Minutes of the Meeting Of the Design Review Committee of the Cotton Ranch Homeowners Association March 9, 2016

Similar documents
Procedure for Obtaining Design Review Committee Approval

SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION WOODMOOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

SUBMIT YOUR PIC APPLICATION:

MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

The Bluffs at Eagle. Design Review Application. Date Bluffs Lot Number Street Address. Address. and/or fax. Address. Owner (if different) Phone

Below is a list of items that are required to accompany the application prior to review by the Architectural Review Committee.

KMAC Meeting Minutes February 27, 2007

Landmarks Preservation Commission Tacoma Economic Development Department Culture and Tourism Division

SMALL PROJECTS & IMPROVEMENTS: DOG RUNS, PATIO ENCLOSURES & FENCES, EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS (Abbreviated Design Review Application)

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE TOWN APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL FORM AND APPLICATION

City of Lompoc Building & Safety Services Section 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc, CA Phone: Fax:

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND CHECK LIST

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HOMESITE CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL FORM AND APPLICATION

Modifications Committee Guidelines

SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

Niguel Shores Community Association Architectural Committee (AC) EXTERIOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL (EMS) FINAL APPLICATION

CHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Architectural Review Board Application For Modifications & Renovations

RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW

Applying for a Site Development Review

City of Cape May Historic Preservation Commission Monday, August 17, :30 PM

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION EXTERIOR PLAN / LANDSCAPE PLAN

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT OFFICE 3966 Archer Pkwy Cheyenne, WY Phone (307) Fax (307)

INDIGO LAKES HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW INTRODUCTION

SITE PLAN APPLICATION

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP 9611 SE 36 th Street, Mercer Island, WA (206)

Checklist for Minor Plan Modification

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT

CLIPPER ESTATES HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION DESIGN GUIDELINES

Home Improvement Application. Type of Improvement

Architectural Review Application

PEAK VIEW RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Architectural & Design Review Request Form

TOWN OF CLINTON PLANNING BOARD MEETING FINAL MINUTES December 15, 2015

WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305

PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Ventnor City Planning Board Minutes January 22, Atlantic Ave, Ventnor N.J 08406

Mailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip:

CITY OF LOMPOC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE BROCHURE ENCROACHMENT PERMITS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS

Applying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only)

Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

Promontory Architectural Review Committee

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OF WITCHDUCK LAKE DESIGN RULES & GUIDELINES

Clear Creek County Site Development

Estimated Cost of Project Contractor License No. Contractor Qualifier No.

White Lake Township Building Dept Highland Rd. (248) White Lake, MI Fax (248)

Residential Plot Plans

City of Cape May Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes April 28, 2011

SECTION 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

CITY OF ORANGE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FINAL April 4, 2018

CITY OF BURLINGAME - PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW

Cielito Lindo de Tubac Home Owners Association PAINTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Attachment A HERON RIDGE ESTATES RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING DESIGN COMMITTEE APPROVAL

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES

SVRA ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT

CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPLICATION PACKET

Signs, Canopies & Awnings City of Oshkosh Department of Community Development

ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS

Developer Design Review Submittal Requirements - SECTION 5

Disclaimer for Review of Plans

SECTION II PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Single-Family Dwelling Submittal Requirements

Ventnor City Planning Board Minutes May 9, 2018, 6:30pm 6201 Atlantic Ave, Ventnor N.J 08406

Amberfield Homeowners Association. Architectural Standards And Control Specifications. October 2001

R 1 Design Review Application

1 copy of all plans in pdf format and I copy of this form must be submitted, or it will be returned because it is an incomplete submittal.

