Mobius3D. Software based IMRT QA

Similar documents
Emerging Technology: Real-Time Monitoring of Treatment Delivery EPID Exit Dose QA

Nathan Childress, Ph.D., DABR

PHYSICS QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

IQM Detector Characteristics: Signal reproducibility

3D Diode Array Commissioning: Building Confidence in 3D QA Technology

7/23/2014. Acknowledgements. Implementing a new digital medical accelerator. New Generation of Medical Accelerators

LINEAR ACCELERATOR. Buyer's Guide. Version 1.1

ISPFILMQATM STATE-OF-THE-ART RADIOTHERAPY VERIFICATION SOFTWARE. Supports all major radiotherapy technologies! FilmQA TM

ArcCHECK, ein neuartiger QS-Ansatz bei der Rotationsbestrahlung

X3D in Radiation Therapy Procedure Planning. Felix G. Hamza-Lup, Ph.D. Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University Savannah, Georgia USA

The Current State of EPID-Based Linear Accelerator Quality Assurance. Disclosures. Purpose of this First Talk 8/3/2017

Initial Experience with a Commercial System for Volumetric Analysis of Patient Specific QA. Katja Langen Mariana Guerrero Shifeng Chen Shh..

COMPREHENSIVE TG-142 IMAGING AND MACHINE QA

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. David Shepard Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, WA

Quality Assurance Results for a Commercial Radiosurgery System: A Communication

A Generalized Strategy for 3D Dose Verification of IMRT/VMAT Using EPID-measured Transit Images

8/3/2016. The EPID Strikes Back. Novel Applications for Current EPID Technology. Joerg Rottmann, PhD. Disclosures and acknowledgements

Isocenter and Field of View Accuracy Measurement Software for Linear Accelerator

Sensitivity study of an automated system for daily patient QA using EPID exit dose images

Aperture Based Inverse Planning AAPM Summer School 2003

A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer *

ArcCHECK. The Ultimate 4D QA Solution. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

IMRT Delivery System QA. IMRT Dose Delivery. Acceptance testing. Why: specific tests for IMRT? Accuracy of leaf positioning (gaps) MLC Alignment

8/3/2017. Use of EPIDs for Non-Routine Linac QA. Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Parts of this project received support from Varian Medical System.

SRS MapCHECK. SRS Patient QA, No Film. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

SUN NUCLEAR. EPIDose : An Overview of EPIDose and the EPIDose Process and Algorithm. corporation. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

ArcCHECKTM. The Ultimate 4D QA Solution. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools. VMAT RapidArc TomoTherapy Pinnacle 3 SmartArc Conventional IMRT

Commissioning. Basic machine performance MLC Dose rate control Gantry speed control End-to-end tests

SRS MapCHECK. SRS Patient QA, No Film. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools

DOSELAB TOMOTHERAPY TG-148 QA QUICK GUIDE TG-148 RECOMMENDED TESTS 1. V.B.1.C. - Y-JAW DIVERGENCE/BEAM CENTERING

CHAPTER 2 COMMISSIONING OF KILO-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY

A positioning QA procedure for 2D/2D (kv/mv) and 3D/3D (CT/CBCT) image matching for radiotherapy patient setup

The Ultimate 4D QA Solution A 4D isotropic cylindrical detector array for arc delivery QA and Dosimetry.

An Introduction to TG-142 Imaging QA Using Standard Imaging Products. Mark Wiesmeyer, PhD, DABR Technical Product Manager Standard Imaging, Inc.

A diagnostic tool for basic daily quality assurance of a tomotherapy Hi Art machine

Characterization, Commissioning and Evaluation of Delta 4 IMRT QA System. Ram Sadagopan 1 UTMD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX.

Development of the Use of Amorphous Silicon (ASi) Electronic Portal Imaging Devices as a Physics Tool for Routine Linear Accelerator QA

Comparative performance evaluation of a new a-si EPID that exceeds quad high-definition resolution

Comparison of peripheral dose measurements using Ionization chamber and MOSFET detector

Conflict Disclosure. Rotational IMRT. Arc therapy. Dynamic Arc therapy. Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy Principles and Perspectives

University of Wollongong. Research Online

Evaluation of dosimetry parameters of photons and electron beams using a linear ionization chamber array

Commissioning and Calibrating a Linear Accelerator State-of-the-Art in 2010

GafChromic QuiCk Phantom with EBT3P/3+P Film and FilmQA Pro for Radiation Therapy Dosimetry Applications

Initial setup and subsequent temporal position monitoring using implanted RF transponders

Performance evaluation of the RITG148 + set of TomoTherapy quality assurance tools using RTQA 2 radiochromic film

Evaluation of a diode array for QA measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Installation und Kommissionierung des Viewray MRIdian Linac Hamburg, 28. Mai 2018 Sebastian Klüter

TOMOTHERAPY H SERIES TomoH, TomoHD and TomoHDA Systems Technical Specifications

Characterization and evaluation of an integrated quality monitoring system for online quality assurance of external beam radiation therapy

Fast Real Time Calibration of a Varian 2100 (High Energy) series LINAC

Sub-mm accuracy of accelerators: How manufacturers achieve it, how physicists verify it

- Water resistant. - Large size.

