The JEF-2.2 Nuclear Data Library

Similar documents
English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS FINAL REPORT AND ANSWERS TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Innovation in Europe: Where s it going? How does it happen? Stephen Roper Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK

Rebuilding for the Community in New Orleans

Co-operative Programme on Decommissioning Projects CPD. Jean-Guy Nokhamzon CEA/DEN/DPA

Nuclear Competence Building

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2008: Highlights

English text only NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE ON THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Non-destructive testing Qualification of radiographic film digitisation systems Part 2: Minimum requirements

This document is a preview generated by EVS

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Nomenclature Specification for a nomenclature system for medical devices for the purpose of regulatory data exchange

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Hot rolled square steel bars for general purposes Dimensions and tolerances on shape and dimensions

Munkaanyag

Munkaanyag

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Chem & Bio non-proliferation

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geotechnical investigation and testing Field testing Part 3: Standard penetration test

Does exposure to university research matter to high-potential entrepreneurship?

Confidence in SKYLON. Success on future engine test would mean "a major breakthrough in propulsion worldwide"

Innovation policy mixes and implications on HEIs - emerging conclusions from the OECD innovation policy reviews

ILNAS-EN 14136: /2004

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2010 Highlights

COPYRIGHT Danish Standards. NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE OR REPRODUCTION. DS/EN ISO 9431:1999

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Framework Programme 7 and SMEs. Amaury NEVE European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs

EXTRABUDGETARY RESOURCES (as estimated on 15 March 1999) Table 4

Implementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions

Frame through-beam sensors

Assuring Nuclear Safety

This document is a preview generated by EVS

THE ECONOMICS OF DATA-DRIVEN INNOVATION

INPRO Dialogue Forum on Sustainable Supply Chains for Advanced Nuclear Power Systems

Automated Frequency Response Measurement with AFG31000, MDO3000 and TekBench Instrument Control Software APPLICATION NOTE

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

WOODWORKING TECHNOLOGY IN EUROPE: HIGHLIGHTS European Federation of Woodworking Technology Manufacturers

Using the Model 4225-RPM Remote Amplifier/ Switch to Automate Switching Between DC I-V, C-V, and Pulsed I-V Measurements APPLICATION NOTE

Creating the world technology leader in surface solutions under one roof

OECD Innovation Strategy: Developing an Innovation Policy for the 21st Century

Welcome to the IFR Press Conference 30 August 2012, Taipei

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Understanding Knowledge Societies Report of UNDESA/DPADM. Measurement Aspects. Irene Tinagli Tunis, 17 Nov World Summit on Information Society

Economic Outlook for 2016

Public Private Partnerships & Idea selection

Patented Medicine Prices Review Board P M P R B GUIDELINES REFORM. 15 th Annual Market Access Summit. Douglas Clark Executive Director PMPRB

Communication systems for meters and remote reading of meters - Part 4: Wireless meter readout (Radio meter reading for operation in SRD bands)

2018/2019 HCT Transition Period OFFICIAL COMPETITION RULES

English version. Steel and steel products Location and preparation of samples and test pieces for mechanical testing (ISO 377:1997)

CRC Association Conference

User Manual for 24 GHz Blind-Spot Radar Sensor

Verifying Power Supply Sequencing with an 8-Channel Oscilloscope APPLICATION NOTE

Table of Contents Executive Summary 29

Remote participation in Question sessions Audio options VoIP

OBSTACLES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PECS INDUSTRY TO PARTICIPATE IN ESA PROGRAMMES SPACE4SME PROJECT. Prague April 25, 2008

Through-beam ring sensors

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY COMMITTEE FOR TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES ON NUCLEAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND FUEL CYCLE

DEUTSCHE NORM DIN EN ISO 10447

ICC Rev May 2008 Original: English. Agreement. International Coffee Council 100th Session May 2008 London, England

How big is China s Digital Economy

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Public Consultation: Science 2.0 : science in transition

IS INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Welding - General tolerances for welded constructions - Dimensions for lengths and angles - Shape and position

Ref: Overview of the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement (patents) in the EPC contracting states and observer countries

This document is a preview generated by EVS

10 GHz Linear Amplifier PSPL5866 Datasheet

National Census Geography Some lessons learned and future challenges in European countries

ISU Symposium The Public Face of Space Strasbourg, France February A quiet and sustainable success story.

