IEEE C802.16e-03/ Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon

Similar documents
IEEE C802.16h-06/011. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Discuss the MAC messages supporting the CSI, such as DCD, DL-MAP etc.

IEEE C802.16e-05/039. Pilot carriers can be used as secondary Fast-feedback channel or secondary UL ACK channel in OFDMA

IEEE C802.16e-04/518r1 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Network Management Study Group Closing Plenary Report

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Working Group Review of Working Document 802.

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Merging CXCC sub-channels 1-4 and CSI sub-channel into one figure

A Mixed OFDM Downlink and Single Carrier Uplink for the 2-11 GHz Licensed Bands

IEEE C802.16e-04/403 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Assignments of Pilots for 256 FFT OFDMA mode

C802.16a-02/76. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16d-04/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Extended IE format for concurrent transmission of bursts

C802.16a-02/68. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Framework for Enabling Closed-loop MIMO for OFDMA

IEEE C802.16d-04/88r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/001. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < WirelessMAN coexistence function primitives consolidation

Title: LE Task Group Report - Session #45

IEEE C802.16d-04/26

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Corrections and clarifications to the d OFDMA Channel Coding

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Show some simulation result for the energy pulse symbol duration

John Liebetreu and Randall Scwartz

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

IEEE C802.16d-04/47. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-05/059r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/127. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/015. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/94r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE abc-01/23. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/109. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050r2

IEEE C802.16h-05/030r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/46. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed PAR to convert P802.16d from Amendment to Revision

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Editorial correction to use of the Term-of-Art 'backbone network'

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Coverage/Capacity simulations for OFDMA PHY in with ITU-T channel model

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed Antenna Radiation Pattern Envelopes for Coexistence Study

IEEE C802.16e-04/420. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/517 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Common PHY & Messages for Neighbor Discovery Using CTS

IEEE C802.16h-07/054r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C /008. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Action Item from Session #48: UTC time stamp text remedy

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Procedure in community Entry of new BS

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < The unified TLV encoding for DCD and UCD in OFDMA PHY mode

IEEE C802.16h-07/013. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Additional comments to P802.16d/D2

IEEE C802.16h-06/071. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

AAS Maps Format for OFDM

IEEE C802.16h-06/038r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

C802.16g-05/039

IEEE C802.16h-06/022

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Voice: Fax:

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Relay Combining Hybrid ARQ for j

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE e-03/60. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16maint-07/033

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/012. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

UCP simulation: Approach and Initial Results

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/022r1

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Interference Management Procedure in the Operating Stage

Channel estimation issues for TDD and FDD OFDM

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < updating the text related to CSI under CX-Frame scheme

IEEE C802.16h-06/090

IETF Liasion Report, November 2006

IEEE C802.16e-04/515r3. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Zion Hadad Voice: RunCom Communitcations Ltd. Fax: Hachoma st. Rishon le-zion, Israel

IEEE C802.16h-07/003r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE abc-01/59. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Simulating coexistence between y and h systems in the 3.65 GHz band Scenarios and assumptions

IEEE d -04/35r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Mesh Networks in Fixed Broadband Wireless Access

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16d-03/34. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Metrics and Techniques for Evaluation of FEC Systems

IEEE C802.16h-05/020. Proposal for credit tokens based co-existence resolution and negotiation protocol

IEEE C802.16h-06/042

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Montreal, a candidate for Session #33

IEEE C802.16h-07/051. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Changes in ARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

IEEE abc-01/56r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Transcription:

IEEE C802.16e-03/116 Project Title Date Submitted Source(s) Re: Abstract Purpose Notice Release Patent Policy and Procedures IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16> CQI Signaling with Unequal Error Protection for OFDMA 2004-5- Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon ETRI 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-350 KOREA Voice: +82 42 860 4895, Fax: +82 42 860 6732 mailto: ciyeh@etri.re.kr IEEE P802.16-REVe/D2-2004 This document contains suggestions for the performance improvement of the CQI signaling in the uplink of OFDMA mode. The document is submitted for discussion by 802.16e Working Group This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.16. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802.16 Patent Policy and Procedures <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/policy.html>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <mailto:chair@wirelessman.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.16 Working Group. The Chair will disclose this notification via the IEEE 802.16 web site <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/notices>. - 1 -

