ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 18, 2015

Similar documents
David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 15, 2012

PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT

CITY OF PINE CITY SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES

SECTION 35 ANTENNAS AND TOWERS

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Chapter 15

Modify Section , Major Impact Services and Utilities, of Chapter (Civic Use Types):

# Insite RE Inc./ Verizon Wireless Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Wireless Facility Peer Engineering Review

City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY

CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY SITE APPLICATION / MODIFICATION REQUEST FORM

Frequently Asked Questions about Wireless Facilities on Wooden Utility Poles and Streetlight Poles

: PERSONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE FACILITIES: REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of Laguna Hills Application for a Conditional Use Permit Project Information and Justification

WHEREAS, the City of (the City ) is an Illinois municipality in. accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and,

GUIDELINES AND MINIMUM ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PARKING MANAGEMENT PLANS (PMP) ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT (ACG)

Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

COUNTY OF CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. July 31, :00 PM. Commissioners Chamber

Wireless Facility Engineering Review

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T Proposed Telecommunications Facility 2700 Watt Avenue APN#

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).

Royal Street Communications, LLC Proposed Base Station (Site No. LA0366A) 315 4th Avenue Venice, California

RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT. Verizon Wireless. Report Status: Verizon Wireless is Compliant

Joint Application Village / AT&T

PROJECT NARRATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS

Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol

Special Meeting of the Village Board

Telecommunications Law

Small Cell Infrastructure in Denver

Moline Illinois CODE OF ORDINANCES. Art. IX. Miscellaneous DIVISION 3. IN-BUILDING EMERGENCY RADIO SYSTEM COVERAGE

COUNCIL ACTION FORM WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES TEXT AMENDMENT

Town of Burlington Small Wireless Facility. and similar structures. Design Rules and Regulations

MODEL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE for Siting of "Small Cell" Telecommunication Infrastructure in Public Rights-Of-Way

Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Meeting. Neighborhood Leaders Meeting May 8, 2014

ZONING ORDINANCES AND TELECOM PROVIDERS CAN WE LIVE IN HARMONY?

CHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1926

CLARK COUNTY FIRE CODE AMENDMENTS

The Problem: Close Proximity Microwave Radiation Antennas near Homes MARCH 6, 2018 SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MYSTREETMYCHOICE.

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Berkeley Bekins ) 2721 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, California

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No South Goleta ) 4500 Hollister Avenue Santa Barbara, California

S 0342 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION TOWER COLLOCATION OR MODIFICATION (ELIGIBLE FACILITIES)

Agenda Town of Duck Planning Board Regular Meeting Paul F. Keller Meeting Hall Wednesday, October 11, :30 p.m.

Initial Comments on DRI Application for Wakeby Road Cell Tower September 26, 2017

April 15, Dear UBC Students and Campus Community:

Sudden Valley RF Documentation

5 February 11, 2015 Public Hearing

DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION

Summerlin South Community Association. Model Rules for Installation of Antennas in Planned Unit Developments. Satellite Antenna Resolution & Criteria

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Palos Verdes ) 1506 Camino Verde Walnut Creek, California

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE FIXED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS COALITION

Attachment A. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Lake Cachuma ) 2680 Highway 154 Santa Barbara County, California

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER POLICY DENVER FIRE DEPARTMENT. Emergency Responder Radio Enhancement Coverage System (RES)

Verizon Wireless 3003 E Harmony Road, Combined Project Development Plan and Final Plan, #FDP150014

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE, WYOMING:

APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type

EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO SIGNAL PERMIT APPLICATION

Site Plan Review Application. Interest in the Property (e.g. fee simple, land option, etc.)

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE STUDY

Planning Commission meeting

2200 Noll Drive Lancaster, PA Latitude: N 40º (NAD 83) Longitude: W 76º (NAD 83) 362 AMSL

City of Burbank. Planning and Transportation Division WIRELESS AND DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM ( DAS ) PROJECTS SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM

Technical Requirements for Land Mobile and Fixed Radio Services Operating in the Bands / MHz and / MHz

SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION

Notice of Proposed Amendment Request for Expedited Review

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

Metro Cell: Best Practices. For a Successful Densification Strategy


Telecommunications. A Presentation to the Georgia Planning Association. David C. Kirk, AICP Troutman Sanders LLP

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

Wireless Facility Engineering Review

CHAPTER 18 Lighting Regulations

AT&T Mobility Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN4779A) 1101 Keaveny Court Walnut Creek, California

