PhD Defense. Low-order wavefront control and calibration for phase-mask coronagraphs. Garima Singh

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 17 Jun 2014

Predicting the Performance of Space Coronagraphs. John Krist (JPL) 17 August st International Vortex Workshop

Focal Plane and non-linear Curvature Wavefront Sensing for High Contrast Coronagraphic Adaptive Optics Imaging

Wavefront control for highcontrast

Opportunities and Challenges with Coronagraphy on WFIRST/AFTA

Calibration of AO Systems

MALA MATEEN. 1. Abstract

GPI INSTRUMENT PAGES

High-contrast imaging with E-ELT/HARMONI

Bruce Macintosh for the GPI team Presented at the Spirit of Lyot conference June 7, 2007

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA; c. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, Palo Alto, CA ABSTRACT

Design and test of a high-contrast imaging coronagraph based on two. 50-step transmission filters

HC(ST) 2 : The High Contrast Spectroscopy Testbed for Segmented Telescopes

Matthew R. Bolcar NASA GSFC

Towards Contrast for Terrestrial Exoplanet Detection:

The Coronagraph Tree of Life (non-solar coronagraphs)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 6 Nov 2009

Optimization of coupling between Adaptive Optics and Single Mode Fibers ---

Effect of segmented telescope phasing errors on adaptive optics performance

A Ground-based Sensor to Detect GEOs Without the Use of a Laser Guide-star

High contrast imaging lab

Laboratory Experiment of a High-contrast Imaging Coronagraph with. New Step-transmission Filters

Modeling the multi-conjugate adaptive optics system of the E-ELT. Laura Schreiber Carmelo Arcidiacono Giovanni Bregoli

An Achromatic Focal Plane Mask for High-Performance Broadband Coronagraphy

High Contrast Imaging and Wavefront Control with a PIAA Coronagraph: Laboratory System Validation

MAORY E-ELT MCAO module project overview

The Extreme Adaptive Optics test bench at CRAL

Non-adaptive Wavefront Control

Speckle Phase Sensing in Vortex Coronagraphy

Payload Configuration, Integration and Testing of the Deformable Mirror Demonstration Mission (DeMi) CubeSat

SPEED: the Segmented Pupil Experiment for Exoplanet Detection

The Self-Coherent Camera : a focal plane sensor for EPICS?

Development of a Low-order Adaptive Optics System at Udaipur Solar Observatory

The predicted performance of the ACS coronagraph

PCS: E-ELT Planet finder

Adaptive Optics lectures

Gemini 8m Telescopes Instrument Science Requirements. R. McGonegal Controls Group. January 27, 1996

Apodized phase plates & Shaped pupils

Robo-AO: Robotic Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics on the Palomar 60 in Christoph Baranec (PI) & Nick Law (PS)

Exoplanet transit, eclipse, and phase curve observations with JWST NIRCam. Tom Greene & John Stansberry JWST NIRCam transit meeting March 12, 2014

DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM FOR THE UH HOKU KE`A OBSERVATORY ABSTRACT

THE SUBARU CORONAGRAPHIC EXTREME ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM: ENABLING HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING ON SOLAR-SYSTEM SCALES

MAORY ADAPTIVE OPTICS

1.6 Beam Wander vs. Image Jitter

Comparative Performance of a 3-Sided and 4-Sided Pyramid Wavefront Sensor. HartSCI LLC, 2555 N. Coyote Dr. #114, Tucson, AZ

MIRI 4-Quadrant Phase Mask Coronagraphs. Anthony Boccaletti & C. Cavarroc, P.-O. Lagage, P. Baudoz & the MIRI consortium

Evaluation of Performance of the MACAO Systems at the

CHARA AO Calibration Process

High Contrast Imaging

MODULAR ADAPTIVE OPTICS TESTBED FOR THE NPOI

Recent Progress in Vector Vortex Coronagraphy

Design of the MagAO-X Pyramid Wavefront Sensor

HiCIAO for WEB

The First Light of the Subaru Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System

