CALIBRATING THE NEW ULTRACAM OSPREY OBLIQUE AERIAL SENSOR Michael Gruber, Wolfgang Walcher

Similar documents
NEWS FROM THE ULTRACAM CAMERA LINE-UP INTRODUCTION

UltraCam and UltraMap An Update

UltraCam Eagle Prime Aerial Sensor Calibration and Validation

Vexcel Imaging GmbH Innovating in Photogrammetry: UltraCamXp, UltraCamLp and UltraMap

Update on UltraCam and UltraMap technology

UltraCam and UltraMap Towards All in One Solution by Photogrammetry

UltraCam and UltraMap An Update

ULTRACAM EAGLE MARK 3. One system for endless possibilities

ULTRACAMX AND A NEW WAY OF PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PROCESSING

PROPERTY OF THE LARGE FORMAT DIGITAL AERIAL CAMERA DMC II

Calibration Report. Short Version. UltraCam Eagle, S/N UC-E f210. Vexcel Imaging GmbH, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Aerial Triangulation Radiometry Essentials Dense Matching Ortho Generation

Calibration Report. Short Version. UltraCam L, S/N UC-L Vexcel Imaging GmbH, A-8010 Graz, Austria

HIGH RESOLUTION COLOR IMAGERY FOR ORTHOMAPS AND REMOTE SENSING. Author: Peter Fricker Director Product Management Image Sensors

Calibration Report. UC-SXp Version of Report:

Calibration Report. Short Version. Vexcel Imaging GmbH, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Leica ADS80 - Digital Airborne Imaging Solution NAIP, Salt Lake City 4 December 2008

Calibration Report. Short version. UltraCam X, S/N UCX-SX Microsoft Photogrammetry, A-8010 Graz, Austria. ( 1 of 13 )

VisionMap Sensors and Processing Roadmap

Calibration Report. UltraCam Eagle, S/N UC-Eagle f80. Vexcel Imaging GmbH, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Calibration Report. Short version. UltraCam Xp, S/N UC-SXp Vexcel Imaging GmbH, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Phase One 190MP Aerial System

TELLS THE NUMBER OF PIXELS THE TRUTH? EFFECTIVE RESOLUTION OF LARGE SIZE DIGITAL FRAME CAMERAS

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC IIe

VERIFICATION OF POTENCY OF AERIAL DIGITAL OBLIQUE CAMERAS FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY IN JAPAN

Jens Kremer ISPRS Hannover Workshop 2017,

VisionMap A3 Edge A Single Camera for Multiple Solutions

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II Aero Photo Europe Investigation

Digital Aerial Photography UNBC March 22, Presented by: Dick Mynen TDB Consultants Inc.

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Calibration Report. Vexcel Imaging GmbH, A-8010 Graz, Austria

POTENTIAL OF LARGE FORMAT DIGITAL AERIAL CAMERAS. Dr. Karsten Jacobsen Leibniz University Hannover, Germany

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

[NAIP, 2009]. That. 2011, Global Ortho

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC II

While film cameras still

CALIBRATION OF IMAGING SATELLITE SENSORS

Nneirda - Fotolia.com

ABOUT FRAME VERSUS PUSH-BROOM AERIAL CAMERAS

** KEYSTONE AERIAL SURVEYS R. David Day, Wesley Weaver **

EXAMPLES OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS PRODUCED FROM SPACE AND ACHIEVED ACCURACY CARAVAN Workshop on Mapping from Space, Phnom Penh, June 2000

Calibration Certificate

Leica - 3 rd Generation Airborne Digital Sensors Features / Benefits for Remote Sensing & Environmental Applications

CALIBRATION OF OPTICAL SATELLITE SENSORS

Geometric Property of Large Format Digital Camera DMC II 140

High Resolution Sensor Test Comparison with SPOT, KFA1000, KVR1000, IRS-1C and DPA in Lower Saxony

2019 NYSAPLS Conf> Fundamentals of Photogrammetry for Land Surveyors

Camera Calibration Certificate No: DMC III 27542

LECTURE NOTES 2016 CONTENTS. Sensors and Platforms for Acquisition of Aerial and Satellite Image Data

Chapters 1-3. Chapter 1: Introduction and applications of photogrammetry Chapter 2: Electro-magnetic radiation. Chapter 3: Basic optics

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF DIGITAL CAMERAS AND SPACE IMAGERY. Karsten JACOBSEN

DEM Generation Using a Digital Large Format Frame Camera

Aerial photography: Principles. Frame capture sensors: Analog film and digital cameras

Chapters 1-3. Chapter 1: Introduction and applications of photogrammetry Chapter 2: Electro-magnetic radiation. Chapter 3: Basic optics

Geometry perfect Radiometry unknown?

MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA EVALUATION BASED ON THE LATEST PHASE ONE TECHNOLOGY

Ground Control Configuration Analysis for Small Area UAV Imagery Based Mapping

Phase One ixu-rs1000 Accuracy Assessment Report Yu. Raizman, PhaseOne.Industrial, Israel

DMC The Digital Sensor Technology of Z/I-Imaging

Airborne or Spaceborne Images for Topographic Mapping?

Geometry of Aerial Photographs

Technical Evaluation of Khartoum State Mapping Project

Processing of stereo scanner: from stereo plotter to pixel factory

Lecture 7. Leica ADS 80 Camera System and Imagery. Ontario ADS 80 FRI Imagery. NRMT 2270, Photogrammetry/Remote Sensing

Sample Copy. Not For Distribution.

DIGITAL AERIAL SENSOR TYPE CERTIFICATION

INCREASING GEOMETRIC ACCURACY OF DMC S VIRTUAL IMAGES

QUALITY COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND FILM-BASED IMAGES FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PURPOSES Roland Perko 1 Andreas Klaus 2 Michael Gruber 3

Baldwin and Mobile Counties, AL Orthoimagery Project Report. Submitted: March 23, 2016

Novel Concepts for Aerial Digital Cameras

DMC PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE AND ACCURACY ASSESSMENT

Monitoring the vegetation success of a rehabilitated mine site using multispectral UAV imagery. Tim Whiteside & Renée Bartolo, eriss

OVERVIEW OF KOMPSAT-3A CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION

IGI Ltd. Serving the Aerial Survey Industry for more than 20 Years

Tutorial 10 Information extraction from high resolution optical satellite sensors

UAS Photogrammetry Best Practices

Geomatica OrthoEngine v10.2 Tutorial Orthorectifying ALOS PRISM Data Rigorous and RPC Modeling

Consumer digital CCD cameras

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF DIRECT GEOREFERENCING FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPLICATIONS ON SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL PLATFORMS

CALIBRATING DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AIRBORNE IMAGING SYSTEMS IN A TEST FIELD

AIRPORT MAPPING JUNE 2016 EXPLORING UAS EFFECTIVENESS GEOSPATIAL SLAM TECHNOLOGY FEMA S ROMANCE WITH LIDAR VOLUME 6 ISSUE 4

Planet Labs Inc 2017 Page 2

HD aerial video for coastal zone ecological mapping

RPAS Photogrammetric Mapping Workflow and Accuracy

ifp Universität Stuttgart EuroSDR network on Digital Camera Calibration Report Phase I (Status Oct 26, 2004)

HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY FOR MAPPING AND LANDSCAPE MONITORING

PLANET IMAGERY PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PLANET.COM

CSI: Rombalds Moor Photogrammetry Photography

CEE 6100 / CSS 6600 Remote Sensing Fundamentals 1 Topic 4: Photogrammetry

A European Network on Digital Camera Calibration

Overview. Objectives. The ultimate goal is to compare the performance that different equipment offers us in a photogrammetric flight.

EnsoMOSAIC Aerial mapping tools

Introduction to Photogrammetry

LPIS Orthoimagery An assessment of the Bing imagery for LPIS purpose

Geometric Analysis of DMC II 140

GEOMETRIC RECTIFICATION OF EUROPEAN HISTORICAL ARCHIVES OF LANDSAT 1-3 MSS IMAGERY

NRMT 2270, Photogrammetry/Remote Sensing. Lecture 4

RADIOMETRIC AND GEOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE CAPABILITIES OF THE NEW AIRBORNE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SENSORS

Transcription:

