RF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

Similar documents
EEC 134 Final Report

EEC 134AB. Application Note. Radar System Design for RF. By: Yharo Torres. Group: Diode Hard 3. Fundamental Design of Radar:

Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar

RF Board Design. EEC 134 Application Note. Jo Han Yu

Short-term stay in UC Davis Technical report

RF System: Baseband Application Note

EEC134 Final Report. Cameron Vossoughi PCB Design. Christian Hernandez RF Design. Kevin Matsui RF Design and PCB Assembly

Radar Shield System Design

David Fisher EEC 134 Application Note

S-Band 2.4GHz FMCW Radar

EEC 134 Project Report RF/Microwave System Design Fall - Winter 2016 Professor Liu. Team RF Eater Qun Xia Yueming Qiu Tianyi Gao Jiaming She

EEC134 Application Note. FMCW Radar System Test. By Ghazanfar Abbas Alvi

EEC WINTER Instructor: Xiaoguang Leo" Liu. Application Note. Baseband Design. Duyen Tran ID#: Team DMK

Project Report. Laptop Based Radar

Exercise 1: RF Stage, Mixer, and IF Filter

Wireless Communication Systems Laboratory Lab #3: Introduction to wireless front-end

Wireless Communication Systems Lab-Manual-3 Introduction to Wireless Front End. Objective

Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Radar (FM-CW Radar)

A Courseware about Microwave Antenna Pattern

EEC 134AB: RF System Design Senior Project Team J (AKA J Crew) Members: Joe Cooney Jimmy Hua Jesus Beltran

A 5.8-GHz microwave (vital-signs) Doppler radar (for non-contact human vital-signs detection)

ELEC RADAR FRONT-END SUMMARY

MICROWAVE MICROWAVE TRAINING BENCH COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS:

6.101 Project Proposal April 9, 2014 Kayla Esquivel and Jason Yang. General Outline

RF/IF Terminology and Specs

Today s communication

Complete Microstrip System

HY448 Sample Problems

ELEC 391 Electrical Engineering Design Studio II (Summer 2018) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

10 GHz Microwave Link

Lecture 15: Introduction to Mixers

INVENTION DISCLOSURE- ELECTRONICS SUBJECT MATTER IMPEDANCE MATCHING ANTENNA-INTEGRATED HIGH-EFFICIENCY ENERGY HARVESTING CIRCUIT

Tips in Soldering. By Jesus Beltran. Team J (AKA J Crew) EEC 134AB, Professor Xiaoguang Liu UC Davis College of Engineering

EE 3324 Electromagnetics Laboratory

Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Algorithms for CW/FMCW Portable Radar

Frequency Division Multiplexing and Headend Combining Techniques

Self Calibrated Image Reject Mixer

RF System Design and Analysis Software Enhances RF Architectural Planning

SDARS Receiver Front-End

1. General Outline Project Proposal April 9, 2014 Kayla Esquivel and Jason Yang

Low Cost Transmitter For A Repeater

PVD5870R. IQ Demodulator/ Modulator IQ Demodulator/ Modulator

Alleviating RF Transmit Signal Corruption in Wireless Data Systems

Installation instructions

CMOS Design of Wideband Inductor-Less LNA

MICROSTRIP ARRAY DOUBLE-ANTENNA (MADA) TECHNOLOGY APPLIED IN MILLIMETER WAVE COMPACT RADAR FRONT-END

CHAPTER 3 PROJECT METHODOLOGY

1. Explain how Doppler direction is identified with FMCW radar. Fig Block diagram of FM-CW radar. f b (up) = f r - f d. f b (down) = f r + f d

Modeling Physical PCB Effects 5&

RADIO RECEIVERS ECE 3103 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Overview of the MSA 12/30/10

The 144MHz Anglian 3 transverter

White Paper MHz RF Amplifier Design

QUEEN BEE FINDER. James Dillenburg. Abhijeet Srivastava. Krishna Yarramasu. Final Report for ECE 445, Senior Design, Spring 2015.

