PATENT PROTECTION IN FRANCE

Similar documents
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OVERVIEW. Patrícia Lima

Computer-implemented inventions - the Commission s proposal for a Directive

What s in the Spec.?

SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

1. 3. Advantages and disadvantages of using patents as an indicator of R&D output

Topic 8: Filing Patent Applications: Examples of Filing in Different Countries and under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Questionnaire May Q178 Scope of Patent Protection. Answer of the French Group

International Patent Regime. Michael Blakeney

Topic5 Advantages and Limitations of the PCT System from the User Perspective

Utility Utilit Model Sy Model S stem in China

Finland Russia Ukraine CONTENTS

_ To: The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks Bhoudhik Sampada Bhavan, Antop Hill, S. M. Road, Mumbai

WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR PATENT LAWYERS

INTRODUCTION TO THE ARIPO PATENT SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES

Patent application strategy when, where, what to file?

Software Patents in the European Union

WIPO Sub-Regional Workshop on Patent Policy and its Legislative Implementation

European Patent Law: Law And Procedure Under The EPC And PCT By Ian Muir

The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century

National Intellectual Property Office in Sri Lanka (NIPO)

Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow

Patent Examination system in Madagascar. Narisoa RABENJA Technical Manager

A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)

The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) at the center of the international patent system

Topic 3 - Chapter II.B Primary consideration before drafting a patent application. Emmanuel E. Jelsch European Patent Attorney

PCT PROTECTING YOUR INVENTIONS ABROAD: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

TRIPS Article 27 Patentable Subject Matter

Meeting of International Authorities under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) : QUALITY SUBGROUP 8 th Informal Session

Patent examination procedure of Mongolia

What can be patented, how to proceed and what is absolutely crucial in the process?

COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED INVENTIONS

PATENTING. T Technology Management in the Telecommunications Industry Aalto University

FICPI views on a novelty grace period in a global patent system

Keynote Speech. at the. Trilateral User Conference "CHALLENGES FACING THE GLOBAL PATENT SYSTEM"

PATENTS FOR CHEMICALS, PHARMACEUTICALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Twelve ways to manage global patent costs

Ref: Overview of the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement (patents) in the EPC contracting states and observer countries

Brazilian Patent Substantive Examination

Hong Kong. Patent Application. Hong Kong Trademark & Design Protection Agency Ltd. HKT&DPA Ltd All Rights Reserved.

Topic 2: Patent Families

International IP. Prof. Eric E. Johnson. General Principles

Topic 3: Legal Requirements for Patentability and typical Parts of a Patent Application

March 9, H. David Starr. Nath, Goldberg & Meyer

Unitary patent system

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Patents in the European Union

Research Valorization Process.

Topic 5-7. Effective utilization of Patent Classification Systems

The Patent System In Ethiopia

Patents as a regulatory tool

The TRIPS Agreement and Patentability Criteria

Implementation of IP Policy Methodological Issues: Establishing Action Plans with Specific Indicators

PCT Status Report. Francis Gurry

Department of Intellectual Property

IP KEY SOUTH EAST ASIA ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOR 2018

Patents and other Intellectual Property. Carl Otto Barth ABACUS Patentanwälte Klocke Späth Barth Adliswil/Zürich (CH) + Horb/Neckar (DE)

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions in the field of Computer Security

Exhaustive Training module for new Patent examiners

Geneva, November 10-14, Topic 2: Patents

Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions

Patent protection of inventions

Statement by the BIAC Committee on Technology and Industry on THE IMPACT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

Training for IP Administrators

IPR in the EU 2011, 2012, 2013, By Jesper Kongstad Director General, CEO The Danish Patent and Trademark Office

IP, STRATEGY, PROCEDURE, FTO Peter ten Haaft (PhD, Dutch and European Patent Attorney)

Outline of Patent Attorney Act and Its History of Revisions for Further Improving the Quality of Patent Attorneys in Japan

PROTECTION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS IN CSIC

Workshop on IP Patents, trademarks

PROTECTING INVENTIONS: THE ROLE OF PATENTS, UTILITY MODELS AND DESIGNS

PCT FAQs. Protecting your Inventions Abroad: Frequently Asked Questions About the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library. Presentation Adapted from Dr. V K Gupta, CSIR

1 Enhancement of Intellectual Property-Related Activities at Universities and Public Research Institutes

DEFENSIVE PUBLICATION IN FRANCE

By Fredrick O. Otswong o & Cleophas O. Ojode Patent Examiners Kenya Industrial Property Institute

Aleksandar Stojkov, PhD Spring 2016

IIPTA. Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Industry. Launch a Career. Be Awesome

Session 1 Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan - Part III -

PATENT ATTORNEYS EXAMINATION

The IPR strategies of the Italian National Research Council and its researchers

WIPO sub-regional workshop on the utilization of. examination capacities and increase the quality of. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Nov.29 - Dec.

