A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

Similar documents
HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

NASA s Changing Human Spaceflight Exploration Plans

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team Cis-Lunar Analysis. M. Lupisella 1, M. R. Bobskill 2

ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Perspectives on human and robotic spaceflight. Steve Squyres Chairman, NASA Advisory Council Cornell University

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

NASA Mission Directorates

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

Constellation Systems Division

NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

Judith L. Robinson, Ph.D. Associate Director Space Life Sciences Directorate Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas USA

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Human Mars Architecture

Future technologies for planetary exploration within the European Exploration Envelope Programme at the European Space Agency

National Space Exploration Campaign Report. Pursuant to Section 432(b) of the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017 (P.L.

IAC-18.A5.1.4x Concept for a Crewed Lunar Lander Operating from the Lunar Orbiting Platform-Gateway

Human Spaceflight: Past, Present, and Future (if any) James Flaten MN Space Grant Consortium Univ. of MN Minneapolis

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

Where are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? USA (NASA) System Description Goal Remarks * Space Launch System (SLS) Program

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

BEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT

Questions for the 2018 RASC-AL Q&A Session

European Manned Space Projects and related Technology Development. Dipl.Ing. Jürgen Herholz Mars Society Deutschland Board Member marssociety.

Focus Session on Commercial Crew

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

Nasa Space Shuttle Crew Escape Systems. Handbook >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

The Lunar Split Mission: Concepts for Robotically Constructed Lunar Bases

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

Astronaut Edwin Buzz Aldrin climbing down the ladder of Apollo 11 and onto the surface of the Moon on July 20, (National Aeronautics

The Global Exploration Roadmap

The Global Exploration Roadmap

Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

Status and Outlook for European Exploration Envelope Programme

ASTRA ERA and Future Robotics (for Exploration)

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

Near Term Space Settlement: Risk Reduction Missions

Two Different Views of the Engineering Problem Space Station

Human Spaceflight Programmes and Possible Greek Participation

Kennedy Space Center. Connecting Space Grant with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

STEM Teacher Roundtable Aerospace Engineering Sean Tully CRS/Cygnus Systems Engineering Manager

MAXIMIZING NASA S POTENTIAL IN FLIGHT AND ON THE GROUND: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE NEXT ADMINISTRATION

John P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

2009 ESMD Space Grant Faculty Project

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

IAC-14.D2.8-A5.4.2 COOPERATIVE SCENARIOS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

Space Exploration. Summary. Contents. Rob Waring. Level 3-1. Before Reading Think Ahead During Reading Comprehension... 5

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

ExoMars and Beyond. Thales Alenia Space. Feb 28th, 9:00 AM. Follow this and additional works at:

Billionaires want to help Trump send rockets to the moon again

ISS and beyond: What is in there for You?

10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.

Evolvable Mars Campaign & SKGs

Why and How Humanity Must Return to the Moon

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

IAC-13-A3.1.3.x17944 COORDINATED ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT INTERESTS FOR THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: THE GER TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MAP

From ISS to Human Space Exploration: TAS-I contribution and perspectives

COVER FEATURE BUILDING THE NEXT SPACE AGE BUILDING THE NEXT INSTEAD OF DESTINATIONS AND DEADLINES, THE U.S. SPACE PROGRAM SHOULD

On July 20, 1969, Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong became the first human beings to walk on the moon. Armstrong stepped out first, followed 20 minutes

ESA Preparation for Human Exploration ACQUIRING CAPABILITIES

High Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA

estec REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Technologies, science payloads, and commercial services for lunar missions ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use

Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities

Preliminary Report Regarding NASA s Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle

International Space Station. Josephine Burnett ISS Ground Processing & Research Office, Director

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

Emerging LEO Economy. Carissa Christensen April 26, 2016

IAC-11-D3.1.2 ISECG MISSION SCENARIOS AND THEIR ROLE IN INFORMING NEXT STEPS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

