Summerset Boulcott Retirement Village. Visual Simulations Index. 1. Visual simulations methodology. (3 pages) 3. Spencer Holmes survey data (3 pages)

Similar documents
Proposed Kumototo Site 10 Wellington

Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL

RAF DRAFT. Viewpoint 11: Taken from a road within Burlescombe, looking oking south-west towards the site.

Appendix 8.2 Information to be Read in Conjunction with Visualisations

Architectural Design Process

Telecommunication Application Form

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT

Virtual Reality & Real-Time Simulation. Animation. 3D Stereoscopy

SITE PLAN, SUBDIVISION & EXTERIOR DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS

CHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION EXTERIOR PLAN / LANDSCAPE PLAN

Checklist for Minor Plan Modification

East Anglia TWO & ONE North. Broom Covert, Sizewell Visualisations

Architectural Review Application

PARKING IMPROVEMENT AIRPORT CAMPUS AMENDED SITE PLAN APPROVAL DRAWINGS 113 KING STREET TOWN OF NORTH CASTLE, NEW YORK AIRPORT CAMPUS I-V LLC

SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION

Owner / Architect Certification of Complete Documentation for the Additions and Remodels Conditional Approval Review

I. REQUEST: The undersigned petition the Village of Matteson, Illinois to approve the application(s) submitted.

Section E NSPS MODEL STANDARDS FOR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS Approved 3/12/02

VISUAL RESOURCE EVALUATION PROPOSED ATTACHED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATION

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY STANDARDS AND DELIVERABLES

APPENDIX D: DRAWING SUBMISSION STANDARDS

Option 1. Design Options are diverse e.g. new route alignments covering a wide area. Option 2. Design Options are restricted

APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type

GEORGE M. JANES & ASSOCIATES. September 4, Ted Fink Greenplan 302 Pells Rd. Rhinebeck, NY 12572

Guidelines for Laying Targets for Ground Control Points

City of Whitefish 418 E 2 nd St PO Box 158 Whitefish, MT Phone: Fax:

SITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects)

IAN HUMBY TEACHING. List of Hand-Outs. Levelling

looking west looking east A0.6 Proposed Development Model Shots 1327 Marine Drive West Vancouver revision date fax (604) phone (604)

VISUALISATION STANDARDS

PICTURING THE PAST AT MILLS MANSION GREENHOUSE COMPLEX

Zone 7 (W1) Visualisations

Survey Requirements. Design Guidelines and Standards. June Office of the University Architect

City of Whitefish Planning & Building Department PO Box E 2 nd Street Whitefish, MT Phone: Fax:

APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE TOWN APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL FORM AND APPLICATION

Last Name: First Name: M.I:

February Prepared for

Mailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip:

City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department UDRB SUBMITTAL CHECK LIST

For Office Use: Filing Date: Case Number: Zoning District: LIST ALL ADDRESSES INVOLVED IN YOUR PROJECT:

1. Land survey Work. 2. Civil and Structural engineering services.

Section 4: Ontario Realty Corporation CAD Standards and Guidelines

Ball State University Department of Architecture Spring 2017 Grondzik

CLIPPER ESTATES HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION DESIGN GUIDELINES

Don Hillock Drive ONE UNIT REMAINING. Aurora, ON LARGE INDUSTRIAL FACILITY FOR LEASE IN AURORA FOR LEASE > INDUSTRIAL FACILITY

Suveying Lectures for CE 498

CLIENT GUIDE TO MEASURED BUILDING SURVEYS

BIM. e Submission Guideline Structural. Annex 1a. Recommended Process Revit 2010

Architectural Sketches and Perspectives

Oakland County Michigan Register of Deeds Plat Engineering, GIS, & Remonumentation Dept. Ph: (248) Fax (248)

2D Drawings Levels of Detail Specification

Question bank. Unit 1: Introduction

Public Call to Artists for Expressions of Interest Newton Recreation Centre Glass Curtain Wall Design for glass frit application

SURVEYING FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS

Specifications for Post-Earthquake Precise Levelling and GNSS Survey. Version 1.0 National Geodetic Office

Simonson Design Lab, Inc. Design Agreement

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Contours and Form DEFINITION

APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Town of Holly Springs Sign Installation Packet

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV

Architectural Review Application New Application Processing Improvements

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HOMESITE CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL FORM AND APPLICATION

