COORDINATION GAMES. Nash Equilibria, Schelling Points and the Prisoner s Dilemma. Owain Evans, MIT Paradox, Monday 25 February 2013.

Similar documents
Game Theory. Vincent Kubala

ECON 282 Final Practice Problems

EC3224 Autumn Lecture #02 Nash Equilibrium

Game Theory. Vincent Kubala

Reading Robert Gibbons, A Primer in Game Theory, Harvester Wheatsheaf 1992.

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 4

1\2 L m R M 2, 2 1, 1 0, 0 B 1, 0 0, 0 1, 1

Introduction to (Networked) Game Theory. Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2014 Prof. Michael Kearns

Introduction to (Networked) Game Theory. Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2016 Prof. Michael Kearns

CS510 \ Lecture Ariel Stolerman

"Students play games while learning the connection between these games and Game Theory in computer science or Rock-Paper-Scissors and Poker what s

RECITATION 8 INTRODUCTION

Multiagent Systems: Intro to Game Theory. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

NORMAL FORM (SIMULTANEOUS MOVE) GAMES

Multiagent Systems: Intro to Game Theory. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

Multi-player, non-zero-sum games

Multiagent Systems: Intro to Game Theory. CS 486/686: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence

THEORY: NASH EQUILIBRIUM

FIRST PART: (Nash) Equilibria

ECO 220 Game Theory. Objectives. Agenda. Simultaneous Move Games. Be able to structure a game in normal form Be able to identify a Nash equilibrium

EconS Game Theory - Part 1

Introduction to Game Theory I

Game theory Computational Models of Cognition

Finance Solutions to Problem Set #8: Introduction to Game Theory

Game Theory ( nd term) Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi. Graduate School of Management and Economics Sharif University of Technology.

INTRODUCTION TO GAME THEORY

Mixed Strategies; Maxmin

Chapter 3 Learning in Two-Player Matrix Games

CPS 570: Artificial Intelligence Game Theory

16.410/413 Principles of Autonomy and Decision Making

Spring 2014 Quiz: 10 points Answer Key 2/19/14 Time Limit: 53 Minutes (FAS students: Teaching Assistant. Total Point Value: 10 points.

Analyzing Games: Mixed Strategies

Introduction to Game Theory

Noncooperative Games COMP4418 Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

LECTURE 26: GAME THEORY 1

Chapter 15: Game Theory: The Mathematics of Competition Lesson Plan

CSC304 Lecture 3. Game Theory (More examples, PoA, PoS) CSC304 - Nisarg Shah 1

Chapter 30: Game Theory

Game Theory Week 1. Game Theory Course: Jackson, Leyton-Brown & Shoham. Game Theory Course: Jackson, Leyton-Brown & Shoham Game Theory Week 1

Homework 5 Answers PS 30 November 2013

ECO 5341 Strategic Behavior Lecture Notes 3

CSCI 699: Topics in Learning and Game Theory Fall 2017 Lecture 3: Intro to Game Theory. Instructor: Shaddin Dughmi

Note: A player has, at most, one strictly dominant strategy. When a player has a dominant strategy, that strategy is a compelling choice.

CMU-Q Lecture 20:

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Dominance

Lecture #3: Networks. Kyumars Sheykh Esmaili

Lecture 6: Basics of Game Theory

Grade 7/8 Math Circles. February 14 th /15 th. Game Theory. If they both confess, they will both serve 5 hours of detention.

Problem 1 (15 points: Graded by Shahin) Recall the network structure of our in-class trading experiment shown in Figure 1

Game Theory Lecturer: Ji Liu Thanks for Jerry Zhu's slides

CSC304 Lecture 2. Game Theory (Basic Concepts) CSC304 - Nisarg Shah 1

DECISION MAKING GAME THEORY

Lecture 10: September 2

Introduction to Game Theory

n-person Games in Normal Form

Computing Nash Equilibrium; Maxmin

Game theory. Logic and Decision Making Unit 2

A Brief Introduction to Game Theory

A Brief Introduction to Game Theory

Evolutionary Game Theory and Linguistics

Introduction to Game Theory

Agenda. Intro to Game Theory. Why Game Theory. Examples. The Contractor. Games of Strategy vs other kinds

Domination Rationalizability Correlated Equilibrium Computing CE Computational problems in domination. Game Theory Week 3. Kevin Leyton-Brown

0.1 Battle of the Sexes. 0.2 Chicken. 0.3 Coordination Game

PARALLEL NASH EQUILIBRIA IN BIMATRIX GAMES ISAAC ELBAZ CSE633 FALL 2012 INSTRUCTOR: DR. RUSS MILLER

[ Game Theory ] A short primer

Game Theory Intro. Lecture 3. Game Theory Intro Lecture 3, Slide 1

Multiple Agents. Why can t we all just get along? (Rodney King)

Games of Perfect Information and Backward Induction

Mixed strategy Nash equilibrium

Japanese. Sail North. Search Search Search Search

Finite games: finite number of players, finite number of possible actions, finite number of moves. Canusegametreetodepicttheextensiveform.

Chapter 13. Game Theory

First Prev Next Last Go Back Full Screen Close Quit. Game Theory. Giorgio Fagiolo

Math 464: Linear Optimization and Game

Nash Equilibrium. Felix Munoz-Garcia School of Economic Sciences Washington State University. EconS 503

Introduction to IO. Introduction to IO

Lecture 13(ii) Announcements. Lecture on Game Theory. None. 1. The Simple Version of the Battle of the Sexes

Lecture 3: Nash Equilibrium

Extensive Games with Perfect Information A Mini Tutorial

The book goes through a lot of this stuff in a more technical sense. I ll try to be plain and clear about it.