STATEMENT OF TIM HUGHES SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FOR GLOBAL BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

On July 8th, 2011, STS 135, the final space shuttle mission, launched from the

Human Exploration and Operations: AA Perspective. Bill Gerstenmaier April 22, 2013

AVSS Project. ENAE483 Fall 2012

MOON Outcome of the Symposium on a New Era of Human and Robotic Exploration

Transcription:

A Call for Boldness If I were to say, we shall send to the moon a giant rocket on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and return it safely to earth, and do it right and do it first before this decade is out then we must be bold. President Kennedy September 1962

NASA s Bold Response

Space Shuttle and International Space Station World's first reusable spacecraft, and first spacecraft in history that could carry large satellites to and from orbit. Launched like a rocket, maneuvered in Earth orbit like a spacecraft, and landed like an airplane. Orbited the earth at 115 to 400 statute miles with a velocity of over 17,321 mph. Since 1981 it boosted more than 3 million pounds of cargo into orbit, and more than 600 crew members. Altitude: ~200 miles above earth. Velocity: 17,240 MPH, completing 15.7 orbits per day Joint project between United States, Russia, Japan, Canada, several European countries, and Brazil. World-class research platform for biomedical, material science, fluid physics, biotechnology, quantum physics, astronomy and meteorology. Permanently manned since November 2, 2000.

Fulfilling a New Era of Boldness our goal is no longer just a destination to reach. Our goal is the capacity for people to work and learn and operate and live safely beyond the Earth for extended periods of time, ultimately in ways that are more sustainable and even indefinite. American footprints on distant worlds are not too big a dream President Trump February 2017 President Obama April 2010

Our Goal The The nation s nation s goal goal for for space space exploration is to exploration lead an effort is that to lead expands an human effort presence that expands deeper into human the solar presence system through deeper a into sustainable the solar human system and through robotic spaceflight a sustainable program. human and robotic spaceflight program. 6

EXPLORATION DESTINATIONS 100s of Miles International Space Station 220 miles 1,000s of Miles 10,000s of Miles Moon 239,000 miles 70 t 100,000s of Miles 1,000,000s of Miles 10,000,000s of Miles Lagrangian Point L2 274,000 Near-Earth miles Asteroid 3,100,000 miles 100,000,000s of Miles Mars 34,600,000 miles Commercial Partners Earth 130 t Europa 390,400,000 miles Human Space Operations Human Space Exploration Robotic Science 8150 Public Version

MARS IS HARD THERE & BACK The ability to launch a very powerful rocket High-reliability spacecraft systems Size requirements of crew capsule Validation of performance of SLS and Orion in the deep space environment (hotter, colder, radiation) Deep space navigation Rendezvous and docking Life support systems High speed re-entry HAPPY & HEALTHY Air, water, food Waste containment Psychological impact Low- / no-gravity Medical emergencies Bone loss Radiation Ocular degeneration Hygiene WELL EQUIPPED & PRODUCTIVE Sample handling Microgravity operations Space suits Advanced training and tools Mission planning Situational awareness and decision making Crew relationships

Hazards of Spaceflight Space Radiation Altered Gravity/Physiological Changes Isolation and Confinement Distance from Earth Hostile/Closed Environment

Exercising in Zero-G

One-year Mission and Twins Study Scott Kelly Mark Kelly Twin Study: NASA selected 10 investigations to conduct with identical twin astronauts Scott and Mark Kelly. These investigations will provide broader insight into the subtle effects and changes that may occur in spaceflight as compared to Earth by studying two individuals who have the same genetics, but are in different environments for one year. http://www.nasa.gov/twinsstudy/research

Exploring Space In Partnership Now Using the International Space Station 2020s Operating in the Lunar Vicinity 2030s Leaving the Earth- Moon System and Reaching Mars Orbit Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phases 3 and 4 Solve exploration mission challenges through research and systems testing on the ISS. Understand if and when lunar resources are available Conduct missions in cislunar space; assemble Deep Space Gateway and Deep Space Transport Complete Deep Space Transport and conduct Mars verification mission Missions to the Mars system, the surface of Mars

