Low-power shared access to spectrum for mobile broadband Modelling parameters and assumptions Real Wireless Real Wireless Ltd.

Similar documents
ECC Report 203. Approved 8 November 2013

RF exposure impact on 5G rollout A technical overview

Feasibility of UMTS-TDD mode in the MHz Band for MBMS

White Paper 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence 900 MHz Receiver Blocking Problem

REPORT ITU-R M Characteristics of broadband wireless access systems operating in the land mobile service for use in sharing studies

3GPP TR V7.0.0 ( )

SET Congress Sao Paulo 24 August in the 700 MHz band

RADWIN SOLUTIONS. ENTRPRISE Broadband Wireless Access. Video Surveillance. Remote area BB Connectivity. Small Cell Backhaul

LMS4000 & NCL MHz Radio Propagation

REPORT ITU-R M

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

REPORT ITU-R M Sharing and adjacent band compatibility in the 2.5 GHz band between the terrestrial and satellite components of IMT-2000

Approved September 2014

3GPP TR V ( )

APPENDIX A TEST PLOTS. (Model: 15Z970)

France 1. AGENDA ITEM 1.1 VIEWS ON SHARING STUDIES BETWEEN IMT INDOOR SYSTEMS AND RADAR SYSTEMS IN THE BAND MHz FOR WRC-15 AGENDA ITEM 1.

ETSI TR V ( )

ECC Report 197. COMPATIBILITY STUDIES MSS TERMINALS TRANSMITTING TO A SATELLITE IN THE BAND MHz AND ADJACENT CHANNEL UMTS SERVICES

Submission on Proposed Methodology for Engineering Licenses in Managed Spectrum Parks

Providing Extreme Mobile Broadband Using Higher Frequency Bands, Beamforming, and Carrier Aggregation

New spectrum for audio PMSE. Further details on approach to modelling and sharing in the band MHz

3GPP TR V ( )

Technical Support to Defence Spectrum LTE into Wi-Fi Additional Analysis. Definitive v1.0-12/02/2014. Ref: UK/2011/EC231986/AH17/4724/V1.

Channel Models. Spring 2017 ELE 492 FUNDAMENTALS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 1

Derivation of Power Flux Density Spectrum Usage Rights

Deployment scenarios and interference analysis using V-band beam-steering antennas

Modelling the Energy Efficiency of Microcell Base Stations

TDD-TDD Interference Analysis Involving Synchronized WiMAX Systems 18 September 2009

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) CHARACTERISTICS OF IEEE SYSTEMS IN MHz

Huawei WLAN Indoor/Rail Transportation APs Antenna Datasheet

WINNER+ IMT-Advanced Evaluation Group

COSMOS Millimeter Wave June Contact: Shivendra Panwar, Sundeep Rangan, NYU Harish Krishnaswamy, Columbia

Colubris Networks. Antenna Guide

Planning Your Wireless Transportation Infrastructure. Presented By: Jeremy Hiebert

TV White Spaces white space device requirements

Analysis of RF requirements for Active Antenna System

ECC Report 276. Thresholds for the coordination of CDMA and LTE broadband systems in the 400 MHz band

PMSE LTE Coexistence

TV White Spaces Maps Computation through Interference Analysis

Space Frequency Coordination Group

Outdoor Booster Equipment for 2 GHz FOMA

mm Wave Communications J Klutto Milleth CEWiT

ETSI TR V6.3.0 ( )

ETSI TR V5.2.0 ( )

Ray-Tracing Urban Picocell 3D Propagation Statistics for LTE Heterogeneous Networks

3GPP TR V9.0.0 ( )

Base Station (BS) Radio Transmission Minimum Requirements for LTE-U SDL. Presented at the LTE-U Forum workshop on May 28, 2015 in San Diego, CA

REFERENCE GUIDE External Antennas Guide 1

REFERENCE GUIDE External Antennas Guide. Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)

APT REPORT IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH USE OF THE BAND MHZ BY MOBILE SERVICES. No. APT/AWG/REP-24 Edition: September 2011

License Exempt Spectrum and Advanced Technologies. Marianna Goldhammer Director Strategic Technologies

CEPT Report 42. Report from CEPT to the European Commission in response to Task 3 of the Mandate to CEPT on the 900/1800 MHz bands

Radio Propagation Characteristics in the Large City and LTE protection from STL interference

INTRODUCTION OF RADIO MICROPHONE APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE MHz

ESG. UMTS900 Overview & Deployment Guidelines. November W Rev A. Engineering Services Group

