France. 1 Introduction. 2 Employed methodology. Radiocommunication Study Groups

Similar documents
Update of the compatibility study between RLAN 5 GHz and EESS (active) in the band MHz

Sharing Considerations Between Small Cells and Geostationary Satellite Networks in the Fixed-Satellite Service in the GHz Frequency Band

Recommendation ITU-R SF.1843 (10/2007)

Point-to-Multipoint Coexistence with C-band FSS. March 27th, 2018

France SHARING STUDIES BETWEEN AERONAUTICAL TELEMETRY TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS AND IMT SYSTEMS WITHIN MHZ BAND

Technical Annex. This criterion corresponds to the aggregate interference from a co-primary allocation for month.

Derivation of Power Flux Density Spectrum Usage Rights

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1652 *

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SF.1719

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1819

REGULATORY GUILDELINES FOR DEPLOYMENT OF BROADBAND SERVICES ON THE GHz BAND

Report ITU-R S (06/2015)

REPORT ITU-R M Rep. ITU-R M (2007)

ECC Decision (17)06. Approved 17 November 2017

The 3 rd Annual CIS and CEE Spectrum Management Conference

ARTICLE 22. Space services 1

REPORT ITU-R M Sharing and adjacent band compatibility in the 2.5 GHz band between the terrestrial and satellite components of IMT-2000

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

ECC Report 276. Thresholds for the coordination of CDMA and LTE broadband systems in the 400 MHz band

Table 1: OoB e.i.r.p. limits for the MFCN SDL base station operating in the band MHz

Recommendation ITU-R SA (07/2017)

France. SHARING STUDY BETWEEN RADIOLOCATION AND IMT-2020 BASE STATION WITHIN MHz

Sharing between the Earth explorationsatellite service (Earth-to-space) and

ORGANIZACION DE LOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Recommendation ITU-R M (05/2011)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1341*

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) CHARACTERISTICS OF IEEE SYSTEMS IN MHz

Characteristics and protection criteria for non-geostationary mobile-satellite service systems operating in the band

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1654 *

Recommendation ITU-R F (05/2011)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.1628

Report ITU-R SA.2193 (10/2010)

Agenda Item 1.13 HAPS outside IMT-2000 bands

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1639 *

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY OF TETRA AND TETRAPOL IN THE MHZ FREQUENCY RANGE, AN ANALYSIS COMPLETED USING A MONTE CARLO BASED SIMULATION TOOL

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S *

Space Frequency Coordination Group

WRC-07 Radio Astronomy Preparations CORF Meeting October 15, 2006

France 1. AGENDA ITEM 1.1 VIEWS ON SHARING STUDIES BETWEEN IMT INDOOR SYSTEMS AND RADAR SYSTEMS IN THE BAND MHz FOR WRC-15 AGENDA ITEM 1.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1402*, **

ECC Report 197. COMPATIBILITY STUDIES MSS TERMINALS TRANSMITTING TO A SATELLITE IN THE BAND MHz AND ADJACENT CHANNEL UMTS SERVICES

Geographic Sharing in C-band Final Report

REPORT ITU-R M

Recommendation ITU-R M (06/2005)

CEPT Report 42. Report from CEPT to the European Commission in response to Task 3 of the Mandate to CEPT on the 900/1800 MHz bands

Technical and Regulatory Studies on HAPS

Propagation Modelling White Paper

Interference criteria for meteorological aids operated in the MHz and MHz bands

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BT.1832 * Digital video broadcast-return channel terrestrial (DVB-RCT) deployment scenarios and planning considerations

ECC Report 172. Broadband Wireless Systems Usage in MHz

Guidelines for efficient use of the band GHz by the Earth explorationsatellite service (space-to-earth)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA Protection criteria for deep-space research

Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band MHz

ECC Report 245. Compatibility studies between PMSE and other systems/services in the band MHz

Thuraya response to Federal Office of Communications consultation

Information on the Evaluation of VHF and UHF Terrestrial Cross-Border Frequency Coordination Requests

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 210/7)

