Presentation: COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE Greater Binghamton, New York www.angeloueconomics.com Angelos G. Angelou July 25, 2006
PROGRAM 1. Greater Binghamton Today 2. Target Industries 3. What it Takes to Compete! 4. Best Practices 5. Your Priorities COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 2
THE BC PLAN 2002 Conducted by: COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 3
PUBLIC SECTOR CLIENTS COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 4
PRIVATE SECTOR CLIENTS COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 5
What is Economic Development? Life isn't about finding yourself. Life is about creating yourself. George Bernard Shaw COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 6
Greater Binghamton, New York Greater Binghamton Today COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 7
Broome County Today Employment Net New Jobs New Home Permits Unemployment Rate Population Net Migration 2005 93,278-906 (-0.96%) 267 (-2.6%) 4.9% 196,947 (-0.49%) -1,008 COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 8
EMPLOYMENT GROWTH, 02-05 Annual Growth 4% County Total 2-County Total 2-County Mftg 1.2% 3.5% 0% -4% -3.0% -2.4% -0.4% -1.0% -1.7% -8% -12% -9.4% -10.7% Manufacturing '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 9
MIGRATION TRENDS, 2001-2005 Net New Persons, Broome County 0-104 -500-462 -1,000-908 -708-1,008-1,500 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 Source: Census COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 10
BROOME COUNTY JOB GROWTH, 2005 Education & Health Services Personal Services 67 58 0.5% 2.1% 04-05 Growth Rate Information Leisure & Hospitality Total Private Job Growth, 2005-660 45 44 2.2% 0.5% Natural Resources & Mining 36 25.5% Construction Financial Activities Trade, Trans., & Utilities Prof. & Business Services Manufacturing -383-70 -113-166 -221-2.0% -2.6% -0.9% -2.5% -3.0% COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 11 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
AVERAGE WAGE GROWTH, 2002-2005 Private Sector 8% 4% 0% 3.2% Broome County New York U.S. 6.0% 4.3% 2.7% 2.4% 1.9% 1.8% 2.2% 1.1% 1.2% -4% -1.3% -2.1% '02 '03 '04 '05 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 12
% OF POPULATION AGES 25 to 44, 2005 Broome County 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 25.7% 2000 Census 26.8% New York 28.9% 30.7% U.S. 28.2% 30.2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 13
% BACHELOR S DEGREE OR HIGHER, 2005 Broome County 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 23.0% 2000 Census 22.7% New York 31.1% 27.4% U.S. 27.7% 24.4% Source: U.S. Census Bureau COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 14
MEDIAN HH INCOME, 2005 Median HH Income 5-year 2005 Growth Broome Co. $38,716 9.5% New York $47,592 9.1% U.S. $46,350 9.7% % of HHs $75,000 + 19.7% 30.5% 27.5% Source: U.S. Census Bureau COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 15
THE BOTTOM LINE What is the bottom-line impact of a stagnant economy? Rising County Property Tax Rates Economic development seeks to expand the economy, expand the tax base, ultimately reduce the tax burden on existing residents and companies. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 7.06 7.78 7.45 7.61 6.00 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: Broome County COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 16
Greater Binghamton, New York Target Industries COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 17
GOOD INDUSTRIES TO TARGET In Technology: Advanced Security Clean Energy Life Sciences Software & Electronics Design Data Centers COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 18
Still Target Manufacturing? Output continues to grow steadily in manufacturing, but technology investments translate into a shrinking manufacturing job base. Industries that are growing and good to target: Food processing we always need to eat Wood products mostly for construction Fabricated metal to support Auto & Aerospace Construction machinery infrastructure Auto & Aerospace Not growing, bad targets: clothing, furniture, electronic components COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 19
THE BC PLAN TARGETS In 2002, we recommended: Computer equipment & electronics Communications Services Food processing Health Services Biotechnology Keep? X Yes Yes Yes Yes Consider adding: Back office, call centers, defense COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 20
Greater Binghamton, New York What it Takes to Compete COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 21
WHAT IT TAKES TO COMPETE Leadership and Vision A Plan and its Implementation Aggressive Economic Development Entity Financial Resources Long Term Tenacity Marketing & PR Regional Effort COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 22
THE BC PLAN, 2002 Top Recommendations Regional organization (one point of contact) Strong Website Involve Binghamton University Target marketingcampaign Brownfield redevelopment Downtown revitalization New entrepreneurship focus Young professionals focus Stable Funding for E.D. Status Yes Yes Yes No Some Some Some Yes No COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 23
WHAT IT TAKES TO COMPETE There is still much to be done implementing the BC Plan Determine Who you want to BE and where you want to Go! COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 24
NEW PRIORITIES Economic Development Agency Stable funding Should be private and public money Fund an external marketing campaign Revisit your target industries Commit to a regional name: Brownfields redevelopment Get more people involved COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 25
