INTRODUCTION OF RADIO MICROPHONE APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE MHz

Similar documents
COMPATIBILITY AND SHARING ANALYSIS BETWEEN DVB T AND TALKBACK LINKS IN BANDS IV AND V

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN DECT AND DCS1800

TETRA Tx Test Solution

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN GSM AND TETRA MOBILE SERVICES AT 915 MHz

ECC Report 276. Thresholds for the coordination of CDMA and LTE broadband systems in the 400 MHz band

ECC Recommendation (16)04

Table 1: OoB e.i.r.p. limits for the MFCN SDL base station operating in the band MHz

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY OF TETRA AND TETRAPOL IN THE MHZ FREQUENCY RANGE, AN ANALYSIS COMPLETED USING A MONTE CARLO BASED SIMULATION TOOL

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN TETRA TAPS MOBILE SERVICES AT 870 MHz

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F Characteristics of HF fixed radiocommunication systems

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1580 *, ** Generic unwanted emission characteristics of base stations using the terrestrial radio interfaces of IMT-2000

ECC Report 245. Compatibility studies between PMSE and other systems/services in the band MHz

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN NARROWBAND DIGITAL PMR/PAMR AND TACTICAL RADIO RELAY IN THE 900 MHz BAND. Cavtat, May 2003

CEPT Report 42. Report from CEPT to the European Commission in response to Task 3 of the Mandate to CEPT on the 900/1800 MHz bands

REPORT ITU-R BT TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN BANDS ABOVE 2 GHZ (Questions ITU-R 1/11 and ITU-R 49/11)

3GPP TS V ( )

International Journal of Engineering and Technology Volume 3 No. 6, June, 2013

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY OF 400 MHZ TETRA AND ANALOGUE FM PMR AN ANALYSIS COMPLETED USING A MONTE CARLO BASED SIMULATION TOOL

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1063 * Criteria for sharing between BSS feeder links and other Earth-to-space or space-to-earth links of the FSS

Radio Propagation Characteristics in the Large City

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1341*

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN GSM AND CDMA-PAMR AT 915 MHz

EUROPEAN pr ETS TELECOMMUNICATION December 1996 STANDARD

Approved September 2014

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1639 *

Calculation of Minimum Frequency Separation for Mobile Communication Systems

ETSI EN V6.7.1 ( )

EUROPEAN pr ETS TELECOMMUNICATION July 1995 STANDARD

Title: Test on 5.8 GHz Band Outdoor WiFi (802.11b/g) Wireless Base Station

EUROPEAN ETS TELECOMMUNICATION April 1994 STANDARD

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Radio compliance test

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

EUROPEAN ETS TELECOMMUNICATION April 1994 STANDARD

Radio Transmitters and Receivers Operating in the Land Mobile and Fixed Services in the Frequency Range MHz

DraftETSI EN V1.2.1 ( )

EUROPEAN ETS TELECOMMUNICATION September 1996 STANDARD

Derivation of Power Flux Density Spectrum Usage Rights

Aeronautical mobile (route) service sharing studies in the frequency band MHz

Announced on the 7 th day of May B.E (2010)

EUROPEAN ETS TELECOMMUNICATION January 1998 STANDARD

ECC Report 197. COMPATIBILITY STUDIES MSS TERMINALS TRANSMITTING TO A SATELLITE IN THE BAND MHz AND ADJACENT CHANNEL UMTS SERVICES

Sharing Considerations Between Small Cells and Geostationary Satellite Networks in the Fixed-Satellite Service in the GHz Frequency Band

Kushwinder Singh, Pooja Student and Assistant Professor, Punjabi University Patiala, India

ARIB Standard Compliance of STD MHz

CEPT/ERC Recommendation ERC E (Funchal 1998)

Technical Support to Defence Spectrum LTE into Wi-Fi Additional Analysis. Definitive v1.0-12/02/2014. Ref: UK/2011/EC231986/AH17/4724/V1.

