From Sketch to SketchUp --- Reflecting the application of drawing and computer aided architecture design (CAAD) on studio work Course: Tutor: Carolyn Butterworth, Student: (MAAD) Registration No: 120185469 Date: April 9, 2013
List of figures Fig. 1 Main line of communication.6 Fig. 2 First impression: canal and bridges... 7 Fig. 3 Network of leisure area in Shipley... 8 Fig. 4 Site collage 9 Fig. 5 Site...10 Fig. 6 Section of the site....11 Fig. 7 Bridges on site...12 Fig. 8 Conceptual sketch: slope and bridge...12 Fig. 9 Conceptual sketch: roof...12 Fig. 10 Conceptual SketchUp model. 13 Fig. 11 Comparison of three conceptual SketchUp model 13 Fig. 12 SketchUp model...14 Fig. 13 Eco-bridge 1.. 14 Fig. 14 Section of eco-bridge 1. 15 Fig. 15 Sketch of the eco-bridge structure....15 Fig. 16 Eco-bridge 2...16 Fig. 17 Eco-bridge 3...16 Fig. 18 Perspective of eco-bridge 3.17 Fig. 19 SketchUp model of eco-bridge 3 17 Fig. 20 Model of eco-bridge 3....17 Fig. 21 Relationship between drawing and CAAD 18 1
Contents 1. Introduction...3 2. Drawing and Computer aided architecture design (CAAD).. 3 2.1 Drawing. 3 2.2 Computer aided architecture design (CAAD)...4 3. Three aspects.. 5 3.1 Site perceiving..5 3.2 Conceptual design..... 9 3.3 Design concept.13 4. Conclusion.18 5. Bibliography..20 6. List of figures. 21 2
1. Introduction As architects, drawing is the first thing that they should learn. They inspire architects with visual images, guide designers across confused thoughts, and finally present people beautiful and functional buildings. The wide utilization of computers broadens the way of design. After the first use in 1960s, Computer aided architecture design (CAAD) experienced a rapid developing. For instance, SketchUp, a computer aided software, almost covered all aspects of architecture design, from the conceptual design, drawing, modelling and rending. Compare with traditional drawings, the outcomes of computers are orderly, clear, appearing to be accurate or real and the process of architecture design is more efficient. From this angle, computer aided architecture design injects vigor into conventional design and architectural education. However, it also brings negative influence. The vivid rending by computer always covers the shortages in architecture design. After a brief introduction of drawing and computer aided architecture design, with the reflection of my own experience of studio work, this essay will compare and contrast the applications of drawings and CAAD in three aspects --- site perceiving, conceptual design and structure design, trying to find their own advantages in different areas which can guide designers to design more effectively. 2. Drawing and Computer aided architecture design (CAAD) 2.1 Drawing As people begin to design, drawing is an essential starting position (Edwards, 2008). The role of drawing changes in different periods. In the Middle Ages, the drawings acted a double role which combined plan and the elevation in rigid geometric layout. The design drawing and construction 3
drawing are coincident. However, this situation changed in the Renaissance with the emergence of study drawing which focused on schematic way and became a crucial method to analyze building (Herbert, 1993). In that time, drawing also allowed architectural designers to experiment with the expressive quality of building than did the Middle Ages (Robbins, 1994). Including schemata, in modern architecture design, drawing infiltrates the whole process of design and construction. It is a medium to communicate an idea with clients, a way to analyze building typology, a tool to represent a magnificent building. In total, Straightforwardness is the value of drawing because it brings a method to express designer s abstract and uncertain thought in a visual and clear way (Frascari & Starkey, 2007). Potentially, graphic thinking (Laseau, 2000), which depends on these drawings or schemata to express architects ideas, analyze the buildings and communicate with each other, is the essence of drawing. 2.2 Computer aided architecture design (CAAD) As the name shows, computer aided architecture design, computer will help architects to design buildings in an efficient way in the new century. Compare with the long history of architectural drawing, the history of computer aided architecture design is short. The first application of CAAD is in 1963, Ivan Sutherland s work on the Sketchpad drawing system (Sutherland, 1963). After that, with the speedy development of computer graphics, numerous software is invented (Giddings & Horne, 2002). For example, SketchUp give a new way to explore the shape and layout of the buildings; CAD improves efficiency of drawing various kinds of plans, sections and construction drawings; V-ray benefit the representation of building; Photoshop helps to depict an outstanding view; Illustrator makes diagrams clearer. They reform the way of design and make the process more efficient not only in the design phase but also the construction period. 4