Report on WIPO-IPO-CII National Roving Seminar on Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

ETHIOPIAN EXPERIENCE By Girma Bejiga October 2014 Harare / Zimbabwe

Patent Office. Patent Administration And Certificate section And Controlling group. Patent. Licensing and Opposition. Group. PCT receiving office

New Draft Manual Of Patent Practice And Procedure - Patent Office India (2008) >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia

Topic Engr. Raisa C. Lubina Intellectual Property Rights Specialist II

Twelve ways to manage global patent costs

Intellectual Property and Public Health - International Framework and Recent Developments in WIPO: SCP and CDIP

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

Slide 15 The "social contract" implicit in the patent system

EPO s Validation Agreements

USE OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY

Patents reward inventions (Lundbeck). What is an invention? How are subject matter conceived as inventions?

Chapter 3 WORLDWIDE PATENTING ACTIVITY

Key issues in building a strong life sciences patent portfolio. Tom Harding and Jane Wainwright Potter Clarkson LLP

KADOR & PARTNER. Kador & Partner invites you to an advanced training course on European Patent Law in Munich

Presented at GIZ/SAWTEE Training on IPR 1-2 March 2012, Laltipur. Ratnakar Adhikari South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment

Transcription:

PATENT PROTECTION IN FRANCE Jean François LEBESNERAIS Adviser - Patent Department INPI INPI -Jean-François Lebesnerais French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.1

INPI : National Institute for Industrial Property French Patent and Trademark Office, under supervision of the French Industry Ministry Location : Paris (450 people) Departments : Nanterre, Compiegne & Lille ( 200 people) 12 regional delegations information desks, libraries and I.P training courses centers ( 150 people) Budget : 124 millions Euros Duties of the INPI: granting national industrial property titles ( patents, trademarks, industrial designs) providing official information concerning industrial property to the public and IP information policy keeping the Trade and Companies Register in addition to the Central Business Directory participating in the drafting of industrial property laws and in the negotiation of international treaties in IP area INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.2

PROTECTING INVENTIONS IN FRANCE Patent applications for protection in France can be filed : through the French route, in which case a French patent will be granted ( 17 000 applications in 2001) through the European route, with granting of a European patent designating France. ( 57 000 applications in 2001) through the International route by an international patent application (PCT) which designates France. ( 102 000 applications in 2001) INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.3

Patents granted by country of origin 42 963 Patents granted in 2001 with effect in France by national route ( 26%) or by European route (76%) E.U 24515 (57%) France 11085 (26%) USA 8430 (20%) JAPAN 6176 (14%) INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.4

Main Applicants in France Organisation Number of Applications Total National route European and international route 1 Philips Electronics NV NL 72 900 972 2 Lucent Technologies Inc US - 887 887 3 Alcatel FR 279 424 703 4 Sony Corp JP 2 616 618 5 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha JP 71 540 611 5 Matsushita Electric Industrial JP 2 609 611 Co Ltd 7 Siemens AG DE 112 494 606 8 NEC Corporation JP 34 483 517 9 Robert Bosch GmbH DE 158 321 479 10 General Electric Company US 23 408 431 INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.5

SUBSTANTIVE CONDITIONS FOR OBTAINING A PATENT RIGHT Since 1978, harmonization of patentability in all countries in Europe France : Intellectual Property Code IPC EPO : European Patent Convention EPC Art 52 EPC - Art L 611-10 IPC : Inventions which are susceptible of industrial application, which are new and which involve an inventive step shall be patentable INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.6