Use of TV white space for mobile broadband access - Analysis of business opportunities of secondary use of spectrum

6 th INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON DIGITAL TV, LA HABANA November 5 to 7, 2018 DIGITAL DIVIDEND SPECTRUM SHARING ISSUES

Table 1: OoB e.i.r.p. limits for the MFCN SDL base station operating in the band MHz

ECC Report 174. Compatibility between the mobile service in the band MHz and the radiodetermination service in the band MHz

Beamforming for 4.9G/5G Networks

SOLUTION BRIEF ONE POINT WIRELSS SUITE. PTP LINKPlanner: No Surprises Link Planning for PTP 800 Solutions

3GPP TS V8.0.0 ( )

Wireless Physical Layer Concepts: Part III

Co-existence. DECT/CAT-iq vs. other wireless technologies from a HW perspective

System Level Challenges for mmwave Cellular

Beyond 4G: Millimeter Wave Picocellular Wireless Networks

The 8th International Workshop on Small Cell and HetNet 21 May and diversity antennas for femtocells. Interference mitigation.

ETSI TR V9.0.0 ( ) Technical Report

5G Antenna Design & Network Planning

Recommendation ITU-R SF.1486 (05/2000)

Mobile Communication Services on Aircraft Publication date: May /34/EC Notification number: 2014/67/UK

Lecture 3: Evolved RAN and Radio Link Budget

LTE Small Cell RCT. Paul Chang Rohde-Schwarz, Taiwan

NTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. RoF System for Dual W-CDMA and LTE Systems. 1. Introduction

2-3 Study on Propagation Model for Advanced Utilization of Millimeter- and Terahertz-Waves

Interference Mitigation Using Uplink Power Control for Two-Tier Femtocell Networks

ETSI TR V5.0.0 ( )

Performance review of Pico base station in Indoor Environments

Recommendation ITU-R M (05/2011)

5G deployment below 6 GHz

Spectrum Sharing between Radar and Communication Systems

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1652 *

Mitigating Interference in LTE Networks With Sequans AIR - Active Interference Rejection

Network Design Considerations and Deployment Concerns for a Ground Aircraft Communication System

TETRA Tx Test Solution

REPORT ITU-R BT TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN BANDS ABOVE 2 GHZ (Questions ITU-R 1/11 and ITU-R 49/11)

EITN85, FREDRIK TUFVESSON, JOHAN KÅREDAL ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Why do we need UWB channel models?

DECT ARCHITECTURE PROPOSAL FOR A CONSTRUCTION SITE

France SHARING STUDIES BETWEEN AERONAUTICAL TELEMETRY TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS AND IMT SYSTEMS WITHIN MHZ BAND

What s New With Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) First R&O + More to Come TCB Workshop April 9, 2014 Aole Wilkins

Point-to-Multipoint Coexistence with C-band FSS. March 27th, 2018

France. SHARING STUDY BETWEEN RADIOLOCATION AND IMT-2020 BASE STATION WITHIN MHz

LTE Direct Overview. Sajith Balraj Qualcomm Research

MEASUREMENTS ON HSUPA WITH UPLINK DIVERSITY RECEPTION IN INDOOR ENVIRONMENT. Tero Isotalo and Jukka Lempiäinen

Radio Propagation Characteristics in the Large City

Using the epmp Link Budget Tool

Sibel tombaz, Pål Frenger, Fredrik Athley, Eliane Semaan, Claes Tidestav, Ander Furuskär Ericsson research.

Cellular Radio Systems Department of Electronics and IT Media Engineering

ECC Report 245. Compatibility studies between PMSE and other systems/services in the band MHz

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Transcription:

Low-power shared access to spectrum for mobile broadband Modelling parameters and assumptions Real Wireless 2011 Real Wireless Ltd.