It should be accepted that computer aided architecture design solve many problems that usually happen in hand drawing, such as the accuracy and efficiency. However, it can not replace drawings in design. The following three aspects will discuss how those two methods work in architectural design. 3. Three aspects 3.1 Site perceiving Many architects consider that drawings are preconceived images which are the results of certain ideas (Herbert, 1993). That is unilateral. In the period of site perceiving, when we do not familiar with the site, drawings are the sources of the following design. Taking my studio project as an example, hand drawings provide large information. The topic of studio is architecture and ageing which is focusing on the elderly people s life and the relationship between the elder and the building. The site is in Shipley --- a small town in Bradford in West Yorkshire, England. After researching the basic information of Shipley, drawing the communication system (Fig. 1) on a tracing paper that covered the master plan provide a convenient means to understand the layout of the town: the green one is the railway, the brown one is the main road and the two blue lines are the river and the Leeds Liverpool Canal from above to below. 5
Fig. 1 Main line of communication (Author, 2012) Some people may question that this drawing is just tracing the fixed lines without thinking. However, this work is the foundation stone of the next research. Drawing is a combination of different elements, including the existing factors which are rigid like the medieval sketches and some schemata which are thoughtful as the Renaissance drawings. Based on the traffic system, the designer got familiar with Shipley. After visiting the small town, the designer was attracted by the canal area because this was the energetic region which had diverse activities that can integrate the elder with the youth. The various bridges along the canal offered different types of links between two sides (Fig. 2). The map below (Fig. 2) tells people the functional zoning, the main traffic system and the first impression about the town. Combining notes and schemata, graphic thinking penetrates the whole development (Laseau, 2000). In this period, hand drawing is more convenient than computer to record and analyze data. 6
Fig. 2 First impression: canal and bridges (Author, 2012) The subsequent work is to find a reasonable theme to further the project. In order to make this drawing clear, the designer used Illustrator (a drawing software) to redraw it. Then the network of leisure area in Shipley came out (Fig. 3). With the help of computer, the different regions are distinct. It can be clearly seen that the green circle which is surrounded by peaceful natural environment and closed to sports field is an ideal place for elder people. 7
Fig. 3 Network of leisure area in Shipley (Author, 2013) The next picture (Fig. 4) is the investigation of that area. With some small notable symbols, the whole district is appearing. Considering the red part is previously greenhouse which was closed to the sports field and surrounded by natural landscape, this area is worthy to transform into a nature center that could attract people of all ages to be closed to the nature and enjoy the leisure time along the canal. With the help of computer, the collage present the existing activities, facilities and environment straightly. 8
Fig. 4 Site collage (Author, 2013) 3.2 Conceptual design Conceptual design should be based on the local environment. Besides the knowledge above, more details about the site are necessary before conceptual design. Taking the example of drawing an overall perspective of the site, the importance of this drawing will be found. Benefiting from Google Earth (a software to view the place all over the world), the designer got a vision of the site immediately (Fig. 5). It seems complete that contain everything. However, like a photo, this picture emphasizes everything in the same level which means no emphasis (Laseau, 2000). 9