Simulating and Testing of Signal Processing Methods for Frequency Stepped Chirp Radar

THE BASICS OF RADIO SYSTEM DESIGN

Design, Optimization and Production of an Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Receiver

LABORATORY 3 v1 CIRCUIT ELEMENTS

1-13GHz Wideband LNA utilizing a Transformer as a Compact Inter-stage Network in 65nm CMOS

High Level Design Group: RF Detection Group Members: Joey Py e, André Magill, Shane Ryan, John Docalovich, Zack Bennett Advisor: Dr.

75 Meter SSB Project Design by KD1JV Built by Paul Jorgenson KE7HR NSS 39382FE

Chapter 6. Case Study: 2.4-GHz Direct Conversion Receiver. 6.1 Receiver Front-End Design

Radar System Design Considerations -- System Modeling Findings (MOS-AK Conference Hangzhou 2017)

APPLICATION NOTE II. Detection and ranging of moving and stationary objects by using the FMCW radar principle.

Receiver Design. Prof. Tzong-Lin Wu EMC Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University 2011/2/21

Manufacturers of RF and Microwave Components and Assemblies Specialist in RF Filters, Power amplifiers and RF Switches

LOW COST PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA TRANSCEIVER FOR WPAN APPLICATIONS

Useful in wideband systems or in in several narrowband systems. Reducing inventory. Extremely High Reliability improving overall system reliability

ECE 4670 Spring 2014 Lab 1 Linear System Characteristics

Instrumentation Receiver: Analog Signal Processing for a DSP World. Rick Campbell Portland State University

20 MHz-3 GHz Programmable Chirp Spread Spectrum Generator for a Wideband Radio Jamming Application

VLF LF 10KHz - 500KHz Up Converter. Brochure. HEROS technology Limited All rights reserved

SPECIFICATIONS: Subcarrier Frequency 5.5MHz adjustable, FM Modulated +/- 50KHz. 2nd 11MHz >40dB down from 5.5MHz

Application Note 5525

IQ+ XT. 144Mhz SDR-RF Exciter (preliminar v0.1)

Spectrum analyzer for frequency bands of 8-12, and MHz

SDARS: Front End Antenna Design. Keven Lockwood Advisor: Dr. Prasad Shastry

10 GHz Power Combiner

FEATURES DESCRIPTION BENEFITS APPLICATIONS. Preliminary PT4501 Sub-1 GHz Wideband FSK Transceiver

Continuous Wave Radar

(12) United States Patent

Modulation is the process of impressing a low-frequency information signal (baseband signal) onto a higher frequency carrier signal

Microwave Metrology -ECE 684 Spring Lab Exercise I&Q.v3: I&Q Time and Frequency Domain Measurements

4. BK2401/BK2421 Module RF test

RF transmitter with Cartesian feedback

APN-077: RF Equipment Selection and Installation for OEM7

RF and Microwave Test and Design Roadshow 5 Locations across Australia and New Zealand

Scalable Front-End Digital Signal Processing for a Phased Array Radar Demonstrator. International Radar Symposium 2012 Warsaw, 24 May 2012

Range Considerations for RF Networks

Microwave Fundamentals A Survey of Microwave Systems and Devices p. 3 The Relationship of Microwaves to Other Electronic Equipment p.

TECH BRIEF Addressing Phase Noise Challenges in Radar and Communication Systems

Department of Electrical Engineering University of North Texas

Exercise 5: Power amplifier measurement

Designing a Custom Antenna

400 MHz to 4000 MHz Low Noise Amplifier ADL5523

ASPiSYS DQAM AM Stereo Decoder

TestData Summary of 5.2GHz WLAN Direct Conversion RF Transceiver Board

Co-existence. DECT/CAT-iq vs. other wireless technologies from a HW perspective

Analog RF Electronics Education at SDSMT: A Hands-On Method for Teaching Electrical Engineers

Preliminary RFI Survey for IIP

Transcription:

EEC 134 Project Report 1 RF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT REPORT EEC 134 Professor Xiaoquang Liu Team DMK Team members: Duyen Tran Khoa Huynh Michelle Lee Date: 5/25/2016

