Welcome to the Yellow Brick Road - Innovation for Australia

Similar documents
The role of Intellectual Property (IP) in R&D-based companies: Setting the context of the relative importance and Management of IP

Industry Working With Academia. MIT Office of Corporate Relations & Industrial Liaison Program Karl F. Koster Executive Director

Industrial Investment in Research and Development: Trends and Prospects

executives are often viewed to better understand the merits of scientific over commercial solutions.

Technology Transfer: Working with Industry at MIT. 10 February 2009 Kenneth A. Goldman Manager, Corporate Relations MIT Industrial Liaison Program

Science, Technology & Innovation Indicators

Engr. VIRGINIA F. AUMENTADO Patent Information Analytics and Technology Monitoring Division (PATMD)

THE U.S. SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY:

Silex Systems - Board Changes

Workshop on International R&D and Technology Transfer Contracts Negotiations, Intellectual Property Rights and Dispute Resolution

IP and Technology Management for Universities

Chapter 1 Introduction Historical Perspective

The 2011 EU industrial R&D investment SCOREBOARD

Technology Commercialization Primer: Understanding the Basics. Leza Besemann

Promoting Foreign Direct Investment in The United States. Christopher Clement International Investment Specialist Invest in America

IP Commercialization Trends Income or Impact. Trieste, September 29 and 30, 2016

Markets for New Technology

University IP and Technology Management. University IP and Technology Management

Big Tech & Global Finance

Patents and Clean Energy Technologies in Africa

Technology transfer industry shows gains

Intellectual property and competition policy

Internationalisation of STI

FELLOWSHIP SUMMARY PAPER. Digital Inclusion in New Zealand A CALL TO ACTION

Academic Technology Licensing & the America Invents Act

Two Presidents, Two Parties, Two Times, One Challenge

Falling Behind on ICT Adoption Indicators: Can We Afford This?

Patenting Strategies. The First Steps. Patenting Strategies / Bernhard Nussbaumer, 12/17/2009 1

Good Laboratory Notebook Practices

2010/IPEG/SYM/007 IP Commercialization in Korea - From Research and Development to Commercialization

Institute for the Theory of Advance Materials in Information Technology. Jim Chelikowsky University of Texas

MINING TRENDS 2018 What you need to know in the METS sector

IP Awareness Seminar OAE OIE. Presented by: Office of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. Summer 2014

Brief Summary of Intellectual Property Activities FUJITSU LIMITED Nov. 2016

Managing Intellectual Property: from invention disclosure to commercialisation

Shareholders are invited to the 2018 Annual Meeting which is scheduled for 27 September 2018.

Data Acquisition, Management, Sharing and Ownership

POWERING AMERICA S AND NEVADA S ADVANCED INDUSTRIES

Journey towards success: From idea to market a real case study. Dr. Wolfram Meyer Malta

Data Sciences Entrepreneurship class

Office for Technology Commercialization Overview. June 23, 2015 MIN-REACH Technology Commercialization Bootcamp

KÜNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ JOBKILLER VON MORGEN?

TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO PRODUCTIVITY: RETHINKING LINKAGES

The Challenge for SMEs. Government Policy

Manufacturing Industry Innovation CRC. Industry Engagement Workshop

RANDI L. KARPINIA SENIOR PATENT OPERATIONS COUNSEL LAW DEPARTMENT, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.

NERA Innovation Cluster Workshop Miranda Taylor, November 2016

Intellectual Property Management Medicines for Malaria Venture. Life Sciences Symposium WIPO 15 December 2008

Why patents DO matter to YOUR business

The role of university science parks in business-university research collaboration

Global Trends in Patenting

European companies outpace American counterparts in R&D investment growth for the first time in five years

Booz & Company 30 October, Making Ideas Work. The 2012 Global Innovation 1000 Study

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

Near Field Communication

Australian Institute for Machine Learning: Catching the wave of the next industrial revolution

Alternatives to the patent system used to support R&D Efforts. James Love WIPO Expert Forum on International Technology Transfer February 17, 2015

ECEN 5004 (5014) Research like papers, proposal like presentations, conference like reviews

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

Domestic Reform and Global Integration: The Evolution of China s Innovation System and Innovation Policies

Progress due to: Feature size reduction - 0.7X/3 years (Moore s Law). Increasing chip size - 16% per year. Creativity in implementing functions.