Proposed corrections to the ECC Report 37

STUDIO TO TRANSMITTER LINKING SYSTEM

Electrical FOR:

ERC/DEC/(01)07 EUROPEAN RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

Introduction to Same Band Combining of UMTS & GSM

White Paper 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence 900 MHz Receiver Blocking Problem

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M

ECC Report 249. Unwanted emissions of common radio systems: measurements and use in sharing/compatibility studies

Information on the Evaluation of VHF and UHF Terrestrial Cross-Border Frequency Coordination Requests

SET Congress Sao Paulo 24 August in the 700 MHz band

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM.1268*

Final draft ETSI EN V1.1.1 ( )

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F RADIO-FREQUENCY CHANNEL ARRANGEMENTS FOR RADIO-RELAY SYSTEMS OPERATING IN THE 13 GHz FREQUENCY BAND

ERC Recommendation 54-01

ETSI EN V7.4.1 ( )

Recommendation ITU-R SF.1486 (05/2000)

PMSE Spectrum Usage Rights & Interference Analysis

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.524-6

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1824 *

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1830

Recommendation ITU-R M (06/2005)

Technical basis for planning of terrestrial digital sound broadcasting in the VHF band

Ave output power ANT 1(dBm) Ave output power ANT 2 (dbm)

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) CHARACTERISTICS OF IEEE SYSTEMS IN MHz

Notification of the National Telecommunications Commission

3GPP TR V7.0.0 ( )

Digital Transmission Systems (DTSs), Frequency Hopping Systems (FHSs) and Licence-Exempt Local Area Network (LE-LAN) Devices

ECC Report 141 Technical supplement. TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT TO ECC REPORT 141 FUTURE POSSIBILITIES FOR THE DIGITALISATION OF BAND II (87.

7. FREQUENCY SEPARATION

Overview. Key Facts. TSP Transmitter. TRANSCOM Cellular Network Measurement

Space Frequency Coordination Group

Protection of fixed monitoring stations against interference from nearby or strong transmitters

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1097 * (Question ITU-R 159/9)

DMR Rx Test Solution. Signal Analyzer MS2830A. Reference Specifications

The equipment will provide up to 50W RF output power in the MHz band.

SRSP-101 Issue 1 May Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

NUMÉRO DOCUMENT / DOCUMENT NUMBER REV PAGE

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1652 *

Final draft ETSI EN V1.1.1 ( )

DMR Tx Test Solution. Signal Analyzer MS2830A. Reference Specifications

Unit 3 - Wireless Propagation and Cellular Concepts

TV White Spaces Maps Computation through Interference Analysis

AN5009 Application note

Report to: Ministry of Economic Development

Technical characteristics and protection criteria for aeronautical mobile service systems in the frequency range GHz

Draft EN V1.1.1 ( )

Radio Transmitters Operating in the Land Mobile and Fixed Services in the Frequency Range MHz

EMI T E S T R E P O R T

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM.1134 *

Planning Parameters for DRM Mode E ( DRM+ )

Spectrum Management and Telecommunications

Report On. FCC and Industry Canada Testing of the Inmarsat Global Ltd IsatPhone Pro GMR2+ Satellite Phone COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN UMTS 900/1800 AND SYSTEMS OPERATING IN ADJACENT BANDS

Transcription:

European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) INTRODUCTION OF RADIO MICROPHONE APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 1785-1800 MHz Siófok, May 1998

Copyright 1998 the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

INTRODUCTION OF RADIO MICROPHONE APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 1785-1800 MHz 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 BASIC PARAMETERS... 1 2.1 SYSTEM PARAMETERS... 1 2.1.1 GSM 1800... 1 2.1.2... 3 2.1.3 TFTS... 5 2.1.4 Radio microphones... 6 2.2 WANTED FIELD STRENGTH FOR RADIO MICROPHONES USING DIGITAL MODULATION... 7 2.3 RESULTS OF COMPATIBILITY ANALYSES... 8 2.4 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS... 9 2.4.1 Results from the viewpoint of the other services affected (i.e. microphones as the interferer)... 9 2.4.2 Results from the viewpoint of radio microphones ( i.e. other services as the interferer)... 9 2.4.3 Combined results... 9 3 RESULTS OF THE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSES... 10 4 CONCLUSIONS... 11 ANNEX 1 MICROPHONE RECEIVER MASK....13

