FLASH: Status and upgrade

Similar documents
FLASH at DESY. FLASH. Free-Electron Laser in Hamburg. The first soft X-ray FEL operating two undulator beamlines simultaneously

FLASH performance after the upgrade. Josef Feldhaus

FLASH II. FLASH II: a second undulator line and future test bed for FEL development.

FLASH II: an Overview

Demonstration of exponential growth and saturation at VUV wavelengths at the TESLA Test Facility Free-Electron Laser. P. Castro for the TTF-FEL team

FLASH 2. FEL seminar. Charge: 0.5 nc. Juliane Rönsch-Schulenburg Overview of FLASH 2 Hamburg,

3 General layout of the XFEL Facility

THz Pump Beam for LCLS. Henrik Loos. LCLS Hard X-Ray Upgrade Workshop July 29-31, 2009

LUCX - THZ PROGRAM: OVERVIEW AND PROSPECTS

R&D Toward Brighter X-ray FELs

Status, perspectives, and lessons from FLASH and European XFEL

Using Higher Order Modes in the Superconducting TESLA Cavities for Diagnostics at DESY

BEAM DIAGNOSTICS AT THE VUV-FEL FACILITY

Feedback Requirements for SASE FELS. Henrik Loos, SLAC IPAC 2010, Kyoto, Japan

VUV-FEL User workshop, August 23-24, 2004

Spectral Phase Modulation and chirped pulse amplification in High Gain Harmonic Generation

Bioimaging of cells and tissues using accelerator-based sources

Photon Diagnostics. FLASH User Workshop 08.

Infrared Single Shot Diagnostics for the Longitudinal. Profile of the Electron Bunches at FLASH. Disputation

FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Jul 2003

Femtosecond-stability delivery of synchronized RFsignals to the klystron gallery over 1-km optical fibers

FLASH Upgrade. Decrease wavelength and/or increase brilliance

H. Weise, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany for the XFEL Group

RF-based Synchronization of the Seed and Pump-Probe Lasers to the Optical Synchronization System at FLASH

TECHNIQUES FOR PUMP-PROBE SYNCHRONISATION OF FSEC RADIATION PULSES

ELECTRON BEAM DIAGNOSTICS AND FEEDBACK FOR THE LCLS-II*

Beam Diagnostics, Low Level RF and Feedback for Room Temperature FELs. Josef Frisch Pohang, March 14, 2011

New generation Laser amplifier system for FEL applications at DESY.

Performance of the TTF Photoinjector Laser System

Performance Evaluation of the Upgraded BAMs at FLASH

2 TTF/FLASH in the XFEL context

SwissFEL Design and Status

Electro-Optic Longitudinal Bunch Profile Measurements at FLASH: Experiment, Simulation, and Validation

Femtosecond Synchronization of Laser Systems for the LCLS

Beam Arrival Time Monitors. Josef Frisch, IBIC Sept. 15, 2015

Frank Schmidt-Föhre, DESY

Zhirong Huang. May 12, 2011

Synchronization Overview

Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

On-line spectrometer for FEL radiation at

Note on the LCLS Laser Heater Review Report

Outline of the proposed JLAMP VUV/soft X-ray FEL and the challenges for the photon beamlines and optics

Spectral characterization of the FERMI pulses in the presence of electron-beam phase-space modulations

Electro-optic Spectral Decoding Measurements at FLASH

OVERVIEW OF SEEDING METHODS FOR FELS

SCS Optical Laser Delivery

CLARA: A new particle accelerator test facility for the UK

Commissioning of the ALICE SRF Systems at Daresbury Laboratory Alan Wheelhouse, ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory ESLS RF 1 st 2 nd October 2008

LLRF Operation and Performance of the European XFEL. An overview

Wisconsin FEL Initiative

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Status of the European XFEL Accelerator Construction Project. Reinhard Brinkmann, DESY

STATUS OF THE TTF FEL

Status on Pulsed Timing Distribution Systems and Implementations at DESY, FERMI and XFEL

Sub-ps (and sub-micrometer) developments at ELETTRA

Laser systems for science instruments

synchronization system

1-Å FEL Oscillator with ERL Beams

FLASH. FLASH Training: RF Gun. FLASH: the first soft X-ray FEL operating two undulator beamlines simultaneously. Siegfried Schreiber, DESY

Installation Progress of the Laser-based Synchronization System at FLASH.