RoamAbout Outdoor Antenna Site Preparation Guide

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP 9611 SE 36 th Street, Mercer Island, WA (206)

SECTION EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE SYSTEMS

CHAPTER TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION

Verizon Wireless Albemarle County s Wireless Policy on Co-locations. August 31, Executive Summary

City of Cape May Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes April 28, 2011

CITY OF RICE LAKE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS ORDINANCE NO. 52 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

CITY OF DES MOINES, IA PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 602 Robert D Ray Drive Des Moines, IA Phone:

Sec Radio, television, satellite dish and communications antennas and towers.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY PLANNING DIVISION ANTENNA MINOR USE PERMIT APPLICATION

View referenced exhibit back-up material. (See Report to the City Council No ) Adoption of a Resolution certifying findings that:

2. As such, Proponents of Antenna Systems do not require permitting of any kind from the Town.

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS, ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION BASE SITES APPLICATION

Signs and Murals - Definitions:

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington DC 20554

City of Astoria Development Code ARTICLE 15 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICE FACILITIES

LIFE SAFETY DIVISION GUIDELINE. Subject: BDA Radio Amplification Checklist Date initiated: Date revised:

EFFECTIVE AUGUST XX, 2016 UNLESS APPEALED PRIOR TO THAT DATE

VINTAGE ORIGINAL ART MURAL REGISTRATION PROCESS

Summerland Planning Advisory Committee. SunPAC Meeting #31 April 28, 2011

ARTICLE 25 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS AND ANTENNAS Updated

Wireless Communication Facility Development Ordinance

Transcription:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 18, 2015 DATE: July 3, 2015 SUBJECT: U-3409-15-1 USE PERMIT for installation of telecommunications equipment at Mercedes-Benz of Arlington; 585 N. Glebe Road (RPC# 14-061-073). Applicant: Verizon Wireless c/o MasTec Network Solutions 9020 Mendenhall Court, Suite H Columbia, MD 21045 By: Edward L. Donohue 117 Oronco Street Alexandria, VA 22314 C.M. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the subject use permit for installation of rooftop telecommunications equipment, subject to Conditions #1 through 3 provided in the staff report and with no further scheduled County Board review. ISSUES: This is a use permit request for Verizon Wireless to install rooftop telecommunications equipment at Mercedes-Benz of Arlington, a car dealership located at 585 North Glebe Road. No issues have been identified. SUMMARY: The applicant, Verizon Wireless, is proposing to install a telecommunications facility on an existing car dealership rooftop located at 585 North Glebe Road. The proposed equipment includes one (1) pole-mounted small cell antenna and one (1) equipment cabinet located on the northwestern portion of the Mercedes-Benz of Arlington building rooftop. The proposed facility is needed for capacity, in order to offload demand from telecommunications sites in the vicinity, and the location has been deemed by the applicant a network user traffic hot County Manager: ##### County Attorney: ***** Staff: Michael Cullen, DCPHD, Planning Division 16. PLA-7040

spot due to its proximity to a heavily trafficked area. A number of other sites in the vicinity were reviewed but did not meet the coverage objective or were unavailable due to future development concerns or leasing issues. Additional coverage is necessary to meet Verizon Wireless s responsibility under its federal licenses as well as to meet the company s minimum coverage objectives, and the proposed location represents the least visual impact to the site and surrounding area while meeting wireless service coverage objectives. The applicant has agreed to conditions that will ensure equipment will be designed to match the appearance of the existing building and that a community liaison is available. The proposed use permit is compliant with the County s Telecommunications Guidelines and with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements, as well as with the ACZO. Verizon Wireless is licensed by the FCC and is required to operate in full compliance with FCC rules and regulations. Federal law prohibits localities from basing a decision on the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions if the facility complies with FCC regulations. Furthermore, the proposal is consistent with the Interim Guidelines for Telecommunications Facilities on County-Owned Property, which also applies to private properties and encourages the placement of antennas on existing structures. The use will not: (1) adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood, (2) be detrimental to the public welfare or (3) be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends that the County Board approve the subject use permit, subject to Conditions #1 through 3 provided in the staff report and with no further scheduled County Board review. BACKGROUND: The subject site is Mercedes-Benz of Arlington, a retail car dealership constructed by-right. There are no special exception uses approved on the property, and existing rooftop structures are for the building s mechanical equipment. The following provides additional information about the site and location: Site: The 40,020 square foot site is at the northeast corner of the intersection at Columbia Pike and Carlin Springs Road. The property is bounded by commercial uses to the north, west, and south, while Phoenix House Counseling Center and low-rise attached housing are to the east. The adjacent properties are zoned C-2 Service Commercial-Community Business District, C-O-2.5 Mixed Use District, and CM Limited Industrial District. Zoning: The site is zoned C-2 Service Commercial-Community Business District and CM Limited Industrial District. Land Use: The subject site is designated on the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) as Medium Office-Apartment-Hotel, and within the North Quincy Street Coordinated Mixed- Use District under Note #14. Neighborhood: The site is located in the Ashton Heights neighborhood, and adjacent to the Bluemont and Buckingham neighborhoods. Staff contacted all three civic associations, and Ashton Heights Civic Association requested additional information, but has not responded with comments as of the date of this report. The Bluemont Civic Association reported no issues with the application. The Buckingham Community Civic Association has not responded with any comments as of the date of this report. U-3409-15-1 Mercedes-Benz of Arlington - 2 - Verizon Wireless PLA-7040

