Coopera've Research, Intellectual Property & Technology Transfer

Similar documents
Intellectual Property

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Principles in the Conduct of Biomedical Research

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

Overview. How is technology transferred? What is technology transfer? What is Missouri S&T technology transfer?

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

Patents. What is a patent? What is the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)? What types of patents are available in the United States?

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)

Identifying and Managing Joint Inventions

TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY

California State University, Northridge Policy Statement on Inventions and Patents

Effective Intellectual Property Management

Policy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (

Discovery: From Concept to the Patient - The Business of Medical Discovery. Todd Sherer, Ph.D.

Patent Due Diligence

UTSA Guide to Invention, Innovation, and Commercialization

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow

UCF Patents, Trademarks and Trade Secrets. (1) General. (a) This regulation is applicable to all University Personnel (as defined in section

Meet the Staff. Fairbanks, AK Tel: Fax:

POLICY PHILOSOPHY DEFINITIONS AC.2.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Programs and Curriculum. APPROVED: Chair, on Behalf of SAIT s Board of Governors

Translational Medicine Symposium 2013: The Roller Coaster Ride to the Clinic

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property

Technology Commercialization Primer: Understanding the Basics. Leza Besemann

Intellectual Property. Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy, PhD

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES ON PATENTS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT NOVEMBER 2, 2015

An Inventor s Guide to Technology Transfer

Prof. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Intellectual Property and UW Technology Transfer. Patrick Shelby, PhD Technology Manager October 26, 2010

New York University University Policies

Northwestern Intellectual Property Policies. OSR-Evanston Quarterly Network Monday, April 13 th Ben Frey, J.D., Senior Contracts Manager

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

Technology Transfer & Inventing in Academia

Intellectual Property

Collaborating with the Office of Technology Transfer

Technology Transfer and the University: an orientation for new faculty at Johns Hopkins University

Berkeley Postdoc Entrepreneur Program (BPEP)

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Best Practices

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets:

Office of Technology Commercialization. Inventors Handbook

THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance

Transferring UCLA discoveries to the public. Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Associate Vice Chancellor for Research

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board. Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property

INNOVATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS OFFICE VOL Inventor s Guide to Technology Transfer

Intellectual Property Policy. DNDi POLICIES

(1) Patents/Patentable means:

Programs for Academic and. Research Institutions

Policy on Patents (CA)

Delaware State University

UHS Intellectual Property Policies and Procedures

Licensing. Guidance Creation Copyright. Licensing PROPERTY. Novelty. FAQs AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER DIRECTORATE OF RESEARCH AND GRADUATE TRAINING

Policy 7.6 Intellectual Property Policy

IP and Technology Management for Universities

Intellectual Property Management - How to capture, protect and exploit your ideas

Patents and Intellectual Property

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OVERVIEW. Patrícia Lima

University Tech Transfer

Inventor-Driven Product Development

Intellectual Property Overview

WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS

Intellectual Property Guide

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1. Overview Invention Disclosures Intellectual Property 7

Introduction to Intellectual Property

executives are often viewed to better understand the merits of scientific over commercial solutions.

Life of a Stanford Invention

Evaluating a Report of Invention & Licensing. Technology Development Boot Camp Peter Liao March 25, 2013

EU- US Industry and Academic Co- opera7on on Smart Ci7es. Haydn Thompson THHINK Group

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

COLLABORATIVE R&D & IP ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

VTIP in 20 Minutes What You Need to Know

PATENT AND LICENSING POLICY SUMMARY

Policy No: TITLE: EFFECTIVE DATE: CANCELLATION: REVIEW DATE:

INTELLECTUALPROPERTY PROCEDURES MANUAL INTERNAL OPERATING MEMORANDUM

Intellectual Property

Alfred University Intellectual Property Policy May 2008

Practical Strategies for Biotechnology and Medical Device Companies to Manage Intellectual Property Rights

An investment in a patent for your invention could be the best investment you will ever

Lewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

Intellectual Property Importance

UNIVERSITI BRUNEI DARUSSALAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: INVENTIONS AND COMMERCIALIZATION

Where to File Patent Application Yumiko Hamano IP Consultant - IP Commercialization Partner, ET Cube International

PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT between THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and INSERT PARTNER'S CORPORATE NAME

Untying the Gordian Knot:

Community Control and Compensa1on:

Translation University of Tokyo Intellectual Property Policy

Intellectual Property

As a Patent and Trademark Resource Center (PTRC), the Pennsylvania State University Libraries has a mission to support both our students and the

Intellectual Property Rights

EASY ACCESS IP AN INTRODUCTION FOR UTS RESEARCHERS FEBRUARY 2014 RESEARCH & INNOVATION OFFICE

Intellectual Property: Ideas Worth Protecting. Eric L. Sophir Gale R. Monahan

Fall National SBIR/STTR Conference

To Patent or Not to Patent

Technology Transfer: Working with Industry at MIT. 10 February 2009 Kenneth A. Goldman Manager, Corporate Relations MIT Industrial Liaison Program

Role of Intellectual Property in Science, Technology and Development

Transcription:

Coopera've Research, Intellectual Property & Technology Transfer Ray Wheatley, M.S. C.L.P. Director for Technology Commercializa'on Office for Technology Development UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Coopera've Research Coopera've research is a term used to describe a research project carried out between two or more en''es. Coopera've research can take place within a single campus and even in a single laboratory.