CALIBRATING THE NEW ULTRACAM OSPREY OBLIQUE AERIAL SENSOR Michael Gruber, Wolfgang Walcher Microsoft UltraCam Business Unit Anzengrubergasse 8/4, 8010 Graz / Austria {michgrub, wwalcher}@microsoft.com KEY WORDS: Photogrammetry, Digital, Camera, Oblique, Calibration ABSTRACT We present methods and results to calibrate the new oblique sensor UltraCam Osprey which was presented for the first time at the ASPRS 2013 conference and exhibition in Baltimore, MD, March 2013. Even if this was not the first time when oblique sensors were introduced into the market, the UltraCam Osprey did show several new conceptual details which are illustrated in this presentation. The design of the camera is focusing on two important characteristics, a metric nadir component which has been derived from the UltraCam Lp sensor, and collection efficiency through very large swath width. The nadir sensor consists of the 90 megapixel panchromatic camera, true-color RGB, and a near-infrared camera. Adding six oblique camera heads, with two each in forward and backwards direction, results in unmatched oblique collection efficiency. We first explain the camera and cone configuration along with the geometric layout of the sensor system. Then we describe the laboratory setup for geometric calibration of the UltraCam Osprey and the calibration process along with the actual results of one such calibration showing sub-pixel accurate image geometry. This proves that the UltraCam Osprey is a fully calibrated metric camera system suitable for photogrammetric survey applications. INTRODUCTION The UltraCam Osprey is the new oblique digital aerial camera by Microsoft and was presented for the first time at the ASPRS 2013 conference and exhibition in Baltimore, MD, March 2013. The camera is based on a concept which offer several new and unique advantages with a clear emphasis on professional photogrammetry and collection productivity. Most important is the metric nadir component which is based on the same design as the well-known UltraCam Lp camera (cf. Wiechert, Gruber, 2009). This nadir camera constitutes the geometry backbone of the UltraCam Osprey and enables traditional photogrammetric processing from an oblique aerial camera system. Osprey images are compatible with the UltraMap software supporting the full workflow from aero-triangulation to dense surface modelling and ortho-image creation. It is worthwhile to say that the six oblique camera heads making the pixel harvest extremely productive. The oblique cameras are aligned to the four cardinal direction at 45 off-nadir. Forwards and backwards are equipped with da double camera head, single cones look left and right. THE ULTRACAM OSPREY DESIGN The camera consists of 10 camera heads. Four cones constitute the classical nadir camera for creating one 90 Mpixel panchromatic image at a focal length of 51 mm, as well as one true-color RGB at 25.5 mm focal length and one near-infrared image (cf. Figure 1 and Table 1). The remaining six camera cones are equipped with 80 mm lenses and high-quality optical prisms. The forward and backward looking cones are assembled pairwise, greatly enlarging the cross-track FOV of these twin cones. Table 1 describes the principal parameters of the camera system and the UltraCam Osprey design. In addition to the description of the photogrammetric design we want to emphasize the benefits of the 3 rd generation of the UltraCam sensor family (cf. Wiechert, Gruber, 2013). This generation was started with the UltraCam Eagle in 2011 and offers the following advantages: 47

Newly developed proprietary lenses New proprietary camera electronic for even faster frame rate Even further improved image dynamic due to the new sensor electronics Integrated computers Integrated solid state storage Integrated UltraNav (GPS/INS/FMS system) Reduced size, weight, and power consumption Multiple camera configurations Exchangeable lens systems (UltraCam Eagle only) by the introduction of a new precision mount system for the camera lenses Figure 1: UltraCam Osprey (left) and cone layout (right) Focal Length Nadir PAN 51.0 mm Oblique Sensor Heads 80.0 mm Nadir RGB and NIR 25.5 mm Frame Format / Pixel Size Nadir PAN 11674 * 7514 6.0 µm Oblique Sensor Heads 6870 * 4520 5.2 µm Nadir RGB and NIR 6735 * 4335 5.2 µm FOV/ deg cross track along track Nadir PAN (RGB) +/- 34.48 +/- 23.85 Nadir RGB (PAN) and NIR +/- 34.48 +/- 23.85 FOV/ deg Oblique Fwd/Bwd - +/- (53,36 / 36,64 ) Oblique Left/Right +/- (57,59 / 32,41 ) - Table 1: Principal design parameters of the UltraCam Osprey The camera design is geared towards productivity in the air. Thus the extent of the nadir footprint and the cross- 48

track dimension of the oblique images are well tuned to each other. At a flying altitude of 1275 m and a nadir GSD of 15 cm the nadir looking image covers the area of 1750 m by 1127 m. The corresponding left and right oblique images overlap with the nadir image, yielding a combined and seamless image footprint of 115 FOV. The crosstrack footprint size of the forward and backward oblique images is more than 1135 m. This supports a flight pattern where the flight line distance is 60% of the nadir footprint (40% side overlap). At a speed over ground of 60 m/sec the UltraCam Osprey frame rate of about 0,45 images /second (2,2 seconds TBFR) allows achieving a forward nadir overlap of 80% at a minimum GSD of 8,5 cm and less than 5 cm GSD with 60% endlap. Figure 2: UltraCam Osprey footprint (left) and FOV diagram (right) GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION Geometric quality and the availability of calibration data is one of the mayor advantages of UltraCam Osprey. Thus it was part of the development process to expand the existing calibration laboratory. This laboratory is in use for the calibration of all cameras of the UltraCam Sensor Family. In order to allow for the larger field of view of the sensor we expanded the calibration target. Additional control points are available to cover the oblique cameras to the left and to the right. Tilting the camera by 90 enables to calibrate the forward and backward sensors as well. Figure 3: Camera calibration of the UltraCam Osprey. The extended calibration laboratory in Graz, Austria and its 3D Structure is the basis for calibration all camera heads of the UltraCam Osprey (left and right oblique and nadir). One specific characteristic of the calibration procedure is the simultaneous calibration of the nadir camera heads together with the oblique cameras. The quality and reliability of the calibration procedure for nadir camera heads 49