CQI Signaling with Unequal Error Protection for OFDMA Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon ETRI, Korea 1. Introduction This document describes the CQI signaling enhancement to the OFDMA mode of IEEE802.16e. To support mobile applications, FAST_FEEDBACK channel is used to transmit CQI messages in the OFDMA mode. The CQI is periodically reported by a subscriber station (SS) in order to inform a base station of the SNR measurement. The measured SNR is represented by a 4-bit CQI message. Since the CQI messages on the FAST_FEEDBACK channel do not include CRC for error checking, we need more accurate CQI transmission method to improve the system capability. When transmitting the CQI messages, the transmission accuracy of MSBs is more important than that of LSBs, because the error induced in the MSBs causes a large difference between the measured SNR at the SS and the value reported to the base station. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce an unequal error protection (UEP) method to the CQI signaling. This contribution proposes a simple and efficient method of unequal error protection for CQI transmission. 2. CQI Signaling with UEP In order to realize the UEP for CQI transmission in the uplink, we need to allocate more energy to MSBs and less energy to LSBs of CQI message. The proposed UEP DPSK modulation can be summarized as:! The CQI is represented by 5 bits according to the channel SNR measured in the SS,! To realize the unequal energy allocation, we introduced different bit repetition depending on the bit position of CQI message,! To obtain frequency diversity, interleaving is introduced in the frequency domain,! DPSK is used for non-coherent demodulation. IEEE802.16d document defines the FAST_FEEDBACK channel composed of 6 3-by-3 tiles. In the proposed method, CQI message will be transmitted using the current FAST_FEEDBACK channel but use more efficient modulation to reduce CQI decoding error. Following is the procedural explanation of UEP DPSK modulation for the transmission of CQI. - 2 -

1. The CQI is represented by 5-bits according to the measured SNR at the SS as shown in Table xxx. Table xxx- CQI representation according to the measured SNR Measured SNR [db] 5-bits CQI -10.0~-9.0 00000-9.0~-8.0 00001-8.0~-7.0 00010-7.0~-6.0 00011-6.0~-5.0 00100-5.0~-4.0 00101-4.0~-3.0 00110-3.0~-2.0 00111-2.0~-1.0 01000-1.0~-0.0 01001 0.0~1.0 01010 1.0~2.0 01011 2.0~3.0 01100 3.0~4.0 01101 4.0~5.0 01110 5.0~6.0 01111 6.0~7.0 10000 7.0~8.0 10001 8.0~9.0 10010 9.0~10.0 10011 10.0~11.0 10100 11.0~12.0 10101 12.0~13.0 10110 13.0~14.0 10111 14.0~15.0 11000 15.0~16.0 11001 16.0~17.0 11010 17.0~18.0 11011 18.0~19.0 11100 19.0~20.0 11101 20.0~21.0 11110 21.0~22.0 11111 2. Repeat each bit of 5-bit CQI message according to a repetition ratio (R 0 :R 1 :R 2 :R 3 :R 4 ), where R 0, R1, R2, R3 and R 4 represent the repetition number for the MSB, the second MSB,, the LSB respectively: CQI message (5 bits) b0b1b 2b3b4 Repeated sequence (48 bits) b 0...b 0 b 1...b 1 b 2...b 2 b 3..b 3 b 4..b 4 R 0 bits R 1 bits R 2 bits R 3 bits R 4 bits R = R 0 + R1 + R2 + R3 + R4 = N, ( L 1) R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 N=6, L=9 (6 3-by-3 tiles) - 3 -

3. Interleave the repeated bit sequence: R x y = x mod R + N N y bit index in the interleaved bit sequence (y=0,1,2,,r-1) x bit index in the repeated bit sequence (x=0,1,2,,r-1) 4. Map k-th (L-1) bits to k-th tile: 5. Make L DPSK symbols for (L-1) bits mapped to each tile, with the first symbol used as phase reference: CQI message (5 bits) MSB LSB Bit repetition Bit sequence (5*4 bits) 4 rep 4 rep 4 rep 4 rep 4 rep Repeated bit sequence (48 bits) UEP bit repetition 4 rep 3 rep 2 rep 2 rep 1 rep Interleaved bit sequence (48 bits) Bit interleaving 8 bits 8 bits 8 bits 8 bits 8 bits 8 bits DPSK signaling Reference symbol CQI channel (54 tones) Fig. 1: DPSK with bit repetion For the current FAST_FEEDBACK channel, six 3-by-3 tiles, the repetition ratio of 5 4:3 4:2 4:1 4:1 4 (=5:3:2:1:1) is recommended. - 4 -