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Determining Crash Data Using Camera Matching Photogrammetric Technique

Applying for a Site Development Review

INTENT An Administrative Site Plan is required for the following situations, excluding single-family detached development:

Environmental Design. Floor Plan. Planometric Drawing. Target Audience. Media. Materials

Perspective. Basic Perspective For Drawing

INDIGO LAKES HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION

2013 Assessment Report. Design and Visual Communication (DVC) Level 2

Office use only: Application Date: UT No.: EA No.: Property Address: ENGINEERING APPROVAL - SUBDIVISION OR STAND-ALONE ENGINEERING WORK

Home Improvement Application. Type of Improvement

Bulletin. Loss Control. Land Surveyors. Towards Achieving Measurement Redundancy* Professional Liability Insurance. Background

Level 1 Imaging software (DIS )

Agenda 1 Introduction 2 Navisworks Overview

HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT St. Anne s on the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Addendum to Screening Opinion OCTOBER 2016

Modifications Committee Guidelines

SITE STATISTICS SQ.FT [ SQ.M.]

ARCHITECT VECTORWORKS EIGHTH EDITION TUTORIAL MANUAL BY JONATHAN PICKUP

Date Requested, 200_ Work Order No. Funding source Name of project Project limits: Purpose of the project

DatuGram 2D. User Guide. Version 2.0 August Datumate Geomatics Expert Systems

Manually verifiable area calculations; and BC Land Surveyor certified area calculations (typically practical only for large development proposals).

This document is a preview generated by EVS

SECTION 4 DESIGN SURVEYS

LESSON 1: UNDERSTANDING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

R 1 Design Review Application

SURVEYORS BOARD OF QUEENSLAND. RTK GNSS for Cadastral Surveys. Guideline

A NEW GEOCENTRIC DATUM FOR NEW ZEALAND

Checklist for Tentative Subdivision Map

CONCEPT REVIEW GUIDELINES

This Call for Qualifications does not require the preparation of a design proposal.

Architectural Review Committee (ARC) Amended Guidelines for All ARC Applications

GEORGE M. JANES & ASSOCIATES. July 12, Sabrina Charney-Hull Planning Director Town of New Castle 200 South Greeley Avenue Chappaqua, NY 10514

Excavation and Watching Brief

CITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET

ARB ACTION MEMO. Mr. Wardell called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. and established a quorum.

City of Del Mar Planning Department Submittal Checklist ADR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT

ELECTRONIC DRAFTING GUIDELINES

Transcription:

Summerset Boulcott Retirement Village Visual Simulations Index 1. Visual simulations methodology. (3 pages) 2. Index & Site Plan + Photomontage collection of 9 viewpoints. Drawings VS 01 VS 37 3. Spencer Holmes survey data (3 pages) Prepared by Stantiall's Studio Ltd. Ph 04 473 7746 9 June 2016

Visual Simulation methodology for Summerset Boulcott Retirement Village Photomontages 9 June 2016 pages 1 of 3 Introduction: Refer to photomontage collection Summerset Boulcott Retirement Village Visual Simulation. The 9 positions selected for visual simulations are shown in Dwg VSO1 - Index and view point plan 1. Intention The intention is to show in the selected views the visual effect that the proposed development will have. They are not real life views but rather simulations of a two dimensional view of the proposed activity from the given viewpoints. The degree of accuracy of +/-.05% of output size of image. The final imagery of built forms is not photorealistic but indicates bulk and location with indicative detail only. The survey data supplied is surveyed verified and was sufficient to provide accurate assessment of the buildings and landscaping visible. The steps outlined below describe the process and information used to develop the photomontages. 2. Process Methodology The process follows the guidelines of the NZILA Visual Simulation BPG 10.2 The simulations, created in the form of photomontages, utilise surveying architectural & landscaping information. It involved a series of processes to ensure as accurate as possible impressions of the proposed development within the photomontages. Final images are dependent an accuracy of information supplied. 3. Architectural Information (Summerset Design team & Aurecon) Information supplied included: A digital model of development. Site plan with FFL s, existing and finished site levels. 1