WHAT IT TAKES TO COMPETE Economic Development must become everybody s business A community of positive thinkers will be become a marketing machine COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 26
RECENT FUNDRAISING Economic Development Agencies Houston Nashville Austin Denver Dallas Oklahoma City Greater Philadelphia Amount $30 m $15 m $14 m $13.3 m $7.5 m $16 m $16 m Source: AngelouEconomics COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 27
CASH INCENTIVES The role of incentives has grown. States that Have Cash Grant Programs for E.D. Michigan $200M for next 2 years (just passed) State of Texas $400M / year allocated Washington $350M life sciences fund is close Maine $157M biotech R&D fund California $3 Billion bond for stem cell research North Carolina $100 M for bio PLUS MANY MORE A dozen+ states have significant cash funds for e.d. But Asian countries like Singapore are spending more. COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 28
YOU MUST FUND A MARKETING EFFORT Typical Discretionary Marketing Budgets for Successful EDCs: <100,000 Population $70,000 100-250,000 Population $120,000 250-500,000 Population $250,000 Source: AngelouEconomics US Marketing Survey Correlates to about $1 per person, per year (just marketing) Greater Binghamton should have $150-200,000 per year to spend on discretionary marketing campaigns (Operations and Salaries require another 1-2x). A total of $500,000 in operational funds should be the 5-year goal. COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 29
BEST PRACTICES I want to present several best practices in the U.S. that address your top priorities: 1. Brownfields redevelopment 2. Funding economic development 3. Marketing and branding COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 30
BEST PRACTICE BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Redevelopment: Kalamazoo, Michigan THE PROBLEM: 3 superfund sites and dozens of large/medium brownfield sites Industrial past in automotive and paper left many areas blighted Local leaders wanted to make brownfields redevelopment a top priority COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 31
BEST PRACTICE BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Redevelopment: Kalamazoo, Michigan THE SOLUTION: City committed $500,000 on average per year to fund acquisition and clean up Strong state support through grants State limited the liability carry-over for cleaned sites Use of Tax Increment Financing to help reimburse costs 20 projects, $115M invested, 1000 jobs COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 32
BEST PRACTICE FUNDING Economic Development Sales Tax: Texas 4A/4B Cities THE PROBLEM Poor funding power in smaller communities to operate economic development programs Perceived weak state agency vis-à-vis the rural areas High growth in Texas required more proactive investment in infrastructure COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 33
BEST PRACTICE FUNDING Economic Development Sales Tax: Texas 4A/4B Cities THE SOLUTION State legislative allowed a local option sales tax The tax is voter-approved ½ to 1 cent of every retail dollar Can fund diverse investments in community: infrastructure, facilities, or even marketing campaigns Highly successful: $350 million raised in state each year COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 34
BEST PRACTICE REBRANDING Rebranding Campaign: Orlando, Florida THE PROBLEM: Brand was exclusive focused on Disney and tourism Significant hidden technology economy required a re-focus Strategic plan led to a new brand and marketing campaign COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 35
BEST PRACTICE REBRANDING Rebranding Campaign: Orlando, Florida THE SOLUTION: Tied past brand to new brand: Putting Imagination to Work Strong follow through on website, marketing, and new local tech-entrepreneur magazine Significant national recognition for marketing efforts COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 36
MORE ON BEST PRACTICE S For more on these best practices, download our recent report on: www.greaterbinghamton.com Additional best practices included: Regional Collaboration: St. Louis, MO Downtown Development: Chattanooga, TN Brownfields Redevelopment: Yonkers, Glen Cove, NY Funding: Greater Philadelphia COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 37
FINAL THOUGHTS Successful Economic Development is a marathon, not a sprint!!! COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 38
YOUR PRIORITIES In summary, AngelouEconomics recommends the following priorities for Greater Binghamton: Fund an economic development organization Fund a marketing campaign How? Sales tax Hotel/Motel room tax Rental car fee Foundations Federal/state funds for brownfields Private sector through a professional fundraising firm COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 39
Tell your Story Next to doing the right thing, the most important thing is to let people know you are doing the right thing. John D. Rockefeller COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 40
YOUR PRIORITIES And finally: Prioritize brownfields redevelopment Energize your citizens about economic development Change attitudes COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 41
Change is an integral part of ED It is not the strongest of the species that survives, or the most intelligent. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change. - Charles Darwin COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE 42
Presentation: COLLABORATING FOR OUR FUTURE Greater Binghamton, New York www.angeloueconomics.com Angelos G. Angelou July 25, 2006