EEC 134 Project Report 2 RF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT REPORT Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 1) Abstract 2) Introduction 3) Component Selection 4) Design Schematics 5) Printed Circuit Board Designs 6) Testing the System 7) Results of the Competition 8) Possibility for Future Extension 9) Suggestions for the class 10) Conclusion

EEC 134 Project Report 3 Acknowledgements This report cannot be completed without the references of team Jame s Group Application Report (School Year 2014 15). We try to follow their project as close as possible and we are much indebted to their explanation of the block diagram and the structure of their reports, which we follow closely. We also would like to thank professor Xiaoquang Leo Liu and TA Hao Wang for their assistance during the two quarters to finish this project. 1. Abstract The goal of this project was to design a frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar system that is capable of determining the distance or range of an object. The distance of an object is determined by examining the difference in frequency between the signal at the transmitter and the signal at the receiver. The operating frequency for our design is 2.4 GHz and the design is composed of two printed circuit boards, one board for the baseband and one for the RF components, as well as two can antennas. The output on board is recorded using Audacity on a laptop, which is then put through a signal processing program in Matlab to processed. From these information, the distance to the target is deduced. To test the system, three experiments are conducted at different distances on an open field, and then the accuracy is measured. 2. Introduction The frequency modulated continuous wave radar is a short range measuring radar with the ability to measure distances, target range and its relative velocity. This FMCW radar system is capable of receiving information about the range to target through the modulation of frequency of a transmitted signal. The continuous wave varies in frequency with respect to a fixed period of time by a modulating signal such as the sawtooth, triangle, square wave, and sinusoidal. The frequency change is achieved by ramping up and down the voltage of the VCO in the radar transmitter. At the receiver of the radar, the difference in frequency will be observed. These differences will be used to determine the distance to an object, in this case a metal sheet.

EEC 134 Project Report 4 In this radar application, the triangle wave was chosen as the modulation pattern. As shown above, the received signal is a delayed form of the transmitted frequency. To find the distance of objects, we first have to find the time difference of the transmitted signal from the radar to the target, for which we use the equation: d t = c where t is the time it takes for the transmitted signal to reach the target, d is the distance to the target, and c is the speed of light. The total time it takes for the transmitted signal to reach the target and back to the radar is given by t = 2 d/c, since it is a round trip. The frequency of the transmitter has changed by f, which is related to the total time by the equation 2d Δ f = k c where k is the rate at which the frequency ramps up and down. Δ f can be measured by passing the received signal and the transmitted signal through a mixer. Therefore, the distance can be determined by the equation: c Δf d = 2k All of the above will be implemented using a matlab code. The block diagram belows shows the structure of the FMCW radar.

EEC 134 Project Report 5 Explanation for this diagram is as followed. The triangular modulation signal is fed from the function generator into the VCO. The frequency modulated signal output from the VCO is then amplified and sent through the power splitter. The power splitter divides the signal into two channels: transmitted signal and LO reference. The transmitted signal is sent from the transmitter can antenna to the targets. The reflected waves are then sent to the receiving can antenna. The signal is then passed through a low noise amplifier to amplify the signals. The signal amplified by the LNA is then mixed with the LO reference signal. After that, it is sent through a baseband amplifier to amplify both the high and low frequency components. The high frequency component is then filtered by the low pass filter, and the modulated low frequency sinusoidal signal is obtained through the output. This signal is then sent to the laptop for data processing. 3. Component Selection General Considerations: We chose that our system should operate at 2.4 GHz because it is a commonly used frequency, and thus there will be many components to choose from at reasonable prices. In choosing components, we first looked at the characteristics of the first quarter components as a reference point. For example in choosing the amplifiers, we first looked for ones that have a gain comparable to the amplifiers given in the first quarter. Then we narrowed it down by looking at the availability of the component. There is no point in looking at the component s characteristics if the component is obsolete and not available for sale or if the component is much too expensive for our budget. For active components we considered the DC supply voltage they required. We did not want DC voltages that wildly varied, which would make designing the circuit a bit more complicated and we did not want very high DC voltages because that would mean higher power consumption. For the low noise amplifiers we considered noise figure because we do not want to

