Who are we? In 3 points

Similar documents
Copernicus Evolution: Fostering Growth in the EO Downstream Services Sector

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

EUROPEAN GNSS APPLICATIONS IN H2020

COST FP9 Position Paper

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies Space

Second MyOcean User Workshop 9-10 April 2013, Copenhagen Main outcomes

8365/18 CF/nj 1 DG G 3 C

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

Position Paper of Iberian Universities Design of FP9

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Space in the next MFF Commision proposals

SPACE: EPIC SRC workshop

7656/18 CF/MI/nj 1 DG G 3 C

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

First MyOcean User Workshop 7-8 April 2011, Stockholm Main outcomes

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Citizens' Observatories & Crowdsourcing Novel ways to engage citizens in science and environmental policy-making

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Engaging Stakeholders

EC-Egypt Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement. Road Map

Research and Innovation Strategy for the Smart Specialisation of Catalonia. Brussels March 20th, 2014

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

From FP7 towards Horizon 2020 Workshop on " Research performance measurement and the impact of innovation in Europe" IPERF, Luxembourg, 31/10/2013

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

HORIZON Presentation at Manufuture Perspectives on Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 and Beyond

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

Brief presentation of the results Ioana ISPAS ERA NET COFUND Expert Group

SPACE. DG GROW Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

Improving national industrial participation in EU programmes and funds

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

Meeting Report (Prepared by Angel Aparicio, Transport Advisory Group Rapporteur) 21 June Introduction... 1

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

SPACE. Conor Sheehan, based on presentation from DG-GROW I1 Dublin, 18th October Space

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

SETTING FOOD SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR HORIZON EUROPE. Marta Hugas EFSA Chief Scientist

DG GROW - Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit

July REFLECTIONS ON FP8 (non - paper)

Mercator Ocean, France

Commission proposal for Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( )

OSRA Overarching Strategic Research Agenda and CapTech SRAs Harmonisation. Connecting R&T and Capability Development

Digital Innovation Hubs & Smart Specialisation

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

Using foresight techniques in the implementation of innovation policies

Strengthening the knowledge base and reducing fragmentation

Commission proposal for Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( )

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

12808/16 PG/cb 1 DG G 3 C

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

Horizon 2020 The EU s new framework programme for research and innovation ( )

ASD EUROSPACE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (SRTC)

Green Paper - From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework. for EU Research and Innovation Funding

The main recommendations for the Common Strategic Framework (CSF) reflect the position paper of the Austrian Council

HORIZON 2020 BLUE GROWTH

The ESA SME Initiative

SEAS-ERA STRATEGIC FORUM

Satellite Environmental Information and Development Aid: An Analysis of Longer- Term Prospects

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

LTS of Ris - Action plan - prospects for the future programming period

Pre-Operational Validation (POV) Examples of Public Procurement of R&D services within EU funded Security Research actions. Paolo Salieri 1/2/2017

Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions

POSITION OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ITALY (CNR) ON HORIZON 2020

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Spanish Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology Platform (PTEPA)

NOTE Strategic Forum for International S&T Cooperation (SFIC) opinion on the ERA Framework (input to the ERAC opinion on the ERA Framework)

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

DANUBE INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP

GEAR 2030 WORKING GROUP 2 Roadmap on automated and connected vehicles

Wind Energy Technology Roadmap

Commission proposal for Horizon Europe. #HorizonEU THE NEXT EU RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME ( )

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

European Research Infrastructures Framework Programme 7

FET Flagships in Horizon 2020

EUREKA in the ERA INTRODUCTION

Developing Smart Specialisation through Targeted Support

Societal engagement in Horizon 2020

SPACE. DG GROW Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

SPACE CALLS in HORIZON 2020

FP7 Cooperation Programme - Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Tentative Work Programme 2011

Presentation of the results. Niels Gøtke, Chair of the expert group and Effie Amanatidou, Rapporteur

SASAR POSITION PAPER ON: GREEN PAPER ON A COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR FUTURE EU RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING

Cooperation between the ESA Climate Change Initiative and the EC Copernicus Climate Change Service

Portugal Space 2030 A research, innovation and growth strategy for Portugal

Session 2: Space Technologies Context and Orientations - ESA

IN-DEPTH ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION (CONTRACT NO ENTR/2010/16, LOT 2) Task 6: Research, Development and Innovation in the Footwear Sector