Figure 1: Location Proposed Equipment Location Mercedes-Benz of Arlington DISCUSSION: In order to increase service in high usage areas within the County, Verizon Wireless is proposing to install one (1) pole-mounted small cell antenna and one (1) equipment cabinet located on the northwestern portion of the lower elevation rooftop of the Mercedes-Benz of Arlington building. An access ladder is proposed on the south side of the rooftop. The proposed facility is needed for capacity, in order to offload demand from telecommunications sites in the vicinity, and the location has been deemed by the applicant a network user traffic hot spot due to its proximity to a heavily trafficked area. The existing building rooftop height is approximately 25 above ground level (AGL). The proposed antenna will be mounted no taller than a radial center (RAD) height of 39 AGL, mounted on a 15 pole for a total height of 40 AGL and set back approximately 6 from the building edge. The single antenna panel is approximately 26.6 by 20.5 in size. Staff expressed some concern over potential visual impact by the proposed location of the rooftop pole toward the front of the building. The applicant has noted that in seeking an ideal location for the installation of a small cell antenna, the RF engineers look for a site that would provide an elevation of between 30 and 40 feet. Heights above this elevation affect coverage area, and a number of other sites in the vicinity were reviewed but either did not meet the coverage objective or were unavailable due to future development concerns or leasing issues. No photo-simulations of the proposed installation have been included with the use permit application, but the applicant has provided documentation clarifying why the site and rooftop location are necessary for a small cell antenna. A number of sites were reviewed that would meet the coverage requirement in the Ballston area, but most were removed from consideration due to future development plans, inability to lease, or engineering issues. The applicant also U-3409-15-1 Mercedes-Benz of Arlington - 3 - Verizon Wireless PLA-7040

provided a technical explanation, attached to this report, explaining how alternative rooftop antenna locations would impact the height and number of antennas needed to meet coverage requirements. After reviewing these alternatives, staff agrees that the proposed location represents the least visual impact to the site and surrounding area while meeting Verizon Wireless responsibility to provide wireless services under its federal licenses. The applicant has agreed to conditions where the proposed antenna and associated utility connection equipment shall match the exterior appearance and/or color of the existing building (Condition #1). This condition will be applicable to any future collocations that may be considered administratively by the Zoning Administrator. As designed and located, no harmful emissions or electrical interference will occur from this telecommunications facility. Staff also proposes that the information for the facility s community liaison be shared with the Ashton Heights, Bluemont, and Buckingham Community Civic Associations prior to issuance of a building permit for the added equipment (Condition #2), and that non-functioning or inactive antennas be removed within 90 days after cessation of use (Condition #3). Furthermore, the applicant shall provide photo documentation and a letter detailing the removal of nonfunctioning equipment to the Zoning Administrator. Figure 2: Layout Plan U-3409-15-1 Mercedes-Benz of Arlington - 4 - Verizon Wireless PLA-7040

Figure 3: Building Elevation Figure 4: Approximate Location of Pole-Mounted Antenna Image Source: Penney Design Group The facility will be unstaffed and require only infrequent visits by maintenance personnel. Verizon Wireless will operate this facility in full compliance with Federal, State and County ordinances and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Federal law prohibits localities from basing a decision on the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions if the facility complies with FCC regulations. Furthermore, the Interim Guidelines for Placement of Telecommunications Facilities on County-Owned Property (Telecommunications Guidelines) was used to evaluate the application. The Telecommunication Guidelines offers direction in the way of design, visual impact, and compliance with FCC regulations, among other things. The Telecommunications Guidelines can be applied to telecommunications facilities on privately owned property as well as County-owned property. The Telecommunications Guidelines encourages the location of new antennas on existing structures, as opposed to constructing a new pole. The proposed antennas and equipment meet these criteria. Attached are plans depicting the location and general appearance of the proposed antennas and associated equipment. U-3409-15-1 Mercedes-Benz of Arlington - 5 - Verizon Wireless PLA-7040