UPenn NETS 412: Algorithmic Game Theory Game Theory Practice. Clyde Silent Confess Silent 1, 1 10, 0 Confess 0, 10 5, 5

CMU Lecture 22: Game Theory I. Teachers: Gianni A. Di Caro

Computational Methods for Non-Cooperative Game Theory

Advanced Microeconomics (Economics 104) Spring 2011 Strategic games I

Introduction to Game Theory

Genetic Algorithms in MATLAB A Selection of Classic Repeated Games from Chicken to the Battle of the Sexes

ESSENTIALS OF GAME THEORY

What is Trust and How Can My Robot Get Some? AIs as Members of Society

Game Theory. 6 Dynamic Games with imperfect information

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Game Theory I (PR 5) The main ideas

Copyright 2008, Yan Chen

Introduction to Game Theory

Backward Induction and Stackelberg Competition

(a) Left Right (b) Left Right. Up Up 5-4. Row Down 0-5 Row Down 1 2. (c) B1 B2 (d) B1 B2 A1 4, 2-5, 6 A1 3, 2 0, 1

Game Theory. Department of Electronics EL-766 Spring Hasan Mahmood

Lecture 5: Subgame Perfect Equilibrium. November 1, 2006

Design of intelligent surveillance systems: a game theoretic case. Nicola Basilico Department of Computer Science University of Milan

Economics 201A - Section 5

Self-interested agents What is Game Theory? Example Matrix Games. Game Theory Intro. Lecture 3. Game Theory Intro Lecture 3, Slide 1

Transcription:

COORDINATION GAMES Nash Equilibria, Schelling Points and the Prisoner s Dilemma Owain Evans, MIT Paradox, Monday 25 February 2013.

2 Newcomb s Paradox $1,000? Box A Box B Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

3 Newcomb s Paradox: Causal Graph Prediction: (1m_onebox, 0_2box) Outcome: (1m+100, 1m, 100, 0) Choice: (OneBox, TwoBox)

4 Newcomb s Paradox: EDT problems EDT fails: If Predictor perfect, then P($0 / OneBox) is undefined. Assume I know I m rational: conditional on any action, I must obtain the highest possible utility in this situation. So choose randomly. Double transparent box Newcomb and other exotic problems.

5 Newcomb s Paradox: CDT problems Does Newcomb reward irrationality? Example of God who kills people for using the best possible decision theory. Key observation: Reward for OneBoxing, but no dependence on how the decision is made. Best possible theory could succeed. Reflective-consistency: CDT agent, given the chance to change DT before Newcomb Or: CDT agent, enters an AI in a competition where one of challenges is NP CDT will modify itself into a non-cdt theory. Conclusion: CDT is not stable under intelligence and so no smart CDT agents will survive.

6 PD: Structure Cooperate Defect Cooperate (4,4) (1,5) Defect (5,1) (2,2)

7 PD: Scenarios in Economics Gains from Trade: Player 1 needs wool as much as Player 2 needs wheat. Trade is conducted by exchanging sealed boxes. By the time boxes can be opened, the other Player has left. Cartel: Two sellers of a good. Prices are announced simultaneously and can t be changed.

8 Pivot: Coordination Games GOAL: Find a decision theory that wins on PD and NP and does well on standard problems. Strategy: PD and NP are coordination problems. Study other coordination problems and find decision theories that solve them.

9 Why is game theory hard? One-player games are easy: Work out the consequences of each action and take action with highest EV. Example: Playing the lottery or 1-player casino games; betting on the weather.

10 Why is game theory hard? Simple coordination game 1: (normal pset) Group Study Cafe Group Study (1,1) (0.5,0) Cafe (0,0.5) (0,0) If players are symmetric, then simulation leads to infinite regress. (Can t happen with natural systems). With asymmetry, simulation is possible. Example: PD vs. religious law-follower.

11 Nash Equilibrium In physics and biology, you can sometimes make predictions even if simulation is intractable: Complex slope, but easy to find the stable equilibria Sex-ratio in biology Image courtesy of Rosso Pomodoro Podcast on Flickr. Available CC BY-NC-SA. Informal definition: A set of strategies/actions is a Nash Equilibrium if no player can do better by changing his strategy while everyone else s are held fixed. Idea: A non-nash pair of actions is unstable because one of the players can do better by doing something else.

12 Nash Equilibrium Simple coordination game: we can predict outcome using NE, and if players each play NE, then they ll do well. PD: If each player plays NE, they both defect. Also for purely competitive games: e.g. Rock-Paper- Scissors. (No NE in pure strategies). Image courtesy of TEDx Athens on Flickr. Available CC BY-NC. Extensively studied and applied in economics. Also studies of computational complexity of finding the NE by MIT s Daskalakis.

13 Schelling game: Rules You get a point if you and your partner provide the same answer. You should face away from each other and are not allowed to communicate in any way before writing your answer down. Image courtesy of New America Foundation on Flickr. Available CC BY-NC-SA.

14 Multiple Equilibria Coordination Games Simple coordination game 2: (collaborative project) Group Study Cafe Group (1,1) (0,0) Study Cafe (0,0) (0.5,0.5) Schelling game: (café is quiet) Group Study Cafe Group (1,1) (0,0) Study Cafe (0,0) (1,1)

15 Schelling Games Many examples: Driving Problem, Rowing, Deciding on Linguistic Conventions How to resolve: One player goes first One player can simulate the other (asymmetric)

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.118 Paradox & Infinity Spring 2013 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.