IAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications. PSA Project. IAEA Guidelines for PSA

Similar documents
Yolande Akl, Director, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Ottawa, Canada. Abstract

ETSON: Role and activities for harmonizing safety assessment practices. Benoit De Boeck ETSON President. N2017 ETSON - Pitesti (May 2017) 1

NSNI Priorities related to Advanced Nuclear Designs

INFCIRC/57. 72/Rev.6. under. Safetyy. read in. Convention. involve. National Reports. on Nuclear 2015.

Goals, progress and difficulties with regard to the development of German nuclear standards on the example of KTA 2000

NUGENIA position paper. Ageing of Low Voltage Cable in Nuclear Environment. 12 February 2015

Research in automation, risk analysis, control rooms and organisational factors;

New Reactor Division Generic Design Assessment. Step 2 Assessment of the Fault Studies of UK HPR1000 Reactor

Basic Level 1. PSA course for analysts

PROGRESS REPORT. (November March 2002)

Nuclear Regulatory Needs and Activities Related to Liquefaction Assessment

PRIMATECH WHITE PAPER COMPARISON OF FIRST AND SECOND EDITIONS OF HAZOP APPLICATION GUIDE, IEC 61882: A PROCESS SAFETY PERSPECTIVE

Petroleum Safety Authority Norway Trends in Risk Level Risk Level Measuring Scheme

SMR Conference Manchester 2014 Regulator s view UK and International. Bob Jennings Systems Lead for ONR s Generic Design Assessment (GDA)

Mitsubishi s computerized HSI and digital I&C system for PWR plants

European Nuclear Education Network Association

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

Foundations for Knowledge Management Practices for the Nuclear Fusion Sector

PSA research in SAFIR2014. NPSAG-möte, Vattenfall, Berlin, Febr 2-3, 2011 Jan-Erik Holmberg VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

LICENSING THE PALLAS-REACTOR USING THE CONCEPTUAL SAFETY DOCUMENT

THE USE OF A SAFETY CASE APPROACH TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN DESIGN

GDA Step 2 Assessment of the Probabilistic Safety Analysis and Severe Accident Analysis of Hitachi GE s UK Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (UK ABWR)

Planning of Knowledge Management System for Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

REPORT OF THE IAEA SECRETARIAT TO THE CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY

The UK Generic Design Assessment

Extending Safety Culture through Improved Communication: Lessons from Russian Norwegian Regulatory Cooperation

The EUR: a great achievement and still on its way Eric de FRAGUIER, EDF EUR Steering Committee Chairman

Use of the Graded Approach in Regulation

Perspectives on CFD V&V in Nuclear Regulatory Applications

Rauno Rintamaa (VTT) Giovanni Bruna (IRSN) Review of TSOs technical needs in safety R&D

SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF NEAR SURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ASAM PROJECT

SMR Regulators Forum. Pilot Project Report. Report from Working Group on Graded Approach

Institute for Energy. ENIQ 2020 Roadmap. ENIQ report No 43

Combined Nuclear Security and Safety Culture Self-assessments in NPPS

Table of Contents/Table des matières. Part 0: General Partie 0 : Général Part A: REGDOC-2.4.1, Deterministic Safety Analysis...

Nuclear Safety and Security Culture Roles and Responsibilities of Individuals. Middle East Scientific Institute for Security (MESIS)

This document is downloaded from the Digital Open Access Repository of VTT. P.O. box 1000 FI VTT Finland VTT

Technical Support Organization (TSO) Roles and Responsibilities

ASAMPSA2 WORKSHOP PRELIMINAR AGENDA

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

UTILIZING RESEARCH REACTOR SIMULATORS FOR REACTOR OPERATOR TRAINING AND LICENSING ABSTRACT

June Phase 3 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of Candu Energy Inc. Enhanced CANDU 6 Design

A/AC.105/C.1/2006/NPS/CRP.7 16 February 2006

Addressing Off-site Consequence Criteria Using PSA Level 3 - Enhanced Scoping Study

Implementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions

A Case for Regulatory Framework

Safety Assessment of a Robotic System Handling Nuclear Material

An Initiative towards Risk-Informing Nuclear Safety Regulation in Hungary

Models and Methods for Advanced Reactor Safety analysis

Nuclear Regulation: Purpose, Philosophy, Principles, Processes and Values - A View. By Mike Weightman

Probabilistic Safety Assessment In The Chemical And Nuclear Industries By Ralph Fullwood Attended Texas Technological University Harvard University

SAFIR2014: CORSICA Coverage and rationality of the software I&C safety assurance

APPENDIX 5 Document Requests

DEVELOPMENT OF A STRUCTURAL SYSTEM RELIABILITY FRAMEWORK FOR OFFSHORE PLATFORMS

Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA

Flexblue : a Subsea Reactor Project Considerations for its licensing July, 2013

SLIDE FOR DISCUSSION NICOLE & KATE

How can value be measured and assessed?

