Test Range Spectrum Management with LTE-A

Similar documents
LTE Aida Botonjić. Aida Botonjić Tieto 1

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

Interference management Within 3GPP LTE advanced

2012 LitePoint Corp LitePoint, A Teradyne Company. All rights reserved.

TECHTRAINED. Foundations Explained. Learn Technology in 10 minutes. Contact:

3G Evolution HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband Part II

Planning of LTE Radio Networks in WinProp

A REVIEW OF RESOURCE ALLOCATION TECHNIQUES FOR THROUGHPUT MAXIMIZATION IN DOWNLINK LTE

Investigation on Multiple Antenna Transmission Techniques in Evolved UTRA. OFDM-Based Radio Access in Downlink. Features of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN

Multi-Cell Interference Coordination in LTE Systems using Beamforming Techniques

LTE systems: overview

Long Term Evolution (LTE) and 5th Generation Mobile Networks (5G) CS-539 Mobile Networks and Computing

Long Term Evolution (LTE)

Massive MIMO for the New Radio Overview and Performance

WHITEPAPER MULTICORE SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR AN LTE BASE STATION

3G/4G Mobile Communications Systems. Dr. Stefan Brück Qualcomm Corporate R&D Center Germany

Background: Cellular network technology

Keysight Technologies Performing LTE and LTE-Advanced RF Measurements with the E7515A UXM Wireless Test Set

WINNER+ IMT-Advanced Evaluation Group

Block Error Rate and UE Throughput Performance Evaluation using LLS and SLS in 3GPP LTE Downlink

Beamforming for 4.9G/5G Networks

5G New Radio Design. Fall VTC-2017, Panel September 25 th, Expanding the human possibilities of technology to make our lives better

Voice over IP Realized for the 3GPP Long Term Evolution

Radio Performance of 4G-LTE Terminal. Daiwei Zhou

Addressing Future Wireless Demand

LTE Review. EPS Architecture Protocol Architecture Air Interface DL Scheduling EMM, ECM, RRC States QoS, QCIs & EPS Bearers

CHAPTER 14 4 TH GENERATION SYSTEMS AND LONG TERM EVOLUTION

Page 1. Overview : Wireless Networks Lecture 9: OFDM, WiMAX, LTE

Submission on Proposed Methodology for Engineering Licenses in Managed Spectrum Parks

Freescale, the Freescale logo, AltiVec, C-5, CodeTEST, CodeWarrior, ColdFire, ColdFire+, C-Ware, the Energy Efficient Solutions logo, Kinetis,

5G NR: Key Features and Enhancements An overview of 5G NR key technical features and enhancements for massive MIMO, mmwave, etc.

References. What is UMTS? UMTS Architecture

Testing of Early Applied LTE-Advanced Technologies on Current LTE Service to overcome Real Network Problem and to increase Data Capacity

Wireless Networks: An Introduction

Low latency in 4.9G/5G

WIRELESS 20/20. Twin-Beam Antenna. A Cost Effective Way to Double LTE Site Capacity

Performance Evaluation of Uplink Closed Loop Power Control for LTE System

NR Physical Layer Design: NR MIMO

4G++: Advanced Performance Boosting Techniques in 4 th Generation Wireless Systems. A National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority Funded Project

A Flexible Frame Structure for 5G Wide Area Pedersen, Klaus I.; Frederiksen, Frank; Berardinelli, Gilberto; Mogensen, Preben Elgaard

LTE-Advanced and Release 10

Performance Analysis of Downlink Inter-band Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced Wang, Hua; Rosa, Claudio; Pedersen, Klaus

Testing Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced Network Infrastructure

3GPP: Evolution of Air Interface and IP Network for IMT-Advanced. Francois COURAU TSG RAN Chairman Alcatel-Lucent

Top 5 Challenges for 5G New Radio Device Designers

LTE-U Forum: Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Qualcomm Technologies Inc., Samsung Electronics & Verizon. LTE-U SDL Coexistence Specifications V1.