Fig. 5 Site (Google Earth, 2013) With careful observation and analysis of photos which were token from the site, a perspective sketch (Fig. 6) about the site would present useful data. The section below present clearly of the existing situation of the site in different colors --- blue canal and river, green abandoned greenhouse, orange residential area and three purple rowing house. Besides, there are three meters of altitude difference on site. Additionally, many bridges go across this region which makes it accessible. Compare with the picture from Google Earth, the information on this sketch could be noticed (Fig. 6). 10
Fig. 6 Section of the site (Author, 2013) Considering the various bridges along the river, three types (Fig. 7) of bridges could be sorted. The draft (Fig. 7), associated with the photos, shows the bridges act a vital role in that direct. Furthering the research about the bridges, respecting the height difference on the site and considering the site as a part of Shipley walk way, the concept (Fig. 8, Fig. 9) came out: extracting the image of the bridge as the main pedestrian line which connects the two sides in three meters of height difference, surrounded by the buildings which extend the roofs to the landscape. The vague lines and the different colors represent the process of designer s thoughts, and finally show a rational direction with vivid image. The conceptual drawing and sketch are creative works that help designer sort out effective data logically and trace the progress of the design immediately. 11
Fig. 7 Bridges on site (Author, 2013) Fig. 8 Conceptual sketch: slope and bridge (Author, 2013) Fig. 9 Conceptual sketch: roof (Author, 2013) 12
Simultaneously, computer model (Fig. 10) makes conceptual design from two-dimension to threedimension which can help architects examine their design from every angle, find the weakness and then revise it. Besides, by clicking mouse and keyboard, computer model is so convenient to modify that designers can get more than ten models to compare and contrast in a short time (Fig. 11). From this point, hand drawings is not predominated. Fig. 10 Conceptual SketchUp model (Author, 2013) Fig. 11 Comparison of three conceptual SketchUp model (Author, 2013) 3.3 Structure design When designer made a proportional model and put it on site, it looks inharmonious (Fig. 12) --- it is so large that would not fit this graceful environment and the building area is too big. The problem is the scale which is usually ignored by designers who draw or make model without proportion (Robbins, 1994). 13
Fig. 12 SketchUp model (Author, 2013) Why the construction is massive? The reason is that the eco-bridge (pedestrian line) which links two parts with three meters of altitude difference is too high. If the structure is constructed as Fig. 13 shows, the height of the bridge would be more than three meters, including the corridor (Fig. 14) under the bridge (more than 2.4M) and the growing media (more than 1M). In that case, the bridge would be higher and the slope (Fig. 8) which conducts the people to the bridge would be longer. Consequently, the building would become huge. Fig. 13 Eco-bridge 1 (Author, 2013) 14
Fig. 14 Section of eco-bridge 1 (Author, 2013) Fig. 15 Sketch of the eco-bridge structure (Author, 2013) 15
Computer model provides an apparent view of the shortage of this proposal (Fig. 14) while the diagrams illustrate why it is not suitable (Fig. 13). Combining CAAD and drawing in design could achieve maximum results with comparatively little effort. From the various draft of the eco-bridge structure, the second idea (Fig. 16) came out. Although the space under the bridge is expanded, the height of the bridge is still not changed. The essential problem does not be solved. Fig. 16 Eco-bridge 2 (Author, 2013) Fig. 17 Eco-bridge 3 (Author, 2013) If the growing media could be moved, the height of the bridge would be reduced. With this concept, designer tried to put two crossed structures which can hold the plants along the passage (Fig. 17). So the previously green roof (Fig. 13, Fig. 16) which covered the corridor would be shifted to the sides. Additionally, the space of the aisle under the bridge would be widened, and the bridge would be spacious. By making computer model (Fig. 18, Fig. 19) or physical model (Fig. 19), designer could check to what extent their concept could be completed. From Fig. 18, the construction also seems a bit large, the reason is that the width (3.6M) of the corridor is too wide. After reducing to 2.7M, on Fig. 19, the whole structure looks more harmonious. Furthermore, when architects finish their model on the computer, it is easy to get an exquisite representation of the building (Fig. 19). 16
Fig. 18 Perspective of eco-bridge 3 (Author, 2013) Fig. 19 SketchUp model of eco-bridge 3 (Author, 2013) Fig. 20 Model of eco-bridge 3 (Author, 2013) 17