Puntino. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for optimizing telescopes. The software people for optics

PYRAMID WAVEFRONT SENSING UPDATE FOR MAGAO-X

Subject headings: turbulence -- atmospheric effects --techniques: interferometric -- techniques: image processing

An overview of WFIRST-AFTA coronagraph modelling

Potential benefits of freeform optics for the ELT instruments. J. Kosmalski

Astronomy. Astrophysics. Comparison of coronagraphs for high-contrast imaging in the context of extremely large telescopes

EXCEDE Technology Milestone #1: Monochromatic Contrast Demonstration

Wavefront sensor design for NGAO: Assumptions, Design Parameters and Technical Challenges Version 0.1

SHARK-NIR overview and optomechanical design: an update

User Manual for the Vortex Coronograph at NIRC2 on Keck II

Optimization of Apodized Pupil Lyot Coronagraph for ELTs

Design parameters Summary

Starshade Technology Development Status

Effect of segmented telescope phasing errors on adaptive optics performance

Experimental results of Multi-Stage Four Quadrant Phase Mask Coronagraph

Adaptive Optics for LIGO

Laboratory demonstration and characterization of phase-sorting interferometry

AVOIDING TO TRADE SENSITIVITY FOR LINEARITY IN A REAL WORLD WFS

Open-loop performance of a high dynamic range reflective wavefront sensor

Breadboard adaptive optical system based on 109-channel PDM: technical passport

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 7 Sep 2017

The performance of the CHEOPS On-Ground calibration system

Near-infrared coronagraph imager on the Subaru 8m telescope

Chapter 7: Adaptive Optics (AO) and High Contrast Imaging

Ultra-Flat Tip-Tilt-Piston MEMS Deformable Mirror

VATT Optical Performance During 98 Oct as Measured with an Interferometric Hartmann Wavefront Sensor

First Successful Adaptive Optics PSF Reconstruction at W. M. Keck Observatory

The SPHERE XAO system SAXO: integration, test and laboratory performance.

Adaptive Optics with Adaptive Filtering and Control

Exoplanet Imaging with the Giant Magellan Telescope

Keck Telescope Wavefront Errors: Implications for NGAO

Low Order Wavefront Sensing and Control for WFIRST-AFTA Coronagraph

12.4 Alignment and Manufacturing Tolerances for Segmented Telescopes

ASD and Speckle Interferometry. Dave Rowe, CTO, PlaneWave Instruments

Proposed Adaptive Optics system for Vainu Bappu Telescope

GROUND LAYER ADAPTIVE OPTICS AND ADVANCEMENTS IN LASER TOMOGRAPHY AT THE 6.5M MMT TELESCOPE

RAPID: A Revolutionary Fast Low Noise Detector on Pionier

Wavefront sensing for adaptive optics

SAXO, the extreme Adaptive Optics System of SPHERE. Overview and calibration procedure

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 15 Aug 2012

Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain International Conference on Space Optics 7-10 October 2014 THE LAM SPACE ACTIVE OPTICS FACILITY

The Wavefront Control System for the Keck Telescope

E-ELT Programme Science drivers

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 17 Jun 2016

Multi aperture coherent imaging IMAGE testbed

What is the source of straylight in SST/CRISP data?

Transcription:

PhD Defense 21st September 2015 Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore on Low-order wavefront control and calibration for phase-mask coronagraphs by Garima Singh PhD student and SCExAO member Observatoire de Paris and Subaru Telescope singh@naoj.org, guiding.honu@gmail.com PhD Advisors: Dr. Olivier Guyon, Dr. Pierre Baudoz and Dr. Daniel Rouan

Outline Exoplanets and high contrast imaging Principle of Lyot-based Low-order Wavefront Sensor (LLOWFS) LLOWFS implementation on the SCExAO instrument Laboratory and on-sky results for different coronagraphs Conclusion and perspective 2