EEC 134 Project Report 6 add a lot of noise to our signal which would lower our signal to noise ratio. We want as low a noise figure as possible with as high a gain possible at the beginning of the receiver cascade, because it would affect the amount of noise subsequent components in a cascade would add as shown by the following equation. For the splitter we looked for low insertion loss and good isolation, and for the attenuator we looked for one that can operate at 2.4 GHz and attenuate as close to 3 db as possible. Other considerations would be the type of package the component came in. An uncommon package would mean we would have to draw the footprint ourselves in KiCAD because of its limited library. We did not consider weight because these PCB IC components are generally very small, and thus generally weigh the same. Components: Power Amplifier: ADL5570 This amplifier was used to boost the power of the signal before transmission. It could amplify the signal by 29 db. Low Noise Amplifier: ADL5521 The ADL5521 provides around 13 db of gain at 2.4 GHz. We placed two of them after the receiving antenna to amplify the signal before reaching the mixer without adding too much noise. Mixer: ADE R20LH+ This mixer was a passive level 10 local oscillator, which meant that the LO signal had to be at least 10 db going into the mixer. The power amplifier s 29 db gain ensured that the LO signal would be high enough. It has an isolation of 32 db and a conversion loss of 6 db. Voltage Controlled Oscillator: MAX2750 This was used to provide a 1 khz modulating frequency for the system. Power Splitter: SP 2U2+

EEC 134 Project Report 7 This power splitter was used to split the signal towards the transmitting antenna and towards the mixer. It is a passive device that operated from 1720 2850 MHz/ 3 db Attenuator: GAT 3+ The attenuator was used to decrease the power of the signal a by 3 db before going into the power amplifier so that the power of the received signal at short range will not burn out the LNAs. 4. Design Schematics

EEC 134 Project Report 8 Baseband Circuit:

EEC 134 Project Report 9 RF Circuit:

EEC 134 Project Report 10 5. Printed Circuit Board Design Baseband PCB:

EEC 134 Project Report 11 RF PCB:

EEC 134 Project Report 12 6.Testing the System When testing the RF signals, it is very difficult to isolate the cause of an error within a system. Under directions from the professor, we stripped a piece of cable and use the metallic core within to poke around the components. After some initial testing, the transmitted signal was read at 10.72 dbm, instead of the expected 12 dbm. In total, there is a loss of almost 23 db. The signal is almost 200 times smaller than expected, thus it is not sufficiently powerful enough to transmit a recognizable signal. Below is a picture of the board we tested: The next step in the testing process is to find the cause of this loss. To do this, we tested all components individually to see which component was not drawing power. If one of the components was drawing insufficient or no power, we could definitively say that is one of the causes. We cannot, however, claim that it is the only cause. For the case of the transmitted power, we had to test the VCO and the first amplifier. To measure the power, we read the voltage and current that was being drawn from the power supply using a bench multimeter. For the VCO, it was drawing 20mA at 5V, and the LNA was drawing 12mA at 3V. That is 100mW and 99mW, respectively. The expected value for the VCO is 33mA (max) at 5V (165mW. This was well within the expected range. However, the LNA max is at 25mA at 3V, which is 75mW. This is too small for amplifying the signal, thus we conclude that this is the source of our problem.

EEC 134 Project Report 13 After carefully consider all the components on the PCB board, we came to the conclusion that it is the LNA which caused the problems at hand. We decided to change all the LNAs on our PCB boards for new ones. At first this seems to work, for our output power goes back to 12 dbm. Here is the indoor results: Unfortunately, one week before the competition, overheat from the VCOs and LNAs rendered the PCB board useless. Two team members recall strange smells during the testing. Here is the results after the incidents:

EEC 134 Project Report 14 Thus, we were forced to change back to our lab 6 system to participate in the competition. Here is a picture of the lab 6 system: 7. Results of the Competition Following the instruction from TA Hao Wang, we conducted three testing experiments to measure the accuracy and the distance of our system. The results are as followed:

EEC 134 Project Report 15 First experiment: Real length is 52 m, measured to be 53 m. Error is 1.9% difference.