Accuracy of SRS dose delivery using the TomoTherapy Hi-Art System

Phantoms in Medical Physics (RT) U. Oelfke. Division of Radiotherapy & Imaging

Impact of energy variation on Cone Ratio, PDD10, TMR20 10 and IMRT doses for flattening filter free (FFF) beam of TomoTherapy Hi-Art TM machines

Gantry angle determination during arc IMRT: evaluation of a simple EPID-based technique and two commercial inclinometers

A Beam-Level Delivery Accuracy Study of the Robotic Image Guided Radiosurgery System Using a Scintillator/CCD Phantom

Beam Commissioning and Annual QA Phantoms, Detectors & Accessories. iba-dosimetry.com

A proposed method for linear accelerator photon beam steering using EPID

Stability of the Helical TomoTherapy Hi Art II detector for treatment beam irradiations

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

CHAPTER 6 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF VARIAN ON-BOARD IMAGER

Addressing Limitations of a Spatially Sensitive Large-Area Ion Chamber for Real-Time Verification of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Imaging system QA of a medical accelerator, Novalis Tx, for IGRT per TG 142: our 1 year experience

A new approach to measure dwell position inaccuracy in HDR ring applicators quantification and corrective QA

Beam Production, Characteristics and Shaping

Department of Physics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, USA

Commissioning an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator

Four-dimensional in vivo dosimetry by dose reconstruction using continuous EPID images and phase sorting method. JiHyung Yoon.

Monica Kishore. Medical Physics Graduate Program Duke University. Approved: Jennifer O Daniel, Co-Supervisor. Fang-Fang Yin, Co-Supervisor

Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy

Pixel response-based EPID dosimetry for patient specific QA

Nancy G. Leveson and Clark S. Turner, An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents. Computer 26(7), pp , Jul Presented by Dror Feitelson

Accurate two-dimensional IMRT verification using a back-projection EPID dosimetry method

Monte Carlo study on a new concept of a scanning photon beam system for IMRT

Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification

Remy Manigold University of Nevada, Las Vegas, UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones

Peace of Mind. Automated.

Historical perspective on IMRT AAPM Summer School: June My view is not the only one. What is history? William Valentine Mayneord.

Automated dose control in multi-slice CT. Nicholas Keat Formerly ImPACT, St George's Hospital, London

A Guide to Radiochromic Film Dosimetry with EBT2 and EBT3

Distributed source x-ray tube technology for tomosynthesis imaging

specifications The Complete Radiation Oncology Solution

END-TO-END TESTING OF THE LEKSELL GAMMA KNIFE ICON SYSTEM

Aim. Images for this section: Page 2 of 13

QUALITY CONTROL SOFTWARE FOR RADIOTHERAPY AND MEDICAL IMAGING

Table 1: Available X-ray Beam Energy Combinations (MV) 6 10/ Yes Yes 6 16/15 6 Yes No 6 23/18 6 Yes No 6 25/20 6 Yes No

Published in: Radiation Oncology. Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

specifications Novalis Tx image-guided radiosurgery linear accelerator

The most Comprehensive, Reliable, Economical and Easy to use GAFCHROMIC film based RT QA system Updated Feb 08 BUSINESS UNIT OF ISP

QUALITY CONTROL PHANTOMS FOR RADIOTHERAPY AND MEDICAL IMAGING

The evaluation of minimum detectable phantom thickness change using a scanning liquid filled ion chamber EPID dose response

SUBCHAPTER 14. THERAPEUTIC INSTALLATIONS

MONTE CARLO MODELLING OF A-SI EPID RESPONSE: THE

TOMOHD. Product Specifications

State of the Art Film Dosimetry

ISO Cube Daily QA Package

Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID

Transcription:

Mobius3D Software based IMRT QA

What is Mobius Medical Systems? Clinical Expertise Software Expertise Nathan Childress, Ph.D., Founder Eli Stevens, Chief Technical Officer Support Expertise Physicists and dosimetrists with real-world clinical experience 9

What is Mobius3D? Software Plan Verification Delivery Verification Every patient, every plan, every fraction

Mobius3D: A complete QA system Photon calculations IMRT / VMAT EDW / physical wedges SRS cones TomoTherapy Every TPS Electron calculations Brachytherapy calculations MU verifications IMRT QA Varian DynaLogs Varian Trajectory Logs Elekta Logs Daily patient QA MVP measurement phantom

How does it work? Computer software with a dedicated server Automatically analyzes every patient s treatment plan Automatically analyzes measurements of treatment delivery Automatically alerts you to problems Easy to use web application

What will Mobius3D do for your clinic? Mobius3D will vastly improve the: + + Safety Efficiency of your patient s treatments Accuracy

Safer is better!

