 and watching the diffraction spots in the lab. several hundred meters away. A convergent beam puts the spots closer, a divergent beam farther than the distance between the holes. Since this will likely be done regularly, we should do this preferably with a camera.

u S u R R u u S SCREEN u + u u S Example: P V = R P V = u u 8 S R 2 u2 4 u2 8R MASK u = 0.08 m, u = 0.001m and S = 300 m P V = 0.05 waves at 600 nm R This is pretty good, but there may be other aberrations present in the beam.

4-hole or rotating 2-hole mask pure defocus Astigmatic astigmatic Comatic comatic Too many holes makes it confusing S2 has an actuated 2-hole mask which is used to focus the beacon beam toward the lab.

REFERENCE MASK DETECTOR IN PUPIL PLANE TEL1 TEL2 MOVING PERISCOPE

How sensitive the telescope etc. focus is to temperature Mersenne 1636 The CHARA telescopes are 1:8 beam reducers with confocal paraboloids in a Mersenne-Cassegrain arrangement. If the foci are separated axially (despace), the output beam is no longer collimated. If the separation is small, the wave front error is mostly defocus with a hint of spherical aberration. The wave front error due to despace s can be estimated as P V = 1 8 λ s (F#) 2 [waves] F = 2.5 thus the sensitivity of the system to despace is P V = s 50 λ [waves]. The secondary assembly is mounted in a frame that is floating on four 2.66 m long invar rods (CTE = 1.2 10 6 K 1 ). The secondary assembly is made of mild steel. The geometry is such that thermal expansion/contraction of the invar rods is partially compensated by that of the steel mounting structure thereby keeping the distance between the M1 and M2 independent from temperature in the first order. Despite of that, we see a seasonal change in telescope focus which can be easily corrected. With a WFS installed at each telescope we will have a tighter control over focus in the future. The primary and secondary are made of Astrosital and Zerodur, each has CTE an order of magnitude less than that of invar.

The beacon The beacon paraboloid is made of borosilicate glass (CTE glass = 3.25 10 6 K 1 ), the breadboard is SS430 CTE SS430 = 5.78 10 6 K 1. The breadboard expands/contract with temperature and so does the paraboloid. The distance between the fiber source and the mirror varies as or Δs = 3.1μm ΔT K since f = 1.22 m. Δs = CTE SS430 CTE glass f ΔT The effective F# of the beacon paraboloid is 9.6 thus the rate of defocus due to temperature changes seems like only about 0. 007 waves K 1. The sensitivity of the beacon focus to temperature is 0. 007 waves K 1 at 600 nm.

WFS feed optics The WFS is fed by a boresilicate 6 in F/4 paraboloid with an effective F of 4.8. The focus sensitivity is Δs 1.5 μm ΔT[K] and the corresponding defocus is 0. 014 waves K 1 at 600 nm. The sensitivity of the WFS feed to temperature is 0. 014 waves K 1 at 600 nm. Overall in the plane of the lenslet array P V = d2 f p 2 8 f 2 2 fc 2 P V = 0.084 waves K 1 f p focal length of the F/4 paraboloid = 609.6 mm f 2 focal length of M2 = 312.5 mm f c focal length of the collimator = 9mm d beam diameter on lenslet array = 1.6 mm axial displacement of M2 = 3.2 μm K 1 at 600 nm

Out[83]=

Problem: The beacon focus changes a lot more than it should u 1 cm from one evening to the next noon. To produce this, the distance between the fiber and the beacon mirror had to change about 0.3 mm. A temperature rise of 97 would be needed if this was purely due to temperature. We had a hot summer but not that hot. There s clearly something else is going on.