CONCLUSION: The proposed use permit is compliant with the County s Telecommunications Guidelines and with FCC requirements, as well as with the ACZO. The proposed location represents the least visual impact to the site and surrounding area while meeting Verizon Wireless responsibility to provide wireless service coverage. The applicant has agreed to conditions that will ensure equipment will be designed to match the appearance of the existing building and that a community liaison is available. Therefore, staff recommends that the County Board approve the subject use permit, subject to use permit Conditions #1 through 3 provided below and with no further scheduled County Board review. Conditions #1 through #3: 1. The applicant agrees that the Verizon Wireless telecommunications facility on the existing building at 585 North Glebe Road will be installed as shown on plans dated September 30, 2014 and that the telecommunications facility, consisting of one (1) small cell antenna, one (1) equipment cabinet, and other related equipment, will be constructed as shown on the application package dated March 3, 2015 and approved by the County Board on June 13, 2015. The applicant agrees that the above-referenced antenna and equipment shall be designed and/or painted to match the existing building. The applicant agrees that any additional installation of antennas or related equipment on the site shall be subject to review, and approval, by the Zoning Administrator through the administrative change process. The Zoning Administrator will approve such administrative changes if she finds that the additional antennas or equipment are contained within the limits of height and space allowed in the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance (ACZO) for the existing building and match the colors and exterior materials of the existing building. 2. The applicant agrees to identify a community liaison who shall be available to address any concerns regarding the facility operation. The name, telephone number, and electronic mail address of the liaison shall be provided to the Ashton Heights, Bluemont, and Buckingham Community Civic Associations and the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a building permit for installation of equipment related to the telecommunications facility. 3. The applicant agrees that any non-functioning Verizon Wireless antennas on the roof of the building shall be removed at the time of installation of any proposed new Verizon Wireless antennas. The applicant further agrees that, in the future, any Verizon Wireless antennas on the site shall be removed within ninety (90) days after cessation of use. The applicant agrees to submit to the Zoning Administrator a letter (within the aforementioned ninety (90) day period) listing the number and type of antennas and other related equipment that shall be removed including photo documentation demonstrating removal of non-functioning equipment. U-3409-15-1 Mercedes-Benz of Arlington - 6 - Verizon Wireless PLA-7040

601 550 C-O-2.5 615 N RANDOLPH ST 501 505 4013 4019 CM 5TH RD N 4012 4011 530 4004 616 C-2 RC 585 C-O-2.5 600 N GLEBE RD C-O-2.5 N QUINCY ST RA6-15 C-O RA6-15 RA8-18 U-3409-15-1 585 N. Glebe Rd. RPC # 14-061-073 Scale: ICase Location(s) 1:1,200 Note: These maps are for property location assistance only. They may not represent the latest survey and other information. Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development County Use Only Date Placard Posted By Removed

Verizon Wireless 9000 Junction Drive Annapolis Junction, MD 20701 June 19, 2015 Mr. Michael Cullen, AICP Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing and Development 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 Re: Ballston Common Cinema Analysis of additional rooftop locations Dear Mr. Cullen: This letter supplements Tracy Themak s email with regards to the additional rooftop locations that Verizon was asked to consider, to locate their antennas. The chosen antenna mounting height, depends on the area that we want to focus our signal (target coverage area), and also needs to take into account any clearance that we need for the RF signal, to ensure that the RF signal will not be obstructed by anything close to the antenna. Obstructions close to the antenna, can block the RF signal entirely, change the expected behavior of RF signal (the coverage pattern ) and also reflect the signal back to the antenna and become a source of interference which can greatly degrade the performance of the site. An antenna is used to shape and focus the RF signal. The RF signal fans out vertically and horizontally from the middle of the antenna (the radiation center). If you look at an antenna pattern, amongst other things, it will specify a vertical beamwidth (a measure of the extent that the signal will fan out vertically before it drops to half of its original output power), and a horizontal beamwidth (a measure of the extent that the signal will fan out horizontally before it drops to half of its original output power). At a minimum, we need to clear any obstacles within these vertical and horizontal beamwidths. In order to focus the RF signal to our target area and also ensure that it will not interfere with signal from other sites in the area, we need to tilt it down and point it in the direction of interest. Because of the physics involved in making an antenna; for a given frequency service band and for a given horizontal beamwidth, the shorter an antenna is the wider its vertical beamwidth. Bearing that in mind, the choice of a 4ft versus a 2ft antenna in this case, was basically so that we could have a narrower vertical beamwidth (7deg, versus 22deg) and so, not need to locate at a much higher rad center, in order to clear the obstacles on the roof.