European funding opportunities for Ocean Energy

An Introdcution to Horizon 2020

COSMOS 2020 Infoday Bratislava Space Call 2015

ClusterNanoRoad

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

ECC ALL ABOUT OUR ORGANISATION The Electronic Communications Committee

FP7 ICT Work Programme

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

H2020 space: a yet unreleased potential for SatCom research. H2020 Space stakeholder consultation workshop, September 2016

)XWXUH FKDOOHQJHV IRU WKH WRXULVP VHFWRU

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

Transcription:

Who are we? In 3 points PwC is a network of consulting firms in 157 countries with more than 208,000 employees 1 PwC space team is part of the PwC Advisory practice (Strategy & Consulting) 2 PwC space team is 100% dedicated to the space sector 3 The team of space specialists based in FR and NL also builds upon previous S& expertise and it is supported by strategy & consulting experts from the global PwC network More on: www.pwc.fr/space 2

The team builds upon the wider PwC network expertise to address a heterogeneous sector with a lot of specificities Space Value Chain Upstream Midstream Downstream End-users Production Operation Applications Usage Spacecraft, launchers and ground segment integrators Systems, sub-systems, equipment and components manufacturers Launch services providers Satellite operators Ground support infrastructure manufacturers and operators Services providers (broadcasting and broadband services, Direct-To-Home TV, Earth Observation added services ) Consumer equipment and products manufacturers and dealers (satellite TV dishes, GNSS equipment, satellite phones ) Governments, institutions, businesses and citizens using space-enabled products and services in their activity Financial support from governments and space agencies, private investors, brokers and insurers Our space team expertise covers the whole value chain, with business, regulatory and (high-level) technical expertise 3

Our team has build expertise in multiple space domains along several functional dimensions Strategy Socio-eco impact assessment Unique capabilities-driven strategy approach thanks to a 100-year legacy in strategy consulting with a has a specific focus on market assessment, business modelling and go-to-market strategies Strong expertise in impact assessment covering the whole spectrum of socioeconomic impact related to public investment in the space sector relying on commonly accepted methodologies to produce results that can be used to support effective decision making and policy design Earth Observation Satcom GNSS Governance analysis Support to governments, public institutions and industrial stakeholders to define governance set-ups for space programmes with the objective to maximize economic development Access to space & space transportation Data analytics Regulatory Exploitation of Big Data applied to the space sector thanks to product and software development capabilities capitalizing on our skilled consultants and data scientists from the PwC Accelerated Solutions Development team Regulatory analysis on the impact of existing and prospective regulations, assessment of regulatory requirements in the cycle market-regulation, survey of regulations at European and global level Space Situational Awareness Human spaceflight LEO economy and Space Resources Utilisation Cross-domain support to innovation and integrated applications 4

Earth Observation: We have extensively worked on the Copernicus Earth Observation programme and capitalising on our expertise to address private players Examples of past studies Functional dimension covered Main takeaways Copernicus Downstream market characterization Copernicus Mid- Term- Review Strategy Socio-eco impact assessment Full characterization of Copernicus up/mid/downstream, with specific deep-dives on the midstream (issue of data dissemination and the need for integrated data access with other data sources) EO downstream market assessment globally, highlighting new trends and dynamics, with focus of Copernicus role in it, in order to recommend policies to foster user and applications market uptake Copernicus data liability study Assessment of the role and participation of the European services industry in the EU Earth observation research and innovation actions Governance analysis Deep-dives on 8 key downstream value chains (agriculture, ocean monitoring, urban monitoring, air quality, renewable energies, oil and gas and insurance linked to natural disasters) as well as on EO2.0 and Landsat, with understanding of EO and Copernicus contributions and estimation of the present and future revenues related to Copernicus for each of these sectors Copernicus new regulation Impact Assessment Overview and assessment of Big Data initiatives in Earth Observation area Data analytics Full analysis of Copernicus supply chain Complete assessment of Copernicus governance and analysis of Entrusted Entities and their role in fostering innovation within the industry Analysis of Copernicus open data policy third party liability risk Regulatory PwC 5

Assessment of the role and participation of the European services industry in the EU Earth observation research and innovation actions Introduction 6

