Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

Similar documents
Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE. FOR CANADA S FUTURE Enabling excellence, building partnerships, connecting research to canadians SSHRC S STRATEGIC PLAN TO 2020

TION A V OR INNO Strategic TION F A roadmap OUND A F ANAD C

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK Updated August 2017

FSAA Strategic Research Plan

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview

WIPO Development Agenda

University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries. Digital Preservation Policy, Version 1.3

Mining Innovation: The Importance of Science Entreprise

TRIUMF ACCELERATING CANADIAN BUSINESS THROUGH SCIENCE AND INNOVATION Pre-Budget Consultation

The Canada Foundation for Innovation: assessing the impact of funded research infrastructure

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

McMASTER UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESEARCH PLAN May 2014

What We Heard Report Inspection Modernization: The Case for Change Consultation from June 1 to July 31, 2012

Connecting Science and Society. NWO strategy

The Biological and Medical Sciences Research Infrastructures on the ESFRI Roadmap

Higher Education for Science, Technology and Innovation. Accelerating Africa s Aspirations. Communique. Kigali, Rwanda.

FY18 CIF Business Plan and Budget (SUMMARY)

COST FP9 Position Paper

FP 8 in a new European research and innovation landscape. A reflection paper

Science, Research and Information Technology

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

CanNor Building a Strong North Together Strategic Framework CanNor.gc.ca

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

RESEARCH AND INNOVATION STRATEGY

Canadian Clay & Glass Gallery. Strategic Plan

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS)

Advancing Health and Prosperity. A Brief to the Advisory Panel on Healthcare Innovation

Dalhousie University Strategic Research Plan Summary

Second APEC Ministers' Conference on Regional Science & Technology Cooperation (Seoul, Korea, Nov 13-14, 1996) JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ

COUNTRY: Questionnaire. Contact person: Name: Position: Address:

A Research and Innovation Agenda for a global Europe: Priorities and Opportunities for the 9 th Framework Programme

National Innovation System of Mongolia

GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

Documentary Heritage Development Framework. Mark Levene Library and Archives Canada

Achieving. A Roadmap. Profession. for the. Prepared by the ASCE Task Committee to Achieve the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025

A Focus on Health Data Infrastructure, Capacity and Application of Outcomes Data

TOWARD THE NEXT EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROGRAMME

Applied Research APPLIED KNOWLEDGE INNOVATIVE RESEARCH PROVEN RESULTS. nscc.ca/appliedresearch

Strategic Research Plan Summary for the Canada Research Chairs Program

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Sparking a New Economy. Canada s Advanced Manufacturing Supercluster

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation Strategic Plan ( ) (Endorsed)

International comparison of education systems: a European model? Paris, November 2008

Arshad Mansoor, Sr. Vice President, Research & Development INNOVATION SCOUTS: EXPANDING EPRI S TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION NETWORK

Government, an Actor in Innovation

1 Canada needs mining. 2 Canada s competitive advantage. 3 Challenges to the industry. 4 Collaboration and engagement

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission of South Africa (CIPC)

Science and engineering driving the global economy David Delpy, CEO May 2012

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Digitisation Plan

Strategic Plan. A WORLD CLASS university creating social and economic impact through science, technology and innovation.

ONR Strategy 2015 to 2020

TALENT AS CANADA S COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Digital Talent Strategy: Road to 2020 and Beyond Ottawa March 9 th Namir Anani President & CEO

SMART CITIES Presentation

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

(Beijing, China,25 May2017)

Minister-President of the Flemish Government and Flemish Minister for Economy, Foreign Policy, Agriculture and Rural Policy

Health Policy Conference Centre for Health Services

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

PURDUE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY AT IUPUI

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information

University of Queensland. Research Computing Centre. Strategic Plan. David Abramson

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

ICSU World Data System Strategic Plan Trusted Data Services for Global Science

g~:~: P Holdren ~\k, rjj/1~

Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs (Ontario) Pre-budget Consultations Submission by Ontarians for the Arts Friday, January 19, 2018

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the

WFEO STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENGINEERING FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY (WFEO-CEIT) STRATEGIC PLAN ( )

Vice Chancellor s introduction

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

Sustainable Development Education, Research and Innovation

An Introduction to China s Science and Technology Policy

Canada s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Rx&D) 2015 Pre-Budget Submission House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance.