The obstacles we had to clear on this roof, were the roof itself, and structures on the roof, mainly the pillar with the Mercedes Benz sign (if we were to locate, as suggested, behind it). The following are drawings showing geometrically, the rad centers we need to locate at, in order to clear the obstacles in the way of the RF signal. They are a comparison of Verizon s currently proposed location (A) versus the location that would require the highest rad center (C). Figure 1 is the elevation drawing with an overview of the 4 locations. Figure 2 shows the dimensions of the part of the building with a pitched roof Figure 3 shows VZW s original location (A), versus location C, illustrating the difference in the extent of the roof that the RF signal has to clear. Location C has to clear the entire length of the roof, and also clear the highest part of the pitched part of the roof (the height of the Apex of the roof, measured from the roof level is about 12ft). Figures 4,5 & 6 are to illustrate, the rad centers we need to locate at, to clear the obstacles on the roof, and the roof itself, with the longer and shorter antenna, at our original location, and location C, which would require the highest rad center of all the locations. Basically, the longer the set back of the antenna from the roof edge, or any obstruction for that matter, the higher the rad center of the antenna. Note that the drawings are not to scale, but length and heights have been included, so a geometrical calculation, can be done if need be, to verify the information presented. Figure 1: Elevation drawing with an overview of the 4 locations.

Figure 2: dimensions of the part of the building with a pitched roof Figure 3: VZW s original location (A), versus location C, illustrating the difference in the extent of the roof that the RF signal has to clear. Location C has to clear the entire lenth of the roof, and also clear the highest part of the pitched part of the roof (the height of the Apex of the roof, measured from the roof level is about 12ft).

Figure 4: Location A: how high we need to be in order to clear the roof at the downtilt that is needed. Figure 5: Location C with a 2ft antenna illustrating that we are obstructed by the roof, before we have even achieved the required downtilt.

Figure 6: Location C with a 4 foot antenna illustrating that we are able to comfortably clear the roof Sincerely, Mercy Luhanga Verizon Wireless RF Engineer

Michael Cullen From: Sent: To: Subject: Tracy Themak <tracythemak@donohuestearns.com> Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:50 AM Michael Cullen RE: U-3409 Mercedes Telecom Use Permit Application Michael, Verizon Wireless (VZW) site acquisition was able to give me the following additional information on the consideration of alternate locations for the small cell proposal at 585 North Glebe Road. 1. RHF Building at 4300 North Carlin Road This building is located directly adjacent to the Harris Teeter property and would have met the coverage objective but a new building is planned to be constructed in front and it would block most of Glebe Road. Currently, there are two (2) wireless carriers already installed, but with plans to develop the properties north of this location along Glebe Road that would further block coverage, VZW s radio frequency (RF) engineers ruled it out. 2. Harris Teeter Despite the landlord s interest, the lease agreement prevented them from leasing space to VZW. 3. Properties along Glebe Road from North Carlin Street to the Mazda dealership Because these properties have been sold and are in the development process, they were precluded from use. 4. Mercedes-Benz of Arlington Repair Shop the landlord here was interested, but wanted to utilize the dealership property across the street given the consideration of development of the repair shop parcel. 5. Building next to Ballston Common Mall - Much too high for a small cell installation to achieve necessary coverage. 6. Ballston Common Mall The location reviewed was owned by Buch Construction and they were not interested in leasing space. 7. Ballston Common Parking Garage This is County property and VZW was directed to pursue the privately-owned parcels that were possible. 8. Italian Restaurant This location did not offer the same level of coverage to both Glebe Road and the Harris Teeter parking lot. It should be noted that in seeking an ideal location for the installation of a small cell, site acquisition looks for a site that would provide an elevation of between thirty (30) and forty (40) feet. Heights above this affect coverage area. 1

I hope this additional information helps and please do not hesitate to contact me with any further questions. Thank you, Tracy Tracy Themak, Esq. 117 Oronoco Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 703.778.1988 2