Exoplanets and scientific motivation Transits As of August 2015 ~1800 confirmed planets, ~ 5000 candidates Questions to be addressed: Similarities with planets in our solar system Atmospheric chemical composition Formation and evolution Signs of biological activities 3

Exoplanets and scientific motivation Goal: Characterize atmosphere of planets in habitable zone Direct detection via: Reflected light (visible) Thermal emission (infrared) Kepler candidates Challenge: High contrast Small angular separation Earth-sun system: contrast 10-10 (visible) Only a handful of massive planets at > 10 AU directly imaged from the ground Current AO correction is insufficient to detect faint structures at < 10 AU Requirement: High contrast imaging on the AO corrected PSF 4

High Contrast Imaging Wavefront correction Starlight cancellation Plane wavefront Speckle calibration Distorted wavefront Telescope (Imaging astronomical objects for example stars and its companions) Atmospheric turbulence Controlling wavefront aberrations at/near the IWA of the coronagraph Extreme Adaptive Optics High-, Low-order wavefront correction and calibration Active speckle control Seeing-limited Adaptive Optics (Correcting atmospheric turbulence) Diffraction-limited Coronagraph (Blocking Starlight) Partially corrected Focus of my PhD research Post-processing (ADI, PDI, SDI) (Calibrating residual speckles) Companion disentangled from the residual speckle noise 5

Stellar coronagraphy Aperture (P) Entrance pupil plane Occulting Mask (M) 1st focal plane Lyot Stop (L) Lyot pupil plane Detector Coronagraphic focal plane Pupil illumination Final downstream a FPM (with no Lyot stop) Coronagraphic PSF Four quadrant phase mask (FQPM) Phase masks are high throughput small inner working coronagraphs. 6

A major challenge in high contrast imaging Goal of current ground-based instruments. Directly image young planets at angular separation < 10 AU. What we need. (1) SR > 90%, (2) Residual of < 50 nm, (3) Raw contrast of ~ 1e-4 in IR and (4) wavefront calibration to ~ 1e-6 contrast at ~ 1 λ/d. Technical challenge. How well the low-order wavefront aberrations upstream of a coronagraph are controlled and calibrated. Simulation with a FQPM coronagraph Coronagraphic PSF Tip aberration (no aberration) PSF is decentered, can easily mimic a companion Focus aberration Astigmatism aberration PSF is broadened, can be misinterpreted as a circumstellar feature Coronagraphs optimized for small inner working angle (IWA) are extremely sensitive to low-order errors! 7

Outline Exoplanets and high contrast imaging. Principle of Lyot-based low-order wavefront sensor (LLOWFS) Concept Simulation First laboratory result 8

Lyot-based low-order wavefront sensor (LLOWFS): Concept Linearity Approximation No solution existed to address low-order aberrations more than just tip-tilt for PMCs! I0 If post-ao wavefront residuals << 1 radian RMS, then I0 = Reference image, IR = Reflected image with aberration, LLOWFS defocused image with a FQPM i = low-order modes, n = total number of modes, α = amplitude of the modes, S = calibrated response of the sensor to the low-order modes (Orthonormal images) v = residual of high-order modes Valid only if I0 stays constant for the duration of the experiment 9

LLOWFS: Simulation example Simulation with a FQPM: Under post-ao wavefront residuals Simulated series of 200 postao phasemaps with random high- and low-order modes. Total amplitude of ~ 180 nm phase RMS average over all the phasemaps. Linearity range for tip-tilt mode: ± 0.2 radian RMS (± 0.12 λ/d) 10

LLOWFS1: First laboratory experiment at LESIA RLS Reference Tip Tilt Difference between two reference Linearity range for tip-tilt mode: ± 0.19 radian RMS ( ± 0.12 l/d) Singh et al., 2014, PASP, 126, 586 11

Outline Exoplanets and high contrast imaging Principle of Lyot-based low-order wavefront sensor (LLOWFS) LLOWFS implementation on the SCExAO instrument Subaru coronagraphic extreme adaptive optics instrument Mode of operation Control scheme 12