Using the epmp Link Budget Tool

LTE Air Interface. Course Description. CPD Learning Credits. Level: 3 (Advanced) days. Very informative, instructor was engaging and knowledgeable!

White paper. Long Term HSPA Evolution Mobile broadband evolution beyond 3GPP Release 10

Radio Interface and Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced

4G TDD MIMO OFDM Network

Survey of Power Control Schemes for LTE Uplink E Tejaswi, Suresh B

LTE-ADVANCED - WHAT'S NEXT? Meik Kottkamp (Rohde & Schwarz GmBH & Co. KG, Munich, Germany;

LTE & LTE-A PROSPECTIVE OF MOBILE BROADBAND

From 2G to 4G UE Measurements from GSM to LTE. David Hall RF Product Manager

MACHINE TO MACHINE (M2M) COMMUNICATIONS-PART II

American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) 2015

2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media,

LTE and NB-IoT. Luca Feltrin. RadioNetworks, DEI, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna. Telecom Italia Mobile S.p.a. - TIM

5G Synchronization Aspects

LTE-Advanced research in 3GPP

3GPP Long Term Evolution LTE

ETSI SMG#24 TDoc SMG2 898 / 97 Madrid, Spain December 15-19, 1997 Source: SMG2. Concept Group Delta WB-TDMA/CDMA: Evaluation Summary

Application Note. LTE Measurement. MT8820C Radio Communication Analyzer

5G NR Update and UE Validation

3G long-term evolution

TS 5G.201 v1.0 (2016-1)

Further Vision on TD-SCDMA Evolution

802.11ax Design Challenges. Mani Krishnan Venkatachari

Frequency Hopping in LTE Uplink

Performance Studies on LTE Advanced in the Easy-C Project Andreas Weber, Alcatel Lucent Bell Labs

Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced

All rights reserved. Mobile Developments. Presented by Philippe Reininger, Chairman of 3GPP RAN WG3

Doppler Compensation for LTE-Based Aeronautical Mobile Telemetry

Enhancing Energy Efficiency in LTE with Antenna Muting

UMTS Radio Access Techniques for IMT-Advanced

A Practical Resource Allocation Approach for Interference Management in LTE Uplink Transmission

5G Frame Structure. August 2017 Frank Kowalewski, Eiko Seidel Nomor Research GmbH, Munich, Germany

3GPP TR V9.0.0 ( )

Millimeter-Wave Communication and Mobile Relaying in 5G Cellular Networks

A Radio Resource Management Framework for the 3GPP LTE Uplink

LTE System Level Performance in the Presence of CQI Feedback Uplink Delay and Mobility

A REVIEW ON EFFICIENT RESOURCE BLOCK ALLOCATION IN LTE SYSTEM

OFDMA and MIMO Notes

One Cell Reuse OFDM/TDMA using. broadband wireless access systems

Part 7. B3G and 4G Systems

Training Programme. 1. LTE Planning Overview. 2. Modelling a LTE Network. 3. LTE Predictions. 4. Frequency and PCI Plan Analysis

Long Term Evolution and Optimization based Downlink Scheduling

Lecture LTE (4G) -Technologies used in 4G and 5G. Spread Spectrum Communications

5G deployment below 6 GHz

System Performance of Cooperative Massive MIMO Downlink 5G Cellular Systems

RF chipset verification for UMTS LTE (FDD) with R&S SMU200A and R&S FSQ Application Note

PXI LTE FDD and LTE TDD Measurement Suites Data Sheet

Resource Allocation Strategies Based on the Signal-to-Leakage-plus-Noise Ratio in LTE-A CoMP Systems

RADWIN JET PtMP Beamforming solution delivers fiber-like connectivity for residential and enterprise. 750 Mbps. PtMP solution with PtP performance

AEROHIVE NETWORKS ax DAVID SIMON, SENIOR SYSTEMS ENGINEER Aerohive Networks. All Rights Reserved.