Research Strategy of Tampere University Community

EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT OPERATION CLOSURE

Focus on Innovation. Historical Perspective on Forest Sector Science and Technology Alignment: The Foundation for Forest Sector Transformation

McGILL UNIVERSITY SENATE Memorandum

Learning Lessons Abroad on Funding Research and Innovation. 29 April 2016

Canada s Intellectual Property (IP) Strategy submission from Polytechnics Canada

Main lessons learned from the German national innovation system

Speech by the OECD Deputy Secretary General Mr. Aart de Geus

Technology and Innovation in the NHS Highlands and Islands Enterprise

Over the 10-year span of this strategy, priorities will be identified under each area of focus through successive annual planning cycles.

Strategic Research Plan

City of Sparks. Fiscal Year 2008 Strategic Plan Progress Report

the EU framework programme for research and innovation

FP7 Funding Opportunities for the ICT Industry

Preliminary Findings for Innovation Case Study on Canadian Fuel Cell Technology

Toppindustrisenteret AS. April 2017

A NATIONAL KEY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

Canada Foundation for Innovation 15 Years of State-of-the-Art Research Infrastructure Funding

Transcription:

Brief to the Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO June 14, 2010

Table of Contents Role of the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)...1 CFI s Strategic Approach...1 The Importance of Research Infrastructure in Today s Economy...2 Performance of the CFI...3 The CFI s Unique Funding Model...3 Focus on Accountability...4 Conclusion...5 Appendix I Logic Model of the CFI Programs...6

Role of the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) Created by the Government of Canada in 1997 as an independent corporation, the CFI s mission is to strengthen the capacity of Canadian universities, colleges, research hospitals and non-profit research institutions to carry out world-class research and technology development that benefit Canadians both socially and economically through the provision of research infrastructure. The CFI funds up to 40 percent of a project s infrastructure costs. Institutions, often in partnership with public, private and non-profit sector organizations, must secure the remainder. Since its creation, the CFI has committed almost $5.3 billion in support of almost 6,700 projects at 130 research institutions in 65 municipalities across Canada. All CFI investments are guided by the strategic research priorities of individual institutions. This approach allows numerous research programs to achieve world-class status, while providing institutions with the resources to recruit and retain outstanding new faculty members and students, as well as foster regional innovation clusters that bring together academia and industry. This approach has also resulted in 85 percent of CFI funding being devoted to the strategic priority areas identified in the Government of Canada s S&T Strategy environmental science and technologies, natural resources and energy, health and related life sciences and technologies, and information and communications technologies. The strategic focus adopted by the CFI provides a strong platform upon which to support the goals of the S&T Strategy. In fulfilling its mandate, the CFI continues to implement the Strategy s four core principles: promoting world-class excellence; focusing on priorities areas important to Canadians; fostering partnerships; and enhancing accountability. The 2009 and 2010 Federal Budgets reinforced the CFI s position as an essential element of the country s S&T capacity by providing $750 million in funding for future CFI activities. Of this amount, $150 million was allocated through competitions held in 2009. The remaining $600 million will be allocated through competitions in 2010-11 and beyond. Canada s future prosperity rests on its capacity to innovate to generate knowledge and ideas that result in the development of new products and services, wealth, enhanced social foundations, environmental sustainability, and ultimately the improvement of quality of life for all Canadians. Increasing this capacity is the central role of the CFI. CFI s Strategic Approach The success of the CFI strategy ultimately rests on the integrity of the Foundation, the professional connections between institutions and CFI staff, and the effectiveness of CFI s transparent merit-review processes. The CFI fulfills its mandate to fund world-class research infrastructure through a suite of competitive programs that award capital, replacement, and 1

