Pavement Markings Under Wet Night Road Conditions A Comparison of 2 Beads in Grooved High Build Waterborne on I-215I
Retroreflectivity- Right Right back atchya Correctly embedded glass bead returns light back to the driver 2
Can t t see lines on a wet night Yellow median White Shoulder (photo from FHWA) 3
Available Wet-night Solutions Profiled Materials (Have tried but plows tear up) Tape Thermoplasitcs Methylmethacrylate RPM & Plowable Markers (not options in Utah) Various Beads Potters Swarco 3M elements 4
Lessons Learned From 1/8 in. Depth Grooved High Build Waterborne 3+ years performance at 1/3 to 1/5 cost of durables Dirt and water accumulation not an issue on higher speed roads No vehicle loss of control Maintainable (can be refreshed-4 applications) UDOT forces can do it 5
I-215 Project Wet-night application at lower cost than other wet-night options Compare 2 manufacturer s s wet-night beads Mixed 50/50 with UDOT std. spec. beads Lower cost-adding $0.10 to cost per foot Total $0.75 per foot Subjective and quantitative evaluation ASTM E2177-Wet Recovery Method Video in wet weather Over at least 2 winters 6
Experimental Design Retroreflectivity Readings 1320 ft. increments ASTM E2177, Wet Recovery Test Method ASTM E1710, Dry Test Method Spring and Fall By LTAP Center (USU) Video Spring and Fall during rainstorm 7
Potter s Visimax Beads Swarco Plus 9 Spots 8
Potter Visimax 9
Swarco Plus 9 Spots 10
Installation Interstate Barricades-grooving and paint installation 11
Installation, cont. 12 Installation 9/15/08
Retroreflectivity Data ASTM E2177-Wet Recovery Method 13
Retroreflectivity Data 150 considered minimum for interstate Wet numbers are significantly lower Typical for all lines 14
SB Outside Lane Beginning Transition Faint Skip Skip 15
SB Outside Lane Ending Transition Skip No Skip 16
Video in the Rain Both Potter and Swarco Beads performed similarly Video s s were shot in Sept. 2008 and April 2009 Video, Sept. 2008, SB, Potter's Visimax Beads 17
Lessons Learned Paint not adhering to patches or polished surface Will change spec to require diamond blades spaced at 1/8 to provide better adhesion 18
Lessons Learned 3M Element not used for test because of higher cost and proprietary nature. 3M required: Own paint Own elements Own certified installer Now cost has come down and is no longer proprietary, so they will be included in next test. 19
Summary/Conclusions Gives increased options of bead types and gradations because plows will not wear them as easily Can be installed easily with State forces or local contractors Now becoming part of operational decisions Will be installing more on other surfaces under different condition Now 3 low cost wet night options using high build waterborne paint 20
Contacts Dan Betts, Operations, 801-975 975-4834, dbetts@utah.gov Ken Berg, Research, 801-965 965-4321, kenberg@utah.gov Vincent Liu, Traffic & Safety, 801-965 965-4264, vliu@utah.gov Rich Clarke, Maintenance, 801-965 965-4120, richardclarke@utah.gov Questions/Comments? 21
Questions/Comments? 22