noise is generally defined as unwanted sound

Similar documents
M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia

Environmental Noise Propagation

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

IS INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

Appendix N. Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

Investigation of Noise Spectrum Characteristics for an Evaluation of Railway Noise Barriers

Field noise measurement in the huge industrial plants for accurate prediction

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels

Problems with the INM: Part 2 Atmospheric Attenuation

Defence Infrastructure Organisation RAF Brize Norton

Please refer to the figure on the following page which shows the relationship between sound fields.

Noise Assessment for Planning Purposes - as per TAN11

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

January 2012 Noise Impact Assessment Report for Proposed Cable Tow System For Wakeboarding & Water-skiing Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 4

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

This section includes a detailed guide to what sound attenuation is and how to attain the optimum performance.

Bickerdike Allen Partners

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

REVISED NOISE IMPACT STUDY

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT MEATH GREEN OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Proposed Hydropower Archimedean Screw Osney Lock and Weir, Oxford. Noise Impact Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

SILVERSTONE CIRCUIT MASTERPLAN APPENDIX H NOISE & VIBRATION

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Liddell Coal Operations

Sound Reflection from a Motorway Barrier

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

Acoustics Technical Note

Muswellbrook Coal Company

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Sheringham Shoal Cawston, Norfolk. Substation Noise Assessment Summary

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Aircraft Noise Monitoring Data from Noise Monitoring Terminals (NMTs)

THE ATTENUATION OF NOISE ENTERING BUILDINGS USING QUARTER- WAVE RESONATORS: RESULTS FROM A FULL SCALE PROTOTYPE. C.D.Field and F.R.

Muswellbrook Coal Company

A REPORT OF MONITORING OF AIRCRAFT NOISE FROM STANSTED AIRPORT AT HELIONS BUMPSTEAD, ESSEX BETWEEN SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER 2008

Analysis on Acoustic Attenuation by Periodic Array Structure EH KWEE DOE 1, WIN PA PA MYO 2

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

WIND TURBINE ACOUSTICS - a sneak preview on research topics- Dr. Andree Altmikus ENERCON Research & Development

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

ACOUSTIC SIGNATURE OF OPEN CUT COAL MINES

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

Liddell Coal Operations

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT FELBRIDGE NOVEMBER 2010 TO OCTOBER 2011

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HEVER FEBRUARY 2011 TO JANUARY 2012

HARMONOISE: NOISE PREDICTIONS AND THE NEW EUROPEAN HARMONISED PREDICTION MODEL

HIIUMAA OFFSHORE WINDFARM, ESTONIA LOW FREQUENCY NOISE AND INFRASOUND SURVEY

A STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS AND PREDICTION METHOD OF NOISE FROM CONCRETE RAILWAY BRIDGE

REVERBERATION CHAMBER FOR EMI TESTING

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Room Acoustics. March 27th 2015

International Journal of Technical Research and Applications e-issn: , Volume 3, Issue 4 (July-August 2015), PP.

A Brief Review Of The Hoosac Wind Turbine Noise Studies

City and Borough of Juneau

City of El Segundo. APPLICATION FOR AN AMPLIFIED SOUND OR NOISE PERMIT ESMC SECTION Amplified Sound/Noise Permit No:

Performance of Roadside Sound Barriers with Sound Absorbing Edges

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

TERRESTRIAL S Noise Barriers

FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Contents

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring

METHODOLOGY FOR VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE FOR NOISE ATTENUATION CALCULATION ACCORDING TO ISO STANDARD

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring. and Compliance Assessment September Report Number Q R2.

NOISE IMPACT STUDY. Benton Boarding and Daycare 5673 Fourth Line Road Ottawa, Ontario City of Ottawa File No. D

sound is a longitudinal, mechanical wave that travels as a series of high and low pressure variations

January 15, File: A. Urban Systems Ltd Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9. Attention: Tim Stevens. Dear Tim:

A low-budget road traffic noise model for individual building evaluation - a case study in Western Australia

PREDICTING SOUND LEVELS BEHIND BUILDINGS - HOW MANY REFLECTIONS SHOULD I USE? Apex Acoustics Ltd, Gateshead, UK

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

A comparing overview on ECAC Doc.29 3 rd Edition and the new German AzB

Low frequency noise near wind farms and in other environments

M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Environmental Noise Survey For. Vista Coal Project. Prepared for: Coalspur Mines Ltd. Prepared by: S. Bilawchuk, M.Sc., P.Eng.