Physics Requirements Document Document Title: SCRF 1.3 GHz Cryomodule Document Number: LCLSII-4.1-PR-0146-R0 Page 1 of 7

Drive Beam Photo-injector Option for the CTF3 Nominal Phase

Status of the Project

Participant institutions: other INFN sections (Mi, RM1, RM2, Ba, Ca, Pi, Ts, Fe, Le, Fi, Na, LNS), ENEA-Frascat

TECHNICAL CHALLENGES OF THE LCLS-II CW X-RAY FEL *

12/08/2003 H. Schlarb, DESY, Hamburg

High Energy Non - Collinear OPA

BEAM ARRIVAL TIME MONITORS

COMMISSIONING STATUS AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK MULTITURN ERL*

Nonintercepting Diagnostics for Transverse Beam Properties: from Rings to ERLs

Progress of the TEO experiment at FLASH

TIME-PRESERVING MONOCHROMATORS FOR ULTRASHORT EXTREME-ULTRAVIOLET PULSES

Installation of the Optical Replica Synthesizer (ORS) at FLASH

KU-FEL Facility. Status Report. Konstantin Torgasin PhD Student Graduate School of Energy Science Kyoto University

The Potential for the Development of the X-Ray Free Electron Laser

ERL based FELs. Todd I Smith Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratories (HEPL) Stanford University Stanford, CA

SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS FOR ERLS

A high resolution bunch arrival time monitor system for FLASH / XFEL

THE ORION PHOTOINJECTOR: STATUS and RESULTS

High Power and Energy Femtosecond Lasers

CHARACTERIZATION OF BUTTON AND STRIPLINE BEAM POSITION MONITORS AT FLASH. Summer Student Programme 2007 DESY- Hamburg.

HIGHER ORDER MODES FOR BEAM DIAGNOSTICS IN THIRD HARMONIC 3.9 GHZ ACCELERATING MODULES *

Romania and High Power Lasers Towards Extreme Light Infrastructure in Romania

INTRA-TRAIN LONGITUDINAL FEEDBACK FOR BEAM STABILIZATION AT FLASH

Timing Issues for the BESSY Femtoslicing Source

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 20 Jan 2010

EUROFEL-Report-2006-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

Eliminating the microbunching-instabilityinduced sideband in a soft x-ray self-seeding free-electron laser

ALICE SRF SYSTEM COMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE A. Wheelhouse ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory

Introduction to the Physics of Free-Electron Lasers

INSTALLATION AND FIRST COMMISSIONING OF THE LLRF SYSTEM

LCLS project update. John Arthur. LCLS Photon Systems Manager

Status of Projects using TESLA Cavities. Mike Dykes, ASTeC, Head of RF.

X-ray FEL Oscillator (XFEL-O) Gun Requirements and R&D Overview FLS2010: WG5: High Brightness Guns March 1, 2010

Designing for Femtosecond Pulses

Commissioning the Echo-Seeding Experiment ECHO-7 at NLCTA

An Overview of MAX IV Insertion Devices & Magnetic Measurement System. Hamed Tarawneh On behalf of Insertion Devices Team

taccor Optional features Overview Turn-key GHz femtosecond laser

Review of Coherent SASE Schemes

Transcription:

: Status and upgrade The User Facility Layout Performance and operational o a issues Upgrade Bart Faatz for the team DESY FEL 2009 Liverpool, UK August 23-28, 2009

at DESY > FEL user facility since summer 2005 > Photon wavelength range from vacuum ultraviolet to soft x-rays: 6.8-47 nm, 10-100 µj, 10-70 fs FWHM pulse length > Single-pass high-gain SASE FEL SASE = self-amplified spontaneous emission > Some first lasing events: Jan 2005 32 nm Apr 2006 13 nm Oct 2007 65nm 6.5 > User experiments 1 st period: Jun 2005 Mar 2007 2 nd period: Nov 2007 Aug 2009 3 rd period: starting summer 2010 > is also a test bench for the European XFEL and the ILC

overview Diagnostics Accelerating Structures Collimator Undulators Bunch Compressor Bunch Compressor 5 MeV 130 MeV 470 MeV 1000 MeV 315 m Bypass FEL Experiments No 3 rd harmonic cavity to linearize phase space short spike, long tail