EEC 134 Project Report 16 Second experiment: Real length is 73 m, measured to be 72 m. Error is 1.36%.

EEC 134 Project Report 17 Third experiment: Real length is 91.4 m, measured to be 90 m. Error is 1.5%. The power of our entire system is 1.13 W ((8*0.06)+(5*0.13)) and the weight is 300 g. Overall, our system is within permitted limit. 8. Possibility for Future Extension If there is possibility of future extension, we would wish to finish soldering a second RF board and test it out with the component. The second board has many improvements over the first board, such as better footprints and better overall layout. Furthermore, it is also made by a different producer, which could makes a difference in performance. If we re given a chance to do over, we would make changes to three aspects of the system. First of all, we would prefer to buy all components from the same producers, preferably Mini Circuits. In this manner, the components are much more compatible with each other and their footprints are easier to access. The reason for Mini Circuits is that the professor and the TA are knowledgeable about their components and give great advices on implementing them. The second aspect is accuracy level. As the above section shows, we eyeball all of our results on the

EEC 134 Project Report 18 graph and thus our accuracy is not great. If we have time, more attention should be paid to create an interface in Matlab so that an accurate reading of the distance is displayed immediately after the code stops. Last but not least, we wish to change the physical casing of the system. We didn t concentrate on this as much as everything else and end up using a cardboard to hold the system, supported by screws and duct taped. This is not ideal however, and during the competition we were impressed by the attention some groups put into the casing. In hindsight, we would like house our components in a plastic box. The two can antennas will be placed on the sides, fasted to the box by strings or adhesive. 9. Suggestions for the Class It may be very helpful to have some tutorial sessions on PCB design. Many people had not designed a PCB before and learning to use PCB CAD software could be difficult for some. We also think it may be good to encourage students from other electrical engineering fields other than RF to take this senior design project class. This would allow for more diverse teams of students with different specialties. For example, a team with students with a lot of knowledge in digital signal processing and coding may be able to make a more innovative code, instead of just browsing the internet for a code that just does the bare minimum for the project. 10. Conclusion We have found that EEC 134 was a great learning experience. The first quarter of the class was very helpful in teaching us what we need to know for designing the radar, like the general structure of a radar circuit and the components used to accomplish that. For some of us, it was the first time we were introduced to working with components such as voltage controlled oscillators (VCO) and mixers. It was also the first time for all of us did PCB design and it took us a long time to complete our PCB designs since we had to first familiarize ourselves with the software, find out how to do certain functions, and then actually lay down the design. The tasks completed in the first quarter really helped us in accomplishing the task given in the second quarter, which was to build an improved radar design. The task given in the second quarter was difficult to negotiate with at first, because we were unable to get the sixth lab from first quarter to work and also because the responsibility of choosing how to design a, not only functional, but also improved radar fell onto us. We had to find components that would at least match the first quarter components in performance, are less bulky, and are easily obtainable for a decent price. We had to familiarize ourselves with the performance figures of the components to be able to compare them to each other so that we could get the best performance for the best price. At first we wanted to design a patch array

EEC 134 Project Report 19 antenna because it would have been much less bulky than the coffee can antennas, but we scrapped that plan and used the coffee cans because fabricating the patch array antenna would put us over budget. We were able to get a signal with our chosen components (LNAs, VCO, mixer, etc.) for a short time, but in the end too many of our amplifiers burned out before we could do a field test and we had to resort to using the first quarter components for our RF circuit. In the end we able to get our radar to detect object up to 90 meters away. Our team was able utilize the skills we learned from our studies in UC Davis as well as learn many other aspects of RF design from this course. These courses gave us good experience in working as a team, teaching us how to solve problems, delegate tasks, and communicate in order to reach a goal. The skills and experience from this class is most beneficial to our growth as electrical engineers.