SCExAO instrument block diagram Visible bench (640-940 nm) VAMPIRES (Aperture masking + Polarimetry) Extreme AO Visitor (high-order sensing instruments in visible) University of Sydney Pyramid wavefront sensor (3.6 khz) 700 900 nm IR bench (940 2500 nm) 2000-actuator AO188 facility (corrects 187 modes) F/14 converging beam Simulated turbulence injection for internal tests Deformable Mirror (wavefront control) FIRST (SpectroInterferometry) Coronagraphy (Imaging in IR) Coronagraphs, IWA 1-3 λ/d (PIAA, PMCs) LLOWFS, 170 Hz (low-order sensing at 1600 nm) Speckle Nulling (170 Hz) Observatory of Paris collimated beam Facility science camera HiCIAO My contribution to the SCExAO instrument 13

SCExAO instrument SCExAO instrument at the summit of Mauna Kea Visible bench Nasmyth IR focus SCExAO AO188 Visible bench HiCIAO IR bench IR bench 14

LLOWFS implementation on SCExAO Correction Sensing 2000-actuator Deformable Mirror (DM) InGaAs CMOS camera 1.5 μm stroke Detector size: 320 x 256 5 dead actuators (1.5 actuators in the pupil) Read-out noise (e-): 140 Frame rate: 170 Hz 15

LLOWFS operation on SCExAO LLOWFS mode of operation in non ExAO regime ( ~ 30 40 % SR in H) during my thesis Direct interaction with DM: Correction of 35 Zernike modes in the laboratory and 10 modes on-sky Low-order corrections sent at 170 Hz LLOWFS F/14 output beam from AO188 2000-actuators DM Residual starlight reflected by RLS Coronagraph Internal NIR camera HICIAO Simulated turbulence injection (internal tests) SCExAO IR bench 16

LLOWFS: Control scheme Aberrated coronagraphic PSF Vortex mask Output Vortex mask Reference Corrected coronagraphic PSF Response Matrix Tilt Tip Singular Value Decomposition method Corrected LLOWFS PSF Aberrated LLOWFS PSF Input Calibration Reference + Sensor Corrections Measurements, αi Control Commands Actuator (DM) Integrator controller n [(gain αi) Zi] i=0 Zernike phasemaps (Zi) 17

Outline Exoplanets and high contrast imaging Principle of Lyot-based low-order wavefront sensor (LLOWFS) LLOWFS implementation on the SCExAO instrument Laboratory and on-sky results for different coronagraphs (non ExAO regime) Sensor linearity Spectral analysis Coronagraphic image stability 18

Laboratory results: Sensor Linearity Calibration Frames PIAA FQPM VVC PIAA FQPM VVC Sensor linearity: Roughly 150 nm RMS (from 50 to + 100 nm RMS, non-linearity of < 10 % at 100 nm) Measurement accuracy for the sensor response to: Tip aberration: < 6 nm RMS Residuals in other modes within the linearity range: ~ 45 nm RMS for all the coronagraphs. 19

Laboratory results: Temporal measurement Laboratory Turbulence: infinite sequence of phase screens with Kolmogorov profile, 100 nm RMS amplitude, 10 m/s wind speed. Closed-loop on 35 Zernike modes with a VVC 20

Laboratory results: Temporal measurement The correction at frequencies < 0.5 Hz is about 2 orders of magnitude, leaving sub nanometer residuals for all the modes. Pointing residuals for open- and closed-loop sampled at 0.5 Hz are about 10-2 λ/d (0.8 mas) and a few 10-4 λ/d (0.02 mas) Similar results for the other coronagraphs. 21