SASE performance Typical user operation parameters: Wavelength range (fundamental) 6.8 47 nm Average single pulse energy 10 100 µj Pulse duration (FWHM) 10 70 fs Peak power (from av.) 1 5 GW Average power (example for 500 pulses/sec) ~ 15 mw Spectral width (FWHM) ~ 1 % Peak Brilliance 10 29-10 30 B B = photons/s/mrad 2 /mm 2 /0.1%bw Top performance at 13.7 nm: Average energy 70 µj Peak energy 170 µj Pulse duration 10 fs Peak power >10 GW Peak brilliance (6 ± 3) 10 29 B

Experiments > ~60 publications (plus ~10 submitted) on photon science at : 1 Nature, 1 Nature Physics, 4 Nature Photonics, 12 PRL, 5 PRA/E, 5 APL, 3 Optics Express, 1 Opt. Lett., 2 JPB PG2 BL1 50 µm focus, monochromatized 100 µm focus 2-stage Raman- BL3 unfocused (5-10 mm), optional multilayer mirror in experiment for few to sub-µm focus BL2 20 µm focus PG1 sub-10 µm focus, monochromatized Spectrometer (under commissioning) MOPC55 for THz Visible Laser FIR -Beamline Plane Grating Monochromator http://hasylab.desy.de/facilities/flash/publications/selected_publications/

2 nd user run Period: November 26, 2007 to August 16, 2009 Total number of hours: 15216 Users 7608 FEL R&D 5352 SASE delivery 5712 XFEL & ILC R&D 1320 SASE tuning 1080 Scheduled Off* 936 Linac set-up 96 Maintenance 204 Down 504** 50% 32% 2% 7% 8 % 10 % 14% 1% 7% 76% *Not including weekly maintenance **20% (~40% in 2009) caused by RF stations.2+3, which will be exchanged

Tuning during user runs Total tuning time 14% Wavelength changes 55% FEL radiation characterization 2% FEL radiation energy, transverse position, stability 18% Quality tuning 7% exact wavelength only one wavelength narrow bandwidth Single multibunch, bunch frequency 3% Lasing with long bunch trains 2% After technical failures 7% After maintenance days 6%

Most demand on shortest wavelength or 13.5 nm 2500 Wavelength delivered to users Number of hou rs 2000 1500 1000 500 7 nm or 3 rd harmonic 8nmor5 th harmonic 40.5 nm + 3 rd harmonic 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Wavelength (nm)

Wavelength change 60 Week 28, 2008 48 hours planned to setup 5 th harmonic of 8 nm Hours tuning per week 50 40 30 20 10 0 No benefit in time, but more with standard operators 10 20 30 40 User week number

FEL performance per user block 2007 Week SASE level (µj) Fraction long pulse trains Collimation <= 1mm 48-51 17.5 2% 7-11 27.6 22 14-17 22.2 20* 5% 2008 26-2929 13.4 6% 33-36 10.8 16% 43-45 45 22.2 48-51 33.8 2% 7-10 27.3 2009 14-17 23 20-23 25.9 3% 26-2828 25.9 10% 31-33 26.8 14% No discrimination of wavelength made * At some point reduced to 30 bunches due to energy/charge chirp

Week 26-29, 2008 (June-July) 50 30 40 SASE level (µj) Wavelength (nm) 25 SAS SE leve el (µj) 30 21 nm 20 13.5 nm 10 8 nm 20 15 10 Wave elength (nm m) 0 2008-06-30 2008-07-06 2008-07-13 Date 5

Week 28, 2008 (July 7 to 13) Temperature at different positions along the undulator On July 7, 48 hours reserved for wavelength change from 13.5 to 8 nm

Week 28, 2008 (July 7 to 13) Movement of undulator quadrupoles : up to 100 µm On July 7, 48 hours reserved for wavelength change from 13.5 to 8 nm

Week 33-34, 2008 (August) 100 30 80 26 nm SASE level (µj) Wavelength (nm) 25 vel (µj J) 60 20 Wavelen SA ASE le 40 13.5 nm 20 7 nm 96nm 9.6 15 10 gth (nm) 0 1 mm aperture Magnets 2008/08/17 2008/08/24 2008/08/30 2008/09/06 Laser LLRF cable Date FEL2008 5

Lasing distribution: August 20, 2008 Distribution over energy, charge (not at the same time) This performance was an exception

Lasing distribution over a pulse train Up to 4 µj for 1&1 mm apertures = 50% Especially suffering were experiments with pulse trains Re-optimization needed when switching between single bunch and trains Up to 4 µj for 10&10 mm apertures =15%