International Journal of Engineering and Technology Volume 3 No. 6, June, 2013

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

The SKA, RFI and ITU Regulations

Radio Propagation Characteristics in the Large City

Report ITU-R SA (11/2014)

Cover note to draft ECC/DEC/(06)AA on UWB

Approved September 2014

Recommendation ITU-R SF.1486 (05/2000)

International Spectrum Management. Darrel Emerson NRAO, Tucson

ECC Report 203. Approved 8 November 2013

ECC Recommendation (14)01

SPECTRUM SHARING AND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN THE INTERNATIONAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION- ADVANCED AND DIGITAL BROADCASTING IN THE DIGITAL DIVIDEND BAND

Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band GHz for intelligent transport systems applications

Technical Requirements for Wireless Broadband Services (WBS) in the Band MHz

REPORT ITU-R BT TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN BANDS ABOVE 2 GHZ (Questions ITU-R 1/11 and ITU-R 49/11)

NASA Space-based Remote Sensing

ADJACENT BAND COMPATIBILITY OF 400 MHZ TETRA AND ANALOGUE FM PMR AN ANALYSIS COMPLETED USING A MONTE CARLO BASED SIMULATION TOOL

The Importance of Retaining C-band for Satellite Service in the Asia-Pacific

Spectrum Utilization Policy Decisions for the Band MHz

Prediction of clutter loss

Co-Existence of UMTS900 and GSM-R Systems

Notice of aeronautical radar coordination. Coordination procedure for air traffic control radar - notice issued to 3.

Technical Requirements for Fixed Wireless Access Systems Operating in the Band MHz

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BO.1834*

Report ITU-R M (11/2010)

PASSIVE MICROWAVE PROTECTION

Digital Radio Mondiale RESULTS OF THE DRM FIELD TRIAL IN BAND I IN TURIN, ITALY

ECC Report 174. Compatibility between the mobile service in the band MHz and the radiodetermination service in the band MHz

Characteristics of and protection criteria for systems operating in the mobile service in the frequency range GHz

Response of Boeing UK Limited. UK Ofcom Call for Input 3.8 GHz to 4.2 GHz Band: Opportunities for Innovation 9 June 2016

Approved 8 November Amended 3 July 2015

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM * Measuring of low-level emissions from space stations at monitoring earth stations using noise reduction techniques

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1580 *, ** Generic unwanted emission characteristics of base stations using the terrestrial radio interfaces of IMT-2000

CEPT Report 29. Report from CEPT to the European Commission in response to the Mandate on

APT REPORT IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH USE OF THE BAND MHZ BY MOBILE SERVICES. No. APT/AWG/REP-24 Edition: September 2011

Frequency sharing between SRS and FSS (space-to-earth) systems in the GHz band

Analysis of RF requirements for Active Antenna System

Technical characteristics and protection criteria for aeronautical mobile service systems in the frequency range GHz

Approved January 2015

Ultra Wide Band (UWB) and Short-Range Devices (SRD) technologies

EMC Evaluation at Green Bank: Emissions and Shield Effectiveness

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Technical Requirements for Fixed Radio Systems Operating in the Bands GHz and GHz

Transcription:

Radiocommunication Study Groups Received: 10 February 2014 Document 10 February 2014 France COMPATIBILITY STUDY BETWEEN THE POTENTIAL NEW MS ALLOCATION AROUND THE 1 400-1 427 MHz PASSIVE BAND AND THE RADIO ASTRONOMY SERVICE UPDATE WITH AGGREGATED POWER 1 Introduction WRC-15 agenda item 1.1 deals with the consideration of additional spectrum requirement for the mobile service (MS) and more specifically for International Mobile Telecommunication and other terrestrial mobile broadband application IMT systems in accordance with Resolution 233 (WRC-12). France has proposed the two bands 1 375-1 400 MHz and 1 427-1 452 MHz for studies under agenda item 1.1 (2x25 MHz, FDD). The adjacent band 1 400-1 427 MHz is allocated on a primary basis to passive services such as earth exploration satellite and radio astronomy, and systems under these services are highly susceptible to interference from unwanted emissions of active services. It is therefore necessary to address the relevant protection of these services from mobile service unwanted emissions. The methodology applied in this study consists in determining the separation distance a between a radio astronomy station and an IMT base station (BS), which will depend on the characteristics of the BS as well as the radio astronomy (RA) receiver sensitivity. In this statistical study, the mobile user Terminal (TS) case is not included. In fact, the separation distance between an RAS station and a BS determines intrinsically the separation distance between an RAS receiver and a TS. 2 Employed methodology The methodology consists in determining, in a statistical analysis, the necessary separation distance between an RAS station and IMT equipment, taking into account the interference due to the aggregated power of a base station in the radio astronomy receiver. These interferences (I) may be written in the following form: n N [ Ptn + Gtn+ Grn Lossn ]/10 I = 10 log( 10 ) (db) (1) = n= 1