GLOBAL RISK AND INVESTIGATIONS JAPAN CAPABILITY STATEMENT

Sustainable Development Education, Research and Innovation

Will Stronger Borders Weaken Innovation?

GDP as a measure of economic growth

Collaborating with the Office of Technology Transfer

Differential adoption of digital technology in the Canadian agriculture and mining sectors

TRENDS IN IP DISPUTES

CVC2.0 Demonstrating Added Value to the Corporate Bottom Line

Invest in America. September 13-15, Mark O Grady Commercial Attachè, US Commercial Service US Embassy, Seoul

Richard Halkett, Executive Director, NESTA Policy & Research Unit. OECD Innovation Workshop 29 th October, 2007

ISRAEL FROM ORANGES TO APPLE

Slide 15 The "social contract" implicit in the patent system

Innovation and Markets for Patents: A Case Study and Admonition

PACIFIC POSSIBLE CONSULTATIONS OF CONCEPT

Transferring UCLA discoveries to the public. Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Associate Vice Chancellor for Research

Patenting, Innovation & Technology Transfer : The CSIR Experience

Promotion of Innovation: Usefulness and Value of Patent Information for Public and Private Sectors

Intellectual Property

PCT Yearly Review 2017 Executive Summary. The International Patent System

Medical Technology Association of NZ. Proposed European Union/New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. Submission to Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade

The Usefulness of Patent Information for the Promotion of Innovation

Discovery: From Concept to the Patient - The Business of Medical Discovery. Todd Sherer, Ph.D.

PATENT AND LICENSING POLICY SUMMARY

Backgrounder. From Rock n Roll to Hafnium The Transistor turns 60. Background Summary

Intellectual Property Initiatives

SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION FACTBOOK

Welcome to the Tuesday 17th June 2014

In 1951 William Shockley developed the world first junction transistor. One year later Geoffrey W. A. Dummer published the concept of the integrated

EU Industrial R&D Scoreboard 2015

Patents in an Environment of Global Collaboration

The Demographics of Intellectual Property

1- History of Silicon Valley Cluster Formation. Core Universit 1891 Stanford University founded. University-originated VB Activity

Getting The Most from Your IP Budget: Strategies for IP Portfolio Management And Litigation Avoidance. March 4, 2009

Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

Will Stronger Borders Weaken Innovation?

Pioneering optical fibre research: connecting our worlds together

Medical Research Council

Fujitsu, SMU, and A*STAR collaborate on traffic management technologies with the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore

Transcription:

Welcome to the Yellow Brick Road - Innovation for Australia Tom Quirk 15 October 2015

Innovation : How it works? Advanced scientific knowledge is discovered by research scientists, who are often motivated by their own curiosity. It is translated into useful knowledge and then applied to economic inputs. This is done by research scientists and sciencetrained professionals, who are responding to signals from business. Business managers then use the economic inputs to produce output, in response to signals from consumers. Report from the Chief Scientist and the Australian Academy of Sciences

The Facts Sources of ideas Patent activity Research and development funding by and from business and government Australina business performance

Sources of ideas for innovation Source of ideas Business - general trade Europe and USA 1980's UK survey 2001 80% 79% Competitors 6% 5% Australia ABS 2013* 94% Customers 8% 12% Higher education 4% 2% 3% Government laboratories 2% 2% 3% Total 100% 100% 100% * ABS has multiple sources

USA Patent Activity in 2014 2014 Position Organisation Patents granted 1 International Business Machines 7481 2 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd 4936 3 Canon K.K. 4172 4 Sony Corp. 3124 5 Microsoft Corp. 2983 6 Google, Inc. 2881 7 Toshiba Corp 2850 8 Qualcomm, Inc. 2706 9 Panasonic Corp. 2394 10 General Electric Co. 2293

USA Patent Activity in 2014 2014 Position Organisation Patents granted 33 Johnson & Johnson 1115 84 Roche Holdings, Inc 484 91 Regents of the University of California 453 92 Abbott Laboratories 437 109 United States of America, Navy 364 124 Sanofi 295 125 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp 293 135 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 275 147 Novartis 243