What clinical errors can impact patient safety? Systemic TPS problems Human errors made during planning Data transfer errors (see NY Times) Delivery errors

Mobius3D detects systemic TPS problems Mobius3D can uncover TPS limitations and commissioning issues Independent beam models and an independent 3D dose calculation Mobius3D can reveal deliverability problems before the patient even enters the treatment room Mobius3D checks for gantry clearance and warns of possible collisions Mobius3D alerts you to violations of your accelerator limitations which would result in an interlock when the plan is delivered

Mobius3D detects systemic TPS problems Incorrect jaw tolerance settings in linac control system (Allegiance Health) Dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) incorrect setting in TPS (Lewis Gale) Couch rotation error (Gibson Cancer Center) AAA algorithm limitations (St. Anthony s) Collision alert on a medial breast setup (St. Anthony s)

Mobius3D detects human errors made during planning Mobius3D can uncover contouring errors Mobius3D can draw attention to improper dose grid coverage Mobius3D reveals if clinical protocols aren t followed

Mobius3D detects data transfer errors Mobius3D is the only system we are aware of that verifies that the information in the R&V system is exactly what the plan from the TPS specified for every single fraction delivered

Mobius3D detects data transfer errors From 1997 to 2007, the World Health Organization reported 1,732 incidents in radiotherapy were due to data transfer errors A 2007 analysis of the Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (ROSIS) database showed that 49% of events reported had an element of data transfer that caused or contributed to the event Symington reported a corruption of data during transfer of a plan from a different site which was not identified during traditional QA methods but was flagged by Mobius3D

Mobius3D detects linac delivery errors A good plan alone, does not guarantee a successful delivery Mobius3D uses log file measurements from every IMRT/VMAT delivery to verify that the machine successfully delivered the plan If there are any issues, the software shows in full 3D what the difference in dose to the patient was for every target and every ROI What information do log files contain? Fractional MU Delivered MU * MLC Positions Jaw Positions Gantry Angles Collimator Angles Couch Angles * Beam Energy * Wedge Insertion * Other Inserts * * TrueBeam and Elekta Only

Why trust treatment log measurements? Every data source has secondary mechanisms verifying the information The data is written with extremely high temporal and spatial resolution up to 100 times per second and down to 0.01mm Machine QA, such as that recommended in TG-142 verifies the measurements in treatment logs are accurate

Mobius3D detects linac delivery errors Data from customers have shown that with increasing modulation, greater errors in MLC position occur Research has shown that a 1 mm systematic change in MLC position can result in up to a 12% difference in target doses This is especially pronounced in SBRT treatments with small average field sizes One user recently reported several SBRT treatments failed Mobius3D delivery verification, yet their traditional measurements said all was OK Recent articles by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core at Houston (IROC) have shown that traditional methods are insensitive to many, if not all failures during delivery

About patient positioning and changes in anatomy We understand that patient positioning and changes in anatomy are important aspects in safely delivering radiation therapy and log files do not contain this information EPID measurements contain this information, but they fail to produce results that are sensitive, specific, and actionable The clear choice for patient position and anatomy analysis for the next-generation QA system is CBCT data and research is underway to transform your CBCT data into a useful quantitative check and include this capability in Mobius3D

EPID Transit Dosimetry vs. CBCT EPID images showing (a) correctly delivered 90 prostate field, (b) phantom shifted 2 cm longitudinally (99.4% 3%/3 mm gamma passing rate), (c) phantom shifted 2 cm vertically (98.6%), and (d)2 cm bolus added to phantom (100%). Images from CBCT analysis currently being researched. The vertical 2 cm shift in the prostate case results in clear differences in the images and significantly reduced passing rates.

More efficient is better!

What are some sources of clinical inefficiency? Time consuming measurement setup Non-automated data collection and entry Complicated and poorly designed analysis software No identification of the root causes of errors

Mobius3D reduces QA measurement setup time No manual or detailed setup of a device Treatment log measurements happen automatically with each delivered fraction resulting in the elimination of setup time Mobius3D imports data automatically removing manual data entry that takes time and adds risk

Mobius3D software is designed for efficiency Most QA software for radiation oncology is confusing and inefficient in design Mobius3D: Has user-friendly workflow Is accessible via a web browser Allows electronic sign-offs Quickly alerts you to problems Allows for detailed analysis if needed

Mobius3D identifies root causes Other QA systems may indicate a problem, but they do not identify the root cause. This leads to frustration and delay

Mobius3D identifies root causes Mobius3D saves you time by identifying: whether a problem is TPS-calculation or delivery based what linac component failed (e.g, MLC, gantry, collimator) what IMRT segment of the delivery failed Root cause identification improves troubleshooting, which can increase safety also

Mobius3D s brings Efficiency to the clinic MD Anderson realized a ~70% reduction in QA time when switching to Mobius3D for IMRT/VMAT QA One clinic in the Netherlands reported an over 75% reduction in clinical time spent on QA after implementing Mobius3D A site in Canada had not been able to implement VMAT throughout their clinical practice due to the bottlenecks created by traditional QA methods. Mobius3D allowed them to begin performing VMAT on six machines

More accurate is better!