Application of Graphical User Interface of Matlab for Opencast Mining Machinery Noise Prediction

Liddell Coal Operations

Application of Grid Infrastructure to Noise Map Calculation of Large City Areas

Ultrasonic Level Detection Technology. ultra-wave

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HAYWARDS HEATH OCTOBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012

Sound-Tech Xpress Systems The Sound Choice for Acoustical Solutions. Schools/Univ. Commercial/Office. And Much More. Gov./Military

USING THE RAILWAY NOISE MODEL (RWNM) FOR DETAILED NOISE ANALYSES AT SOME INTERESTING RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

The Research on Application of Cadna/A Software in Noise Prediction of Urban Substation

A Method for Estimating Noise from Full-Scale Distributed Exhaust Nozzles

Transcription:

noise is generally defined as unwanted sound

Situation/noise source SPL[dBA] pressure [µpa] Avg subj. descript. 30m from a military jet aircraft take off 140 200,000,000 Painful, intolerable Pop concert 105 3,500,000 Night club 100 2,000,000 Pop concert at mixer desk 98 1,600,000 Passing heavy goods vehicle at 7m 90 630,000 Very noisy Ringing alarm clock at 1m 80 200,000 Wake up sound Domestic vacuum cleaner at 3m 70 63,000 Noisy Business office 60 20,000 Normal conversation at 1m 55 11,000 The reading room of the British Museum 35 1,100 Bedroom in a quiet area with the windows shut 30 630 Very quiet Country location w/o any identifiable sound 20 200 Theoretical threshold of hearing 0 20 Uncanny silence

the sound level falls with increasing distance from the source doubling the distance from a point source produces a reduction in sound level of 6dB if the distance from the line source doubles, then the sound pressure halves, that is, 3dB per doubling of distance

when sound is incident on a building (or any acoustically hard surface) a major portion can be reflected back off the façade rather than absorbed if the receiver is the occupier of a building, it is the level at the façade, usually 1m in front of it, that should be measured (calculated)

Relevant methodologies for noise measurement and evaluation BS 4142:1997 Method for rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas BS 5228:1997 Noise and vibration control on construction and open sites BS 7445:1991 Description and measurement of environmental noise BS 8233:1999 Sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings Code of Practice

other documents: CONCAWE EEMUA Noise procedure specification and guide 140&141 Minerals Planning Guidance MPG11 Planning Policy Guidance Note PPG24 ISO 9613-2 1996 Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors World Health Organisation Guidelines for Community Noise Noise Emission in the Environment by Equipment for use Outdoors Regulations

Criterion Typical Situations Design Range Reasonable resting/sleeping conditions Good Reasonable Living rooms 30 40 Bedrooms 30 35 The time period T should be appropriate for the activity involved (e.g. 2300-0700 for bedrooms) For a reasonable standard in bedrooms at night, individual noise events (measured with FAST time weighting) should not normally exceed 45dB LAmax

Noise change db(a) Impact 0 None 0 to 3 Slight 3 to 5 Moderate 5 to 10 Substantial 10 and above Severe

Noise Exposure Categories (PPG24) A B C D Noise need not be considered as a determining factor in granting planning permission, although the noise level at the high end of the category should not be regarded as desirable. Noise should be taken into account when determining planning applications, and where appropriate, conditions imposed to ensure an adequate level of protection. Planning permission should not normally be granted. Where it is considered that permission should be given, for example, because there are no alternative quieter sites available, conditions should be imposed to ensure a commensurate level of protection against noise. Planning permission should normally be refused

Noise Source Noise Exposure Category (PPG24) Time Period A B C D Road Traffic 0700 2300 <55 55 63 63 72 >72 2300 0700 <45 45 57 57 66 <66 Rail Traffic 0700 2300 <55 55 66 66 74 >74 2300 0700 <45 45 59 59 66 >66 Air Traffic 0700 2300 <57 57 66 66 72 >72 2300 0700 <48 48 57 57 66 >66 Mixed Sources 0700 2300 <55 55 63 63 72 >72 2300 0700 <45 45-57 57-66 >66

noise predictions can be useful in three circumstances: at a proposed facility where noise must be quantified before construction to ensure that no noise problems will arise from the installation once it is operational, and to allow Permit noise limits to be set if necessary at existing installations where the effectiveness of various noise control techniques needs to be reviewed and to establish a target Permit level that takes BAT into account at existing installations where changes to operations or the process are proposed

main features of an environmental noise assessment: baseline prediction assessment mitigation presentation follow up

