Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 : : Defendants. :

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

mew Doc 867 Filed 07/11/17 Entered 07/11/17 15:53:25 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 37 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

FILED BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/21/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 117 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/21/2017

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

THIS IS AN ASBESTOS LITIGATION CASE FILED UNDER N.Y.C.A.L.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

[Investment Company Act Release No ; ] New Mountain Finance Corporation, et al.; Notice of Application

Case 2:05-cv JCJ Document 13 Filed 12/27/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session

Case 5:16-cv HRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1400 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 23, 2005 Session

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

MAY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND SANDRA EVANS, Plaintiff, VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY 1 Hayden Drive Petersburg, VA 23806

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

Case 3:02-cv EBB Document 34 Filed 01/20/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff,

David M. Friedman (DF4278) Richard F. Casher KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ROYAL PARK INVESTMENTS SA/NV, Plaintiff, vs. Index No /2012 (Ramos, J.

Case 2:09-cv PJD-PJK Document 19 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Via Hand Delivery T-C Mineral County 911 v. Frontier West Virginia Inc. co M MU N I c AT I o N s

Case 2:15-cv JLR Document 8 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

vs. THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

4. Jeffrey A. Goldberg and Andrew Federhar are attorneys who represented the Kingman Airport Authority with respect to the condemnation proceeding

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE

Case 5:15-cv EJD Document Filed 12/17/18 Page 1 of 6

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

SAMPLE. This document is presented for guidance only and does not completely state either Oklahoma law or OCC regulations.

Case 1:18-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

MULTIPLE ENTRY CONSOLIDATED GROUP TSA USER AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, ALABAMA

May 20, The Board authorize settlement of the above-entitled action in the amount of $450,

Julie A. Dunne. Focus Areas. Overview. Professional and Community Affiliations

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 180 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H Defendants.

Yee ) and A.V. Jewelry Export-Import, Ltd. ( AV Jewelry ) (collectively Plaintiffs ), for their

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1082 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 5

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19

Robinson, Carrie v. Vanderbilt University

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 264 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

mew Doc 2823 Filed 03/13/18 Entered 03/13/18 15:59:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Textron/Harman Fair Fund c/o Analytics Consulting LLC P.O. Box 2011 Chanhassen, MN PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

Case 1:13-cv ML Document 194 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2013

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 265 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3

Rocco E. Testani, Partner

Elena R. Baca. Los Angeles. Orange County. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education

EMPLOYEE SECONDMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Roy W. Arnold Partner Business Litigation. Union Trust Building Pittsburgh, PA

PLATINUM EQUITIES CLASS ACTION. Notice of Certification. This Notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. 20. PMIC 1 21.

SHARON DONALDSON v. EMPIRE CAR RENTAL COMPANY *

1552- Index / Karen Gravano, /14 Plaintiff-Respondent,

THIS IS AN ASBESTOS LITIGATION CASE FILED UNDER N.Y.C.A.L.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7 Victor J. Kisch, OSB No. 941038 vjkisch@stoel.com Todd A. Hanchett, OSB No. 992787 tahanchett@stoel.com John B. Dudrey, OSB No. 083085 jbdudrey@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-3380 Facsimile: (503) 220-2480 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MICHAEL MAKANEOLE, Case No.: 3:14-cv-1528 v. Plaintiff, SOLARWORLD INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC.; SOLARWORLD INDUSTRIES AMERICA, LP; SOLARWORLD INDUSTRIES SERVICES, LLC; SOLARWORLD POWER PROJECTS, INC., RANDSTAD PROFESSIONALS US, LP, and KELLY SERVICES, INC., SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant. In response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, defendants SolarWorld Industries America, Inc., SolarWorld Industries America, LP, SolarWorld Industries Services, LLC, Page 1 - SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 78883609.1 0039698-00016

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 2 of 7 SolarWorld Power Projects, Inc. ("SolarWorld" or "SolarWorld defendants") admit, deny and allege as follows: 1. In response to paragraphs 3.-7, 15-17 and 58 of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, SolarWorld admits that SolarWorld Industries America, Inc. is a domestic corporation; that SolarWorld Industries America LP is a foreign limited partnership; that SolarWorld Industries Services LLC is a foreign limited liability company; that SolarWorld Power Projects, Inc. is a foreign corporation; and that the Oregon Secretary of State lists 25300 NE Evergreen Road, Hillsboro, Oregon, 97124 as an address of record for each entity. SolarWorld further admits that the Court has personal jurisdiction over it for purposes of this case. Except as expressly admitted, SolarWorld defendants deny the allegations contained in these paragraphs. 2. SolarWorld denies the allegations in paragraphs 18, 24, 69, 77, 79-84, 86, and 125 of Plaintiff s Amended Complaint. 3. Paragraphs 1, 14, 19-22, 25-27, 30-31, 33, 55-57, 68, 71-72, 85, 87-88, 90-97, 99-114, 116-119, 126-132 and 139-147 of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint state legal conclusions or descriptions of the action to which no response is required. To the extent these paragraphs raise factual allegations, SolarWorld denies them. 4. Paragraphs 8-13, 60-62, 64-65, and 121-122 relate to parties other than SolarWorld. SolarWorld lacks sufficient information to form a belief as to these allegations and therefore denies them. 5. In response to paragraphs 2, 28, 59, 63, 73, 120, 123-124, and 133-34, SolarWorld admits that SolarWorld Industries America, Inc. employed plaintiff from February 2, 2012 through January 23, 2013, as an at-will, non-exempt employee at its facility in Hillsboro, Oregon. Except as expressly admitted, SolarWorld denies the allegations in these paragraphs. Page 2 - SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 78883609.10039698-00016