Biometrics and Standardization. Presentation to BioSec 2nd Open Workshop, 19th and 20th January, 2005

General Questionnaire

Fasteners Torque/clamp force testing (ISO 16047:2005)

João Cadete de Matos. João Miguel Coelho Banco de Portugal Head of the Current and Capital Accounts Statistics Unit

Simplifying DC-DC Converter Characterization using a 2600B System SourceMeter SMU Instrument and MSO/DPO5000 or DPO7000 Series Scope APPLICATION NOTE

English Version EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.

This document is a preview generated by EVS

SR&ED International R&D Tax Credit Strategies

This document is a preview generated by EVS

The Evolving Role and Image

Who Reads and Who Follows? What analytics tell us about the audience of academic blogging Chris Prosser Politics in

Monthly Summary of Troop Contribution to UN Operations

Success Factors for Effective Regional Innovation Policy

Economic and Social Council

Annexes to the Review of species/country combinations subject to long-standing import suspensions: reptile species from Africa

New era for Eureka - relations with ETPs

Decoding Satellite Telemetry from ARISSat Douglas Quagliana, KA2UPW/5

Rue du Trône BRUSSELS BELGIUM. Phone

EU Ecolabel EMAS Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) State-of-play and evaluations

Technical Meeting on Heat Transfer, Thermal-Hydraulics and System Design for Supercritical Water Cooled Reactors

Encapsulated Transformers 115V + 115V Primary, Low Profile

English Version. Conservation of cultural property - Main general terms and definitions concerning conservation of cultural property

AC Line Rated Disc Capacitors Class X1, 400 VAC/Class Y1, 500 VAC

nuclear science and technology

Walkie Talkie APMP300. User manual

Stress Calibration for Jitter >1UI A Practical Method

IAEA activities in support of accelerator-based research and applications

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Falling Behind on ICT Adoption Indicators: Can We Afford This?

English version. Audio, video and similar electronic apparatus - Safety requirements

Measuring Vgs on Wide Bandgap Semiconductors APPLICATION NOTE

Transcription:

Data Bank The JEF-2.2 Nuclear Data Library JEFF Report 17 N U C L E A R E N E R G Y A G E N C Y

JEFF Report 17 THE JEF-2.2 NUCLEAR DATA LIBRARY April 2000 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996) and the Republic of Korea (12th December 1996). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1st February 1958 under the name of the OEEC European Nuclear Energy Agency. It received its present designation on 20th April 1972, when Japan became its first non-european full Member. NEA membership today consists of 27 OECD Member countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities also takes part in the work of the Agency. The mission of the NEA is: to assist its Member countries in maintaining and further developing, through international co-operation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for a safe, environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as well as to provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues, as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy and to broader OECD policy analyses in areas such as energy and sustainable development. Specific areas of competence of the NEA include safety and regulation of nuclear activities, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, economic and technical analyses of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear law and liability, and public information. The NEA Data Bank provides nuclear data and computer program services for participating countries. In these and related tasks, the NEA works in close collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, with which it has a Co-operation Agreement, as well as with other international organisations in the nuclear field. OECD 2000 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d exploitation du droit de copie (CCF), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, Tel. (33-1) 44 07 47 70, Fax (33-1) 46 34 67 19, for every country except the United States. In the United States permission should be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, (508)750-8400, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, or CCC Online: http://www.copyright.com/. All other applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this book should be made to OECD Publications, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.