- 2 - Where: Pt n : Gt n : Gr n : Loss n : Power level (dbm) in the reference bandwidth at the input of the antenna of a transmitting base station (BS) of the mobile service. Base station or terminal gain (dbi). Relative antenna gain (dbi) of the radio astronomy receiver in the direction of the mobile system of index n. Calculated losses with Recommendation ITU-R P.452-14 between the mobile system of index n and the radio astronomy receiver. The aggregated power is calculated following equation (1), considering each position, gain and power of the BS. The losses are assessed for each propagation path between the BS and the RAS receiver. 3 Mobile service characteristics The characteristics of mobile service (base stations and terminals) are presented in Attachment 1 of the Annex 8 to Joint Task Group 4-5-6-7 Chairman s Report (Document 4-5-6-7/242). This document deals with the considerations of the frequency bands 1 375-1 400 MHz and 1 427-1 452 MHz for the mobile service and with the compatibility between this service and the EESS in an adjacent band (1 400-1 427 MHz). All the parameters for IMT in Tables 1 and 2 below are taken directly from the JTG study (section 2.2). In the base station (BS) case, it has been considered that each base station will include 3 sectors of 120. However, it has also been assumed that, on average, emissions from one sector will always be blocked. Therefore, only 2 sectors per base station have been considered with the following parameter. Considering terminal stations (TS), it has been assumed that, on average, one terminal station will always be transmitting within each of the 2 sectors. These studies suggest that, under a static assumption, to ensure protection of EESS (passive) systems, OoB limits close to 80 dbw/27 MHz (-64 dbm/mhz) are required for base stations. TABLE 1 Mobile service characteristics Base station with two sectors Antenna Gain 17 dbi Antenna Pattern Recommendation ITU-R F.1336 Antenna Elevation -6 (down tilt) Average Activity Factor 50% Height 45m (macro-cells) Table 3 is extracted from Table C of Document 4-5-6-7/236, providing the average cell radius of base station (macro and micro cells) as function of base station location. This study assumes that each location type is represented by a frame of population density (PS) (expressed as inhabitants per square kilometer) as: Urban : PS >10 3 inh/km² Suburban : 10 3 inh/km² <PS <100 inh/km²