INTRODUCTION OF RADIO MICROPHONE APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 1785-1800 MHz SUMMARY This study considerd the compatibility between radio microphones and tactical systems in the frequency range 1785-1800 MHz taking account of the use of the adjacent bands by GSM 1800 (1710-1785 MHz) and TFTS (1800-1805 MHz). The main results of this work are that the operation of radio microphones within the frequency range 1785-1800 MHz is feasible provided that: a guard band of 700 khz is implemented to avoid compatibility problems between radio microphones and GSM 1800 (i.e. 1785-1785.7 MHz); a guard band of 600 khz is implemented to provide protection against interference from TFTS emissions from airborne stations (i.e. 1799.4-1800 MHz); coordination is needed to ensure a 200m separation distance between radiomicrophones and TFTS ground stations in the band 1797-1799.4 MHz, and use at airports (with TFTS in operation) should be prohibited; co-channel sharing with tactical is feasible provided a separation distance of 1.4-2.8 km is observed, this can be achieved through a national licensing/coordination mechanism. the radiated power of the radio microphones is restricted to 10 dbm (17 dbm for body - worn equipment) to minimize interference to tactical systems. These conditions are achievable through a national licensing procedure; this would be necessary in any case for professional radio microphone usage to avoid intra-service interference. For analogue radio microphones the standard ETS 300 422 is applicable; however, if digital equipment were to be developed then a new standard would be required.

Page 1 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to investigate the possibility of using the frequency range 1785-1800 MHz for radio microphones. For this purpose some compatibility considerations have been done. The radio microphones considered in this study are professional applications. Therefore the stringent requirements for broadcast quality are taken into account. Radio microphones are assumed to be operated mainly indoors, although outdoor use is not prohibited. This document describes the prerequisites for the introduction of radio microphones in the aforementioned frequency range. 2 BASIC PARAMETERS 2.1 System parameters 2.1.1 GSM 1800 Source: Draft prets 300 577 (GSM 05.05), May 1995 General parameters: Frequency band: Modulation: Transmission method: Carrier spacing: Channels: Mobile transmitters: Output power: 1710-1785 MHz GMSK TDMA 200 khz Fu = [1710 + 0.2x (n-512)] where 512 n 885 max. 1 W (30 dbm) ± 2.5 db min. 0.25 W (24 dbm) ± 2.5 db micro station 1 mw (0 dbm) ± 6 db Level of spurious emissions given an output power of 1 W: Draft prets 300 577, page 13, Table b) Spurious emissions due to modulation and wideband noise f (khz) 200 250 400 600-1200 1200-1800 1800-6000 6000 Power level (dbc) - 30-33 - 60-60 - 60-71 - 79 f: Frequency offset from the centre frequency of the wanted signal dbc: Level relative to the wanted signal Spurious emissions due to switching transients f (khz) 400 600 1200 1800 Power level (dbm) -23-26 -32-36 f: Frequency offset from the centre frequency of the wanted signal Intermodulation attenuation: Antenna gain: Feeder loss (cable loss): 50 db at 800 khz (f1-f2) from the carrier -2 db 2 db

Page 2 Fixed receivers: Receiver sensitivity: Type designation Normal BTS BTS M1 BTS M2 BTS M3 Level (dbm) -104 (equivalent to 33 db(µv/m)) -102-97 -92 Co-channel rejection: 9 db Maximum permissible interference levels/interfering field strength levels: Normal BTS: -113 dbm = 24 db(µv/m) BTS M1: -111 dbm = 26 db(µv/m) BTS M2: -106 dbm = 31 db(µv/m) BTS M3: -101 dbm = 36 db(µv/m) Adjacent channel rejection: f (khz) ±200 ±400 ±600 Power level (dbc) -9-41 -49 f: Frequency offset from the centre frequency of the wanted signal dbc: Level relative to the wanted signal In-band blocking performance: Blocking level f (khz) (dbm) 600 800 800 3000 Normal BTS -35-25 M1-40 -30 M2-35 -25 M3-30 -20 Out-of-band blocking performance: Spurious emissions: Antenna gain: Feeder loss (cable loss): Average antenna height: Side lobe attenuation: 0 dbm Measurement bandwidth: see draft prets 300 577, page 17 2 nw (-57 dbm) in the band 9 khz - 1 GHz 20 nw (-47 dbm) in the band 1-12.75 GHz 18 dbi 2 db 25 m 14 db

