LHCb Trigger & DAQ Design technology and performance. Mika Vesterinen ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop 8/10/2016

Similar documents
The upgrade of the LHCb trigger for Run III

The LHCb Upgrade BEACH Simon Akar on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

The LHCb trigger system: performance and outlook

Data acquisition and Trigger (with emphasis on LHC)

The LHCb trigger system

Physics at the LHC and Beyond Quy Nhon, Aug 10-17, The LHCb Upgrades. Olaf Steinkamp. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.

Data acquisition and Trigger (with emphasis on LHC)

The upgrade of the LHCb trigger for Run III

LHC Experiments - Trigger, Data-taking and Computing

The Run-2 ATLAS. ATLAS Trigger System: Design, Performance and Plans

Machine learning and parallelism in the reconstruction of LHCb and its upgrade

ATLAS Muon Trigger and Readout Considerations. Yasuyuki Horii Nagoya University on Behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

Trigger and DAQ at the LHC. (Part II)

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)476. The CMS Tracker upgrade for HL-LHC. Sudha Ahuja on behalf of the CMS Collaboration

LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating Pad Detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring

Real-time flavour tagging selection in ATLAS. Lidija Živković, Insttut of Physics, Belgrade

The LHCb Experiment. Experiment and what comes after. O. Ullaland Ljubljana January Theodor Kittelsen, Soria Moria (with modifications)

Status of the LHCb Experiment

LHCb Trigger System and selection for Bs->J/Ψ(ee)φ(KK)

Beauty Experiments at the LHC

Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in Run I and Upgrades for Run II

Track Triggers for ATLAS

Trigger and Data Acquisition Systems. Monika Wielers RAL. Lecture 3. Trigger. Trigger, Nov 2,

Data acquisi*on and Trigger - Trigger -

Streaming Readout for EIC Experiments

LHCb: To Infinity and Beyond

Upgrade tracking with the UT Hits

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 25 Feb 2013

The LHC Situation. Contents. Chris Bee. First collisions: July 2005! Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, France,

CMS SLHC Tracker Upgrade: Selected Thoughts, Challenges and Strategies

The LHCb VELO Upgrade

Nikhef jamboree - Groningen 12 December Atlas upgrade. Hella Snoek for the Atlas group

GPU-accelerated track reconstruction in the ALICE High Level Trigger

Status of the LHCb experiment

Development and Test of a Demonstrator for a First-Level Muon Trigger based on the Precision Drift Tube Chambers for ATLAS at HL-LHC

Operation and Performance of the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter and Level-1 Topological Triggers in Run 2 at the LHC

Triggers For LHC Physics

The ATLAS Trigger in Run 2: Design, Menu, and Performance

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

The trigger system of the muon spectrometer of the ALICE experiment at the LHC

What do the experiments want?

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Upgrade of the ATLAS Thin Gap Chamber Electronics for HL-LHC. Yasuyuki Horii, Nagoya University, on Behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

The Commissioning of the ATLAS Pixel Detector

PoS(VERTEX2015)008. The LHCb VELO upgrade. Sophie Elizabeth Richards. University of Bristol

L1 Track Finding For a TiME Multiplexed Trigger

Development of a Highly Selective First-Level Muon Trigger for ATLAS at HL-LHC Exploiting Precision Muon Drift-Tube Data

Monika Wielers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Phase 1 upgrade of the CMS pixel detector

The LHCb VELO Upgrade

Overview of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ System

Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Pixel Detector

The design and performance of the ATLAS jet trigger

Tracking and Alignment in the CMS detector

Where do we use Machine learning and where do want to improve?

The Status of ATLAS. Xin Wu, University of Geneva On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. X. Wu, HCP2009, Evian, 17/11/09 ATL-GEN-SLIDE

PoS(LHCP2018)031. ATLAS Forward Proton Detector

Hardware Trigger Processor for the MDT System

The LHCb VELO Upgrade. Stefano de Capua on behalf of the LHCb VELO group

Electronics, trigger and physics for LHC experiments

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 13 Oct 2015

The VELO Upgrade. Eddy Jans, a (on behalf of the LHCb VELO Upgrade group) a

Upgrade of the CMS Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC

Trigger and Data Acquisition at the Large Hadron Collider

Hardware Trigger Processor for the MDT System

ATLAS and CMS Upgrades and the future physics program at the LHC D. Contardo, IPN Lyon