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 3 of 7 6. In response to paragraphs 29, 32-33, 74-76, 78, 89, and 135-138, SolarWorld admits that SolarWorld Industries America, Inc. used an electronic timekeeping system at its Hillsboro, Oregon facility to record its hourly employees' working time during a portion of the period alleged to be relevant in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Except as expressly admitted, SolarWorld denies the allegations in these paragraphs. 7. In response to paragraphs 34-54 and 66-67 of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, SolarWorld denies that this action is appropriate for class certification, and further denies any factual allegations that relate to "class members." Although SolarWorld admits that plaintiff's counsel sent various letters purporting to be ORCP 32 H notices, those letters did not comply with ORCP 32H ORS 652.150, 652.200 and/or 653.055. SolarWorld expressly reserves the right to contend such letters constituted inadequate and improper notice. Except as expressly admitted, SolarWorld denies the allegations in these paragraphs. 8. Except as expressly admitted, SolarWorld defendants deny all factual allegations contained in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Without assuming plaintiff's burden of proof as to any claim or issue, SolarWorld defendants assert the following affirmative defenses: FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Failure To State A Claim) granted. 9. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be Page 3 - SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 78883609,10039698-00016

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 4 of 7 SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Statute of Limitations) 10. One or more of the claims in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is outside the applicable statute of limitations. THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (De Minimis) 11. Plaintiff seeks compensation for time that is properly excluded from the hoursworked calculation under the de minimis doctrine. FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (All Wages Paid) 12. SolarWorld defendants timely paid plaintiff all wages due and owing. FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Failure To Provide Written Notice-ORS 652.150, 652.200, 653.055, ORCP 32 H) 13. Plaintiff failed to provide SolarWorld defendants with adequate written notice of his claims prior to filing suit. SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Claim/Issue Preclusion) 14. Plaintiffs claims are barred in whole or part under the doctrines of issue and/or claim preclusion based on the conduct of a prior filed action. / / Page 4 SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 78883609.10039698-00016

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 5 of 7 was not paid. SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Failure to Report) 15. Plaintiff failed to report to SolarWorld defendants that he performed work and EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Good Faith) 16. Any actions taken by SolarWorld defendants with respect to Plaintiff were taken in good faith with reasonable grounds to believe such conduct comported with permissible interpretations of applicable laws. NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Not Willful) 17. Any alleged statutory violations were not willful. TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (No Class or Collective Action) 18. Plaintiff's claims are not entitled to any class or collective treatment and cannot be certified as a class or collective action. Plaintiff. ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (No Employment Relationship) 19. Plaintiff's claims fail as to each SolarWorld defendant who did not employ ADDITIONAL DEFENSES 20. SolarWorld defendants reserve the right to amend this Answer to assert any additional defenses or affirmative defenses as may become available or apparent at any future date. Page 5 - SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 78883609.1 0039698-00016

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 6 of 7 WHEREFORE, SolarWorld defendants pray for judgment as follows: 1. Dismissing all of plaintiff's claims with prejudice; 2. Awarding SolarWorld defendants their costs, disbursements, and attorneys' fees incurred in defending this action; and 3. For such other relief as deemed just and equitable. DATED: April 23, 2015. STOEL RIVES LLP s/ John B. Dudrey Victor J. Kisch, OSB No. 941038 Todd A. Hanchett, OSB No. 992787 John B. Dudrey, OSB No. 083085 Telephone: (503) 224-3380 Attorneys for Defendants SolarWorld Industries America, Inc., SolarWorld Industries America, LP, SolarWorld Industries Services, LLC, and SolarWorld Power Projects, Inc. Page 6 - SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 78883609.1 0039698-00016

Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served the foregoing SOLARWORLD DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE on the following named person(s) on the date indicated below by mailing with postage prepaid Email 0 ECF to said person(s) a true copy thereof, contained in a sealed envelope, addressed to said person(s) at his last-known address(es) indicated below. David Schuck Schuck Law LLC 10013 NE Hazel Dell Avenue, #178 Vancouver, WA 98685 Email: dschuck@wageclaim.org Gerald L. Maatman Jr. Seyfarth Shaw LLP Suite 2400 131 South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60603-5577 Email: gmaatman@seyfarth.com John S. Snelling Toni J. Read Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP 1180 Peachtree Street, NE., Suite 29000 Atlanta, GA 30309 Email: john.snelling@lewisbrisbois.com Email: toni.read@lewisbrisbois.com Andrew S. Moses Gordon & Polscer, L.L.C. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 650 Portland, OR 97225 Email: amoses@gordon-polscer.com Clarence M. Belnavis Fisher & Phillips LLP 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1250 Portland, OR 97204 Email: cbelnavis@laborlawyers.com Karen A Moore 10013 NE Hazel Dell Avenue, Ste 338 Vancouver WA 98685 kmoore@wagelawyer.com DATED: April 23, 2015. s/ John B. Dudrey John B. Dudrey, OSB No. 083085 STOEL RIVES LLP Attorneys for SolarWorld Defendants Page 1 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 78883609.10039698-00016