: PERSONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE FACILITIES: REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

Similar documents
SECTION 35 ANTENNAS AND TOWERS

Sec Radio, television, satellite dish and communications antennas and towers.

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS, ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION BASE SITES APPLICATION

CHAPTER 1123 SATELLITE EARTH STATIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT

Modify Section , Major Impact Services and Utilities, of Chapter (Civic Use Types):

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Chapter 15

5 February 11, 2015 Public Hearing

CHAPTER TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

County of Orange Proposed Wireless Communications Facilities Within County Highways Ordinance Draft September 30, 2015

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Berkeley Bekins ) 2721 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, California

MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION TOWER COLLOCATION OR MODIFICATION (ELIGIBLE FACILITIES)

Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Meeting. Neighborhood Leaders Meeting May 8, 2014

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

Royal Street Communications, LLC Proposed Base Station (Site No. LA0366A) 315 4th Avenue Venice, California

Telecommunications Law

PROJECT NARRATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS

Receiving and Transmitting Antennas, Communication and Broadcast Towers

ZONING ORDINANCES AND TELECOM PROVIDERS CAN WE LIVE IN HARMONY?

Wireless Facility Peer Engineering Review

CITY OF PINE CITY SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES

MODEL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE for Siting of "Small Cell" Telecommunication Infrastructure in Public Rights-Of-Way

COUNCIL ACTION FORM WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES TEXT AMENDMENT

City of Burbank. Planning and Transportation Division WIRELESS AND DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM ( DAS ) PROJECTS SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Planning Commission clarified minor changes to the SAF ordinance on May 24, 2018; and

WHEREAS, the City of (the City ) is an Illinois municipality in. accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and,

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 18, 2015

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).

Frequently Asked Questions about Wireless Facilities on Wooden Utility Poles and Streetlight Poles

Moline Illinois CODE OF ORDINANCES. Art. IX. Miscellaneous DIVISION 3. IN-BUILDING EMERGENCY RADIO SYSTEM COVERAGE

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T Proposed Telecommunications Facility 2700 Watt Avenue APN#

ARTICLE 25 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS AND ANTENNAS Updated

COUNTY OF CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. July 31, :00 PM. Commissioners Chamber

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No South Goleta ) 4500 Hollister Avenue Santa Barbara, California

AT&T Mobility Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN4779A) 1101 Keaveny Court Walnut Creek, California

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Lake Cachuma ) 2680 Highway 154 Santa Barbara County, California

Amendments to the Wichita-Sedgwick County of the Unified Zoning Code Required by K.S.A & FCC Declaratory Ruling

# Insite RE Inc./ Verizon Wireless Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

cm or SONOMA RESOLUTION NO

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR WIRELESS PROJECTS

LOCAL REGULATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

Telecommunications. A Presentation to the Georgia Planning Association. David C. Kirk, AICP Troutman Sanders LLP

ZONING R-LI Low Intensity Residential District. [Amended by Ord. No. 1684] PERMITTED USES BY RIGHT.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City issued a SEPA Determination of Non-significance on April 7, 2003, consistent with RCW 43.

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as The Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance of Polk County, North Carolina.

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1415

Small Cell Infrastructure in Denver

City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

EFFECTIVE AUGUST XX, 2016 UNLESS APPEALED PRIOR TO THAT DATE

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) EXPOSURE REPORT

Wireless Communication Facility Development Ordinance

CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY PLANNING DIVISION ANTENNA MINOR USE PERMIT APPLICATION

CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY SITE APPLICATION / MODIFICATION REQUEST FORM

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE, WYOMING:

ORDINANCE NO

Draft ORDINANCE NO.

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

M E M O R A N D U M. Update of April 11, 2016 Memorandum on Regulation of WITN s Poles in Local Right-of-Way 1

Chapter 22 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities

RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT. Verizon Wireless. Report Status: Verizon Wireless is Compliant

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Notice of Proposed Amendment Request for Expedited Review

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Palos Verdes ) 1506 Camino Verde Walnut Creek, California

MEMORANDUM. AGENDA ITEM #10 July 19,2016. July 15,2016. TO: County Council t 1/ Jeffrey L. Zyonlz'!s'enior LegIslatIve Analyst FROM:

City of Astoria Development Code ARTICLE 15 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICE FACILITIES

Sudden Valley RF Documentation

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1926

WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

Wireless Facility Engineering Review

2200 Noll Drive Lancaster, PA Latitude: N 40º (NAD 83) Longitude: W 76º (NAD 83) 362 AMSL

Town of Burlington Small Wireless Facility. and similar structures. Design Rules and Regulations

DPA : Telecommunications and Small Cell Facilities

Innovation Wireless KRONOsync GPS or NTP Wireless Clock System

PROPOSED CITY OF PORT SAINT LUCIE ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS FOR AMATEUR RADIO SERVICES ADDING SECTION C ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES

Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol

David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner

2. As such, Proponents of Antenna Systems do not require permitting of any kind from the Town.

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION PERMIT APPLICATION

Planning Commission Agenda Report Meeting Date 6/07/18

Index. Linear Booth, Corner Booth and Perimeter Booth 2. End-cap Booth and Peninsula Booth 3. Split Island Booth and Island Booth 4

March 9, Planning Commission. Benjamin J. Ziskal, AICP, CEcD Assistant Planning Director

Exhibit Display Rules and Regulations

Radio Frequency Emissions Analysis Report Sprint Wireless Water Tank Facility

SITE PLAN, SUBDIVISION & EXTERIOR DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS

Planning Commission meeting

Initial Comments on DRI Application for Wakeby Road Cell Tower September 26, 2017

Corner Exhibits A Corner Booth is a Linear Booth ( In-Line ) exposed to aisles on two sides. All other guidelines for Linear Booths apply.

Wireless Facility Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance Review

City of Lompoc Building & Safety Services Section 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc, CA Phone: Fax:

June 29, / C2. Mr. David E. Hilliard, Esq. Wiley, Rein & Fielding 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC Dear Mr.

WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305

TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNA / TOWER SITING PROTOCOL

Notice of Decision. [2] The subject property is on Plan Blk 1 Lot 51A, located at Avenue NW, within the PU Public Utility Zone.

General Class Element 3 Course Prese t n t a i tion ELEMENT 3 SUB ELEMENTS G1 Commission s Rules G2 Oper t a i

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

BLADEN COUNTY Wireless Communication Facility Ordinance

General Wireless Permit Package Submission and Review Guidelines. Non VDOT (Existing and New) Structures within VDOT Right of Way

Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

City of Laguna Hills Application for a Conditional Use Permit Project Information and Justification

Transcription:

10-1-1118: PERSONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE FACILITIES: REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. PERMITTED IN R-3, R-4, AND R-5 ZONES AND IN ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONES. Subject to the regulations contained in this section and any other applicable regulations, personal wireless telecommunications service facilities may be erected and maintained in R- 3, R-4 and R-5 zones and all non-residential zones and on property owned by the United States, the State, the City or the Burbank Unified School District. B. PERMIT REQUIRED. A building permit shall be obtained from the Building Division prior to the installation of a personal wireless telecommunications service facility. Personal wireless telecommunications service facilities shall be installed and maintained in compliance with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Code. C. FEDERAL, STATE, CITY OR SCHOOL PROPERTY. For the purposes of the regulations contained in this section, property owned by the United States, the State, the City and the Burbank Unified School District shall be treated as if it were located in a non-residential zone, unless such property is improved with a residential dwelling unit and is used for residential purposes. D. ONLY BUILDING-MOUNTED IN R-3, R-4 AND R-5 ZONES. Only building-mounted personal wireless telecommunications facilities are permitted in the R- 3, R-4 and R-5 zones. Ground-mounted personal wireless telecommunications service facilities are not permitted in the R-3, R-4 and R-5 zones. E. NUMBER. One personal wireless telecommunications service facility shall be allowed per lot, unless a conditional use permit is granted. F. HEIGHT. (1) Unless otherwise provided, the maximum permitted height of a ground-mounted personal wireless service facility shall be determined by its distance from the closest lot line of any property zoned R-1, R-1-E, R-1-H, and R-2 (or a comparable PD Zone), as follows: EXHIBIT A

(2) For the purposes of this subsection, property zoned R-1, R-1-E, R-1-H, and R-2 also includes similarly zoned property outside the boundaries of the City of Burbank. (3) The height of a personal wireless telecommunications service facility is the distance from the base of the facility, including any support structure, to the highest point of the facility when fully extended. (4) A conditional use permit is required for a ground-mounted personal wireless telecommunications service facility with a height of more than thirty-five (35) feet and for a building-mounted personal wireless telecommunications service facility with a height of more than fifteen (15) feet. (5) Whip antennas of up to fifteen (15) feet in height shall not be subject to the height restrictions. (6) A personal wireless telecommunications service facility of up to fifteen (15) feet in height may be erected on a building in the R-3, R-4 and R-5 zones and all non-residential zones, regardless of building height or residential proximity. (7) A personal wireless telecommunications service facility of more than fifteen (15) feet in height may be erected on a building in the R-3, R-4 and R-5 zones and in all non-