Page 3 2.1.2 Source: National Radio Frequency Agency (NARFA), Germany General parameters: Frequency band: 1785-1800 MHz System designation: FM 1000 Modulation mode: FM Operation mode: FDM or TDM Frequency spacing: FDM: 125 khz TDM: see occupied bandwidths Transmission range: 50-60 km Fade margin: Approx. 20 db Transmitters: Output power: FDM and TDM 1.25 W (1 dbw) Occupied bandwidths for TDM operation: Transmission capacity Bandwidth 256/288 kbit/s 600 khz 512/576 kbit/s 980 khz 1024/1152 kbit/s 1030 khz Maximum system values: FDM operation: Channel mode 12-channel operation 24-channel operation System value 159 db 154 db TDM operation (BER = 10-4 ): Transmission capacity System gain 256/288 kbit/s 128 db 512/576 kbit/s 127 db 1024/1152 kbit/s 119 db Wanted and out-of-band emissions: f (khz) 515 1030 2060 2500-5000 Level (dbc) 0-50 - 60-60 f: Frequency offset from the centre frequency of the wanted signal dbc: Level relative to the wanted signal General value of spurious emissions: - 30 dbm

Page 4 Antenna type 1 Location of use: Gain: Side lobe attenuation: Front-to-back ratio: Voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR): Antenna type 2 Location of use: Gain: Side lobe attenuation: Polarisation: Polarisation attenuation: Front-to-back ratio: Voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR): Both types of antenna Antenna heights: Feeder loss (cable loss): Receivers: Noise figure: Primarily on manoeuvres 19.5-22 dbi 9 db 18 db 2.0 db Applications other than manoeuvres 22 dbi 25 db Horizontal and vertical 30 db 30 db 2.0 db 17-30 m 2 db F 8 db Receiver sensitivity: Bandwidth Pn = {10 log (k* to *B) + F} approx. 125 khz (FDM) -145 dbw 600 khz (TDM) -138 dbw 980 khz (TDM) -136 dbw 1030 khz (TDM) -136 dbw C/N ratios for TDM: Bit error ratio (BER) C/N 1*10-4 Binary transmission: 12 db Biternary transmission: 15 db 1*10-7 Binary transmission: 15 db Biternary transmission: 18 db Receiver sensitivity: Antennas: -88 dbm (average level) Identical to transmitting antenna characteristics Adjacent channel rejection: f (khz) 515 1034 2060 3000 4000 4500 Power level (dbc) 0 3 3 40 60 80 f: Frequency offset from the centre frequency of the wanted signal dbc: Level relative to the wanted signal

Page 5 2.1.3 TFTS Sources: ETS 300 326 1-3 General parameters: Frequency band: Upper band: 1800-1805 MHz (TX: airborne station; RX: ground station) RF channel arrangement: 1/33 MHz = 30.30 khz RF channel number: n = 1-164 General RF channels: Fa(n) = Fg(n) + 130 MHz Fa = airborne transmit channel where Fg(n) = 1670 MHz + n/33 MHz No. of speech channels per RF channel: 4 Modulation: Speech channel: RF channel: Gross data rate: TDMA π/4 DQPSK 44.2 kbit/s Airborne transmitter: Type Location of use Transmit power/tolerance Antenna gain Aircraft station On board aircraft 40 dbm/+2 db -1 db 1 dbi (Transmit power corresponds to mean power (PY).) RF output spectrum mask: (measurement bandwidth: 300 Hz) Frequency offset from the carrier (khz) Relative level (dbc) ± 11.3 +1 ± 14.5-20 ± 15.6-35 ± 30-37 ± 60-49 ± 120-65 ± 2500-70 ± 5000-75 Spurious emissions and out-of-band emissions (see relevant type approval specifications for details of measurement bandwidths) Frequency band Maximum power (peak power (PX) at the antenna port 9 khz - 1 GHz -36 dbm 1 GHz - 12.75 GHz -30 dbm Intermodulation attenuation: Feeder loss (cable loss): See relevant type approval specification 2 db