KELLY WEST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o CAS, Inc N. Salem Street Apex, NC Phone: (919) <> Fax: (919)

CONWAY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MAY 12, Review and Acceptance of Minutes April 28, 2011

PROJECT ENTITLEMENT APPLICATION

Porter County Plan Commission

ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE (ACC) PROJECT APPROVAL REQUEST FORM

C I T Y O F M c K I N N E Y PLANNING

Owner / Architect Certification of Complete Documentation for the Additions and Remodels Conditional Approval Review

City of Santa Paula Planning Department

CITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET

Rezoning/OCP Amendment Application. Current OCP Designation. Proposed OCP Designation

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

AHWATUKEE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES AMENDED AND RESTATED Dec. 10, 2008 Effective April 1, 2009

What Plans Do I Need for a Building Permit?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of DESIGN REVIEW

TOWN OF AMHERST PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR SITE PLAN AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURE

NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) Checklist

Conceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City

Ventnor City Planning Board Minutes September 25, Atlantic Ave, Ventnor N.J 08406

Architectural Review Application New Application Processing Improvements

6.05 acres acres Single-family attached

SITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects)

CLAY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES September 11, 2017

INCOMPLETE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Construction Value: $

DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION

REFLECTION POINTE SUBMITTAL FORMS March 2018 Edition

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Request for Modification Review Information DO NOT COMMENCE ANY WORK PRIOR TO WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE BOARD IF DIRECTORS

Please Print Clearly. Applicant s Signature: Date:

CITY OF DES MOINES, IA PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 602 Robert D Ray Drive Des Moines, IA Phone:

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION

SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARDS A.1 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PLAN SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Article 4.0 Measurements and Exceptions

Transcription:

Minutes of the Meeting Of the Design Review Committee of the Cotton Ranch Homeowners Association March 9, 2016 A Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the Cotton Ranch Homeowners Association, Eagle County, Colorado, was held March 9, 2016. The meeting was held at the Creekside Grill, Cotton Ranch Road, Gypsum, Colorado, in accordance with the applicable statutes of the State of Colorado. Attendance The following Directors were present and acting: Larry Britt David Collins Chris Bystrom Tim O Brien (alternate) Mark Lehman (alternate) Also in attendance were: Leah KS Mayer Tom Pohl Scott Russell Linda Hoyt Don Dotson KT Landreth Jeanne Landreth Call to Order The Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the Cotton Ranch Homeowners Assoc. was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Minutes The Committee reviewed the minutes of the January 27, 2016 and February 24, 2016 DRC meetings. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, it was RESOLVED to approve the January 27, 2016 and February 24, 2016 minutes. New Development Portions of filings 3, 4 & 5 Scott Russell Scott came to introduce himself to the committee and provide an overview of their development in Sky Legend. This land has been purchased from Pauls Corp. Page 1

They expect to begin building homes along Legend Drive on 3 currently developed lots this year. They will be submitting to the DRC shortly. The homes will be a rotation of possibly 4 single-family model types. There are 76 total lots. The DRC discussed being open to discussions about streamlining an approval process with this developer. Suggestions by the committee include providing complete submittals and not changing architects during the process. Scott asked the committee members to provide feedback on which homes in Sky Legend they like or dislike. This developer and JT Landreth asked if they could change the sales sign currently in place at the intersection of Cotton ranch Road & Valley Road to advertise their developments. This would be acceptable to the DRC if they submit a proposal. New Home Final Review 280 Red Fox, Lot 97 - Katherine Hoyt, owner; Don Dotson, builder The Owner has hired an architect, Brent Alm, to provide more information on the drawings. Most of the missing information was provided in new drawings which were brought to the meeting. The roof pitches have been revised. The height of the building to existing grade ranges between 29-0 and 32-6. This was acceptable to the Committee. There are a few pitches lower than 5:12 and the committee accepts these. The roof will be cor-ten or a rusted type corrugated metal. The new grading no longer extends onto the adjacent lot. A swale will be left near the property line. The builder may add retaining walls along the side of the home to lessen the grading. This will be reviewed during construction. The landscape plan has straight lines showing the change from natural grass to lawn. This should be a more natural, curved edge. The builder agreed that the transition from lawn and natural grasses will abut to what is on the adjacent properties. Page 2