4. Landscape information (Wraight + Associates Landscape Architects and Summerset Design team) Master plan including: planting species and design. Direction re positioning of trees Information regarding scale of the tress. The simulations included versions showing tree specified 5 years = 4 m & 10 years =6m 5. Survey Information Information supplied by Spencer Holmes Surveyors. (Refer attached data) Survey PDF showing the viewpoint positions and R.Ls of the selected locations visible within the photographs used in the Visual Simulations. Surveyed site markers established on site (visible in the photo) Supplementary true scale markers measured and recorded photographically. 6. Site Photographs Site Photos were taken by Stantiall's Studio Ltd. for the development of the visual simulations. The 9 locations were survey verified by the surveyor and recorded on the survey plan. The camera used was a Canon Ixus 115 Digital with a 28 mm lens. Photos were taken between 10.30 am and 2.30 pm, horizontally and on a tripod. 7. Model Development Building models supplied were imported into LIghtwave 3D modeling software. Indicative tree markers based on the landscape plan were placed into the model to provide a guide for proposed planting. These showed maturity to suit the various stages required. 8. Virtual Camera Placement The steps to place the 3D model into the photograph included: Using Lightwave 3D, the digital model is scaled 1:1 and placed into 3D space, then positioned in relation to the site plan and given a height relating to the RL on the site plan. Site markers are then modeled to match those in the photograph, using the height and RL information supplied by the surveyors, and placed into 3D space and positioned in relation to the site plan. 2

A virtual camera is then positioned to match the actual camera plot point on the site plan and given the camera height value based on survey information. Interpolation was used where required The photograph is brought into Lightwave 3D as a background image. The Markers within the 3d model are matched with those in the photograph. Further manual trigonometrical checks are carried out where required. 9. Rendering & compositions 1) A high quality image at the same resolution of the original photograph is then rendered out from Lightwave 3D. 2) Using Photoshop, the 3D model render was placed onto the original photograph 3) The render was then edited to fit into the surroundings, adding foreground elements from the original photograph and placed into their position in front of the 3D model. 4) Lighting and tonal adjustments were made to create a suitable bulk an location graphic appearance 5) Proposed tree planting added based on the indicative tree markers (Refer Model Development above). 10. Consultant Review To finalise and confirm the architectural and landscape detail visible the final content of the photomontages were reviewed by the design consultants. 11. Reading Distances (RD) By viewing the images from a particular distance, the actual scale of the view on site can be represented. This is termed the Reading Distance (RD) and is noted on the photo montages and is dependent on the size of image printed or projected. 3

140618c01 site survey.docx 11 th May 2016 Stantiall Studio PO Box 27 210 Marion Square WELLINGTON 6141 Attention: Ian Stantiall Dear Ian, Boulcott Farm Heritage Golf Club, Lower Hutt We have completed the site survey at Boulcott Farm Heritage Golf Club and surrounding areas. Positions and levels for the points you requested have been surveyed and shown on our attached plans S14-0618-SS1/A & SS2/A. The survey has been completed by GPS and total station observations. Coordinates are in terms of New Zealand Geodetic Datum 2000, Wellington Circuit. Levels are in terms of Mean Sea Level, Wellington Datum 1953. The source of coordinates and levels has been derived by GPS. Coordinates have been checked on to NZGD2000 geodetic survey control marks SP I DP 34946 & SPS II SO 370156. Levels have been checked on to Hutt City Council benchmark C.31. Each surveyed point shows a point number, description and reduced level. The points we have surveyed and shown are: - the points shown on your photographs Control Points 060516.pdf. - viewpoints 1 to 8 - points where a staff has been held for site photographs from viewpoints - extra points as requested. Please contact us if you have any questions or require anything further. Yours faithfully Spencer Holmes Limited Zane Oosten Senior Survey Technician Spencer Holmes Ltd Directors: Associates: Consultant: Jon Devine, Ian Leary, Philip McConchie, Hudson Moody Jo Cushen, Vaughan England, John McNaughton Peter Smith