is well proven and consists of 84 shot positions (cf. Ladstaedter et al, 2010). This is the basis for the calibration of the oblique camera heads. The exterior orientation parameters of the nadir cones are introduced into the setup for the oblique cameras. This does improve the redundancy of the adjustment together with eccentricity parameters. The calibration procedure for the oblique cameras is based on 252 images taken from three camera stations at different rotation angles. Thus a highly redundant set of image positions can be automatically measured and introduced into the least squares bundle adjustment procedure. The entire set of measured image positions is approximately 20000 from the panchromatic nadir camera component and 12000 image positions from the oblique camera heads. The quality of the calibration procedure is at a sub-pixel level. The panchromatic bundle adjustment shows a sigma_o below 0.8. The value for oblique images is slightly above at 1.7 at a unit of image measurements of 1 µm. ECCA C4-38.5347 123.3210-109.6294-0.0260-50.0066-0.0080 ECCA C5 37.3850 123.7054-105.1934 0.1721-50.0197-0.1003 ECCA C6-125.0003-38.1254-107.4069-49.9996 0.0065-0.0586 ECCA C7 125.1598-37.5542-107.1613 49.9728 0.0645 0.0123 ECCA C8-37.8284-123.3277-108.2544-0.1884 49.9790-0.1437 ECCA C9 37.6915-123.2628-106.7835 0.0515 49.9907-0.1553 Table 2: Important result from geometric laboratory calibration: Eccentricity vectors for each oblique camera head relative to the panchromatic nadir camera head Figure 3: Image residuals of the full set of calibration images after the bundle adjustment. The sigma_o values (in micron) are 0.77 for the panchromatic nadir 1.79 for the oblique camera heads. IMAGE QUALITY UltraCam sensors are well known for outstanding image quality. This is valid for UltraCam Osprey as well. The radiometric performance of the sensor a result of combining highest quality CCD sensor technology, the latest developments of the UltraCam electronic components, and high performance lens systems. The UltraMap image 50

processing software adds the final polish to the image data, while always maintaining full image dynamic of 16-bit per color channel. In order to proof this image quality we show sample images from flight missions to highlight the quality of UltraCam Osprey production images. The samples shown below are taken from 900m above ground level (cf. Figure 4) and 500m above ground level (cf. Figure 5). Figure 4: Forward looking oblique image taken from 900 m above ground level (Salzburg, Austria). 51

Figure 5: Large scale oblique left looking image at a GSD of approximately 5 cm (Gleisdorf, Austria). UltraCam Osprey images have already been used for Microsoft-internal mapping projects. There images have been introduced into a digital workflow which leads into dense surface models as well as fully textured 3D models of urban environment (cf. Gruber, Walcher, 2013). Thus UltraCam Osprey did successfully show geometric and radiometric image quality which perfectly served for high quality photogrammetric production of value added data sets. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that the novel design of Microsoft s UltraCam Osprey makes this camera system a fully capable photogrammetric aerial camera. While in the past oblique camera systems had played more of a niche role in aerial photogrammetry, there is now a high likelihood that the inherent advantages of oblique sensors - many looks at a pleasant 45-degree viewing angle - will soon find broader market acceptance. This is further helped by the superior flying efficiency of the UltraCam Osprey. At flying costs comparable to a traditional nadir-only camera system, the UltraCam Osprey is capable of delivering 5-look imagery of an area of interest while not compromising geometric quality at all. The inherent redundancy of UltraCam Osprey imagery makes it well suited for automated processing and feature extraction. It is therefore to be expected that soon there will be new software and processing tools to fully explore the multi-view imagery of this exciting new aerial camera system. REFERENCES Wiechert A., M. Gruber, 2009: Vexcel Imaging GmbH -- Innovating in PhotogrammetryUltraCamXp, UltraCamLp and UltraMap, Proceedings of the Photogrammetric Week 2009, Stuttgart, DE Ladstaedter et al, 2010: Monolithic Stitching: One Sensor Geometry For Multiple Sensor Cameras, Proceedings of the American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 26-30 April, 2010, San Diego, CA Wiechert A., M. Gruber, 2013: News from the UltraCam Camera LineUp, Proceedings of the American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 24-28 March, 2013, Baltimore, MD. Gruber M., W. Walcher, 2013: Oblique Image Collection -- Challenges and Solutions, Proceedings of the Photogrammetric Week 2013, September 2013, Stuttgart, DE 52