What are some sources of clinical inaccuracy? Older dose calculation algorithms Low-resolution measurements Measurements conflated by too many variables

How does accuracy affect safety and efficiency? If an inaccurate system generates a false passing result, this is a SAFETY issue. The patient will be treated when there is really an unknown problem If an inaccurate system generates a false failing result, this is an EFFICIENCY issue. The effort to identify and fix what is really a nonexistent problem will be a waste of time These are the reasons that accuracy was one of the core tenets when designing Mobius3D

How does Mobius3D ensure accuracy? Advanced and independently verified collapsed-cone convolution superposition algorithm for dose calculation

How does Mobius3D ensure accuracy? Treatment log files measurements provide high resolution (both temporal and spatial) Up to 100 times the accuracy of other QA systems

How does Mobius3D ensure accuracy? Mobius3D s measurements are not fouled-up by the patient s body or treatment couch Mobius3D s measurements do not rely on complex calibrations or spectral-dependent issues (i.e., for EPID dosimetry)

Mobius3D brings Accuracy to the clinic MD Anderson compared the Mobius3D dose calculations and their customized Pinnacle beam model calculations to measurements and found that Mobius3D was more accurate Epworth in Australia checked more than 850 plans and found the mean dose difference between their TPS and Mobius3D to be 0.00%! with a standard deviation of only 1.31% IROC-Houston studies showed that even non-customized beam models in Mobius3D were more accurate than most center s treatment planning systems

Conclusion Just a couple more slides, I promise!

This is our expertise Clinical Founded and run by a medical physicist with a PhD from UT MD Anderson and six years of clinical experience Software design A dedicated team of 8 software engineers with over 70 years of experience including time at Yahoo!, Cisco Systems, and Oracle Support Our extremely responsive group currently includes four medical physicists and two dosimetrists who understand the need for quick and accurate answers to keep your clinic running smoothly

Conclusion Improved Safety Improved Efficiency (with a lot more root cause data) Improved Accuracy Proven!

Thank You 11

What Our Users Are Saying Mobius 3D s workflow saves our clinic valuable time and removes limitations on patient throughput. The software also played a pivotal role in the commissioning of an otherwise difficult to verify delivery and gave valuable insights into areas we cannot realistically measure due to detector/phantom issues David Jolly, MS, CMPS, QMPS, MACPSEM, Medical Physicist, Epworth Hospital, Australia. One of the only unanimous decisions made by Physics, Physicians, Dosimetrists, and Management in the history of our facility. James P. Nunn, MS, CHP, DA BR, LewisGale Hospital. Pulaski, VA Mobius Medical s products are finally giving clinical medical physicists the tools needed to do our jobs intelligently and efficiently! Philip Silgen, M.S., D.A.B.R., Chief Medical Physicist, HealthEast Cancer Care Mobius is a second physicist, or a second set of eyes, for us. James Monroe, PhD, D.A.B.R., Chief Medical Physicist, St. Anthony s Medical Center 10

Be aware of total cost of ownership Besides yearly software maintenance there are no hidden costs with ownership of Mobius3D EPID based solutions will most likely require replacement of EPID panels as they get damaged by radiation Other devices that are placed in the beam will also suffer damage and require replacement over time

Mobius vs. EPID - Cost Comparison Mobius QA Software Mobius3D $50,000 first linac $25,000 additional linacs BrachyTherapy License $4,950 SRS Cone License $4,950 *Mobius3D and MobiusFX are proven as the most accurate, most efficient, and safest plan verification and machine performance tool on the market. Sun Nuclear PerFraction PerFraction 3D* Approx. $35,000 per linac EPID Replacement Approx. $58,000 per linac every 24 months *Sun Nuclear PerFraction 3D is not released or available for purchase on the market. 12

EPID Caution 13

EPID Caution 14

Automatic Brain Metastases Planning Single isocentre with up to 10 arcs over 5 table angles. Automated template based planning. Optimization engine aims to reduce conformity index for each individual met. Results in volumetric dynamic conformal arcs with more than 1 met treated with each sweep. 6X (iplan PBC Profile). IGRT with ExacTrac and 6D couch. Fast and efficient treatment. Slide courtesy of D Jolly Pictures courtesy of BrainLab 42