LTE Long Term Evolution. Dibuz Sarolta

Wprowadzenie do techniki LTE. Prowadzący: Szymon Raksimowicz

Improving Peak Data Rate in LTE toward LTE-Advanced Technology

Contents. 1. HSPA & HSPA+ Overview. 2. HSDPA Introduction. 3. HSUPA Introduction. 4. HSPA+ Introduction

Transcription:

Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) National Spectrum Consortium (NSC) / Spectrum Access R&D Program Test Range Spectrum Management with LTE-A Bob Picha, Nokia Corporation of America DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 412TW-PA-18039 Acknowledgment of Support: This project is managed by the Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) and funded through Spectrum Access R&D Program via Picatinny Arsenal under Contract No. W15QKN-15-9-1004. The Executing Agent and Program Manager work out of the AFTC Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the TRMC, the SAR&D Program and/or the Picatinny Arsenal.

Introduction The Cellular Range Telemetry (CRTM) and Flightline Radio Network (FRN) projects explore the use of 3GPP Long Term Evolution Advanced (LTE-A) for airborne and ground-based telemetry links This presentation will look at LTE RF carrier configurations How spectrum is shared between multiple users within the LTE system RF characteristics of LTE downlink and uplink signals In the context of these projects: The AMT aircraft-mounted equipment operates as an LTE User Equipment (UE) device Each AMT ground stations operates as an LTE enodeb (base station) LTE downlink = ground-to-air communication (enodeb Tx / UE Rx) LTE uplink = air-to-ground communication (UE Tx / enodeb Rx) This presentation will focus on the LTE uplink, since the primary goal of these projects is delivery of telemetry data from the aircraft to the ground network

LTE carrier generation

Downlink channels and resource mapping In the time domain: 1 slot = 0.5msec 1 subframe = 2 slots (1msec) 10 sub-frames = one frame (10msec) Synchronization signals are embedded twice per frame Master Information Block (MIB) is transmitted once per frame In the frequency domain: The OFDM process modulates data onto individual sub-carriers, which are 15kHz apart 12 sub-carriers are grouped into a resource block, which occupies 180kHz in frequency The number of resource blocks available for data transmission depends on the carrier bandwidth definition Scheduling user data For each sub-frame, the scheduler determines which users will be allocated which resource blocks Carries user data (Aid demodulation) Carries downlink control channel data

Uplink channels and resource mapping In the time domain: Same frame structure as downlink No synchronization signals or Master Information Block required for the uplink In the frequency domain: Same sub-carrier structure as downlink The number of resource blocks available for data transmission depends on the carrier bandwidth definition and the number of resource blocks assigned for Scheduling user data For each sub-frame, the scheduler determines which users will be allocated which resource blocks and sends the appropriate uplink transmission grants to each UE scheduled for that interval. (Aid demodulation) Carries user data Carries uplink control channel data