PHASE 1

Phase 1 Plan Establishing deep-space leadership and preparing for Deep Space Transport development Deep Space Gateway Buildup EM-1 Europa Clipper EM-2 EM-3 EM-4 EM-5 SLS Block 1 Crew: 0 SLS Block 1B Cargo 2018-2025 2026 SLS Block 1B Crew: 4 CMP Capability: 8-9T SLS Block 1B Crew: 4 CMP Capability: 10mT SLS Block 1B Crew: 4 CMP Capability: 10mT SLS Block 1B Crew: 4 CPL Capability: 10mT These essential Gateway elements can support multiple U.S. and international partner objectives in Phase 1 and beyond Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO) 26-40 days Gateway (blue) Configuration (Orion in grey) Europa Clipper (subject to approval) Jupiter Direct 40kW Power/Prop Bus Multi-TLI Lunar Free Return 8-21 days Habitation Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) 16-26 days Cislunar Support Flight Logistics NRHO, w/ ability to translate to/from other cislunar orbits 26-42 days Cislunar Support Flight Airlock NRHO, w/ ability to translate to/from other cislunar orbits 26-42 days Known Parameters: Gateway to architecture supports Phase 2 and beyond activities International and U.S. commercial development of elements and systems Gateway will translate uncrewed between cislunar orbits Ability to support science objectives in cislunar space Open Opportunities: Order of logistics flights and logistics providers Use of logistics modules for available volume Ability to support lunar surface missions 14

Future work to refine later elements; early feasibility trades complete Airlock Deep Space Transport 15 Deep Space Gateway Functionality Assumptions Deep Space Gateway provides ability to support multiple NASA, U.S. commercial, and international partner objectives in Phase 1 and beyond The Gateway is designed for deep space environments Supports (with Orion docked) crew of 4 for total mission up to 42 days Supports buildup of the Deep Space Transport Open trade for compatibility for operations in Low Lunar Orbit Emphasis on defining early Phase 1 elements Gateway Power Propulsion Bus Gateway Habitat Logistics Strategy

Core Values Mission success requires uncompromising commitment to: Safety Excellence Mission Success Teamwork Integrity Safety: NASA s constant attention to safety is the cornerstone upon which we build mission success. We are committed, individually and as a team, to protecting the safety of the public, our partners, our employees, and those assets that the Nation entrusts to us.

S&MA Disciplines KSC S&MA applies the following disciplines to ensure the safety of the institution, reduce the probability of mishaps, and enhance the probability of mission success. Operational Safety System Safety Software Assurance KSC S&MA Quality Mission Assurance Engineering 17

Launch Services Program (LSP) Quality Engineering

Commercial Crew Program (CCP) Quality Engineering

Capsule Parachute System Quality Engineering

Characteristics of a Good Quality Professional Technically credible Courageous and full of integrity Solid knowledge of quality requirements and rationale Above average communication skills (verbal & written) Experienced in applicable field Humble yet not reserved Persistent yet pragmatic Energetic and creative ( yes if ) Skeptical but not cynical Thick skinned with a sense of humor (for longevity)

The Transformation of KSC Past 4 years have seen tremendous change: 43% reduction in workforce 28% reduction in active facilities Developed a robust plan to execute KSC s vision Implementing the KSC vision: Modernizing our facilities and infrastructure for multiple users Updating policies for maximum autonomy and flexibility Supporting NASA priorities and science missions

O&C High Bay

Multi-Payload Processing Facility

Mobile Launcher Orion Service Module Umbilical Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage Umbilical Aft Skirt Electrical Umbilical

Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB)

Launch Pad 39B

Launch Control Center Firing Room 1 Apollo Shuttle GSDO

Launch Pad 39A

Commercial Crew & Cargo Processing Facility

Launch Complex 41

The Future is Now