Why this study? (1/2) Key contextual elements The implementation of the six Copernicus Services has been delegated by EC to Entrusted Entities: EEA, JRC, ECMWF, Mercator Ocean, SatCen, Frontex, EMSA. Realising the full range and scale of Copernicus-enabled benefits, relies on the effective involvement of industry in the exploitation of the Core Services It is important to strengthen the capacity and skills of industry through R&D actions, making it more competitive with regards to its involvement in the Copernicus Services supply chain It is equally important for industry to take up the Copernicus Services core products towards the provision of added value services to downstream markets Needs identified Develop a stronger engagement between industry and the Entrusted Entities Foster an overall coordination of all service activities to open or create new markets in Europe The evolution of the Copernicus services is reinforced by research and innovation actions launched under the Horizon 2020 Work Programme In the 6 thematic areas/services, the involvement of industry differs Put the industry in a position to be able to exploit the services into new markets 7

Why this study? (2/2) EARSC organised a workshop with the Entrusted Entities and the industry in June 2015 Industry view We need well-defined service requirements Industry should be involved as much as possible in supplying services There is a need for a clear definition of boundaries if industry invests in new products Entrusted Entities view Need for consultation with key stakeholders for services evolution Test industry interest to commercialise products with potential Industry will need to be organised in order to respond to Entrusted Entity calls Outcome Need for a clarification of the roles of public and private actors to avoid overlap and competition Need for structuring industry and Entrusted Entity relationships Institutions and the service industry must be partners and not competitors Certification is a key factor Need to develop a roadmap for the effective involvement of industry in Copernicus Services exploitation 8

Two cases of industry involvement were considered Industry as a provider of Core Copernicus products Industry as a intermediate user of Core Copernicus products Public organisation As part of the supply chain Entrusted Entity Procurement of service provision Industry As part of the supply chain Core Copernicus products Third parties and end-users Academia As part of the supply chain Third parties and end-users Entrusted Entity Industry intermediate-user of Core Copernicus products to create value-added products and services 9

Mapping of the current positioning of the industry in relation to the Copernicus Services 1 10

For this study, we used the results of two consultations European EO stakeholders The Consultation 1 was exclusively dedicated for the study and used mostly to gather qualitative data. Consultation 1: PwC/EARSC Identification of key findings Consultation 2 EARSC s industry survey The Consultation 2 (EARSC s industry survey) was mainly used to cross-check and validate the findings of the Consultation 1 and used mostly to gather quantitative data. 11

The key findings of our analysis re grouped in 6 categories These findings have resulted from the 2 consultations User requirements Procurement Process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Data access R&D actions and evolution 12

Key findings User requirements Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Data access R&D actions and evolution The collection of user requirements is implemented through an integrated process with varying levels of industry involvement The main channels of communication for the users requirements are : o Framework contracts, workshops and online surveys put forward by DG GROW o Targeted consultation organised by the Entrusted Entities o Formal institutional channel involving the Copernicus User Forum The industrial stakeholders are involved in the first two steps of the process The implementation of User Uptake programmes is pursued in a different manner across the six Copernicus Services Some of the Entrusted Entities have been proactively pursuing their own user uptake. The various user uptake programmes have placed a strong focus on the demonstration of Copernicus Core products and/or downstream applications User uptake programmes have attracted strong interest from the industry and the end-users. 13

Key findings User requirements Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Data access R&D actions and evolution A need for simplification of the procurement process has been highlighted by industry Differences between the processes of the various Entrusted Entities have been identified as confusing. A need for simplification of the procurement process has been highlighted by the industry regarding award and evaluation criteria, timeframes and administrative requirements The practical aspects differ between Entrusted Entities, frequently causing additional burden to companies, especially SMEs The practical aspects such as the online interface for the access to the tenders, the submission rules and the administrative requirements differ between Entrusted Entities, frequently causing additional burden to companies, especially for SMEs. Although the publication of tenders has been simplified, industry requires longer-term visibility to allow forward-planning and better capacity to respond Industry requires longer-term visibility to allow forward-planning and better capacity to respond to tenders. The publication of preliminary notice by some Entrusted Entities for their tenders has been well received by the industrial stakeholders in this regard. The implementation of innovative procurement approaches such as Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) shows significant potential in effectively linking the demand and supply sides, while also helping industry to build enhanced competencies. The PCP shows also potential for the development of anchor tenant contracts 14