Page 6 Ground station receivers: a) Without interferer Receiver input sensitivity BER Antenna gain Cable loss -112 db < 1 x 10-3 1 dbi 2 db (assumed value) -105 dbm < 1 x 10-6 1 dbi 2 db (assumed value) b) With adjacent interferer Frequency offset from the wanted C/I Bit error ratio signal in (khz) (db) (BER) 0 20 5.0 x 10-3 30.30-20 5.0 x 10-3 60.60-34 5.0 x 10-3 90.90-38 5.0 x 10-3 120.120-40 5.0 x 10-3 Intermodulation attenuation: Antenna gain: Feeder loss (cable loss): See relevant type approval specification 8 dbi 2 db 2.1.4 Radio microphones Transmitter output power hand held: 10 dbm Transmitter output power body worn: 17 dbm Transmitter spectrum mask: as set out in ETS 300 422 Bandwidth (-60 db): analogue as set out in ETS 300 422 (max. 200 khz) digital approx. 300 khz (which is not in compliance with ETS 300 422) Body effect loss hand held: Body effect loss body worn: 6 db 14 db Receiver input power: analogue - 68 dbm/74 db(µv/m); (acc. to Chester meeting) digital - 85 dbm/57 db(µv/m); (see section 2.2) C/I ratio: analogue: 25 db (acc. to manufacturer specification) digital: 18 db (acc. to manufacturer specification) Max. interfering field strength: analogue: 49 db(µv/m) digital: 39 db(µv/m) Receiver spectrum mask: see Annex 1 Operating modes: Channel selection: indoor and outdoor no dynamic channel selection, frequency tuning possible throughout the frequency range.

Page 7 Propagation models: free space (worst case analysis) and for distances < 100 m ITU-R P.529-2, Hata model 1980; (suburban) Application: Analysis of compatibility between systems and radio microphones where separation distances > 1 km are necessary. ITU-R P.529-2, Hata model 1980; interpolated (suburban) Application: Analysis of compatibility between systems and radio microphones where separation distances < 1 km are necessary. Interpolation between free space propa-gation for 100 m and Hata value (suburban) for 1 km. See Annex 1 for a graphical representation. This "model" has not been verified. It was chosen because no other suitable model is currently available for distances of less than 1 km. 2.2 Wanted field strength for radio microphones using digital modulation Some additional details are required in connection with the wanted field strength values of digital microphones. The minimum wanted field strength for a digital receiver with a sensitivity of - 103 dbm (39 db(µv/m)) and a required C/I of 18 db was assumed to be 57 db(µv/m). In view of the transmitter powers now specified for hand-held and body worn devices a coverage radius of approximately 500 m would be possible. In this case the maximum permissible interfering field strength would be 39 db(µv/m). If the same receiver is assumed but the coverage radius is reduced to 150 m, the wanted field strength is 68 db(µv/m) and the permissible interfering field strength increases to 50 db(µv/m). The latter value corresponds virtually to that of an analogue radio microphone. However, it should be borne in mind that analogue radio microphones have a coverage radius of only about 70 m. This means that whilst maintaining an identical maximum permissible interfering field strength the coverage radius of 70 m of an analogue radio microphone can be more than doubled to 150 m by using a digital radio microphone. The results of compatibility analyses of analogue and digital radio microphones with a coverage radius of 150 m are therefore identical. The results obtained for digital radio microphones with a minimum wanted field strength are given in Section 2.3. However, operation based on a minimum field strength in the frequency ranges shared with applications leads to considerable separation distances and should therefore be avoided where possible.

Page 8 2.3 Results of compatibility analyses Microphone interferes with GSM 1800: (BTS) GSM 1800 (MS) interferes with: microphone for a separation distance of 10 m a frequency separation of 700 khz is required; this applies to hand held and body worn devices, analogue and digital for a separation distance of 25 m a frequency separation of 300 khz is required; this applies to hand held and body worn devices, analogue and digital Microphone interferes with tactical : (side lobe suppression antenna type 1 = 9 db) hand held separation distance (free space propagation) 14.9 km separation distance (Hata model) 1 km body worn separation distance (free space propagation) 13.3 km separation distance (Hata model) 1 km Microphone interferes with tactical : (side lobe suppression antenna type 2 = 25 db) hand held separation distance (free space propagation) 2.4 km separation distance (Hata model interpolated) 420 m body worn separation distance (free space propagation) 2.1 km separation distance (Hata model interpolated) 380 m Radio relay interferes with microphone: (side lobe suppression antenna type 1 = 9 db) analogue m./digital m. 150 m separation distance (free space propagation) 33.28 km separation distance (Hata model) 1.4 km digital microphone 500 m separation distance (free space propagation) 105 km separation distance (Hata model) 2.8 km (The values of 33.28 km and 105 km for free space propagation are unrealistic because with an antenna height of 30 m the radio horizon is already reached at 19.6 km.) Radio relay interferes with microphone: (side lobe suppression antenna type 2 = 25 db) analogue m./digital m. 150 m separation distance (free space propagation) 5.92 km separation distance (Hata model interpolated) 610 m digital microphone 500 m separation distance (free space propagation) 14.86 km separation distance (Hata model interpolated) 950 m Microphone interferes with TFTS: (En route/intermediate/airport) TFTS interferes with microphone: for a separation distance of 50 m a frequency separation of 3 MHz is required; this applies to hand held and body worn devices, analogue and digital for a separation distance of 80 m a frequency separation of 600 khz is required; this applies to hand held and body worn devices, analogue and digital.