residential zones as long as the personal wireless telecommunications service facility does not extend more than fifteen (15) feet beyond the maximum permitted height of the building. G. SETBACK. A ground-mounted personal wireless telecommunications service facility shall comply with the setback requirements for the zone in which it is located. H. LOCATION. No personal wireless telecommunications service facility shall be located in the area between the front property line and the main structure or building. No portion of a personal wireless telecommunications service facility shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. No part of a personal wireless telecommunications service facility may be located inside a residential dwelling unit. I. COLOR. A personal wireless telecommunications service facility shall be finished in a color to blend in with its immediate surroundings, to reduce glare and to minimize its visual intrusiveness and negative aesthetic impact. J. PLACEMENT OR SCREENING OF BUILDING-MOUNTED FACILITIES. All building-mounted personal wireless telecommunications service facilities shall be located or screened so as to minimize pedestrian level view from public streets or from any neighboring residential uses. K. WARNING LIGHT. Flashing red beacon lights shall be installed on top of personal wireless telecommunications service facilities, if deemed necessary by the Police Chief, in a type and manner approved by the Police Chief. L. SIGNS PROHIBITED. The display of any sign or any other graphics on a personal wireless telecommunications service facility or on its screening is prohibited, except for public safety warnings. M. REMOVAL. Personal wireless telecommunications service facilities shall be removed within twelve months of cessation of operation. [Added by Ord. No. 3439, eff. 7/22/96.]

Copyright 2010 Kramer Telecom Law Firm, P.C. Current Issues in Cell Tower Regulation Basics of Wireless Technology Presenter: Jonathan L. Kramer, Esq. Kramer Telecom Law Firm, P.C. Los Angeles, California www.telecomlawfirm.com CellularPCS.com City of Burbank June 14, 2010

Jonathan L. Kramer, Esq. Attorney and Counselor at Law Kramer Telecom Law Firm, P.C. Admitted to Practice Law in California Radio Frequency and Broadband Telecom Engineer (30 years) Wireless Siting Planning Expert for Local Governments over the past 18+ years Siting Planning and RF Emissions Safety Reviews Jonathan L. Kramer Attorney and Counselor at Law FCC Licensee (top commercial radiotelephone, digital, radar, amateur licenses) Member, State Bar of California Public Law Section Executive Committee Member, IMLA, FCBA, NATOA, SBE

Radio Frequency Coverage versus Call Handling Capacity Issues Initial goal (FCC Requirement): Build-out for Radio Frequency (RF) Coverage Cell area 1 End goal (never reached): Build-out for Call Handling Capacity Cell area 2 Cell area 1 Cell area 3 3

Coverage versus Capacity Issues Frequency 1 Frequency 2 Frequency 1 Handoff Handoff Zone ~20% Zone Frequency 1 sites do not interfere with Frequency 2 sites (frequency separation) Frequency 1 sites do not interfere with other Frequency 1 sites (physical separation) 4

The Initial Network The Dream Design 5

Adding New Sites No Longer Dreaming 6

RF Safety Compliance Analysis to Determine Compliance with FCC Rules Some Carriers: You can NEVER evaluate RF safety it s a federal issue. You can NEVER even mention it at a hearing. Congress/FCC: Local governments CAN evaluate RF safety to determine compliance with the federal standards in FCC OET Bulletin 65. Common (legal) Sense: Make Your Record, then move on based on that record. 7

RF Safety Evaluation Setting a limit or two. General Population Occupational 1 2 3 4 8

RF Safety Evaluation Power it s relative 1 2 3 4 9

RF Safety Evaluation There are two federal standards in the FCC OET Bulletin 65 rules (sometimes misapplied by carriers): The Controlled/Occupational standards and Uncontrolled/General Population standard. Which one to use? Most roof-top installations require detailed RF evaluations and likely will require special permit approval conditioning to ensure compliance with FCC rules. 1 2 3 4 10

RF Safety Evaluation The FCC has a simple 2-page RF safety evaluation form within: A Local Government Official's Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety: Rules, Procedures, and Practical Guidance Download from: http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/ (Remember that the form is a good STARTING POINT, but may not be the END POINT for your inquiry!) 11

The FCC Shot Me! It was November 18 th 2009. I remember it like it was just 208 days ago 12

Ordinance Compliance? Checklist review? Facially complete? Team already assembled? Fees for all reviews? Fees for extra meetings? Concrete Rule Structure. Geared to the counter Planner. Don t Start the Clock. Too late after receipt. Why fund the industry? Ditto. 13

Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 14

Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 15

Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 16

Site Camouflage Techniques and Considerations Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 17

Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 18

Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 19

Sending out the Word 20

Sending out the Word 21

Water Tank 22

23

Monopalm! TelecomLawFirm.com 24

Monopalm? TelecomLawFirm.com 25

Monopine TelecomLawFirm.com 26

Monopine (Suffering from a Faux Pine Disease) TelecomLawFirm.com 27

Structure-Mounted Invisible TelecomLawFirm.com 28

Structure Mounted Out of Sight TelecomLawFirm.com 29

Structure-Mounted Unsightly TelecomLawFirm.com 30

31

Heavenly Monopole TelecomLawFirm.com 32

Camo Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 33

Photos from www.cellularpcs.com/gallery/ 34

Lighting the way 35

Don t Mess With This Site! 36

37