Australia Patent Activity Patents granted 2011 2012 2013 Total 17,873 17,724 17,112 Non-resident 16,611 16,413 16,002 Resident 1,262 1,311 1,110 Australian Higher Education Patent Activity for 2006 to 2012 4,056 patents published in years 2006 to 2012 of which 1,256 were pharmaceutical and 438 medical technology 1,300 patent publications came from one university 647 patents published from all universities in 2011 and an average of about 600 per year for January 2006 to June 2012

Patent Activity - Conclusions Patent filing activity from industry confirms the results of the source of ideas surveys Not all inventions turn out to be innovations but not all innovations are patented University of California report on Technology Licensing Guiding Tenets of Technology Transfer - Revenue from licensing is dominated by small fraction of disclosures with less than 0.2 percent make up 80 percent of UC s revenues - One cannot predict which inventions will result in significant revenue - It generally takes ten or more years for successful inventions to begin generating revenue

Research and Development 2010-11 R & D % GDP Total Business Government Higher Education Australia 2.13 1.24 0.26 0.63 Canada 1.74 0.88 0.21 0.65 Finland 3.64 2.56 0.35 0.73 USA 2.79 1.95 0.45 0.39 OECD average 2.33

Research and Development 2010-11 Australia spent some $4 billion on mineral exploration. This is the mining business equivalent of industrial expenditure on R & D. This is 0.27% of GDP so total R & D would be 2.40% of GDP if it were included For Finland some 40% of business R & D is from Nokia US Government expenditure is roughly 50% on defence and 50% on higher education.

Business Research and Development High-tech % Business R & D (2001) Medium high-tech Low-tech Service Sweden 49.1 29.1 7.1 12.8 United States 39.4 19.4 6.1 34.4 Australia 21.4 15.4 13.7 39.9 Australia has a quite different mix of businesses when compared to Sweden and the United States. Australia has a small manufacturing base. This a function of market size and distance from other markets.

Australian industries - a comparison Company Revenue $ millions R & D $ millions R & D as % of revenue Merck & Co Inc 2012 47,267 8,168 17 CSL Limited 2013 4,950 427 9 ResMed Inc 2015 1,679 115 7 Cochlear Limited 2014 805 128 16 Microsoft 2014 86,833 11,381 13 Computershare 2014 2,015 74 3.7 BHP Billiton include exploration Rio Tinto include exploration 2014 64,227 2014 47,664 43 0.1 926 1.4 112 0.2 895 1.9

Business R & D - Conclusions Australia, with a resource based economy has a respectable R & D performance. The small population and remote large markets makes product development and marketing difficult However, successful Australian businesses that do market and sell high-tech products internationally have R & D spends of the same order as that of their peers elsewhere. Mineral exploration should not be overlooked in performance comparisons with other countries,

Government and Higher Education R & D For Australia, industry has moved to support universities rather than the CSIRO Research and Development Revenue Millions $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 CSIRO direct Australian private sector CSIRO Rural & CRC support CSIRO C'wlth, State & Local Govt grants University industry support 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2012 to 30 June of year

Government and Higher Education R & D - Conclusions There are no rules for how much governments spend on R & D. Higher education spending is vital for the supply of graduates but not just in science and engineering Higher education is a major "export" earner and attracts students from the region because of our excellent universities. University reputations are built on leading edge research. Government research institutions are a problem. The CSIRO seems to have lost industry support. It may be unmanageable given the range of its activities.

Innovation Case Studies Location and navigation The transistor The integrated circuit The internet WiFi Cancer vaccine Nobel Prizes

Location and Navigation Establishing longitude was vital for exploration The meridian line measurements at the summer solstice often measured in cathedrals - Bologna a good example The transit of Venus across the Sun established longitudes for distant place - Captain Cook in the South Pacific Harrison's clock helped with navigation in 1736 - first sea trial Longitude for Australia at Darwin measured using the telegraph in the 1880s when cloud prevented a transit of Venus measurement. Singapore. had a well measured longitude and with a telegraph cable connection to Darwin its longitude was measured using the "American method". Global positioning by satellite started in the 1970s. GPS use corrections derived from Einstein's Special and General Relativity Theories

The Transistor 1947 The first transistor was created by Bardeen, Brittain and Shockley 1953 the first transistor radios from Texas Instruments As part of an Anti-Trust settlement with Bell, Bell Labs made non exclusive licences available for $50,000. Masaro Ibuka, a co-founder of Sony, purchased a licence. Shockley moved to the Bay area of California and founded Shockley Semiconductor and hired some superb engineers and physicists.