Methodology for Agent-Oriented Software

INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY CHALLENGES OF THE st 21 CENTURY April, Islamabad, Pakistan.

SPICE: IS A CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL APPLICABLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY? Spice: A mature model

ASME NQA-1 Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications. Prague, CR July 7 8, 2014

Standards in. International Trade & Nuclear Safety. The Role of IAEA

Office for Nuclear Regulation

NRC TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EVALUATION OF ITS POSITION ON PROTECTION AGAINST COMMON CAUSE FAILURE IN DIGITAL SYSTEMS USED IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Decommissioning conduct Working Group

The Fukushima nuclear accident

Energiforsk Nuclear power concrete structures R&D program

MU064: Mechanical Integrity & Reliability in Refineries, Petrochemical & Process Plant

Technical Meeting on Stakeholder Involvement across the Nuclear Power Plant Life Cycle

BWROG RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SHORT AND LONG TERM RESEARCH

Instrumentation and Control

Office for Nuclear Regulation

IEEE STD AND NEI 96-07, APPENDIX D STRANGE BEDFELLOWS?

Focus on Mission Success: Process Safety for the Atychiphobist

API RP 78 Overview RECOMMENDED PRACTICES FOR WELLBORE POSITIONING 3/4/2016 PRESENTED BY LISA GRANT AT THE ISCWSA/SPE WPTS 43RD GENERAL MEETING

Metrics and Methodologies for Assessment of Proliferation Risk

How it works and Stakeholder Benefits

Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities Top Ups

State of Shimane Nuclear Power Station

The Safety Case and the Risk-Informed Performance-Based Approach for Management of US Commercial Low-Level Waste (Paper #190)

Information Sheet. Background. Cadarache-Château France May 2018 with optional field & nuclear facilities visits - 17 th May 2018

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Public and Aboriginal engagement Public Information and Disclosure REGDOC-3.2.1

Proving absence of CCFs; a case for Open Source

Higher National Unit specification. General information for centres. Photography: Photojournalism. Unit code: DW8A 35

Process Validation to Improve Food Safety Meat and Poultry. James S Dickson Inter-Departmental Program in Microbiology Department of Animal Science

State of Shimane Nuclear Power Station

Tuning-CALOHEE Assessment Frameworks for the Subject Area of CIVIL ENGINEERING The Tuning-CALOHEE Assessment Frameworks for Civil Engineering offers

ONR perspectives on design assessment and licensing of SMRs

The creation of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Expert Group (EPREG) which held its second meeting last month.

DOE-NE Perspective on Proliferation Risk and Nuclear Fuel Cycles

Improving the Safeguardability of Nuclear Facilities

Apply Functional Modelling to Consequence Analysis in Supervision Systems. Abstract

INPRO Dialogue Forum on Legal and Institutional Issues in the Global Deployment of SMRs

Site-specific seismic hazard analysis

E5 Implementation Working Group Questions & Answers (R1) Current version dated June 2, 2006

Radiological Protection: Old Questions Needing New Answers

clarification to bring legal certainty to these issues have been voiced in various position papers and statements.

A/AC.105/C.1/2011/CRP.4

Transcription:

IAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications PSA Project IAEA Guidelines for PSA

Introduction The following slides present the IAEA documents that deal with procedures, guidance and good practices for the performance of PSA and PSA tasks Slide 2.

IAEA-Safety Series 50-P-4 4 Procedures for Conducting Probabilistic Safety Assessments of Nuclear Power Plants (Level 1) (1992) Provides guidance for conducting a level 1 PSA Internal initiating events (excluding internal hazards) Emphasis is provided on the procedural steps of the PSA rather than on details of corresponding methods It promotes a standardised framework, terminology and form of documentation for PSA so as to facilitate the review of such studies Slide 3.

TECDOC-719 Defining initiating events for the purposes of probabilistic safety assessment (1993) It provides information on different approaches for defining Initiating Events It includes a generic initiating event database that contains about 300 records taken from 30 plant specific PSAs It includes IEs for PWR, BWR and WWER reactors It includes an introduction to the treatment of internal and external hazards Slide 4.

TECDOC-749 Generic initiating events for PSA for WWER reactors (1994) This report presents a generic list of initiators for both WWER reactor types (440 and 1000) It presents the frequencies of more frequent initiators (transients) based on collected operating experience It also presents frequencies of LOCAs as used in several PSA projects on-going at the time of the preparation of this report Slide 5.

TECDOC-648 Procedures for conducting common cause failure analysis in probabilistic safety assessment (1992) The objective of this report is to provide explicit guidance for a practical approach to CCF analysis A four step analysis framework is proposed: System logic model development Identification of groups of components subject to common cause failure (qualitative and quantitative screening) Common cause modelling and data analysis System quantification and interpretation of results Slide 6.