- 3 - Rural : 100 inh/km 2 <PS < 1 inh/km² Deserted: PS < 1 inh/km². For a deserted location, cell deployment is assumed to be insignificant. TABLE 2 Mobile service base station deployment Macro rural Macro suburban Macro urban Small cell outdoor / Micro urban Small cell indoor / Indoor urban Cell radius / Deployment density (for bands between 1 and 2 GHz) > 3 km (typical figure to be used in sharing studies 5 km) 0.5-3 km (typical figure to be used in sharing studies 1 km) 0.25-1 km (typical figure to be used in sharing studies 0.5 km) 1-3 per urban macro cell <1 per suburban macro site depending on indoor coverage/ capacity demand Cell radius / Deployment density (for bands between 2 and 3 GHz) > 2 km (typical figure to be used in sharing studies 4 km) 0.4-2.5 km (typical figure to be used in sharing studies 0.8 km) 0 0.8 km (typical figure to be used in sharing studies 0.4 km) 1-3 per urban macro cell <1 per suburban macro site depending on indoor coverage/ capacity demand Document 4-5-6-7/236 states that the distance between each BS is three times greater than the cell radius. Therefore in this study, the deployment takes into account distances between each BS equal to: 1.5 km in macro urban case 3 km in macro suburban case >10 km in macro rural case 4 Radio astronomy service characteristics The band 1 400-1 427 MHz is used more intensely than any other, in all ITU-R Regions, for radio astronomy observations. The band is used for studies of the so-called 21 cm spectral line of cosmic neutral hydrogen and for broadband continuum observations. The band is fundamental to our understanding of e.g. the origin and evolution of structures in the Universe, and of the galaxies within them (see also Document 4-5-6-7/175). In addition, this band is fully protected by RR footnote 5.340 ( all emissions are prohibited ). Any evolution of the use of bands adjacent to 1 400-1 427 MHz requires careful coexistence studies to ensure that this band remains as fully operational for passive services as it is today. Table 5 provides the technical characteristics of this band in the case of two kinds of observation: continuum and spectral line. These values are taken from Recommendation ITU-R RA.769-2. In order to fully protect radio astronomy observations, the protection criteria of continuum observation will be used, i.e., an interference threshold level of -189 dbm/mhz. This criterion has to be respected during at least 98% of the time (interference can occur for a maximum of 2% of the time see Recommendation ITU-R RA.1513)

- 4 - TABLE 3 Technical characteristics of the passive band 1 400-1 427 MHz for continuum observations (CO - dark grey) and spectral line observations (SLO - grey) Obs. Type Centre Frequency (MHz) Assumed Bandwidth (MHz) Minimum Noise Temperature (K) Receiver Noise Temp. (K) Temp. (mk) Power Spectral Density db(w/hz) Input Power (dbw/dbm) Power Flux Density (db(w/m 2 )) CO 1413.5 27 12 10 0.095-269 -205/-175-180 SLO 1420 0.02 12 10 3.48-253 -220/-190-196 Notes to Table 3: For spectral line measurements, the input power corresponds to -220 dbw or -190 dbm in 20 khz, or -173 dbm/mhz. For continuum measurements, the input power corresponds to -205 dbw or -175 dbm in 27 MHz, or -189 dbm/mhz. In accordance with Recommendation ITU-R RA.769-2, the antenna gains of all radio astronomy stations will be assumed to be 0 dbi corresponding to a semi-omnidirectional antenna (half the space above the ground/horizon). Most of the radio astronomy receivers listed in Table 4 have a height of 15 to 20 meters. In order to evaluate the coordination (or exclusion) distance around radio astronomy stations, only two kinds of stations combined with two kinds of population density are used (as mentioned in Table 4): Stations among low and high configurations of terrain relief, surrounded by low or high population densities. TABLE 4 List of radio astronomy site observing in the band 1 420-1 427 MHz, used in this study Site Nançay Dimensions (m) Flat mirror (200 40) Spherical Mirror (300 35) Minimum elevation ( ) Country 3.6 France Effelsberg 100 7 Germany Jodrell Bank 76 2 UK Westerbork 14 25 0 Netherlands MeerKAT 64 13.5 x South Africa GPS location (longitude, latitude) 02 12 00 47 23 00 06 53 00 50 31 32-02 18 26 53 14 10 06 36 01 57 13 22 21 24 39.6-30 43 15.6 Relief / population density around Flat / Low Medium / Low Flat / High Flat / Medium High/Deserted