BAT (Best Available Techniques) include: costs and benefits the technical characteristics of the installation concerned geographical location local environmental conditions

noise levels at sensitive receptors can be minimized by: reduction at source ensuring adequate distance between the source and receiver the use of barriers between the source and receiver

The amount of noise radiated depends on: the sound power level of the source the nature of the building structure gaps in the fabric of the building the number of sources

The noise received depends on the degree of attenuation provided by: distance from source attenuation provided by the type of ground screening by walls, banks, other buildings the wind direction meteorological conditions, such as temperature inversions and gradients atmospheric absorption

CUW, UK

Porto Montenegro den day noise lev el after during bef ore reconstruction 13 59 1 Noise levels db(a) <30.0 <40.0 30.0 40.0 <= <35.0 <42.0 35.0 42.0 <= <40.0 <44.0 40.0 44.0 <= <45.0 <46.0 45.0 46.0 <= <50.0 <48.0 50.0 48.0 <= <55.0 <50.0 55.0 50.0 <= <60.0 <52.0 60.0 52.0 <= <65.0 <54.0 65.0 54.0 <= <70.0 <56.0 70.0 56.0 <= <75.0 <58.0 75.0 58.0 <= <80.0 <60.0 80.0 60.0 <= 5 4 3 1,2 Signs and symbols Road axis Emission line Surf ace Main building Area Area source Point source Length Scale 1:10000 0 50 100 200 300 400 m CUW-UK

3 HRAPAVOST Voda, z 0 = 0.0001m Ledina, z 0 = 0.03m Šuma, z 0 = 0.3m Naselja, z 0 = 1m 1 2 8 11 4 6 9 7 10 5 PRIJEMNICI BUKE 1. Kličevac 2. Rečica 3. Ram 4. Zatonje 5. Ostrovo 6. Biskuplje 7. Kisiljevo 8. Kurjače 9. Popovac 10. Topolovnik 11. Majilovac

KARAKTERISTIKE IZVORA BUKE Tip VGT: ENERCON E- 82 Naznacena snaga: 2000 kw Precnik rotora: 82 m Visina centra rotora lopatica: 138 m Broj lopatica: 3 Površina koju prebrišu lopatice: 5281 m 2 Obimna brzina: 6 19.5 o/min Brzina vrha lopatice: Brzina vetra pri ukljucenju: 2.5 m/s Naznacena brzina vetra: 12 m/s LwA,ref (Z=138m) VGT8 25 80 m/s VGT7 99.6 db(a) VGT6 VGT5 VGT4 VGT3 VGT2 VGT1 VGT1 VGT2 VGT3 VGT4 VGT5 VGT6 VGT7 VGT8 X (m) 5619.5 5579.5 5549.5 5500.5 5372.5 5174.5 4996.5 4838.5 Y (m) 9070.4 8744.4 8458.4 8131.4 7825.4 7584.4 7301.4 7094.4 Z (m) 214.6 250.8 276.8 306.3 306.5 281.2 255.7 233.8 61.5 125 500 1 2 4 8 Hz Hz Hz khz khz khz khz Zbir db(a) 81 86.4 95.6 94.0 88.3 82.9 71.8 99.6

14000 13500 13000 12500 12000 11500 11000 10500 9500 10000 9000 8500 8000 7500 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 14000 14000 3 13500 13500 13000 13000 12500 12500 12000 12000 11500 11500 11000 11000 10500 10500 10000 Projekat vetrogeneratorske farme "Veliko Brdo" Noise map 1 - Kličevac 2 - Rečica 3 - Ram 4 - Zatonje 5 - Ostrovo 6 - Biskuplje 7 - Kisiljevo 8 - Kurjače 9 - Topolovnik 10 - Majilovac Map 3 10000 2 9500 5 4 9500 Noise levels night 9000 9000 8500 8500 8000 8000 Signs and symbols in db(a) Road axis 1 7500 7500 7000 7000 6500 6500 6000 6000 6 7 5500 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 < 10-13 - 16-19 - 22-25 - 28-31 - 34-37 - 40-43 - 46-49 - 52 >= 52 Emission line Surface Main building Auxiliary building Wall Terrain edge Point receiver Point source 5500 Length scale 1:50000 5000 5000 4500 4500 10 4000 1 1.5 4000 8 3500 0 0.250.5 3500 9 3000 3000 2500 2500 2000 2000 14000 13500 13000 12500 12000 11500 11000 10500 9500 10000 9000 8500 8000 7500 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 Dirigent Acoustics 2 km