The detector read-out in ALICE during Run 3 and 4

Triggers: What, where, why, when and how

8.882 LHC Physics. Detectors: Muons. [Lecture 11, March 11, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

The CMS Muon Trigger

Opera&on of the Upgraded ATLAS Level- 1 Central Trigger System

Totem Experiment Status Report

3.1 Introduction, design of HERA B

R&D for ILC detectors

Signal Reconstruction of the ATLAS Hadronic Tile Calorimeter: implementation and performance

The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter barrel upgrade for High-Luminosity LHC

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 24 Oct 2012

BaBar and PEP II. Physics

Layout and prototyping of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC

Mitigating high energy anomalous signals in the CMS barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter

TRIGGER & DATA ACQUISITION. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

Triggering at ATLAS. Vortrag von Johannes Haller, Uni HH Am ATLAS-D Meeting, September 2006

EPJ C direct. The ATLAS trigger system. 1 Introduction. 2 The ATLAS experiment. electronic only. R. Hauser, on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration

DAQ & Electronics for the CW Beam at Jefferson Lab

ATLAS Phase-II trigger upgrade

The Run-2 ATLAS Trigger System

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. CMS detector performance.

CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Preliminary Plan and Cost Estimate

Operation and performance of the CMS Resistive Plate Chambers during LHC run II

ATLAS ITk and new pixel sensors technologies

The LHCb Silicon Tracker

Muon Collider background rejection in ILCroot Si VXD and Tracker detectors

Track and Vertex Reconstruction on GPUs for the Mu3e Experiment

PoS(ICPAQGP2015)098. Common Readout System in ALICE. Mitra Jubin, Khan Shuaib Ahmad

Introduction to Trigger and Data Acquisition

Pixel characterization for the ITS/MFT upgrade. Audrey Francisco

Beam Condition Monitors and a Luminometer Based on Diamond Sensors

The ALICE Upgrade. W. Riegler, ECFA HL-LHC Experiment Workshop, Oct. 3rd, 2016

Readout architecture for the Pixel-Strip (PS) module of the CMS Outer Tracker Phase-2 upgrade

Level-1 Track Trigger R&D. Zijun Xu Peking University

Transcription:

LHCb Trigger & DAQ Design technology and performance Mika Vesterinen ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop 8/10/2016

2 Introduction The LHCb upgrade will allow 5x higher luminosity and with greatly increased trigger efficiency. Underpinned by triggerless readout and the full software trigger. And by real time methods that are being pioneered in Run-II.

3 Heavy flavour signatures Beauty M 5 GeV ~10 mm Charm M 2 GeV ~4 mm

Heavy flavour signatures Beauty M 5 GeV ~10 mm Charm M 2 GeV ~4 mm Hardware trigger thresholds * Muon pt > 2 GeV Hadron ET > 4 GeV...,... *Very approximate Run-II values. They are still evolving since the LHC hasn t yet provided the complete number of colliding bunches that we can expect during Run-II. Mika Vesterinen 4

5 Heavy flavour signatures Beauty M 5 GeV ~10 mm Charm M 2 GeV ~4 mm At Run-II 45 khz 1 MHz luminosity in LHCb acceptance 4 x 10 32 cm -2 s -1 in LHCb acceptance Inclusive High Level Triggering ~250 exclusive selections

6 Run-I/II and lumi levelling Luminosity levelled at 4 x 10 32 cm -2 s -1 Lint [cm -2 s -1 ] L Run-I 4 x 10 32 3 fb -1 Run-II 4 x 10 32 5 fb -1 LHCb

7 Hardware trigger bottleneck CERN-LHCC-2011-001 Muonic Hadronic design Run-I/II

8 Hardware trigger bottleneck CERN-LHCC-2011-001 Muonic Triggerless readout in the upgrade allows 2x higher efficiency for hadronic b decays at 5x higher luminosity Hadronic Lint design [cm -2 s -1 ] Run-I/II L Run-I-II 4 x 10 32 8 fb -1 Run-III-IV 2 x 10 32 50 fb -1

9 Run-I Trigger 40 MHz bunch crossing rate L0 Hardware Trigger : 1 MHz readout, high ET/PT signatures 450 khz h ± 400 khz µ/µµ 150 khz e/γ Software High Level Trigger Introduce tracking/pid information, find displaced tracks/vertices Offline reconstruction tuned to trigger time constraints Mix of exclusive and inclusive selections 5 khz (0.3 GB/s) to storage 2 khz Inclusive beauty 2 khz Charm 1 khz Muons Alignment and calibration