Uplink user data capacity When a UE registers with the LTE system, it communicates its data buffer status to the enodeb The uplink scheduler manages data transmission from UEs with data to send such that carrier capacity is used efficiently and UEs are served fairly For terrestrial systems, this process must be capable of handling several hundred UEs For test range applications, maximum user density in any one geographical space is likely 4 or less Amount of data scheduled per sub-frame determined by Modulation Coding Scheme (MCS) used for each UE MCS choice based on measured Signal to Interference + Noise (SINR) and UE power headroom Each MCS value has an associated coding rate and modulation order, which determine what the payload for the scheduling interval will be. From Table 8.6.1-1 Modulation, TBS index and redundancy version table for PUSCH MCS Index I MCS Modulation Order Q m TBS Index I TBS Example: Maximum throughput per carrier for a single UE Size = 4 10MHz bandwidth (50PRB) Size = 6 Size = 8 FDD UL Maximum Throughput (Mbps) Size = 4 15MHz bandwidth (75PRB) Size = 6 Size = 8 Size = 4 20MHz Bandwidth (100 PRB) Size = 6 Size = 8 0 0 1.26 1.22 1.16 1.99 1.93 1.86 2.66 2.60 2.54 1 1 1.67 1.61 1.54 2.60 2.54 2.47 3.50 3.50 3.37 2 2 2.09 1.99 1.86 3.24 3.11 2.98 4.26 4.26 4.14 3 3 2.66 2.54 2.47 4.14 4.01 3.88 5.54 5.54 5.35 4 4 3.24 3.11 2.98 5.16 4.97 4.78 6.97 6.71 6.46 5 QPSK 5 4.01 3.88 3.75 6.20 5.99 5.99 8.50 8.25 7.99 6 6 4.78 4.58 4.39 7.48 7.22 6.97 9.91 9.91 9.53 7 7 5.74 5.35 5.16 8.76 8.50 8.25 11.83 11.45 11.45 8 8 6.46 6.20 5.99 9.91 9.53 9.53 13.54 12.96 12.96 9 9 7.22 6.97 6.71 11.06 11.06 10.68 15.26 14.69 14.69 10 10 7.99 7.74 7.48 12.58 12.22 11.83 16.99 16.42 16.42 11 10 7.99 7.74 7.48 12.58 12.22 11.83 16.99 16.42 16.42 12 11 9.14 8.76 8.50 14.11 14.11 13.54 19.08 19.08 18.34 13 12 10.68 9.91 9.53 16.42 15.84 15.26 22.15 21.38 21.38 14 13 11.83 11.45 10.68 18.34 17.57 16.99 24.50 24.50 23.69 15 14 12.96 12.58 12.22 20.62 19.85 19.08 27.38 27.38 26.42 16QAM 16 15 14.11 13.54 12.96 22.15 21.38 20.62 29.30 29.30 28.34 17 16 14.69 14.11 13.54 22.92 22.15 22.15 31.70 30.58 30.58 18 17 16.42 15.84 15.26 25.46 24.50 24.50 35.16 34.01 32.86 19 18 18.34 17.57 16.42 28.34 27.38 26.42 37.89 37.89 36.70 20 19 19.85 19.08 18.34 30.58 29.30 29.30 40.58 40.58 39.23 21 19 19.85 19.08 18.34 30.58 29.30 29.30 40.58 40.58 39.23 22 20 21.38 20.62 19.85 32.86 31.70 31.70 45.35 43.82 42.37 23 21 22.92 22.15 21.38 35.16 35.16 34.01 48.94 46.89 46.89 24 22 24.50 23.69 22.92 37.89 36.70 36.70 51.02 51.02 48.94 64QAM 25 23 26.42 25.46 24.50 40.58 39.23 37.89 55.06 55.06 52.75 26 24 28.34 26.42 25.46 43.82 42.37 40.58 59.26 57.34 57.34 27 25 29.30 28.34 26.42 45.35 43.82 42.37 61.66 59.26 59.26 28 26 34.01 32.86 30.58 52.75 51.02 48.94 71.11 68.81 68.81 Increasing modulation order + larger coding rate = Higher throughput

Uplink channel - summary The maximum uplink throughput for a UE is determined by channel configuration, channel conditions, path loss, and how many other users are sharing the same channel The maximum capacity of an uplink LTE carrier depends on the bandwidth, channel conditions and path loss of each UE scheduled in the same interval The process of a UE connecting to the system, indicating it has data to send, sending data, and moving across coverage areas is totally automated within the LTE system For flightline applications: Path loss is low and received SINR is high, so UEs will be scheduled with maximum MCS Throughput per user and carrier capacity will be high Density of aircraft on ground and data requirements for each aircraft will drive system design For airborne test segments (CRTM) applications: Path loss and received SINR are variable, so UEs will be scheduled with varying MCS Throughput per user and carrier capacity will be lower Link budget considerations will drive system design