Laboratory results: Spectral analysis Smoothed open- and closed-loop PSD of tip aberration for a VVC. Loop closed at 170 Hz. For gain = 0.7 Vibration at 60 Hz due to camera cooler Vibration issue solved Singh et al., 2015, PASP, accepted For frequencies < 0.5 Hz: Reduction in residual by a factor of 30 to 500 on all the modes. At 0.5 Hz, improvement by 2 orders of magnitude. For frequencies > 0.5 Hz, improvement is only between 3 and 12, due to vibrations. For long exposures, the correction is limited by the vibration while for short exposures, it is limited by the photon noise. 22

Laboratory results: Improved stability Standard deviation of the processed frames. Standard deviation is more stable in closed-loop! Science camera Open-loop Closed-loop LLOWFS camera Closed-loop Open-loop VVC PIAA Images are at same brightness scale! FQPM EOPM 23

LLOWFS in action 24

On-sky results in non ExAO regime: Temporal measurement Observation of a star with mh = 1.92 with a VVC (seeing 0.35 in H band) AO188: 30 40 % SR in H-band with a ~ 200 nm RMS wavefront error. LLOWFS loop closed on 10 modes with a gain of 0.5 at 170 Hz. Best on-sky pointing residual obtained with the LLOWFS in non ExAO regime. For frequencies < 0.5 Hz, Correction is ~ 2 orders of magnitude better than at higher frequencies. Closed-loop pointing residual of 10-4 λ/d (0.02 mas) is obtained for slow varying errors. 25

On-sky results in non ExAO regime: Spectral analysis Closed-loop PSD and the cumulative standard deviation of the 10 modes. gain = 0.5 Telescope vibration at 6 Hz Closed-loop PSD of the tip Vibration at 6 Hz is visible as a step aberration in the cumulative standard deviation plot 26

On-sky results in non ExAO regime: Improved stability Observation of a star with mh = 1.92 with a VVC (seeing 0.35 in H band) HiCIAO frames are de-striped, Flat-fielded and bad pixels removed. Standard deviation and average per pixel of 4 frames only (few seconds of exposure time). Open loop Closed loop Standard deviation Variance is improved by an order of magnitude. Average Singh et al., 2015b, Under preparation 27

Outline Exoplanets and high contrast imaging Principle of Lyot-based low-order wavefront sensor (LLOWFS) LLOWFS implementation on the SCExAO instrument Laboratory and on-sky results for different coronagraphs (Non-ExAO regime) LLOWFS operation in ExAO regime Integration of LLOWFS inside SCExAO's high-order Pyramid wavefront sensor On-sky results 28

LLOWFS operation in ExAO regime LLOWFS integrated with high-order Pyramid wavefront sensor to deal with the differential chromatic low-order aberrations in the IR science channel. Only tip-tilt are addressed in the laboratory and on-sky in ExAO regime during my thesis Visible Bench High-order visible Pyramid wavefront sensor Zero-point update High-order commands < 3.6 khz Differential pointing system Differential tip-tilt commands 25 Hz IR Bench LLOWFS F/14 output beam from AO188 Residual starlight reflected 2000-actuators DM Internal NIR camera Coronagraph HiCIAO Dichroic 29

On-sky results in ExAO regime A G8V C Spectral type variable star (mh = 5.098), 800 modes corrected (60-70% SR in H). 1h 45m long LLOWFS + PyWFS closed-loop temporal measurements. Pretransit During transit (16 min) Post-transit Closed-loop PSD of the residuals in the Elevation direction Sensing and correction frequency: 20 Hz The strength of the vibration at 3.8 Hz is amplified by a factor of ~ 2 at 5.2 Hz during the transit of the target (target at maximum elevation). 30

On-sky results in ExAO regime Vibrations excited during transit of the target (target at maximum elevation) A G8V C Spectral type variable star (mh = 5.098) PyWFS closed + LLOWFS open PyWFS closed + LLOWFS closed No Vortex, only Lyot stop in Single HiCIAO frame, 1.5s 31

Outline Exoplanets and high contrast imaging Principle of Lyot-based low-order wavefront sensor (LLOWFS) LLOWFS implementation on the SCExAO instrument Laboratory and on-sky results for different coronagraphs (Non-ExAO regime) Integration of LLOWFS inside SCExAO's high-order Pyramid wavefront sensor and on-sky results (ExAO regime) Conclusion and Perspective 32