NO A REVISION FIRST ISSUE BY DATE 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 G208 BASE OF POST 12.34 G209 BASE OF POST 12.21 STKDG8 PPT 8A 7.94 8.53 TRUNK T32 T33 TRUNK 8.44 JOINS PLAN S14-0618-SS1 JOINS PLAN S14-0618-SS2 VP8B VP8 12.23 G207 TOP CNR OF WALL 10.64 T31 TOP OF LOG 10.83 STKDG9 PPT 8B 9.20 10.99 BASE OF POST G206 T17 TOP OF POLE 13.24 9.72 PPT 1A G9 8.97 VP1 STKDVP1 T20 EAVE 12.04 T19 RIDGE 15.53 T16 TOP OF POLE 12.99 9.389 BASE OF POLE T18 T8 EAVE 15.60 LEVELS ARE IN TERMS OF MEAN SEA LEVEL WELLINGTON DATUM 1953 ORIGIN OF LEVELS : HCC BM C.31 REDUCED LEVEL = 8.617 SOURCE: HCC RECORDS SpencerHolmes engineers - surveyors - planners Level 6-8 Willis Street PO Box 588 Wellington New Zealand Phone (04) 472-2261 Fax (04) 471-2372 Email admin@spencerholmes.co.nz CLIENT SUMMERSET VILLAGES T25 EAVE 13.67 T24 EAVE 12.48 9.75 GL T27 15.49 RIDGE T5 T6 TOP OF FENCE 11.69 13.09 EAVE T7 9.48 VP3 STKDVP3B PROJECT BOULCOTT FARM HERITAGE GOLF CLUB DRAWING TITLE SITE SURVEY DESIGN CONSULTANT STKDVP2 VP2 9.48 12.77 EAVE T26 Copyright of this drawing is vested in Spencer Holmes Ltd. The Contractor shall verify all dimensions on site. CAUTION - The information shown on this plan has been prepared under specific instruction from the client and is intended solely for the clients use. The information is valid as at the date of survey. Spencer Holmes Limited will accept no liability for any consequence arising out of the use of this plan, or the information thereon whether in hard copy or electronic format by any other party for any purpose whatsoever. CAD FILE S14-0618-SS1 - SS1 DRAWN AZO CHECKED SCALE 1 : 500 DRAWING NUMBER FB DATE S14-0618-SS1 11/05/2016 AT REV A1 A

NO A REVISION FIRST ISSUE BY DATE 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 T33 TRUNK 8.44 JOINS PLAN S14-0618-SS1 JOINS PLAN S14-0618-SS2 G27 PPT 4C 8.14 8.09 PPT 4B STKD4B STKD4A PPT 4A 8.35 T87 EAVE 11.42 T85 RIDGE 15.32 T50 RIDGE 12.80 14.94 EAVE T46 T45 TOP EDGE OF SKYLIGHT 16.61 13.28 CNR OF SILL T48 12.65 G2032 T55 TOP OF FENCE PPT 5B STKD5B PPT 7B T47 G22 8.50 11.50 VP 5 SHRUB 8.77 8.70 10.24 VP6 T47 G2101 PPT 7A 11.48 T56 TOP OF FENCE JNT 13.33 G26 VP7 11.33 T57 TOP OF FENCE JNT 13.33 T58 TOP OF CONC. WALL 12.92 11.43 EAVE T86 12.24 EAVE T88 9.56 VP4 G5 LEVELS ARE IN TERMS OF MEAN SEA LEVEL WELLINGTON DATUM 1953 ORIGIN OF LEVELS : HCC BM C.31 REDUCED LEVEL = 8.617 SOURCE: HCC RECORDS SpencerHolmes engineers - surveyors - planners T8 EAVE 15.60 15.49 RIDGE T5 T6 TOP OF FENCE 11.69 13.09 EAVE T7 9.48 VP3 STKDVP3B Level 6-8 Willis Street PO Box 588 Wellington New Zealand Phone (04) 472-2261 Fax (04) 471-2372 Email admin@spencerholmes.co.nz CLIENT SUMMERSET VILLAGES PROJECT BOULCOTT FARM HERITAGE GOLF CLUB DRAWING TITLE SITE SURVEY DESIGN CONSULTANT Copyright of this drawing is vested in Spencer Holmes Ltd. The Contractor shall verify all dimensions on site. CAUTION - The information shown on this plan has been prepared under specific instruction from the client and is intended solely for the clients use. The information is valid as at the date of survey. Spencer Holmes Limited will accept no liability for any consequence arising out of the use of this plan, or the information thereon whether in hard copy or electronic format by any other party for any purpose whatsoever. CAD FILE S14-0618-SS1 - SS2 DRAWN AZO CHECKED SCALE 1 : 500 DRAWING NUMBER FB DATE S14-0618-SS2 11/05/2016 AT REV A1 A