Channel edge Resource block Channel edge Deployment of LTE carriers for RF coverage Cellular approach to RF coverage RF coverage is attained using three sectors of coverage around a single site Each sector is driven by an antenna and Remote Radio Head (RRH). All RRHs at a site are connected to a single LTE baseband unit Each sector contains 1 or more LTE carriers ( cells in 3GPP speak). The number of carriers within a sector depends on the data throughput required within that sector Spectrum usage Typically all sectors contain the same number of carriers, and each carrier can be thought of as part of a single-frequency layer that extends across the system. This allows the capacity of a single LTE carrier to be re-used many times across the system Inter-cell interference due to single-frequency layers Downlink interference can be managed through frequency selective scheduling (low throughput requirements) Uplink inter-cell interference is expected to be most prevalent in FRN systems and can be managed through use of Coordinated Multi-point reception (CoMP) Interference Rejection Combining (IRC) Use of narrow beam antennas Table 5.6-1 Transmission bandwidth configuration N RB in E-UTRA channel bandwidths LTE carriers can be placed channel edge to channel edge without causing adjacent channel interference UE out-of-channel emissions at -25dBm/30kHz at 1MHz from channel edge UE out-of-channel emissions at -25dBm/30kHz at 10MHz from channel edge Figure 5.6-1 Definition of Channel Bandwidth and Transmission Bandwidth Configuration for one E-UTRA carrier Transmission Bandwidth Configuration [RB] Transmission Bandwidth [RB] Active Resource Blocks Channel Bandwidth [MHz] Center subcarrier (corresponds to DC in baseband) is not transmitted in downlink

33Mbps 8Mbps 33Mbps 12Mbps 33Mbps 25Mbps 33Mbps 25Mbps Effects of data load on LTE carriers GBR = Guaranteed Bit Rate Standard (non-gbr) bearer channel is default when User Equipment (UE) attaches to an LTE system Offered data is less than LTE carrier capacity Using standard (non-gbr) bearer channels Offered data is at LTE carrier capacity Offered data is more than LTE carrier capacity Offered data is more than LTE carrier capacity, but critical data sent via GBR bearer channel Request for higher QoS triggers set-up of a GBR bearer channel for that UE 20MHz LTE Uplink carrier Maximum throughput: 45Mbps (assuming 16QAM Max MCS Using QoS not as important for FRN applications where RF conditions are good, but will be important for CRTM (airborne) applications where channel conditions change as the test article moves across the range All data gets through with low latency and zero packet loss Latency and packet loss begin to rise due to scheduling constraints Packet loss may be OK for TCP applications Throughput limited to carrier capacity. Best effort scheduling shares the available throughput between streams Not OK for most applications Data sent via GBR bearer gets through with no packet loss and low latency Non-GBR stream packet loss and latency suffer Not OK for UDP (AMT)

20Mbps 8Mbps 12Mbps 8Mbps 20Mbps 8Mbps Using carrier aggregation to increase capacity To avoid the bottlenecks described on the previous slide, additional carriers can be deployed Each additional carrier adds capacity in the coverage area Individual carrier capacity may not be used efficiently when data is being sent over a few large streams Carrier Aggregation allows two or more carriers to be treated as a single spectrum resource Allows any stream to be divided and sent over carriers in the aggregation group Single Cell 2 x 20MHz LTE carriers Supporting 80Mbps 38Mbps 38Mbps

Summary The process of a UE connecting to the system, indicating it has data to send, sending data, and moving across coverage areas is totally automated within the LTE system RF planning for flightline networks and airborne test range networks are driven by different requirements For flightline (FRN) applications: Carrier capacity will be high because of excellent signal quality conditions Density of aircraft on ground will probably require multiple frequency layers with carrier aggregation LTE features supporting uplink interference mitigation will be turned on For airborne test segments (CRTM) applications: Density of airborne test articles will be lower than on the flightline, but throughput per carrier will be lower due to channel conditions Lower per carrier capacity will result in deploying multiple frequency layers with carrier aggregation