Factors affecting LLOWFS performance LLOWFS stability depends on the correction provided by the AO188 and the PyWFS. Uncorrected high frequency variations will break LLOWFS loop. LLOWFS correction is a trade off between the defocus of the sensor, speed of the loop and number of modes corrected. Bright targets: more defocus, faster correction, correction of > 10 modes Faint targets: closer to focus, slower correction, correction of only 2-3 modes Excitation of the vibrations. Noisy on-sky reference and response matrix due to bad seeing. Asymmetries in the response matrix can introduce non-linearities in the calibrated response of the sensor. Tuning of the loop by setting the gain manually. Not knowing whether the gain applied is optimal. Can make the loop unstable! 33

Upgrades to improve LLOWFS performance Upgrades already done To correct high number of modes and to improve the speed in ExAO regime, LLOWFS simultaneously send the correction to the DM and update the zero point of the PyWFS. Correcting 16 modes now! To deal with the telescope vibrations, accelerometers are installed to measure the vibrations. To increase the SNR, LLOWFS camera is cooled and the reflectivity of the RLS in improved. Integrate both LLOWFS and speckle nulling loop inside the PyWFS control loop. Near-future upgrades Implement a LQG controller for the low-order loop to provide an optimal control of the vibrations. Use low-order telemetry to calibrate the uncorrected low-order aberrations in real-time. A10kHz frame rate LOWFS camera project has already been funded. Should allow SCExAO to detect young Jupiters (a few Mj) by a factor of ~3 closer to their host stars than is currently possible. 34

Conclusion LLOWFS only solution for the PMCs to address pointing and other low-order aberrations. Singh et al 2014, PASP Operational on the SCExAO instrument. Open to use for the science observations. Successful loop closure in the laboratory with the PIAA, the VVC and the FQPM/ EOPM coronagraphs. Closed-loop pointing residual between 10-3 λ/d and 10-4 λ/d in non ExAO regime. On-sky correction of 10 Zernike modes with the VVC and the PIAA. Obtained a closed-loop tip-tilt residuals of a few 10-3 λ/d for slow varying errors. Singh et al 2015, PASP, accepted Improved the variance of the coronagraphic images by an order of magnitude. Detection sensitivity should improve by same factor. Successfully integrated LLOWFS with PyWFS and addressed the NCP errors between the visible wavefront sensing channel and the infrared science channel. Obtained most durable and stable pointing with LLOWFS on faint targets with a VVC in ExAO regime. Loop remain closed for 1 hour 45 minutes! Singh et al 2015b, under preparation LLOWFS measurements addressed unknown vibration issues during transit of the target that are crucial for the ADI. Under high Strehl ratio, LLOWFS is envisioned to provide pointing residuals of 10-3 l/d in ExAO regime on a regular basis. 35

Perspective Both LLOWFS approaches can easily be implemented on any ExAO instrument that has: either a dedicated low-order DM or has the possibility to feed the low-order correction to their existing DM or to a tip/tilt mirror. The PICTURE-C mission, a high-altitude ballon carrying a VVC has selected LLOWFS to deal with the pointing errors over SHWFS and Curvature WFS. LLOWFS is under study for the Keck Planet Imager, an upcoming upgrade of the Keck AO system. LLOWFS can help the direct imagers of the ELTs to probe the habitable region around the Mtype main sequence stars. SCExAO including LLOWFS is envisioned to be a first light instrument for TMT. Equally relevant for the next generation HCI instruments aboard space telescopes such as WFIRST-AFTA, Exo-C and ACESat to deal with the low-order aberrations induced by the thermal drifts and the telescope pointing. Linearity study on SCExAO can give the requirement on the pointing of the spacecraft, The level of correction demonstrated on SCExAO can be scaled to space conditions to give specifications on the acceptable level of vibrations. 36

Questions? 37