FOREWORD The Joint Evaluated File (JEF) project was started in 1982 as a collaborative project between the NEA Data Bank Member countries. The main objective is to provide participating countries with a common and unique source of nuclear data for the calculation and prediction of different nuclear applications. The first version of the JEF file was issued in 1985, and was followed in spring 1993 by an improved second version (JEF-2.2). The JEF project is managed by a Scientific Co-ordination Group (SCG). The technical work is performed within specific working groups, comprising experts working on different nuclear data related activities, such as measurements, evaluations, processing and validation. An extensive programme of benchmark testing of the JEF-2.2 data has been undertaken and is reported in this publication. The JEF file has been validated both for thermal and fast reactor applications, as well as for many other special applications, such as criticality, decay heat and radiation shielding, including a special emphasis on the major structural materials. A large number of laboratories throughout Western Europe have been engaged in this data processing and validation phase. The main contributors were: CEA, France; IKE, Germany; IRI and ECN, Holland; ENEA, Italy; PSI, Switzerland; Studsvik, Sweden; and AEAT, UK with financial support from national industries (BNFL, EDF, COGEMA ). The collective work for the JEF project, mainly presented at the biannual JEF meetings, has been documented in a series of unofficial publications called JEF/DOC. These documents have been extensively consulted in the production of the present summary report of the JEF-2.2 data library. The CD-ROM version of this summary report contains direct hyper-links to the referenced JEF/DOCs, included on the CD-ROM. The list of authors, who were directly involved in writing this report, is given on the next page. The chairpersons who led the JEF Scientific Co-ordination Group over the years were: C.G. Campbell, UKAEA (1982-1986), M. Salvatores, CEA Cadarache (1986-1994), P.J. Finck, CEA Cadarache (1994-1997), H. Gruppelaar, ECN Petten (1997-1999). The present chairman is R. Jacqmin, CEA Cadarache. The secretariat of the meetings, as well as the assembly and the maintenance of the JEF file, has been the responsibility of NEA Data Bank (C. Nordborg, M. Konieczny, M. Kellett and A. Nouri). Special thanks to J. Rowlands, who edited the report, and to H. Tellier, who reviewed the whole document and made valuable comments regarding the overall homogeneity of the text. This summary report is dedicated to the former JEF chairman, Harm Gruppelaar, who was strongly devoted both to the JEF and the EFF (European Fusion File) projects. Following his initiative, these two projects are now co-operating very closely on the development of a joint new evaluated data library called JEFF-3. Harm Gruppelaar passed away on 14 November 1999. 3

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE DIFFERENT CHAPTERS CHAPTER 1: NEA Data Bank CHAPTER 2: Summary by J. Rowlands based on the paper by J. Blachot, and C. Nordborg with additions from the paper by A. Tobias, and contributions by A.L. Nichols, and F. Storrer. CHAPTER 3: R.W Mills, D.R. Weaver and M.F. James. CHAPTER 4: Summary by J. Rowlands based on JEF Report by M. Mathes et al. CHAPTER 5: Summary of different JEF/DOCs (see list at the end of this chapter) by J. Rowlands. CHAPTER 6: Summary by J. Rowlands based on work done mainly at CEA/Cadarache by E. Fort, G. Rimplaut (see reference section of this chapter). CHAPTER 7: A. Nouri, N. Smith, B. Roque and I. Guimier. CHAPTER 8: Update by J. Rowlands of the paper by A.F. Avery with additions from S.H. Zheng. CHAPTER 9: Summary by J. Rowlands based on different studies by F. Storrer, B. Nimal, J. Blachot, J.C Nimal and C.M Diop, P. de Leege, J. Hoogenboom and J. Kloosterman. CHAPTER 10: Summary by J. Rowlands of a more detailed study by E. Fort, V. Zammit et al. CHAPTER 11: R.W Mills. CHAPTER 12: E Fort, W. Assal, A. Avery, P. Blaise, J-C. Bosq, S. Cathalau, C. Dean, G. Rimpault, J. Rowlands, P. Smith, R. Soule, V. Zammit, M. Salvatores, P.J. Finck. CHAPTER 13: Compiled by NEA/Data Bank. CHAPTER 14: A.L Nichols, C.J Dean. CHAPTER 15: Summary by J. Rowlands of different papers (see reference list of this chapter). 4