10 Run-I Trigger 40 MHz bunch crossing rate L0 Hardware Trigger : 1 MHz readout, high ET/PT signatures 450 khz h ± 400 khz µ/µµ 150 khz e/γ Software High Level Trigger Introduce tracking/pid information, find displaced tracks/vertices Offline reconstruction tuned to trigger time constraints Mix of exclusive and inclusive selections 5 khz (0.3 GB/s) to storage 2 khz Inclusive beauty 2 khz Charm 1 khz Muons Alignment and calibration

11 Run-I to Run-II 40 MHz bunch crossing rate L0 Hardware Trigger : 1 MHz readout, high ET/PT signatures 450 khz h ± 400 khz µ/µµ 150 khz e/γ Software High Level Trigger Introduce tracking/pid information, find displaced tracks/vertices Offline reconstruction tuned to trigger time constraints Mix of exclusive and inclusive selections 5 khz (0.3 GB/s) to storage 2 khz Inclusive beauty 2 khz Charm 1 khz Muons Alignment and calibration

12 Run-I to Run-II 40 MHz bunch crossing rate L0 Hardware Trigger : 1 MHz readout, high ET/PT signatures Real time 450 khz h ± 400 khz µ/µµ 150 khz e/γ Sub detectors fully aligned and calibrated in real time Software High Level Trigger HLT performs offline quality Introduce tracking/pid information, find displaced tracks/vertices Offline reconstruction tuned to trigger time constraints Mix of exclusive and inclusive selections reconstruction, incl. RICH PID. 5 khz (0.3 GB/s) to storage 2 khz Inclusive beauty 2 khz Charm 1 khz Muons Alignment and calibration

13 Run-I to Run-II 40 MHz bunch crossing rate L0 Hardware Trigger : 1 MHz readout, high ET/PT signatures Real time 450 khz h ± 400 khz µ/µµ 150 khz e/γ Sub detectors fully aligned and calibrated in real time Software High Level Trigger HLT performs offline quality Introduce tracking/pid information, find displaced tracks/vertices Offline reconstruction tuned to trigger time constraints Mix of exclusive and inclusive selections reconstruction, incl. RICH PID. 5 khz (0.3 GB/s) to storage Real time physics analysis 2 khz Inclusive beauty 2 khz Charm 1 khz Muons with the Turbo stream Comp. Phys. Com. 208, 35-42, (2016) Alignment and calibration

14 Run-I to Run-II 40 MHz bunch crossing rate L0 Hardware Trigger : 1 MHz readout, high ET/PT signatures 450 khz h ± 400 khz µ/µµ 150 khz e/γ Software High Level Trigger Introduce tracking/pid information, find displaced tracks/vertices Offline reconstruction tuned to trigger time constraints Mix of exclusive and inclusive selections 5 khz (0.3 GB/s) to storage 2 khz Inclusive beauty 2 khz Charm 1 khz Muons The fully deferred split HLT allows us to Alignment and calibration employ the HLT farm throughout the year

15 Run-II to Upgrade

16 Run-II to Upgrade

Triggerless readout Data network throughput [ Tbit / sec ] Figure courtesy of Niko Neufeld, based on presentations at DAQ@LHC 2016 Mika Vesterinen 17

18 LHCb upgrade DAQ Cavern Surface data center

19 Full software trigger

Track reconstruction Scintillating Fibre Tracker VELO Upstream Tracker LHCb Tracker Upgrade TDR, LHCB-TDR-015 Mika Vesterinen 20

Track reconstruction Scintillating Fibre Tracker VELO Upstream Tracker LHCb Tracker Upgrade TDR, LHCB-TDR-015 Mika Vesterinen 21

Physics performance The 30 MHz tracking sequence only compromises a few % in efficiency compared to the ideal version. LHCb Trigger and Online Upgrade TDR LHCB-TDR-016 Mika Vesterinen 22

Speed Reconstruction time for nominal LHCb upgrade conditions measured on a node 1 from the current LHCb EFF Algorithm Time [ms] VELO tracking 2.0 VELO-UT tracking 1.3 Forward tracking 1.9 Primary vertexing 0.4 Total 5.4 LHCB-TDR-016 Within estimated budget 2 of 13 ms, allowing for subsequent selection and reconstruction 1. Dual socket x86 server with Intel x5650. 12 physical cores + 12 hyper threads, and 24 GB RAM. 2. Based on CPU growth projections Mika Vesterinen 23

Speed Reconstruction time for nominal LHCb upgrade conditions measured on a node 1 from the current LHCb EFF Algorithm Time [ms] VELO tracking 2.0 VELO-UT tracking 1.3 Forward tracking 1.9 Primary vertexing 0.4 Total 5.4 LHCB-TDR-016 Ongoing effort to (i) adapt LHCb software to better exploit modern CPU architectures & (ii) evaluate use of co-processor technologies. Mika Vesterinen 24

