Minimum Antenna Elevation for Specific Fraction of SC6 Limits Version 1.0 Standard May 7, 2009

Similar documents
Calculated Radio Frequency Emissions Report. Cotuit Relo MA 414 Main Street, Cotuit, MA 02635

Safety Code 6 Analysis Freedom Mobile 3G & LTE Network. Radio frequency exposure for uncontrolled and controlled environment.

Safety Code 6 Compliance Analysis of NLA031. Study conducted by Eastlink, Radio Frequency Engineering Department

Safety Code 6 (SC6) Measurement Procedures (Uncontrolled Environment)

NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS & ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION

FIRE FIGHTERS GUIDANCE NOTE # 3-4

RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT. Verizon Wireless. Report Status: Verizon Wireless is Compliant

CALCULATING RADIOFREQUENCY FIELD STRENGTH SAFETY CODE 6 SITE VALIDATION

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Berkeley Bekins ) 2721 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, California

Royal Street Communications, LLC Proposed Base Station (Site No. LA0366A) 315 4th Avenue Venice, California

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) COMPLIANCE STUDY ON TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) EXPOSURE REPORT

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Palos Verdes ) 1506 Camino Verde Walnut Creek, California

Guidelines for the Protection of the General Public in Compliance with Safety Code 6

MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE STUDY

ITU-T Study Group 5. EMF Environmental Characterization

RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS

ITU-T K.70. Mitigation techniques to limit human exposure to EMFs in the vicinity of radiocommunication stations

ITU-T K.70. Mitigation techniques to limit human exposure to EMFs in the vicinity of radiocommunication stations

Guidelines for the Measurement of Radio Frequency Fields at Frequencies From 3 khz to 300 GHz

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No South Goleta ) 4500 Hollister Avenue Santa Barbara, California

AT&T Mobility Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN4779A) 1101 Keaveny Court Walnut Creek, California

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Lake Cachuma ) 2680 Highway 154 Santa Barbara County, California

2200 Noll Drive Lancaster, PA Latitude: N 40º (NAD 83) Longitude: W 76º (NAD 83) 362 AMSL

Vertical or horizontal antenna for limited space

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) EXPOSURE REPORT

SAFETYTRAINING INFORMATION Your TYT ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD radio generates RF electromagnetic energy during transmit mode. This radio is designed for and

Exercises on preparing frequency assignment notices to be notified to the BR (Region 2)

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

REFERENCE GUIDE External Antennas Guide 1

Verizon Wireless Site ID Lime Site Name Lime Site Compliance Report

Antenna & Propagation. Antenna Parameters

SHENZHEN LCS COMPLIANCE TESTING LABORATORY LTD. FCC ID: WXLRAMV Report No.: LCS E-03 FCC MPE TEST REPORT. 47 CFR FCC Part 2 2.

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Practical Considerations for Radiated Immunities Measurement using ETS-Lindgren EMC Probes

Overview of the Notification workshop on Fixed and Mobile Services General guidelines for Fixed and Mobile Services Reference documents for

SIGFOX END- PRODUCT RADIATED TEST PLAN FOR SIGFOX READY TM CERTIFICATION

Chapter 4 The RF Link

SAR REPORT. TEST STANDARDS: FCC Part 15 Subpart C Intentional Radiator. ARRIS Model Spectrum 110A Set Top Box With Bluetooth (DSS) and RF4CE (DTS)

Model: M /800 MHz Mobile Radio

Range Considerations for RF Networks

RADIO FREQUENCY NIER REPORT

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

Modeling Electromagnetic Radiation on Lookout Mountain, Colorado

REFERENCE GUIDE External Antennas Guide 1

Radio Frequency Emissions Analysis Report Sprint Wireless Water Tank Facility

Measurements of Exposures Around Vodafone New Zealand Limited Cellsites from June 2012 to May 2013

Regulatory Authority of Bermuda report on

advancing information transport systems

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *

Exercise 1-4. The Radar Equation EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION OF FUNDAMENTALS

Noise and Propagation mechanisms

APPLICATION SPECIFICATION

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (EMF) STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS SITE: ROHRERSTOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OCTOBER 16, 2017

Power Handling Considerations in a Compact Range

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) CHARACTERISTICS OF IEEE SYSTEMS IN MHz

RF Exposure Evaluation Declaration

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Product Specifications

BASICS OF ANTENNAS Lecture Note 1

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 15, 2012

Downtilt: How to set it

Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band GHz for intelligent transport systems applications

Technical Note 2. Standards-compliant test of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on radar equipment

Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report

Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report

Report On. RF Exposure Assessment of the Sepura plc SRG3900 with AQHB Antenna. FCC ID: XX6SRG3900UW Industry Canada ID: 8739A-SRG3900UW

Full-Dimension MIMO Arrays with Large Spacings Between Elements. Xavier Artiga Researcher Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC)

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

4GHz / 6GHz Radiation Measurement System

RF Exposure Evaluation Declaration

White Paper 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence 900 MHz Receiver Blocking Problem

Mobile Phone Base-Station Audit

Antennas: Problems and exercises: Answers

November 24, 2010xx. Introduction

Low-power shared access to spectrum for mobile broadband Modelling parameters and assumptions Real Wireless Real Wireless Ltd.