Coopera've Research Ideally, research rela'onships should be documented, especially when a rela'onship exists with a research group outside the University. Absent a wripen agreement signed by all par'es, there are no rules and no diligence will be performed in advance. There are different types of agreements for different types of rela'onships.

Informa'on Exchange A Confiden'al Disclosure and Limited Use Agreement, Non- disclosure Agreement or similar agreement is used to describe a rela'onship where only informa'on is disclosed.

Material Sharing A Material Transfer Agreement is used to describe a rela'onship where one party wishes to share research materials with another en'ty. We promote the use of a standard agreement accepted by many non- profit en''es called a UBMTA whenever possible to govern such transfers.

Research Collabora'on A Collabora've Research Agreement is typically used to describe a research collabora'on involving two en''es with no exchange of money. A Consor'um Agreement is typically used to describe a research collabora'on involving many en''es with no exchange of money.

Sponsored Research A Sponsored Research Agreement is typically used to describe a research rela'onship where the university laboratory receives monetary support for a research project. University charges an overhead rate of 30% on all such contracts.

What is intellectual property? Intellectual property is the general term for intangible property rights which are a result of intellectual effort. Patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets are the main categories of intellectual property rights. At UT Southwestern, intellectual property most frequently refers to patentable inven'ons and copyrightable works created by faculty and staff in the course of their research or scholarly ac'vi'es.

IP Agreements Confiden'al Disclosure & Limited Use Agreements Material Transfer Agreements Consor'um Agreements Collabora've Research Agreements Sponsored Research Agreements Op'on Agreements License Agreements

What is technology transfer? Technology transfer is the process enabling the transfer of a technology from one party to another. For universi'es, it is primarily regarded as the process of transferring technologies developed as a result of our academic research to companies for commercial development.

University Technology Transfer The modern era of university technology transfer was ini'ated by the Bayh- Dole Act (1980) enabling universi'es to exercise 'tle to inven'ons developed under U.S. Government funding. This enabled universi'es to safely make investments in technologies to capture the value of innova'ons developed on campus.

Who owns IP developed on campus? In virtually all cases, a university will own all IP rights developed by their faculty, staff and students as described in their policies. At all UT ins'tu'ons, IP is owned by the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System.

How is the process ini=ated? A researcher recognizes that a unique observa'on or development has taken place that may have poten'al value in the marketplace. The researcher discloses the inven'on to the Office for Technology Development and Coopera've Research as required by the Board s Rules & Regula*ons.

Disclosure Disclosure is achieved through the filing of an Intellectual Property Ques'onnaire (IPQ) or a Sodware Intellectual Property Ques'onnaire. Our IPQ is designed to collect the basic informa'on required to ini'ate our evalua'on of the inven'on. It is very important to fill out an IPQ as completely and accurately as possible. Informa'on in the IPQ will be used to fulfill our disclosure obliga'ons to third par'es (i.e. government sponsor, research collaborator, etc.)

IPQ Basics Title Contributors Inven'on summary Unusual features? Differences from exis'ng technologies? Advantages? What needs are met? Third party materials used? Exis'ng agreements? Uses and indica'ons? Interested companies? Contributor informa'on Publica'ons & disclosures Financial resources used Append all addi'onal informa'on that might be helpful

What is the inven=on?

Ini=al Review What sources of funding were used and how will they affect our ability to patent and license the inven'on? What third party materials were used or incorporated in the inven'on? Is documenta'on available? How will it likely affect our ability to patent and license the inven'on? Are all the contributors employed by UT Southwestern? If not, what obliga'ons do the contributors have? Is there a wripen agreement? Is there an approaching one year 'me bar to file in the US or an upcoming publica'on date? How fast do we have to move?

What is a good inven=on? It s a CAN T MISS technology - - C = Commercial poten'al A = Advancement over the current art N = Novel T = Transferable M = Meets needs I = Income genera'on poten'al S = Sole source S = Sexy

The Inven=on in the Marketplace What enabling technologies are required to prac'ce the inven'on? Are they available? What further developments might be necessary to translate the technology into a product? What other third party rights might need to be acquired in order to commercialize a product? Will a protec'on strategy (i.e. patent) add value? What is the market? US? Foreign? Are compe''ve products available or in the pipeline? What is the likelihood that improvements to the technology will be developed here?