Device parameters LTE UE Max Transmit Power dbm 23 Antenna Gain dbi 0 Units Value Source TS 36.101 Also matches 3GPP R4-092042 Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation Also matches 3GPP R4-092042 Antenna Height m 0.5 from floor Cable, Combiner and Connector Losses db 0 Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation Receiver Noise Figure db 9 Assumption in line with 3GPP R4-092042 Adjacent Channel Rejection Ratio db 31.5dB for 10MHz and below 28.5dB for 15MHz 25.5dB for 20MHz 3GPP TS 36.101 Body loss db 0 Transmit power control Dynamic range db 64 TR36.942 Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation for data-centric devices 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 2

Device parameters Outdoor low power enodeb ` Value Units Source Max Transmit Power 24 dbm As per maximum transmit power for a local area basestation given in TS 36.104. Also matches with stakeholder comments. Antenna Gain 5 dbi Assumption of a small directivity value achieved by suppressing emissions in the vertical direction, R4-092042 Antenna Height 5 (default), up to 15m m Location on a lamp-post or other pole Cable, Combiner and Connector Losses 0 db Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation for a tower-mounted device Adjacent channel rejection ratio 43.5 db TS 36.104 section 7.5.1 Assumption in line with the noise figure used for HeNBs in 3GPP R4-092042. Receiver Noise Figure 8 db TS 36.101 section 7.2 specifies the same receiver sensitivity for both home basestations and local area basestations so we are assuming that the noise figure for this outdoor low power enodeb (i.e. a local basestation) will be the same as the home enode B case. 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 3

Device parameters Home enode B Value Units Source Max Transmit Power Antenna Gain 20 for residential environment 24 for public environment and enterprise dbm 0 for residential 3 5 for public area and enterprise dbi For a residential environment assess a power range from 0-20dBm as per R4-092042 and the max power limit for a home BS in TS 36.104 For a public area environment assess a power range from 0-24dBm as per the max transmit power for a local BS in TS 36.104 Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation Antenna Height 2.5m from the floor m Ceiling fit or wall mount Cable, Combiner and Assumption in line with 2G Connector Losses 0 db Liberalisation Adjacent channel rejection ratio 43.5 db TS 36.104 section 7.5.1 Assumption in line with 3GPP R4- Receiver Noise Figure 8 db 092042 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 4

Device parameters Macro enode B Downtilit 6 deg Value Units Source Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation and 2.6GHz and Radar Study From TS 36.104 the maximum transmit power set is independent of bandwidth choice so the EIRP is the same for 10 and 20MHz deployments. EIRP (10 or 20MHz channel) 60 dbm Antenna height 25 m Table 2 of 3GPP R4-092042 gives BS transmit power of 46dBm for macrocells and an antenna gain of 14dBi giving an EIRP of 60dBm. Assumption in line with 2G Liberalisation and 2.6GHz and Radar Study Antenna gain 14 dbi Assumption in line with 3GPP R4-092042 Max att due to patterns 20 db Assumption in line with 3GPP R4-092042 HPBWhor 70 deg Assumption in line with 3GPP R4-092042 Adjacent channel rejection ratio 43.5 db TS 36.104 section 7.5.1 BS noise figure 5 db 3GPP R4-092042 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 5

Device parameters TDD adjacent channel parameters Value Units Low-power enb transmit power 0 to 24 dbm Low-power enb antenna gain 3 dbi Bandwidth 20/10 MHz ACLR 45 db Propagation model free space path loss ACS 43. db Noise Figure 8 db 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 6

Device parameters S band radar Parameters Value Unit Radar Tx power 91.2 dbm Antenna gain (main beam) 28 dbi Antenna gain (side lobe) -2 dbi HP Beamwidth 1.5 Deg ACIR 26.8 db Propagation model ITU-R P 1411 Duty cycle 1.7 µs Pulse Repetition Frequency 1 khz Radar height 12 M Radar frequency 2730 MHz 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 7

Propagation Modelling Path Type a) Outdoor, relatively short range for coverage, low height (5-10m) like microcells b) Outdoor interference range (diffraction over building rooftops) Model ITU-R P.1411 for LOS situations within street canyons ITU-R P. 1411 over-rooftop model (equivalent to COST 231 Walfisch-Ikegami) plus COST231 NLOS building penetration loss c) Outdoor to indoor (microcell providing indoor coverage) ITU-R P.1411 for LOS situations within street canyons plus COST 231 LOS building penetration loss (or Depth 2 penetration loss in simplified model) d) Indoor to indoor (femto coverage) For residential and shopping centre scenarios use COST 231 multi wall model with different wall spacings (4.85m for residential and 13.5m for shopping centre). For indoor office model use ITU-R P.1238 e) Indoor to outdoor interference (femto to outdoor As (c), i.e. P.1411 street canyon model, plus external interference) wall loss f) Indoor to indoor between buildings P.1411 street canyon model plus two instances of COST 231 LOS building penetration loss. Possible free space sensitivity case. g) Macro to indoor, macro to outdoor to determine Not required underlay interference assume no need to model as work with assumed macro coverage levels 2011 Real Wireless Ltd. 8