- 5 - FIGURE 1 Representation of population density around four of the RAS stations listed in Table 4 (Jodrell Bank, Nançay, Effelsberg and Westerbork). In the legend, the logarithm of the population density (in inhabitants/km 2 ) is shown 5 Determination of the coordination distance in a statistic assumption Terminal locations are directly linked to BS positions. In this study, the separation distance is therefore only calculated for BS. The result of study is based on several assumptions: 1. The simulations are made considering the BS deployment around the radio astronomy receiver. This deployment is directly linked to the population density per km 2 and the macro cells radius per location (rural, urban ) described in the Table 3 (between 1 to 3 GHz). 2. The distribution considers random positions of BS. For each BS, only one sector is assumed to point in the direction of the RAS station. The elevation between the transmitter and the RAS receiver is calculated taking into account the tilt angle of the BS. For a BS, there is a probability of 33% that the sector in the direction of the RAS station is turned off (in which case the BS is considered to have no contribution to the aggregated power). This assumption is linked to the fact that on average, emissions from one sector will always be blocked. After the deployment, 50% of the remaining sectors are considered randomly turned off (to take into account the factor activity 50% - by assuming that measurements are made by the RAS receiver 100% of the time). 3. The BS OoB emission level is assumed to be -64 dbm/mhz (i.e., the OoB level necessary to respect the EESS (passive) protection in the band 1 400-1 427 MHz). 4. The losses between each BS and the RAS receiver are calculated using Recommendation ITU-R P.452-14. In this loss calculation urban clutter is not used 5.1 Study of Nançay Low population density and low relief Taking into account the deployment rules (Table 3) and the population density of Figure 1, the total number of deployed BS near Nançay is close to 2500. Considering the switch off ratio and the sector discriminations, the number of active sectors is around 880 within an area of 1.5 degree in

- 6 - latitude and (330 km) and 1.5 degree in longitude (210 km) around the RAS station (see Figure 2 below) (or about 67 000 km 2 ). On average, the study considers 1.3 BS per 100 km 2 pointing in the direction of Nançay. FIGURE 2 Representation of the random BS deployment for the case of Nançay. Each point indicates a BS position. Red points correspond to BS with a 50% turn off. Orange points are BS which do not emit in the direction of the RAS station. Green points are BS which turned on and present at least one sector in the direction of the RAS station For an OoB level of -64 dbm/mhz, and 450 working base stations, the separation distance between the RAS receiver and the first BS has to be about 115 km (see Figure 3) in the case of flat terrain profile and low population density.

- 7 - FIGURE 3 Representation of the aggregated interference in the station of Nançay Aggregated Interference in the RAS receiver (dbm/mhz) -165-170 -175-180 -185-189 -190-195 -200 0 20 40 60 80 100 115 140 160 180 Separation Distance (km) 5.2 Study of Effelsberg High population density and high relief Taking into account Table 3 and the population density of Figure 1, the total number of BS deployed near Effelsberg is close to 8000. Considering the switch off ratio and the sector discrimination, the final number of actives sectors is around 2600 within an area of 1.5 degree in latitude (330 km) and 1.5 degree in longitude (210 km) around the RAS station (see Figure 4 below) (or about 67 000 km 2 ). On average, the study considers 4 BS per 100 km 2 pointing in the direction of Effelsberg.

- 8 - FIGURE 4 Representation of the random BS deployment for the case of Effelsberg. Each point indicates a BS position. Red Points correspond to BS with a 50 % turn off. Orange points are BS which do not emit in the direction of the RAS station. Green points are BS which turned on and present at least one sector in the direction of the RAS station FIGURE 5 Representation of the aggregated interference in the station of Effelsberg Aggregated Interference in RAS receiver (dbm/mhz) -180-185 -189-190 -195-200 -205-210 -215-220 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Separation Distance (km) Figure 5 shows that the separation distance between RAS receiver and the first BS have to be inferior of 10 km. In fact, the case of Effelsberg is particular. The station is enclosed between medium terrain profiles (hills /valley) and this configuration ensures to the RAS receiver a really good protection to interference coming from BS on the top.

- 9-5.3 Study of Jodrell Bank and Westerbork High / Medium population density and low relief Taking into account Table 3 and the population density of Figure 1, the total numbers of BS deployed respectively near Jodrell Bank and Westerbork are close to 6000 and 4400. Considering the switch off ratio and the sector discrimination, the final number of active sectors is respectively around 2000 and 1600 within an area of 1.5 degree in latitude (320 km) and 1.5 degree in longitude (215 km) around each RAS station (see Figures 6 and 7 below) (or about 67 000 km 2 ). On average, the study considers 3 BS per 100 km 2 for Jodrell Bank and 2.4 BS per 100 km 2 for Westerbork. FIGURE 6 Representation of the random BS deployment for the case of Jodrell Bank. Each point indicates a BS position. Red Points correspond to BS with a 50% turn off. Orange points are BS which do not emit in the direction of the RAS station. Green points are BS which turned on and present at least one sector in the direction of the RAS station