TECDOC-648 Procedures for conducting common cause failure analysis in probabilistic safety assessment (cont.) This TECDOC gives the following additional guidelines: Recommended parametric CCF models Parameter estimates and data analysis Plant specific estimates Construction of pseudo specific data base Generic parameter estimates Analysis of results Practical considerations modelling of high redundant systems breaking the symmetry Slide 7.

IAEA-Safety Series No. 50-P-10 Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants (1995) This document presents a practical approach and terminology for HRA in PSA It describes methods and data sources for analysing the human actions Slide 8.

TECDOC-478 Component reliability data for use in probabilistic safety assessment (1988) This report is a compilation of component reliability data from the publicly available literature It consists of about 1000 records from 21 data sources Includes data for NPP components usually modelled in PSA It provides detail description and definition of major generic failure modes considered when compiling the database Slide 9.

TECDOC-508 Survey of ranges of Component reliability data for use in probabilistic safety assessment (1989) This document presents the ranges of rates or probabilities of component failure for selected components that are usually considered in PSA It could be used to compare particular data with the bulk of data found in the literature Slide 10.

IAEA-Safety Report Series No.10. Treatment of Internal Fires in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants (1998) This report provides information and good practices in conducting internal fire PSA It concentrates on procedural steps of fire PSA rather than on specific details Slide 11.

IAEA-Safety Series 50-P-7 7 Treatment of External Hazards in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants (1995) Provides guidance for conducting PSA for external hazards in Nuclear Power Plants Emphasis is provided on the procedural steps of the PSA rather than on details of corresponding methods It promotes a standardised framework, terminology and form of documentation for external hazards so as to facilitate the review of such studies Slide 12.

TECDOC-724 Probabilistic safety assessment for seismic events (1993) This document is associated with IAEA-Safety Series 50-P-7 Treatment of External Hazards in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, and discusses in detail a specific external hazard, I.e., earthquakes Slide 13.

IAEA-Safety Series 50-P-8 8 Procedures for Conducting Probabilistic Safety Assessments of Nuclear Power Plants (Level 2) This document presents procedures for conducting PSAs concerned with accident progression and phenomena leading to potential containment failure It emphasises the procedural steps rather than specific details Methods for determining the likelihood of containment failure and the release of radionuclides to the atmosphere are also given Slide 14.

IAEA-Safety Series 50-P-12 Procedures for Conducting Probabilistic Safety Assessments of Nuclear Power Plants (Level 3) This document presents procedures for conducting PSAs concerned with the release of radionuclides and their transfer through the environment, and with the assessment of the public health and economic consequences of an accident It emphasises the procedural steps rather than specific details Slide 15.

TECDOC-1101 Framework for a quality assurance programme for probabilistic safety assessment This report describes the framework for developing an adequate QA programme for PSA The framework is based on and is in accordance with the related QA guidelines of the IAEA for safety in nuclear power plants and other related installations The report identifies the key areas that are recommended to be addressed by a QA programme for PSA Slide 16.

TECDOC-832 IPERS guidelines for the international peer review service IPERS (IPSART): International Peer Review Service (International PSA Review Team) This TECDOC is intended to give guidance on how an IPERS (IPSART) review is organised and conducted It describes the steps needed to prepare the review It highlights the PSA aspects which should be covered in detail Slide 17.

IPSART GENERAL OBJECTIVES Assess the adequacy of the treatment of important technological and methodological issues in the PSA Assess whether specific conclusions and applications of the PSA are adequately supported by the underlying technical basis IPSART does not replace internal, independent reviews and it does not perform a validation of the PSA nor does it replace quality assurance Slide 18.

IPSART (cont.) The IPERS reviews are conducted in the most profitable way for the PSA team by: assuring that the comments of the reviewers are fully understood promoting discussion to allow for a transfer of knowledge and experience Slide 19.

TECDOC-1106 Living probabilistic safety assessment (LPSA) This report presents a definition for Living PSA It discusses the planning and documentation requirements necessary to ensure that a completed PSA is a Living PSA It also discusses aspects related to the PSA updating process Slide 20.

TECDOC-1144 Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants for low power and shutdown modes Provides guidance for conducting a level 1 low power and shutdown PSA (SPSA) Emphasis is provided on the procedural steps of the PSA rather than on details of corresponding methods Provides examples of plant operating states (POS) being analysed for different plant designs Slide 21.

TECDOC-1135 Regulatory review of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) Level 1 Provide guidance to regulatory authorities on how to review the PSA Emphasis on Level 1 full power PSA studies Discusses all the review tasks in details Slide 22.

TECDOC-1200 Applications of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for nuclear power plants Compiles information on a comprehensive set of PSA applications Discusses the basis for PSA applications Both the utility and regulatory use of the PSA are discussed in details Slide 23.

TECDOC-1267 Procedures for conducting probabilistic safety assessments for non-reactor nuclear facilities A new area of application of PSA methods Provides guidance for conducting PSA for non-reactor facilities Emphasis on the general procedural steps specific for non- nuclear facilities rather than on methodological details Slide 24.