25 How much signal do we need to record?

26 Anatomy of upgrade events LHCb-PUB-2014-027 Beauty Charm τ > 0.2 ps Hyperons

Anatomy of upgrade events The goal of the trigger is no longer to distinguish signal from background, but rather to distinguish different signals. Mika Vesterinen 27

Selectivity example 60M Right sign decays Candidates / (0.1 MeV/c 2 ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 10 LHCb (a) D +! D 0 + 3 D +! D 0 + Data Fit Background 0 2.005 2.01 2.015 2.02 M (D 0 π s + ) [GeV/c 2 ] Candidates / (0.1 MeV/c 2 ) 10 60 LHCb 50 (b) 40 30 20 10 250k Wrong sign decays Data Fit Background 0 2.005 2.01 2.015 2.02 M (D 0 π s + ) [GeV/c 2 ] Figures correspond to full Run-II dataset PRL 111, 251801, 2013 Mika Vesterinen 28

29 HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 Run-II 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Approximate HLT output rate in khz

30 HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 Run-II un-iii* Run-III 0 50 100 150 200 Approximate HLT output rate in khz

31 HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 Run-II un-iii* x5 luminosity Run-III 0 50 100 150 200 Approximate HLT output rate in khz

32 HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 Run-II un-iii* Run-III x5 luminosity No hardware trigger bottleneck 0 50 100 150 200 Approximate HLT output rate in khz

HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 Run-II un-iii* Run-III x5 luminosity No hardware trigger bottleneck 0 50 100 150 200 Approximate HLT output rate in khz E.g., Triggerless readout provides great potential for kaon physics 1,2,3 1. LHCb-PUB-2016-017 2. LHCb-PUB-2016-016 3. KAON 2016 indigo link Mika Vesterinen 33

34 HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 Run-II un-iii* Run-III 0 50 100 150 200 Approximate HLT output rate in khz Real time physics analysis methods needed to manage these data

35 HLT output rate Beauty Charm Muons Other 2011 2012 khz isn t the appropriate unit... Run-II un-iii* Run-III 0 50 100 150 200 Approximate HLT output rate in khz Real time physics analysis methods needed to manage these data

36 The Turbo Stream Comp. Phys. Com. 208, 35-42, (2016) Run-II HLT already performs full offline reconstruction Charm analysis is mostly based on the signal candidate We can do real time physics analysis which discards the majority of the event. Stream Full Turbo Event size 70 kb 5 kb

37 The Turbo Stream JHEP10 (2015) 172 Comp. Phys. Com. 208, 35-42, (2016) 2015: 13 TeV J/ψ μμ cross section measurement presented within 1 week of recording the data! 2016: More than 200 Turbo HLT2 lines in operation.

Evolution of Turbo Example: What if, unlike the D-D mixing example, you want all of the favoured charm decays, and not just the candidate? E.g. D*X spectroscopy Mika Vesterinen 38

39 Evolution of Turbo Turbo in 2015 Appropriate for analyses with exclusively triggered candidate

40 Evolution of Turbo Turbo in 2015 Turbo in 2016 Appropriate for analyses with exclusively triggered candidate Applicable to most physics analyses

Evolution of Turbo Turbo in 2015 Turbo in 2016 Appropriate for analyses with exclusively triggered candidate Applicable to most physics analyses We approach the flexibility to perform any type of physics analysis in real time with the Turbo stream! Mika Vesterinen 41

42 Beyond 2 x 10 33 cm -2 s -1? Proposed phase II LHCb upgrade in LS4 Record 300 fb -1 at 2 x 10 34 cm -2 s -1 See Chris Parkes talk in this workshop (link).

43 Trigger considerations We wouldn t go back to a triggered readout. - Increased occupancy and #channels should easily be absorbed by a larger #links and technology evolution. The main constraint is likely to be offline computing. The real time approach will be key.

Summary The LHCb upgrade requires a revolutionary advance in trigger and DAQ which is needed to better exploit the LHC potential for HF physics. Good progress towards the triggerless readout and the full software trigger Real time methods are being proven in Run-II. Bold but realistic plans are taking shape for future upgrades. Mika Vesterinen 44

45 Backup slides

46 Anatomy of upgrade events

Output bandwidth LHCB-TDR-016 Consider 2, 5 and 10 GB/sec scenarios assuming 120 kb raw event size Mika Vesterinen 47

LHCB-TDR-016 Mika Vesterinen 48

49 HLT output rate More than 1 billion charm signal D 0 D+ Ds Approximate HLT output rate in khz D * Λc