Key findings User requirements Procurement process Copernicus Core products are primarily designed by the public authorities part of the Copernicus User Forum to serve their needs. This creates a challenging situation towards fostering market uptake as such products could not be easily used as a basis for value-added products or services by the industry. Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Industry has raised concerns over the boundaries of the services/products offered by Copernicus Core Services. Such situation is creating a risk for the industry to not be able to create a market due to the free and open access of the Copernicus Core products. Data access R&D actions and evolution The products of the Copernicus portfolio are not always easily exploitable by the industry. This misconnection is related both to the composition of the product portfolio as a whole but also to the technical characteristics of specific products (e.g. resolution). 15

Key findings User requirements Procurement process A different approach is followed by each Copernicus Service with regards to communicating its strategy and work programme. Not all Entrusted Entities present their annual work programme or longer term strategies online. Companies have to go through their national focal point to express their needs or perspectives to the Copernicus User forum. Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Limited staffing is often hindering Entrusted Entities ability to engage with the industry and communicate the various planned activities. Data access R&D actions and evolution Both industry and Entrusted Entities have noted the need communicate with downstream markets towards further uptake. The importance of an increased synergistic efforts to engage the actors involved in the various value chains benefitting from the use of Copernicus Core Services and associated downstream applications, has been underlined by Entrusted Entities and industry. 16

Key findings User requirements Procurement process There are challenges related to the capabilities of the current ESA portal especially on access to data Downloading Sentinel data from the ESA s portal was claimed as an issue for most industrial stakeholders interviewed Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Data access R&D actions and evolution All the stakeholders have a lot of expectations for the new portal that ESA is currently being set-up (DIAS initiative). They unanimously expect improvements implemented in this new data access system. Those evolutions expect to allow a better access to the Copernicus data allowing a wider use of those products and foster the downstream market. 17

Key findings User requirements Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Strategic coordination of R&D activities is essential to support optimal exploitation of Copernicus Services, effective market development, successful service evolution and the development of the downstream sector. In that regard, cross-fertilisation and strategic alignment between activities supported through H2020, Entrusted Entity-driven actions and other initiatives (e.g. under ESA) is considered necessary. Introducing new products and services is often a lengthy process. This process for the introduction of a new product/service can become lengthy. It is often the case that the introduction of a new product takes 2 years from the time the relevant request was made. The R&D activities around Copernicus Services are not confined to long-term evolution but can also entail incremental improvements or prototypes. In that regards, the current interfaces between the industry and the Entrusted Entities are not well defined. Data access R&D actions and evolution Compared to the build-up phase of Copernicus pre-operational services, the budget allocated to EO-related R&D activities have been reduced. Nevertheless, it appears that a greater diversity of R&D activities funded under Horizon 2020 has been introduced. 18

Recommendations 2 19

Recommendations User requirements Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders R&D actions and evolution The establishment of a channel for the industry to have its voice heard in a clear and structured way. The set up of an Industry Forum, through which the industrial perspective can be clearly articulated to the Entrusted Entities and the European Commission. Leverage Copernicus Relays Network and other structures under development towards effectively collecting industry views at national and regional level. Establish a mechanism that enables a quicker and more flexible incorporation of incremental changes to products and services within the core services portfolio A carefully tailored Lean Service Development Approach should be applied (relevant users are engaged by Entrusted Entities in an iterative process towards the development of successive Minimum Viable Products). Those iterative changes could benefit from a more flexible procurement process that foresees the necessary provisions on service improvements in the tender specifications. Further foster User Uptake Encourage the further implementation of UU programmes at Copernicus Services level and raise awareness among the user community on success stories in relation to Core Copernicus Products and value-added services enabled by Copernicus Services. Those UU programmes should be developed at the DG GROW level and shared among the Entrusted Entities. And scale-up (in terms of budget and coverage) the instruments introduced under the User Uptake programme (e.g. Copernicus accelerator). 20

Recommendations User requirements Pursue the implementation of a more simplified tendering process. Foster the incorporation of a common set of best practices for the procurement of Copernicus Services supply across all Entrusted Entities. Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders R&D actions and evolution Provide greater visibility of procurement plans to ensure industry is better prepared to respond. Introduce a common policy based on the best practices with regards to the timeframes for the publication of upcoming tenders and foster the organisation of regular Information Days. Foster the implementation of innovative procurement as a means to foster demand-driven development of Copernicus-based solutions. Further support the implementation of PCP under H2020 and upcoming Framework Programmes and encourage the Entrusted Entities to introduce PCP schemes. 21