4. Conclusion After comprehensive reflection of my studio work, the methods of drawing and computer aided architecture design cooperate with each other, permeating the whole design process (Fig. 21). The abilities to instill complexity into a simple sketch and imbue an ordinary diagram with the nuances of a design, such as extracting the image bridge to develop an eco-bridge, have significant meaning that can help designers learn how to observe carefully, analyze deeply and think creatively (Jones, 2011). In terms of CAAD, it is an effective tool to further architecture design which can analyze design factors, check uncertain data, make accurate models and represent admirable pictures. Some of those advantages could not be replaced by drawings, such as making precise models not to mention the mass drawing or modelling of the building efficiently. Fig. 21 Relationship between drawing and CAAD (Author, 2013) In conclusion, comprehensive utilization of drawing and CAAD would make design efficiently. As different architect has different habit, there is no particular standard to define the best way of applying those two methods. With graphic thinking, designer need more and more practice to find an efficient 18
pattern. This essay is just a beginning and the pattern that mentioned in those three aspects need to be modified in the following work. (2046 words) 19
5. Bibliography Edwards, B. (2008). Understanding architecture through drawing. Taylor and Francis. Frascari, M., Hale, J., & Starkey, B. (Eds.). (2007). From models to drawings: imagination and representation in architecture. London: Routledge. Giddings, B., & Horne, M. (2002). Artists impressions in architectural design. London: Spon Press. Herbert, D. (1993). Architectural study drawings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Jones, W. (Eds.). (2011). Architects sketchbooks. London: Thames & Hudson. Laseau, P. (2000). Graphic Thinking for architects and designers. New York: Wiley. Robbins, E. (1994). Why Architects Draw. London: The MIT Press. Sutherland, I. (1963). Sketchpad: a man-machine graphical communications system. Baltimore: Spartan Books. 20
6. List of figures Fig. 1. Main line of communication. Xia, Y. (2012). Main line of communication. Unpublished manuscript....6 Fig. 2. First impression: canal and bridges. Xia, Y. (2012). First impression: canal and bridges. Unpublished manuscript... 7 Fig. 3. Network of leisure area in Shipley. Xia, Y. (2013). Network of leisure area in Shipley. Unpublished manuscript.... 8 Fig. 4. Site collage. Xia, Y. (2013). Site collage. Unpublished manuscript.... 9 Fig. 5. Site. Site. (2013). Retrieved April 6, 2013, from http://ditu.google.cn/maps?q=shipley,+united+kingdom&hl=zh- CN&ie=UTF8&sll=35.86166,104.195397&sspn=53.393656,107.578125&oq=shiple&t=h&brcurrent =3,0x0:0x0,0%3B5,0,0&hnear=%E8%8B%B1%E5%9B%BD%E8%A5%BF%E7%BA%A6%E5%8 5%8B%E9%83%A1%E5%B8%8C%E6%99%AE%E5%88%A9&z=14...10 Fig. 6. Section of the site. Xia, Y. (2013). Section of the site. Unpublished manuscript...11 Fig. 7. Bridges on site. Xia, Y. (2013). Bridges on site. Unpublished manuscript....12 21
Fig. 8. Conceptual sketch: slope and bridge. Xia, Y. (2013). Conceptual sketch: slope and bridge. Unpublished manuscript....12 Fig. 9. Conceptual sketch: roof. Xia, Y. (2013). Conceptual sketch: roof. Unpublished manuscript....12 Fig. 10. Conceptual SketchUp model. Xia, Y. (2013). Conceptual SketchUp model. Unpublished manuscript.. 13 Fig. 11. Comparison of three conceptual SketchUp model. Xia, Y. (2013). Comparison of three conceptual SketchUp model. Unpublished manuscript.. 13 Fig. 12. SketchUp model. Xia, Y. (2013). SketchUp model. Unpublished manuscript..14 Fig. 13. Eco-bridge 1. Xia, Y. (2013). Eco-bridge 1. Unpublished manuscript. 14 Fig. 14. Section of eco-bridge 1. Xia, Y. (2013). Section of eco-bridge 1. Unpublished manuscript.. 15 Fig. 15. Sketch of the eco-bridge structure. Xia, Y. (2013). Sketch of the eco-bridge structure. Unpublished manuscript....15 22
Fig. 16. Eco-bridge 2. Xia, Y. (2013). Eco-bridge 2. Unpublished manuscript....16 Fig. 17. Eco-bridge 3. Xia, Y. (2013). Eco-bridge 3. Unpublished manuscript....16 Fig. 18. Perspective of eco-bridge 3. Xia, Y. (2013). Perspective of eco-bridge 3. Unpublished manuscript..17 Fig. 19. SketchUp model of eco-bridge 3. Xia, Y. (2013). SketchUp model of eco-bridge 3. Unpublished manuscript. 17 Fig. 20. Model of eco-bridge 3. Xia, Y. (2013). Model of eco-bridge 3. Unpublished manuscript.....17 Fig. 21. Relationship between drawing and CAAD. Xia, Y. (2013). Relationship between drawing and CAAD. Unpublished manuscript. 18 23