The Integrated Circuit Eight key staff ("The Traitorous Eight") left Shockley to found Fairchild Semiconductor. Of these, Bob Noyce and Gordon Moore moved on to found Intel in 1968 to manufacture integrated circuits The Chief Scientist of the US Department of Defence told them there was no call for such circuits. 1970 Intel gains a contract to design and build a chip for a Japanese company. The Japanese company would pay for the development and own the intellectual property The task of design was given to three Intel engineers Their solution was a programmable processor - the microprocessor Senior management thought there might be wider uses for this device In 1971 the contract with the Japanese company was quickly renegotiated with Intel retaining all rights other than the specific task set by the Japanese company

The Internet In 1969 the US Department of Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) funded a project to enable remote computers to interact. This was the ARPANET. The ARPANET was used by physicists in the 1970s to gain access to large but remote computers. Even then email and games were available and hacking occurred. In 1989 Tim Berners-Lee at CERN in Geneva proposed the hypertext transfer protocol (http). This enabled large and dispersed scientific collaborations to swap data and analysis results This was the development of a tool that enabled fundamental research. So the World Wide Web was born A most disruptive invention that has allowed the creation of Google, Amazon and other online retailing and wholesaling activities. The internet is a threatening development for the news and entertainment industries

WiFi In 1991 WLAN was developed by NCR and AT & T for use in a cashier system In 1992 radio astronomers at the CSIRO filed a key patent that enabled reception of a clear radio signal The patent was granted in 1996 in the late 1990s two Macquarie University professors acquired a non-exclusive licence for the CSIRO invention. They established a company Radiata to make the WiFi chips. 2000 Cisco Systems acquired Radiata for $567 million. 2002 the first patent infringement appeared 2006 CSIRO files infringement claims 2009 first settlement for $205 million and in 2012 a second settlement for $212 million, So $417 million in royalties for an invention to assist radio astronomy

CSL and a cancer vaccine Mid 1980's reseachers at Queensland University, Rochester University and the National Cancer Institute started to develop a vaccine against the human papilloma virus, a cause of cervical cancer In 1994 Frazer and Zhou filed a patent for a virus like particle to act as a vaccine. CSL (privatised in 1994) had supported this work but chose to licence the clinical development to Merck & Co for a royalty of 7.5% of sales In 2006 the FDA approved the marketing of the vaccine under the name Gardasil Gardasil sales rose to $1830 million in 2013 Royalties to date are over $450 million but the patent must be nearing its expiry date CSL presumably retains marketing rights in Australia and New Zealand

Case Studies - Conclusions Expert opinions may not be well informed. This is particularly obvious with policy makers. Innovations arise from scientific research but often as a by-product of leading edge work. Innovation is frequently the result of an accumulation of experience and inventions. GPS depends on research that was completed some 100 years ago. Taking innovations to market depends on being able to overcome financial barriers. Sometimes, as in drug development, this is beyond the reach of a local business.

Innovation gives rise to discovery The most famous and fundamental discovery coming from commercial development was made at Bell Labs Penzias and Wilson were trying to remove the background microwave noise from their satellite receiver. The lab was close to New York city but that was not the cause and the noise appeared constant despite the search for variability. In fact it was the cosmic microwave background radiation. An echo of the Big Bang. They were awarded the Nobel Prize in 1978 Note: The inventors of the transistor and the integrated circuit were awarded Nobel Prizes

Conclusions Innovation is a random walk along a tortuous road Some simple lessons are: 1. Leading edge research is a key supplier of ideas but many innovations come from enabling research but not the endpoint of the research. 2. Universities should support leading edge research and not expect an income stream from inventions. 3. The key role for universities is producing graduates who will invent, implement and deploy innovations. 4. National needs offer little guidance for direction or level of financial support. 5. There is no better incentive than to see the success of others.