initial operating and maintenance funds, based on a rigorous assessment. The CFI s funding mechanisms are continually adjusted and refined to align with the evolving research environment. Together, the elements of this approach assure the CFI s relevance to all stakeholders and ensure the greatest impact of its investments on Canada s research enterprise. The underlying logic of the strategy from a policy perspective is included in Appendix I. This approach has proven to be highly adaptable, allowing the CFI to effectively support Canada s S&T Strategy by promoting world-class excellence in research and technology development. The Importance of Research Infrastructure in Today s Economy Research infrastructure is a central component in building research capacity. It provides the nuclei for skills and knowledge formation, either through the centralization of these activities within specific research institutions or through networked collaboration between researchers in multidisciplinary teams. Indeed, the training of scientists and engineers through experience with research infrastructure is an integral part of this research capacity building process. The research facilities that the CFI supports are, essentially, centres of excellence for research and training. And since activities in these facilities lie at the frontiers of science, they stimulate the interest of young people who want to embrace scientific and engineering careers. Access to, and use of, advanced technology facilities enables young researchers and students to tackle complex problems as part of high level interdisciplinary teams, qualifying them, in an outstanding manner, for tasks in science or industry. Research infrastructure contributes to the growth of a knowledge economy, not only by facilitating world-class research, but also through the combination of expertise from different backgrounds, from the development of communication capacities and from strengthening the interaction between research and industry. This occurs not just through the use of infrastructure by researchers in collaboration with industry, but also through the construction and maintenance of facilities, creating important supply and demand effects. Innovation capacity results from new technologies applied in constructing world level research installations as well as from spin-off products and/or start up companies. Research infrastructure also benefits from industrial design and construction expertise, project management expertise and the development of new technologies and new engineering processes. Industry benefits from having a customer base that continually pushes the boundaries of knowledge and the application of the most advanced technologies. It challenges companies to be innovative while providing them with opportunities to test, pilot and further develop their products. The on-going symbiotic relationships that results from the purchase, installation and use of research infrastructure is, therefore, of direct benefit to industry, research institutions, and Canadian society as a whole. It boosts innovative capacity in industry, creates stable markets for the development of leading-edge technologies, and facilitates the creation of the knowledge we need to improve the health and well-being of all Canadian citizens. 2

Performance of the CFI In accordance with our Funding Agreement with the Government of Canada, the CFI underwent an Overall Performance Evaluation and Value-for-Money Audit in 2010. These reports, conducted by KPMG, were extremely positive. The results of this comprehensive examination were then reviewed by an International Review Panel of seven highly accomplished experts. The KPMG evaluation focused on the achievements of the CFI in fulfilling its national objectives and addressed global questions regarding relevance, results and the design and delivery of CFI s programs. The audit looked at the CFI s management practices and processes, and whether they have been carried out with regard to economy, efficiency and effectiveness. The KPMG performance evaluation concluded that: in relation to results, design and delivery, and relevance, the CFI s record of achievement to date is outstanding. In its review of the results of the evaluation and audit, the International Review Panel highlighted the following aspects of the CFI s performance: Canada s cutting-edge labs, equipment and facilities are attracting researchers from around the globe and retaining Canadian talent. The CFI has been driven by a commitment to excellence, an emphasis on multidisciplinary collaborations and strategic thinking in funding this infrastructure. And in doing so, it has played a catalytic role in revitalizing and transforming the research enterprise in Canada and making it world-class. The CFI s foundation model gives it the autonomy and flexibility it needs to promote excellence through rigorous funding competitions. The Government of Canada s continued support for this model has allowed the CFI to adjust its programs to meet Canada s research infrastructure needs while safeguarding the public interest. The CFI s programs and processes involve world s best practices that are worthy of emulation. For more than a decade, the CFI has been a key player in rebuilding Canada s status as a destination of choice for research talent and collaboration. In today s global knowledge-based economy, where research is increasingly important to a country s economic prosperity, the CFI s achievements are relevant to Canada s needs and national interests. The CFI s Unique Funding Model Since its inception, the CFI has required all recipient institutions to match the 40% funding provided by the CFI with 60% funding from other sources. This leveraging formula has resulted in an investment of over $11 billion in Canada s research intensive universities, colleges, research hospitals and not-for-profit research organizations. This shared investment model has dramatically increased the commitment of Canada s provincial governments and private sector organizations to building world-class research capacity (See Figure 1). 3

Figure 1 -- Partner contributions since the inception of the CFI Voluntary organizations $37 million 1% Private Sector Corporations/firms $1.1 billion 20% Provincial governments (departments or agencies) $2.9 billion 50% Federal government (departments or agencies) $201 million 3% Institutions, trust funds or foundations $1.4 billion 24% Other governmental sources (municipal or foreign) $15 million 0% Other $99 million 2% Focus on Accountability As a foundation entrusted with public funds, the CFI operates in an efficient, effective and transparent manner, while communicating its results to a wide audience. The CFI recognizes its responsibility to deliver programs that address the needs of Canadians by enabling institutions and their researchers to compete in the global, knowledge-based. The CFI assures responsible stewardship of public funds through ongoing performance management within a broad framework that integrates measurement, evaluation, risk assessment and audit activities. As part of the CFI s efforts in assessing impacts and disseminating results, activities in 2010-11 will include: Overall Performance Evaluation and Value-for-Money Audit (OPEA) With the completion of the Overall Performance Evaluation and Value-for-Money Audit, the CFI undertook an extensive communications program to ensure that the results were widely distributed to Canadians. These communications focused on the CFI s achievements in meeting its national objectives, its relevance and demonstrated effectiveness in program design and delivery, and the benefits that result from the Government of Canada s support for science and technology. Progress Reports In order to ensure transparency and accountability, as in previous years, the CFI analyzes the data from institutional progress reports and posts this information on its website. 4