The deck will be Trex. Railing details have been provided. Galvanized flashing will not be allowed. The lattice under the deck is acceptable. All wood will be stained, none painted. The front door will be solid wood. A committee member commented that the door seems out of proportion to the front of the home. The soffit will be stained wood. The irrigation detail must be included on the drawings. RESOLVED to approve the final design for the home at 265 Red Fox with minor drafting changes discussed above. New Buildings - Villas at Cotton Ranch New Duplex (Site Review) 72 & 74 Black Bear (Building #3) New Triplex (Building Review) 62, 64, 66 Black Bear (Building #4) New Duplex (Building & Site Review) 52, 54 Black Bear (Building #5) New Duplex (Building & Site Review) 42, 44 Black Bear (Building #6) JT Landreth, developer The committee listened to the developer s concerns regarding the DRC submittal process. He is interested in making the process more streamlined for this project and presented some ideas. He plans to submit Phase 2, the next 5 buildings, to the DRC at once and asked if he could have approval for all 5 at once. He proposes to stagger the start times as needed based on construction completion and sales. If this is agreed upon, the developer would submit complete drawing sets, specific to each building, at one time for each phase. The phases will include approximately 5 or 6 buildings. Once these are approved as a whole, he will notify the DRC as to specific start dates. He will pay the fees before starting excavation on any building. After approval of the buildings in each phase, the developer offered to cloud any changes to the drawings when revisions are submitted. The developer requested to have all staking waived from DRC approval. The committee requested that the submittals be complete and thorough. The committee would like to see a streetscape of all the buildings in a row for the future phases. Page 3

This proposal, presented by the developer to the DRC to streamline the process, was agreeable, but not voted on. It will be reviewed by the committee and the HOA Board. The proposal to charge hourly fees to the developer for the DR Administrator will also be reviewed. Items that have been missing from previous submittals were discussed. Grading will be waived as long as the proposed main level elevation and street curb elevation are shown on the enlarged site plan. Setbacks, easements and lot coverage should also be shown on this drawing. The proposed building elevations for Buildings #4, #5 & #6 were reviewed and approved in this meeting. Previous building sets (#1, #2 & #3) were looked at during the meeting because JT did not bring hard copies of all the new buildings to the meeting. The drawing sets for #5 &#6 do not yet have coordinated addresses and lot information. These will need to be coordinated prior to being stamped by the DR administrator. Balcony detailing on the triplex was reviewed. It differs from the approved drawing elevations. The committee approved the current detailing on the balconies with 4x4 wire instead of wood pickets. The developer agreed to add the material notes to the triplex drawings. Exterior materials in this phase will remain the same as previously approved buildings including the garage doors. If the developer decides to vary the materials, these will need to be approved by the DRC. Exterior building colors for buildings #3, #4, #5 & #6 have not yet been presented or approved. It was suggested that all new color schemes should be presented at once for review by the DRC. The variation in architects for this development was discussed as a factor contributing to the frustration at the DRC approval process. Consistently submitted information would make the process smoother. RESOLVED to approve the elevations and large site plan as presented for buildings #4, #5, #6. The drawing sets will need to be coordinated and fees paid before new construction work can begin on these homes. Page 4

RESOLVED to approve the balcony as built on the triplex (Building #2) for the future proposed triplex buildings. Minor Exterior Alteration 94 Black Bear Helena Knight, owner The homeowner is requesting to install a retractable awning on the rear of her home. There is no specific mention of awnings in the design guidelines. There are several references that building items should not appear tacked on. After discussion, the committee members would prefer to see a more permanent solution such as a trellis or trees for shading in the rear of this home. RESOLVED to deny the installation of a retractable awning for the home at 94 Black Bear. Adjournment RESOLVED to adjourn the meeting of the Cotton Ranch Homeowners Association Design Review Committee this 9 th day of March, 2016. Respectfully submitted, Leah KS Mayer, Secretary for the meeting Page 5