PATENTABLE INVENTIONS Shall not be regarded as inventions : Art L 611-10 IPC Art 52 EPC discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods aesthetic creations schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business programs for computers presentation of information Shall not be patentable : Art L 611-17 IPC Art 53 EPC inventions the publication or the exploitation of which would be contrary to the public policy or morality new plant varieties animal varieties or essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.7

PATENTABILITY CONDITIONS ABSOLUTE NOVELTY : the novelty involves the comparison of the invention with the state of the art. The state of the art comprises all information available to the public INVENTIVE STEP : non obviousness of the invention in comparison with the state of the art. The non obviousness shall be appreciated by a person skilled in the art An invention shall be considered susceptible of INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION if it can be made or used in any kind of industry, including agriculture. INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.8

FRENCH PATENT GRANTING PROCEDURE FILING AN APPLICATION CHECKING FILING REQUIREMENTS NATIONAL DEFENCE ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL EXAMINATION PRELIMINARY SEARCH REPORT CONVERSION TO UTILITY CERTIFICATE. PUBLICATION OF THE APPLICATION APPLICANT RESPONSE THIRD PARTY OBSERVATIONS (FINAL) SEARCH REPORT GRANTING INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.9

TECHNICAL EXAMINATION REGULARITY OF THE APPLICATION CONCERNING 1) creations excluded from the patentabillity 2) non unitary application a) new draft of the claims by the applicant b) filing of a divisional application 3) clarity and understanding of the description and the claims possibility of rejection of the application 4) support of the claims by the description 5) technical elements of the application - claims (non technical features, linkage of the claims) - technical abstract (sufficient documentary quality) OFFICIAL LETTER sent to the applicant in case of non regularity Partly or wholly REJECTION PROCEDURE INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.10

PRELIMINARY SEARCH REPORT 1) STARTING OF THE SEARCH PHASE - at the moment of the filing date or after a period of 18 months - if the search fee has not been paid, transformation into utility certificate 2) THE SUBCONTRACTING OF THE SEARCH TO EPO - the preliminary search report contains the prior art documents to assess the value of the novelty and the inventive step - transmission to the applicant 8 or 9 months after the filing date 3) THE APPLICANT S RESPONSE - if relevant documents have been cited comments and/or claims modifications must be filed - in the case of non response, rejection of the application INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.11

GRANTING EXAMINATION OF THE RESPONSE TO THE PRELIMINARY SEARCH REPORT novelty examination - partly or wholly procedure of rejection in the case of manifest absence of novelty of the claims PREPARATION OF A FINAL SEARCH REPORT in view of the relevance of the documents with the latest set of claims PUBLICATION OF THE SPECIFICATION with the search report INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.12

OFFICIAL FEES Filing fee Search fee Granting fee 2d to 5th year fee 6th to 7th year fee 10th to 15th year fee 16th to 20th year fee 35 Eur 4 000 Y 320 Eur 40 700 Y 85 Eur 11 000 Y 25 Eur 3 000 Y 135 Eur 17 200 Y 270 Eur 34 000 Y 530 Eur 67 000 Y TOTAL 5215 Eur 700 000 Y INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.13

PATENT DEPARTMENT OF INPI 80 EXAMINERS TO COVER ALLTECHNICAL FIELD MAIN DUTY : examination of the patent applications, drafting of the final search report, technical and legal advises concerning patent applications. OTHERS DUTIES - IP information courses for SME, for students in engineering universities - Cooperation with the international affairs department (OAPI,China,Brazil) - General information to future applicants (150 persons by month in Paris ) - Documentary research in the field of patents, trademarks and design - Experts by the National Commission for Employees Inventions - Help to regional delegations - Participation to professional fairs INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.14

ADVANTAGES OF THE FRENCH PROCEDURE FRENCH PROCEDURE Procedure with examination of novelty, but no examination of inventive step Prior art listing, drawn up by the EPO, enabling the applicant to evaluate by himself the patentability of the invention France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg allow the applicant by a first low cost application to extend his protection abroad (EPO, PCT) INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.15

RECENT / FUTUR DEVELOPMENTS electronic filing ratification of the PLT ( restoration of priority right, language filing requirements ) ratification of London agreement (suppression of translations into French for granted European patents) INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.16

MERCI ARIGATO GOZAIMASU INPI - Jean-François LEBESNERAIS French-Japanese Workshop TOKYO 10 & 11 March 2003 P.17