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Spring 2010

RF-EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT REPORT

GUIDELINES With elements of technical solution depending on the nature of radiocommunication service

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

RF EME ANALYSIS REPORT TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED WIFI BASE CUBE

EMF Test Report: Ericsson Radio 2205 B46

Mobile Phone Base-Station Audit

Chapter 2. Fundamental Properties of Antennas. ECE 5318/6352 Antenna Engineering Dr. Stuart Long

ENGINEERING TEST REPORT # C LSR Job #: C-2411 Compliance Testing of: RM186-SM

Product Compliance Assessments of Low Power Radio Base Stations with Respect to Whole-Body Radiofrequency Exposure Limits

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band GHz

L-Band and X-Band Antenna Design and Development for NeXtRAD

Methodology for Analysis of LMR Antenna Systems

Health Issues. Introduction. Ionizing vs. Non-Ionizing Radiation. Health Issues 18.1

LMS4000 & NCL MHz Radio Propagation

RF FIELD SURVEY REPORT

Fundamentals of Antennas. Prof. Ely Levine

Radio Frequency (RF) Fields Signs and Access Control

Antenna Design Seminar

Estimation of Peak Power Density in the Vicinity of Cellular Base Stations, FM, UHF and WiMAX Antennas

Simulation of Electromagnetic Radiation Levels for some Radiocommunication Systems

Guidelines for the Submission of Applications to Provide Mobile-Satellite Service in Canada

Transcription:

Specific Fraction of SC6 Limits Version 1.0 Standard May 7, 2009 RF engineering team Ian Hung DRAFT

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 Purpose... 3 1.2 Scope... 3 1.3 Intended Audience... 3 2 ANALYSIS... 4 2.1 Calculation of Power Densities and Exposure Limits... 4 2.2 Calculation Constants and Assumptions... 6 3 CONCLUSION... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 A.1 Hotspot (for 6deg Downtilt)... 9 A.2 Hotspot (for 12deg downtilt)... 10 DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 2/11

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum height of the cellular antenna radiation centre above the rooftop surface where the resulting RF exposure is within a specific fraction of the limits set by Industry Canada s SC6 guidelines. 1.2 Scope This study serves to rapidly identify the antenna height where the resulting RF power density is within some fraction of the SC6 limits. This document is not a safety guideline but serve merely to state those findings based on calculations outlined in the Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3kHz to 300 GHz as published by authority of the Minister of Health, Canada. 1.3 Intended Audience This document is intended for those individuals that direct cellular antenna placement and configuration particularly upon building rooftops in Canada. This document was written under the context of XXXXX thus antenna selection and operating frequency are unique to this study. DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 3/11

2 ANALYSIS 2.1 Calculation of Power Densities and Exposure Limits The approach to determine the power density output by the antenna at a certain point upon the rooftop is to first find the distance of which the far-field begins. For areas that lie within the near-field, the near-field calculations are used which assume the cylindrical modified HPBW Method 1. For areas that lie within the far-field, the far-field calculations are used according to the Free Space Method. In both the near and far-field regions, the horizontal and vertical antenna pattern discrimination is summed and asserted against the isotropic radiated power of the antenna. The cumulative power density due to all transmitting elements on the rooftop at each position on the rooftop is summed. The determination of when the far field begins (for antennas that are physically large compared to the wavelength at which they operate) is defined by the equation in Figure 1. Figure 1: Equation to calculate the distance to the far field The near field equation to determine RF power density is Figure 2 and is based upon the Modified Half Power Beamwidth (HPBW) model in Figure 3. 1 Outlined under Section 4.2 of the RaPD-Calc: Radio Frequency Power Density Calculation Tool with reference to Industry Canada s report on A Study on Electric Field Intensity Distribution in the Near-Field Region of PCS Base Station Antenna Installations. DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 4/11

Figure 2: Equation to calculate the power density within the near field Figure 3: Modified Half Power Beamwidth (HPBW) model Conversely, the far field calculation to determine RF power density is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Equation to calculate the power density within the far field DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 5/11