3. Simulation Results Performances are compared for the current and proposed CQI transmission methods:! FAST_FEEDBACK (or orthogonal modulation with nonbinary block coding; See C80216d-04_85r1.pdf),! Differential binary PSK with bit repetition (UEP). 3.1 BER & MER comparison under AWGN Bit error rate 1E+0 1E-1 1E-2 1E-3 AWGN CQI message error rate 1E+0 1E-1 1E-2 1E-3 AWGN 1E-4 1E-4 1E-5 1E-5 Simulation result summary: In the BER or MER point of view the performance of is better than UEP DPSK over the entire SNR range. 3.2 BER & MER comparison under Rayleigh 1E+0 Independent Rayleigh 1E+0 Independent Rayleigh 1E-1 1E-1 Bit error rate 1E-2 1E-3 1E-4 1E-5 CQI message error rate 1E-2 1E-3 1E-4 1E-5 Simulation result summary: If the repetition rate is 3:3:2:2:2, then the BER performance of UEP DPSK is better than the that of under Rayleigh channel conditions. Considering the MER point of view, DPSK is better than when the SNR is higher than 4dB. - 5 -

3.3 CQI Error comparison under AWGN CQI error is defined by the difference between the actual SNR measured at the SS and the decoded SNR at the BS. The unit of CQI error is db Mean of absolute CQI error (db) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 AWGN DPSK(5:3:2:2:1) Standard deviation of CQI error (db) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 AWGN 1 1 0 0 Under AWGN channel conditions, the performance of UEP DPSK is better than that of except when the SNR is large. 3.4 CQI Error comparison under Rayleigh Mean of absolute CQI error (db) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Independent Rayleigh Standard deviation of CQI error (db) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Independent Rayleigh 1 1 0 0 The performance of UEP DPSK is better than that of under Rayleigh channel condition over the entire SNR ranges. And the recommended repetition rate is 5:3:2:1:1. - 6 -

Conclusions from Simulation Results are:! We need more accurate CQI signaling method because the OFDMA mode does not use the CRC for error checking,! The CQI error of the DPSK is smaller than that of FAST_FEEDBACK,! The complexity of DPSK is simpler than that of FAST_FEEDBACK,! The recommended repetition ratio for DPSK is 5:3:2:1:1. 4. Proposed Text Changes 4.1 PHY Changes [Insert the text] 8.4.5.4.10.4 FAST_FEEDBACK (CQI) modulation using UEP DPSK (optional).by allocating different powers to the CQI bits and using DPSK, the CQI decoding error can be reduced. The CQI transmission using UEP DPSK is defined over the six 3-b-3 FAST_FEEDBACK channel. The procedure for this CQI modulation is as follows: The CQI is represented by 5-bits according to a measured SNR at the SS as shown in Table xxx. Table xxx- CQI representation according to a measured SNR Measured SNR [db] 5-bits CQI -10.0~-9.0 00000-9.0~-8.0 00001-8.0~-7.0 00010-7.0~-6.0 00011-6.0~-5.0 00100-5.0~-4.0 00101-4.0~-3.0 00110-3.0~-2.0 00111-2.0~-1.0 01000-1.0~-0.0 01001 0.0~1.0 01010 1.0~2.0 01011 2.0~3.0 01100 3.0~4.0 01101 4.0~5.0 01110 5.0~6.0 01111 6.0~7.0 10000 7.0~8.0 10001 8.0~9.0 10010 9.0~10.0 10011 10.0~11.0 10100 11.0~12.0 10101 12.0~13.0 10110 13.0~14.0 10111-7 -

14.0~15.0 11000 15.0~16.0 11001 16.0~17.0 11010 17.0~18.0 11011 18.0~19.0 11100 19.0~20.0 11101 20.0~21.0 11110 21.0~22.0 11111 Repeat each bit of 5-bit CQI message according to a repetition ratio (R 0 :R 1 :R 2 :R 3 :R 4 =5:3:2:1:1), where R 0, R 1, R 2, R 3 and R 4 represent the repetition number for the b 0, b 1, b 2, b 3 and b 4, respectively. CQI message (5 bits) b 0 b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 Repeated sequence (48 bits) R = R 0 + R1 + R2 + R3 + R4 = N, b 0 b 0 b 1...b 1 b 2...b 2 b 3...b 3 b 4...b 4 R 0 bits R 1 bits R 2 bits R 3 bits R 4 bits ( L 1) R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 Interleave the repeated bit sequence to obtain frequency diversity. R x y = x mod R + N N y bit index in the interleaved bit sequence (y=0,1,2,,r-1) x bit index in the repeated bit sequence (x=0,1,2,,r-1) Map k-th (L-1) bits to k-th tile. Make L DPSK symbols for (L-1) bits mapped to each tile, with the first symbol used as phase reference. 4.2 MAC Changes [Insert the text] 11.7.8.9 FAST_FEEDBACK(CQI) report control CQI report method may be negotiated between MSS and BS during the registration procedure using the following TLV encoding. Type Length Value Scope 5.x 1 Bit#0: CQI report not supported Bit#1: FAST_FEEDBACK supported Bit#2: UEP DPSK-based CQI report supported Bit#3~7: Reserved OFDMA REG-REQ REG-RSP - 8 -

- 9 -