Outcome Measurement Studies (OMS) The OMS is designed to assess the degree to which the CFI s investment in research infrastructure in a specific theme in an institution are critical to strategic research planning, research capacity building, recruiting and training highly qualified personnel, increasing research productivity and fostering innovation. These studies demonstrate the significant progress being made as a result of CFI investments, particularly in areas such as biomedical engineering, oil sands research, cardiology, energy technologies, geo-engineering, brain imaging and advanced materials science. Evaluations and Special Studies While the CFI will concentrate on the OMS, it will also continue its ongoing examination into the need for new research infrastructure and renewal of existing research infrastructure, as well as into the impacts of research collaborations, and the specific social and economic benefits that result from research infrastructure. Communicating with Canadians Communicating the results of research investments is critical on a number of fronts. It draws national and international attention to the needs and benefits of research. It attracts the interest of potential partners, increases the potential for commercialization, encourages funding and research partnerships, attracts talent to Canada and provides the CFI with an opportunity to recognize the Government of Canada for entrusting it with its important mandate. The CFI will continue to work with its client institutions to report to the public through the media on the research enabled by CFI infrastructure investments. Every CFI news release announcing new investments includes a quote approved by the Government of Canada. Conclusion As the recent International Review Panel emphasized, the CFI is successfully meeting its mandate to strengthen the capacity of Canadian universities, colleges, research hospitals and other non-profit research institutions to carry out world-class research and technology development for the benefit of Canadians. Its infrastructure investments have clearly had a dramatic impact on the science and engineering landscape in Canada, paving the way for the country s transformation to a knowledge-based economy. Through the actions of the Government of Canada, the provinces and private industry, we have established a global reputation as a destination for high-quality research and training. Proof that these research investments are paying off can be seen in the caliber of talent this country is able to attract and in the groundbreaking discoveries that are being made every day in Canada. These discoveries have the power to improve our quality of life. For Canada to remain one of the most innovative countries in the world a nation whose economic foundation increasingly depends on the knowledge-based economy the Government of Canada needs to stay the course in supporting research. Canada s economic prosperity and quality of life depend on it. 5

Appendix I Logic Model of the CFI Programs National Objectives To support economic growth and job creation; as well as health and environmental quality through innovation. To increase Canada s capacity to carry out important world-class scientific research and technology development. To expand research and job opportunities by providing support through research infrastructure for the development of highly qualified personnel. To promote productive networks and collaboration among Canadian post-secondary educational institutions, research hospitals and the private sector. Activities Development of fund guidelines, criteria, etc. Continuous consultations with stakeholders Dissemination of fund information Review and evaluation of applications Administration of funds Monitoring and evaluation of funds Outputs Infrastructure awards in line with institutional priorities and the national S&T strategy Communication regarding infrastructure awards Business services delivered to CFI to ensure its effective and efficient functioning Information and reports available for management and accountability purposes Immediate Outcomes Partner contributions leveraged Infrastructure acquired and operationalized CFI and its funds designed and operated efficiently and effectively (1) Intermediate Outcomes Availability and use of necessary, high quality infrastructure Attraction and retention of researchers High quality training environment Productive networks and collaborations (2) Long-Term Outcomes World-class R&D conducted in line with national and institutional priorities Highly qualified personnel developed through involvement with world-class R&D projects Ultimate Impacts Socio-economic benefits (3) resulting from application of world-class R&D and increased research capability Note: The word fund includes CFI Funds (programs) and funds (awards disbursed). (1) Efficient and effective operation of the CFI s funds includes ensuring compliance with the Funding Agreement and fund guidelines and requirements. (2) Networks and collaborative arrangements include links between researchers, links between institutions, and links with end-users of the outputs of the R&D process. This objective also includes the sharing of new infrastructure i.e., the arrangements that are set up include those related to infrastructure sharing. (3) Socio-economic benefits include economic growth, job creation (including jobs resulting from infrastructure construction), improved health and health care, and improved environmental quality. 6