An error window is included in the calculation to account for differences between the theoretical model and reality such as exact building orientation, antenna azimuths, etc. A reflection factor of 60% (where RF=1.6) is included to account for such effect of radio waves reflecting off penthouse walls, etc 2. For additional information and detailed description of the formulas, refer to the Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3kHz to 300 GHz and RaPD-Calc: Radio Frequency Power Density Calculation Tool. 2.2 Calculation Constants and Assumptions The exposure limits for persons not classed as RF and Microwave Exposed Workers (Including the General Public) is chosen to be the upper limit and are outlined under Section 2.2 of the Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3kHz to 300 GHz. The exposure to the public is potentially 24 hours a day for 7 days a week, compared with 8 hours a day, 5 days a week for RF and microwave exposed workers. For the operating frequency of XXXXX which corresponds to the downlink frequency range of XXXXMHz the maximum power density for non-rf workers (general public) is defined as 10 W/m^2. Other assumptions are as follows: The primary antenna pattern used throughout the study is the XXXXXX (Dual Polarized, XXXXXX, 65deg, 18.4dBi, 1.3m, VET, 0-10deg) along with its electrical downtilt patterns as supplied by XXXXXX. One (1) antenna (transmitting element) is used for calculation. The antenna radiation centre is chosen to be the reference point for all relevant calculations. Three (3) variations of the output power from the BTS are used for calculation that are: 20W, 40W, and 80W. The maximum EiRP is respectively 1230W, 2460W, and 4920W from the antenna (transmitting element). The maximum power is assumed to be always transmitted and not simply the pilot power for WCDMA technology. Two (2) downtilt variations are used for calculation that are 6 deg (electrical) and 12 deg (10 deg electrical + 2 deg mechanical). 2 Consistent with measurements performed by Industry Canada and FCC as specified under Section 4.5 of RaPD- Calc: Radio Frequency Power Density Calculation Tool DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 6/11

3 CONCLUSION The minimum cellular antenna radiation centre [d] above the roof surface is as follows: Table 1: Minimum Cellular Antenna Radiation Centre [d] above Rooftop Surface (@ 6deg Downtilt) Percentage of Maximum Allowable Power Density EiRP 90% 50% 10% 1230W (20W @ BTS) d = Xm d = Xm d = Xm 2460W (40W @ BTS) d = Xm d = Xm d = Xm 4920W (80W @ BTS) d = Xm d = Xm d = Xm Table 2: Minimum Cellular Antenna Radiation Centre [d] above Rooftop Surface (@ 12deg Downtilt) Percentage of Maximum Allowable Power Density EiRP 90% 50% 10% 1230W (20W @ BTS) d = Xm d = Xm d = Xm 2460W (40W @ BTS) d = Xm d = Xm d = Xm 4920W (80W @ BTS) d = Xm d = Xm d = Xm For instance, for one (1) antenna with EiRP 2460W with downtilt of 12deg, the minimum radiation centre above the rooftop surface to achieve less than 50% of the maximum allowable power density throughout the rooftop is Xm. The figure below is a visual representation of this scenario. Figure 5: Antenna Radiation Centre [d] above the Rooftop Surface Please note the following conditions in the interpretation of the results: DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 7/11

The calculations assume the maximum exposure levels of the general public and are referenced Xm above the rooftop surface. The power density levels are subject to a single antenna (transmitting element) and thus does not account for any pre-existing power densities due to other antennas from the surrounding RF environment; thus, prudence should be exercised in judgement. Although the minimum antenna radiation centre [d] should ensure that the resulting power density is some percentage of the maximum allowable limits throughout an infinite sized rooftop surface, the actual hotspot may occur beyond the dimensions of the actual rooftop (please refer to Appendix A.1 and A.2 accordingly). Please refer to Appendix A.3 to see the implications towards the XXXXX Greenfield Project. DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 8/11

Appendix A A.1 Hotspot (for 6deg Downtilt) Table 3: Corresponding Hotspot Location for 6deg D/T Percentage of Maximum Allowable Power Density EiRP 90% 50% 10% 1230W (20W @ BTS) d=3.3m, r=16m to 17m d=3.4m, r=12m to 26m d=4.4m, r=14m to 15m 2460W (40W @ BTS) d=3.4m, r=around 16m d=3.5m, r=12m to 32m d=5.2m, r=around 15m 4920W (80W @ BTS) d=3.5m, r=13m to 24m d=4.0m, r=11m to 40m d=6.4m, r=37m to 38m Legend: 90% > Maximum Power Density > 50% 50% > Maximum Power Density > 10% 10% > Maximum Power Density Ex) For one (1) antenna with downtilt of 6deg and EiRP of 4920W and d=3.5m, the hotspot (less than 90% and greater than 50% of the maximum allowable power density = orange area) extends 13m to 24m away from the antenna. DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 9/11

A.2 Hotspot (for 12deg downtilt) Table 4: Corresponding Hotspot Location for 12deg D/T Percentage of Maximum Allowable Power Density EiRP 90% 50% 10% 1230W (20W @ BTS) d=3.9m, r=15m to 16m d=4.0m, r=14m to 23m d=5.9m, r=24m to 25m 2460W (40W @ BTS) d=4.0m, r=15m to 20m d=4.5m, r=13m to 27m d=7.5m, r=30m to 32m 4920W (80W @ BTS) d=4.6m, r=18m to 24m d=5.5m, r=14m to 33m d=9.7m, r=38m to 41m Legend: 90% > Maximum Power Density > 50% 50% > Maximum Power Density > 10% 10% > Maximum Power Density Ex) For one (1) antenna with downtilt of 12deg and EiRP of 2460W and d=4.5m, the hotspot (less than 50% and greater than 10% of the maximum allowable power density = yellow area) extends 13m to 27m away from the antenna. DRAFT 11/12/2009 1.0 10/11

End of Document