Improvement of the machine performance Main Improvements Education of operators Improvements of tools/panels Cathode Laser stability (changed optics + exchanged BBO) LLRF, especially gun (oscillation gun power tuning difficult) Ongoing improvements Feedback for pulse train stability (RF and beam based) Beam based alignment/dispersion & orbit correction BPMs, especially undulator Online spectrometer/photon BPMs

RF Gun stability Nov. 5, 2008 RF Gun field measurement calibration Before calibration: 0.2 degr. U trans = U for + U ref SASE intensity fluctuations down from 25% to a few percent After calibration: 0.1 degr. Nov. 27, 2008

Implementation status of optical synchronization system Posters WEPC66 WEPC69 WEPC70 WEPC72 Talk: FROA05 Components installed: 2 nd laser + opt. distr. 4 engineered links 3 BAM/1 EBPM OXC for Ti:Sa ~ 35% of complete system Arrival time drift & jitter from photo-injector Without FB! σ t = 86fs 0.8ps Laser ϕ rf 70% Gun ϕ rf 30% Without AFF! Tuning pulse train arrival For FB missing: robust exception handling & exit of linac σ t = 82fs σ t = 64fs residual drifts 1.1ps jitter intra-train 4.0ps 300µs

Improvement of the machine performance Comparison of 7 nm run during August 2008 and July /August 2009 7 nm most critical wavelength with minimal tolerance Period of large temperature variations high demand on stability Same/similar user groups similar demands on machine performance Not representative of entire machine performance August 2008 was an example of low SASE, high instability

Lasing distribution: July/August, 2009 0.02% rms flatness over pulse train 45 µj for10x10 mm apertures, 100 khz at 7.02 nm 0.9% rms charge fluctuation 7 pc intra train flatness Flatness of compression signal for feedback

Change of experiment 1 mm aperture

Upgrade Plans > Rebuild dump beamline (finished) + ILC 9mA test in September > Upgrade in 2009/2010: major modifications installation the 3 rd harmonic (3.9 GHz) accelerating module installation of the 7 th accelerating module energy up to ~ 1.2 GeV <5 nm installation of an experiment for seeded VUV radiation s replacement of complete electron beam line between collimators and SASE undulators (~ 40 meters) exchange of the RF gun upgrades of RF stations and waveguide distribution > Commissioning spring 2010 > The 3 rd FEL user period is foreseen to start summer 2010 > Beyond this upgrade: proposal for a 2 nd undulator beamline ( II) together with Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin (HZB)

Upgrade: Linac layout Present layout BC2 BC3 LOLA Collimator SASE Undulators ACC1 ACC2/3 ACC4/5/6 New layout s + New RF gun redesigned electron beamline Exchange of ACC1 (M3**) 3 rd harmonic module (ACC39) ACC7 (M8) LOLA

s WEPC04, WEPC05, WEPC73, THOB05 > High Harmonic Laser Seeding at 30nm > To be installed between the linac and the undulators top view

Upgrade: Hall layout Experimental hall Beam distri- bution area -Install a focusing mirror at BL3 -Modify differential pumping units of the BL2 and BL3 end stations -Install a fast switching mirror unit -Include the autocorrelator as a permanent device in the direct beamlines -Install new filter units and new fast shutters -Repair VLS spectrometer -Modify differential pumping units -Install additional BPMs with MCP/fluorescence screen monitor -Install new online spectrometer based Tunnel on atomic photoionisation (like GMD) -Install a MCP/fluorescence screen monitor in the MCP tool

Online determination of the spectral distribution using i- and e- TOF spectrometer Gas inlet with ~10-7 mbar (rare gases) Ǿ 22mm apertures at both ends WEPC01 for details

Combined DESY/HZB proposal for a 2 nd undulator line ( II) II HGHG mod1+2 & rad1 Extend user capacity with HHG/HGHG seeding Use of existing infrastructure up to last accelerating module New undulator tunnel, new experimental Hall Decision on Funding end of 2009

II

Summary > is a world-wide unique light source in the wavelength range of 47 nm to 6.8 nm ultra-short FEL pulses (10 to 50 fs) unprecedented brilliance > Since summer 2005, user FEL experiments in different fields have been performed successfully > Upgrade shutdown 21-Sep-2009 2009 to 1-March 2010 increase beam energy to 1.2 GeV (<5 nm) 3rd harmonic cavity seeding experiment s > 3rd user period will start summer 2010 0 > Proposal pending for a 2nd beamline ( II) together with HZB > is also a world-wide unique test facility for SCRF technology