Page 9 2.4 Overview of results 2.4.1 Results from the viewpoint of the other services affected (i.e. microphones as the interferer) Service GSM 1800 Microphones TFTS Frequency range 1710-1785 MHz 1785.0-1785.7 MHz 1785.7-1797.0 MHz 1797.0-1800 MHz 1800-1805 MHz Separation distance 10 m ca. 1 km 50 m 2.4.2 Results from the viewpoint of radio microphones ( i.e. other services as the interferer) service GSM 1800 Microphones TFTS frequency range 1710-1785 MHz 1785.0-1785.3 MHz 1785.3-1799.4 MHz 1799.4-1800 MHz 1800-1805 MHz separation distance 10-25 m 1.4-2.8 km 50-80 m 2.4.3 Combined results Service GSM 1800 Microphones TFTS Frequency range 1710-1785 MHz 1785.0-1785.7 MHz 1785.7-1797.0 MHz 1797.0-1800 MHz 1800 1805 MHz Separation distance 10-25 m 1.4-2.8 km 50 m

Page 10 3 RESULTS OF THE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSES The adjacent channel analyses regarding GSM 1800 and TFTS yielded the result that guard bands will need to be established to protect these services. For GSM 1800 a guard band of 700 khz is required. As far as TFTS ground station receivers are concerned, a guard band of 3 MHz has to be implemented if no coordination takes place. However, this guard band can be decreased considerably by means of a licensing procedure involving the coordination of ground station receivers. This would enable individual Administrations to protect both the TFTS receivers at airports and any en-route stations whose coordinates are known. This leaves the need for a guard band of 600 khz to protect microphones against interference caused by airborne TFTS transmitters. In the remaining frequency range 1797-1799.4 MHz, coordination is needed with a separation distance of 200 m to protect the TFTS ground stations. An examination of the sharing range 1785-1800 MHz reveals that fairly wide separation distances have to be observed both for tactical and microphones. This applies especially to applications vis-à-vis microphone receivers. Here again, a licensing procedure involving coordination is essential. NB The results for the operation of radio microphones on adjacent frequencies are based on the receiver spectrum mask in Annex 1. However, this mask was originally developed for initial assessments of the interference situation and may change considerably owing to future developments in radio microphone technology.

Page 11 4 CONCLUSIONS A guard band of 700 khz will have to be implemented (1785-1785.7 MHz) to avoid compatibility problems between radio microphones and GSM 1800. A guard band of 600 khz will have to be implemented (1799.4-1800 MHz) to provide protection against interference from TFTS emissions from airborne stations. The use of radio microphones subject to licensing is possible in the frequency range 1785.7-1799.4 MHz: In the frequency range 1785.7-1799.4 MHz a licensing procedure could ensure protection against transmissions. To this end the use of this frequency range on military sites must be prohibited. In all other cases a distance of 1.4 km to 2.8 km must be observed. In the frequency range 1797-1799.4 MHz a licensing procedure could ensure protection of the TFTS ground stations. To this end the use of this frequency range on airports must be prohibited. Furthermore, distances of 200 m to ground stations must be observed. GSM 1800 Microphones TFTS 1710 MHz - 1785.0 MHz - 1785.7 MHz - 1797.0 MHz - 1799.4 MHz - 1800 MHz - 1785 MHz 1785.7 MHz 1797.0 MHz 1799.4 MHz 1800 MHz 1805 MHz 1.4-2.8 km separation distance to protect the tactical systems licensing and licensing by national regulator coordination by national regulator 700 khz guard band 10-25 m separation distance to protect GSM 1800 200 m separation distance to protect TFTS 600 khz guard band

Page 12 LEFT BLANK

Page 13 ANNEX 1 MICROPHONE RECEIVER MASK 80 78 76 74 72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 Level relative to wanted signal (dbc) 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Frequency offset from centre freq. (khz)