AFFILIATION OF THE AUTHORS FRANCE: J. Blachot CEA Grenoble W. Assal CEA Cadarache P. Blaise CEA Cadarache J-C. Bosq CEA Cadarache S. Cathalau CEA Cadarache P.J. Finck CEA Cadarache E. Fort CEA Cadarache B. Roque CEA Cadarache G. Rimplaut CEA Cadarache M. Salvatores CEA Cadarache R. Soule CEA Cadarache F. Storrer CEA Cadarache V. Zammit CEA Cadarache B. Nimal CEA Saclay J.C Nimal CEA Saclay C.M Diop CEA Saclay S.H. Zheng CEA Saclay I. Guimier IPSN Fontenay-aux-Roses UNITED KINGDOM: N. Smith AEA Technology Winfrith P. Smith AEA Technology Winfrith R.W. Mills BNFL M.F. James UKAEA A.F Avery AEA Technology Winfrith A.L. Nichols AEA Technology, Harwell A. Tobias Magnox Electric, Berkeley D.R. Weaver The University of Birmingham NETHERLANDS: J. Hoogenboom Delft University of Technology J. Kloosterman Delft University of Technology P. de Leege Delft University of Technology INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS: C. Nordborg OECD/NEA A. Nouri OECD/NEA J. Rowlands Consultant to OECD/NEA 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 9 Part I. EVALUATIONS IN JEF-2.2... 11 Introduction... 13 Chapter 1. SUMMARY OF THE SOURCES OF JEF-2.2 EVALUATIONS IN THE GENERAL PURPOSE LIBRARY... 15 Chapter 2. THE JEF-2.2 RADIOACTIVE DECAY DATA LIBRARY... 47 Annex 1. Examples of Data adopted from CEA and UK Libraries... 59 Annex 2. Isotopes for which the decay energies are from the measurements of G. Rudstam or the theoretical estimates of H. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, et al... 61 Chapter 3. THE JEF-2.2 FISSION YIELD LIBRARIES... 65 Chapter 4. THERMAL SCATTERING DATA... 89 Part II. JEF-2.2 VALIDATION STUDIES... 93 Introduction... 95 Chapter 5. THERMAL REACTOR VALIDATION STUDIES... 97 Annex 1. JEF/DOC Documents Relating to JEF-2.2 Thermal Reactor Benchmark Studies... 111 Annex 2. TRX-1 and TRX-2... 115 Annex 3. Results of Calculations for the KRITZ Cores... 117 Chapter 6. FAST REACTOR VALIDATION STUDIES... 119 Annex Relevant JEF/DOC References... 135 Chapter 7. CRITICALITY VALIDATION STUDIES... 139 Annex List of JEF Documents Related to JEF-2.2 Benchmarking for Criticality Safety Studies... 157 7

Chapter 8. SHIELDING VALIDATION STUDIES... 159 Annex List of JEF Documents Related to Shielding Validation Studies... 171 Chapter 9. DECAY HEAT VALIDATION STUDIES... 173 Chapter 10. DELAYED NEUTRON VALIDATION STUDIES... 183 Chapter 11. DELAYED NEUTRON SUMMATION CALCULATIONS... 185 Part III. ADJUSTMENT STUDIES... 197 Chapter 12. VALIDATION OF THE JEF-2.2 GENERAL PURPOSE FILE BY MEANS OF CROSS-SECTION ADJUSTMENT STUDIES... 199 Part IV. A SUMMARY OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (JEFF-3)... 225 Introduction... 227 Chapter 13. A LIST OF KNOWN ERRORS IN JEF-2.2... 231 Chapter 14. PLANS FOR NEW DECAY DATA EVALUATIONS. UK WORK UNDERTAKEN AFTER BNFL/CEA AND UKAEA REVIEWS OF JEF-2.2 DECAY DATA FILES: 1996-2000... 237 Chapter 15. VALIDATION STUDIES MADE USING JEF-2.2 WITH NEW EVALUATIONS INCLUDED... 249 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The present report is a summary documentation of the second version of the Joint Evaluated File (JEF-2.2). The information contained in the file comprises neutron reaction data, radioactive decay data, fission yield data and thermal scattering law data. The data library has been assembled and tested as a joint undertaking between experts in NEA Data Bank Member countries. The Data Bank secretariat acted as co-ordinator of the project and maintains the master version of the file. The report has been divided up in the following four parts: Part one provides information on the origin of the data. It also describes modifications and improvements that were made to the data before adopting them in the JEF-2.2 library. Part two summarises the validation and testing of the JEF-2.2 library for different nuclear applications. All validation has been performed with non-adjusted data, i.e. the performances are those derived directly from the original data without taking into account feedback from specific integral experiments. In addition, the JEF-2.2 data-testing programme gave special attention to the use of the most sophisticated models, to carrying out systematic computer code comparisons and to selecting clean and well-documented integral benchmarks. The overall conclusion from this data validation programme is that the unadjusted JEF-2.2 file generally performs well, at least as well as former adjusted data libraries. However, there are still areas where improvements are needed. Part three gives an overview of the validation of the JEF-2.2 data by means of cross-section adjustment studies. This part provides a short description of the methodologies used, and it derives quantitative information on data changes needed to achieve a very good accuracy in the calculation of different reactor applications. Part four proposes improvements to the JEF-2.2 file to meet the new challenges, both for advanced reactor concepts and new fuel cycle options. This feedback is being taken into account in the preparation of the new version of the evaluated file JEFF-3. 9