Why do we protect technologies? Each protec'on strategy provides the owner with the ability to exclude others from accessing the technology for a specified 'me period. The ability to minimize compe''on protects a patent owner s (or licensee s) investment in the technology.

Protec=on - The ins'tu'on may elect to protect an inven'on in order to preserve value and can choose between a number of different protec'on strategies: Patent (20 years from the applica'on filing date) Copyright (life of the creator + 50 years) Trademark (20 years, but extendable) Trade Secret (forever?)

Requirements of a Patent The inven'on must be useful, novel and non- obvious. In the US, the ini'al patent applica'on must be filed within 1 year of an enabling public disclosure. Overseas, the patent applica'on must be filed prior to ANY enabling public disclosure.

Patent Rights The typical form of formal protec'on pursued by UT Southwestern for its inven'ons. Patentability assessments conducted by internal staff as well as outside counsel. Assessments are shared with inventors and are some'mes fine tuned ader ini'al discussions. Obviousness rejec'ons are typically the largest impediment in prosecu'on, so the results of a patentability search must be interpreted in light of what is achievable during patent prosecu'on. Availability of patent protec'on alone is never enough jus'fica'on to pursue a patent.

Scope of Coverage The scope (or coverage) of claims in an issued patent must provide adequate protec'on to the patent owner and poten'al licensees. Commercial en''es will invariably seek the path of least resistance to the marketplace (in both 'me and money) and will only seek a license to a patent when it is in their best interest to do so as determined by a cost/benefit assessment. An inven'on that describes the best way of achieving a commercial goal doesn t mean it will always be preferred.

Typical Patent Timeline Inventive act Disclosure US patent application filed Foreign filing decision Foreign national/regional stage 1 year US patent issues? 30 months Foreign patents issue?

What are the costs? The filing and prosecu'on of a typical US biotech patent applica'on may cost as much as $30,000, but there is a wide varia'on in costs. Foreign prosecu'on and maintenance costs can be extremely high. The university pays all expenses.

Enforcement A patent is only as good as your ability to monitor its use and your willingness to enforce it. Companies will infringe issued patents - - it s just another factor in the cost/benefit equa'on for them. Costs can be enormous (>$1 million) and are borne by UT Southwestern or our licensee. Overseas, monitoring use is more difficult and enforcement is much more risky and expensive.

Copyright The exclusive right, granted by law, of the creator of a work (or his/her assignees or employers) to make or dispose of copies and otherwise to control the use of a literary, drama'c, musical, ar's'c, or other work. UT does not own all categories of copyrightable works created on campus. Cost is minimal.

Trademark Any word, name, symbol, device, slogan, package design or combina'on of these that serves to iden'fy and dis'nguishes a specific product from others in the market place or in trade. Even a sound, color combina'on, smell or hologram can be a trademark under some circumstances. Cost can vary.

License Strategy Possible strategies are discussed in our group immediately upon receipt and review of the IPQ. Is the inven'on already obligated to a company? Tradi'onal license or start- up? What fields of use are available? Exclusive or non- exclusive? How are similar technologies licensed and how have they performed? What strategies do poten'al industry partners use to access such technologies?

License Strategy What are the costs associated with advancing the technology into the marketplace? Which poten'al partners have sufficient financial, technical and intellectual property resources to commercialize the inven'on? Which poten'al partners might be amenable to expanding the rela'onship beyond a license? Which poten'al partners have licensed technologies from universi'es previously?

Who nego=ates the deal? The Office for Technology Development nego'ates license agreements, not inventors. Inventors are kept informed of progress in nego'a'ons to the extent they wish to be informed.

When can licensing take place? Inven've act Disclosure US patent applica'on filed Foreign filing decision Foreign na'onal/regional stage 1 year US patent issues? 31 months Foreign patents issue? LICENSING?

How are license revenues distributed? All license revenues are distributed in accordance with the Board s Rules & Regula*ons. Ader reimbursement of all patent and licensing expenses, 50% is distributed to the inventor(s) and 50% is retained by the ins'tu'on. UT Southwestern policy distributes ½ of its ins'tu'onal share to unrestricted laboratory accounts for use by the inventor(s).

Ray Wheatley, M.S., C.L.P. Director for Technology Commercializa'on UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard Dallas, TX 75390-9094 Phone: (214) 648-1888 Fax: (214) 648-1889 ray.wheatley@utsouthwestern.edu hpp://www8.utsouthwestern.edu/home/research/ techdevelopment/index.html