- 10 - FIGURE 7 Representation of the random BS deployment for the case of Westerbork. Each point indicates a BS position. Red Points correspond to BS with a 50% turn off. Orange points are BS which do not emit in the direction of the RAS station. Green points are BS which turned on and present at least one sector in the direction of the RAS station FIGURE 8 Representation of the aggregated interference in the station of Jodrell Bank Aggregated Interference in the RAS receiver (dbm/mhz) -150-160 -170-180 -189-200 -210-220 Jodrell Bank Westerbork -230 0 20 40 60 80 106 120 138 160 180 Separation Distance (km) For an OoB level of -64 dbm/mhz, and 2000 working base stations (Jodrell Bank), the separation distance between the RAS receiver and the first BS has to be about 106 km (see Figure 8). In the case of 1600 working base stations (Westerbork), the distance becomes equal to 138 km. By comparison with Nançay (flat terrain assumption), it can be noted that the difference of the aggregated interference in the RAS receiver is around 14 db between Nançay and Jodrell Bank in the case of zero separation distance. This value is directly linked to the proximity of high density

- 11 - population areas near Jodrell Bank (combination of the two factors). Finally, the required separation distances for the two stations are quite similar, because for each separation distance, a large number of BS near Jodrell Bank are erased (in fact at 100 km, there are no BS in the biggest cities in UK Manchester, Liverpool, Nottingham, and Birmingham) 5.4 Study of MeerKAT Deserted location and high relief The total number of BS deployed near MeerKAT is close to 36. Considering the switch off ratio and the sector discrimination, the final number of used BS is 13 within an area of 1.5 degree in latitude (320 km) and 1.5 degree in longitude (215 km) around the RAS station. FIGURE 9 Representation of the random BS deployment for the case of MeerKAT. Each point indicates a BS position. Red Points correspond to BS with a 50% turn off. Orange points are BS which do not emit in the direction of the RAS station. Green points are BS which turned on and present at least one sector in the direction of the RAS station

- 12 - FIGURE 10 Representation of the aggregated interference in the station of Meerkat Aggregated Interference in the RAS receiver (dbm/mhz) -185-189 -190-195 -200-205 -210-215 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Separation Distance (km) Figure 10 does not yield a separation distance (with the distribution used) necessary to protect the RAS receiver. A look at the BS distribution displayed in Figure 9 shows clearly that the first functional base station is at distance of around 100 km (yellow line in Figure 9). For such a large distance, the aggregated power in the receiver is not affected by the aggregated OoB emissions from the more remote BS. 6 Conclusions Table 5 summarizes the results (for both kinds of IMT equipment, BS and TS) of the calculated separation distances necessary to protect a radio astronomy receiver. The BS OoB power level used in this study is -64 dbm/mhz (i.e., the level necessary to ensure the protection of the EESS in the passive band 1 400-1 427 MHz). The antenna gain depends of the reception angle and the BS tilt. Moreover the results summarized in Table 5 are dependent on the time-variability of the population density. In the case of station surrounded by a high density population, the use of the urban clutter in a real condition of deployment could decrease the separation distance. TABLE 5 Summary of statistic simulation results using Recommendation ITU-R P.452-12 for base station Terrain relief Low (h<100m) Medium & High (100m<h) Population Density Approximated coordination distance (km) (Min-Max) Low 115 High 106 138 Deserted Not necessary (in this configuration) High <10

- 13 - This study shows clearly that the compatibility between IMT out of band emission and radio astronomy observations protection, around 1 400-1 427 MHz, could be achieved within each country by setting appropriate coordination distances (Table 5) or/and limits of unwanted emission levels at the radioastronomy site, considering the actual equipment deployment. In the case of calculated small, or even zero, separation distances of a few kilometers (5 to 10 km) around the RAS station have to be used as an exclusion zone in order to eliminate TS from the proximity of the RAS station, taking into account the low probability of connections between TS and BS through particular propagation paths.