Recommendations User requirements Procurement process Ensure better visibility on the product portfolio, its evolution and boundaries. Foster a more effective linkage of the product portfolio to the needs of the downstream markets. Give necessary clarity and long-term perspective for the industry in the exploitation of core products and encourage the investment in the development of new Core products by the industry for the industry. Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders Incorporate the intermediate users needs into the development and evolution of the product portfolio Leverage the establishment of an industry forum (See user requirements) towards the systematic gathering of intermediate users requirements and their potential incorporation in the product portfolio. R&D actions and evolution 22

Recommendations User requirements Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders R&D actions and evolution Ensure regular and consistent communication on annual work programme and overall strategy across all Copernicus services Introduction of a common policy with regards to the publication of annual work programmes and strategic evolution plans. Leverage structures and processes set up or promoted through the Copernicus User Uptake and streamline the organisation of Industry/Information Days Intensify communication around Copernicus Services to all stakeholder groups. Leverage existing platforms from COM (e.g. copernicus.eu), industry (e.g. EARSC online tools) and Entrusted Entities to ensure greater awareness. Exploit Multiplier effects at national level Promote use cases and success stories to pursue greater visibility for end-users communities Promote joint activities between Entrusted Entities and industry to engage downstream actors and develop vertical markets. Engage with industrial actors from downstream markets to showcase Copernicus-enabled benefits. Proactively communicate on the benefits from the use of Copernicus Core Products and Copernicus-enabled value-adding services. Carry out joint communication activities in the language of the targeted communities. 23

Recommendations User requirements Procurement process Product portfolio Communication between stakeholders R&D actions and evolution Introduce a well-maintained Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda Encompass a common vision for the effective exploitation of Copernicus Services through R&D&I activities. Incorporate inputs from all key stakeholders with regard to strategic research priorities, in view of their respective needs. Provide the strategic thread connecting the various R&D&I whilst ensuring coordination of investments. Strengthen a well-defined, visible to all stakeholders Copernicus Evolution process. Made a wider use of a 3-tiers process and create synergize with Tier 1 for day to day development funded by Copernicus Tier 2 for the development of applications funded by Copernicus Tier 3 for fundamental research and technical developments funded by H2020. Deploy more reactive tools enabling short-term applied research for prototyping of service additions or developments. Leverage DG JRC s research capacity to perform short-term applied research for prototyping of service additions or developments. Reinforce synergies between Copernicus User Uptake and R&I programmes. Scale up successful tools introduced under Copernicus User Uptake Programme within the next H2020 work programmes and the upcoming Multiannual financial framework. Link these tools with other instruments (e.g. SME instrument) that can support the development of start-up 24

To implement in the short-term (<1 year) To implement in the mid-term (1 to 3 years, during H2020) To implement gradually (from now to FP9) Improving the collection of user requirements and the implementation of user uptake activities Establish a channel for the industry to have its voice heard in a clear and structured way Establish a mechanism that enables a quicker and more flexible incorporation of products and services within the core services portfolio Foster the implementation of innovative procurement as a means to foster demand-driven development of Copernicus-based solutions Further foster User Uptake Pursue the implementation of a more simplified tendering process Introduce a well-maintained Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda Provide greater visibility of procurement plans to ensure industry is better prepared to respond Ensure better visibility on the product portfolio, its evolution and boundaries Incorporate the intermediate users needs into the development and evolution of the product portfolio Establish a well-defined, visible to all stakeholders Copernicus Service Evolution process Improving the procurement process Improving the Product portfolio Improving the communication between stakeholders Ensure regular and consistent across Copernicus Services communication on annual work programme and overall strategy Intensify communication around Copernicus Services to all stakeholder groups Promote joint activities between Entrusted Entities and industry to engage downstream actors and develop vertical markets Reinforce synergies between Copernicus User Uptake and R&I programmes Deploy more reactive tools enabling short-term applied research for prototyping of service additions or developments Legend: Impact on providers Impact on intermediate-users Impact on both Improving the R&D actions and service/product evolution