Evolvable Mars Campaign & SKGs

Similar documents
HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

Constellation Systems Division

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

The Global Exploration Roadmap

The Global Exploration Roadmap

NASA s Joint Robotic Precursor Activity: Providing Strategic Knowledge to Inform Future Human Exploration

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

The NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment

IAC-13-A THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: STRENGTHENING EXPLORATION THROUGH INCREASED HUMAN ROBOTIC PARTNERSHIP

BEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT

Expanding human activities beyond LEO

NASA Mission Directorates

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

NEO Science and Human Space Activity. Mark V. Sykes Director, Planetary Science Institute Chair, NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group

NASA s Changing Human Spaceflight Exploration Plans

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

IAC-11-D3.1.2 ISECG MISSION SCENARIOS AND THEIR ROLE IN INFORMING NEXT STEPS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,

IAC-13-A3.1.3.x17944 COORDINATED ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT INTERESTS FOR THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP: THE GER TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MAP

GLEX x12693 ASTEROID NEXT: A VIEW TO THE ROLE OF ASTEROID MISSIONS IN THE 2 ND ITERATION OF THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

Perspectives on human and robotic spaceflight. Steve Squyres Chairman, NASA Advisory Council Cornell University

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Future technologies for planetary exploration within the European Exploration Envelope Programme at the European Space Agency

Human Mars Architecture

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities

NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

National Space Exploration Campaign Report. Pursuant to Section 432(b) of the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017 (P.L.

Global Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

estec PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document

International Space Exploration Coordination Group Science White Paper Space Studies Board 2015 Fall Meeting 4 November 2015

Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0

NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team Cis-Lunar Analysis. M. Lupisella 1, M. R. Bobskill 2

High Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA

U.S. Exploration EVA: Architecture and ConOps Overview. NASA-JSC EVA Office/J. Buffington

ASTRA ERA and Future Robotics (for Exploration)

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

SYMPOSIUM ON HUMAN SPACE ENDEAVOURS IAC-11.B3.1.8 THE GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP

Reaching New Heights and Revealing the Unknown: A Conversation with Charles F. Bolden, Jr. NASA Administrator

Status and Outlook for European Exploration Envelope Programme

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

ASSEMBLY AND SERVICING OF SPACE TELESCOPES

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

IAC-13,B3.1,8x Bernhard Hufenbach ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands,

C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001

Human Exploration Systems and Mobility Capability Roadmap. Chris Culbert, NASA Chair Jeff Taylor, External Chair

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

Lisa Pratt, MEPAG Chair Report to PSS March 10-11, 2016

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

IAC-14.D2.8-A5.4.2 COOPERATIVE SCENARIOS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway

WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.

European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

Enabling Technologies for robotic and human Exploration

The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)

Once Explorers, Always Explorers Europe s Space Exploration Vision

The Lunar Split Mission: Concepts for Robotically Constructed Lunar Bases

Human Spaceflight Programmes and Possible Greek Participation

IAC-18.A5.1.4x Concept for a Crewed Lunar Lander Operating from the Lunar Orbiting Platform-Gateway

61 st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, CZ. Copyright 2010 by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved.

NASA and Earth Science Enterprise Overview

ESA Preparation for Human Exploration ACQUIRING CAPABILITIES

Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)

NASA Research Areas of Interest Released by NASA HQ February 2014

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme

The Space Portal A Framework for Exploration and Development

Earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in the cradle forever

Ocean Worlds Robert D. Braun

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

Call for Ideas. for the Next Exploration Science and Technology Mission of the European Space Exploration Programme - Aurora

Human Exploration and Operations: AA Perspective. Bill Gerstenmaier April 22, 2013

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: FY 2011 Budget Highlights

NNH13ZCQ001L ASTEROID INITIATIVE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Summary of Results of a NASA-funded Study on: An Evolvable Lunar Architecture Leveraging Commercial Partnerships

Journey To Mars Evolvable Mars Campaign Overview

Action Vehicle Action Surface Systems. -Exc. -Processing -Growth

Transcription:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Evolvable Mars Campaign & SKGs Ben Bussey Chief Exploration Scientist January 7, 2015 Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate

Pioneering Space - Goals Fifty years after the creation of NASA, our goal is no longer just a destination to reach. Our goal is the capacity for people to work and learn and operate and live safely beyond the Earth for extended periods of time, ultimately in ways that are more sustainable and even indefinite. And in fulfilling this task, we will not only extend humanity s reach in space -- we will strengthen America s leadership here on Earth. - President Obama, April 2010 2

NASA Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 Expand human presence into the solar system and to the surface of Mars to advance exploration, science, innovation, benefits to humanity, and international collaboration. 3

Strategic Principles for Sustainable Exploration Implementable in the near-term with the buying power of current budgets and in the longer term with budgets commensurate with economic growth; Exploration enables science and science enables exploration, leveraging robotic expertise for human exploration of the solar system Application of high Technology Readiness Level (TRL) technologies for near term missions, while focusing sustained investments on technologies and capabilities to address challenges of future missions; Near-term mission opportunities with a defined cadence of compelling and integrated human and robotic missions providing for an incremental buildup of capabilities for more complex missions over time; Opportunities for U.S. commercial business to further enhance the experience and business base Multi-use, evolvable space infrastructure, minimizing unique major developments; Substantial international and commercial participation, leveraging current International Space Station and other partnerships. 4

Global Exploration Roadmap: Common Goals and Objectives Develop Exploration Technologies and Capabilities Develop the knowledge, capabilities, and infrastructure required to live and work at destinations beyond low- Earth orbit through development and testing of advanced technologies, reliable systems, and efficient operations concepts in an off-earth environment. Engage the Public in Exploration Provide opportunities for the public to engage interactively in space exploration. Enhance Earth Safety Enhance the safety of planet Earth by contributing to collaborative pursuit of planetary defense and orbital debris management mechanisms. Extend Human Presence Explore a variety of destinations beyond low-earth orbit with a focus on continually increasing the number of individuals that can be supported at these destinations, the duration of time that individuals can remain at these destinations, and the level of self-sufficiency. Perform Space, Earth, and Applied Science Engage in science investigations of, and from, solar system destinations and conduct applied research in the unique environment at solar system destinations. Search for Life Determine if life is or was present outside of Earth and understand the environments that support or supported it. Stimulate Economic Expansion Support or encourage provision of technology, systems, hardware, and services from commercial entities and create new markets based on space activities that will return economic, technological, and quality-of-life benefits to all humankind. Perform Science to Enable Human Exploration Reduce the risks and increase the productivity of future missions in our solar system, characterizing the effect of the space environment on human health and exploration systems. 5

Evolvable Mars Campaign Goal: Define the pioneering strategy and operational capabilities required to extend and sustain human presence in the solar system including a journey towards the Mars system in the mid-2030s 6

Mars Vicinity Options Provide the Pull Mars Orbit Mars Moons Mars Surface Opportunities for integrated human-robotic missions: - Real time tele-operation on Martian surface - Mars sample return - Other science objectives - Technology demonstrations Demonstrate sustainable human exploration splitmission Mars concept Validate transportation and long-duration human systems Validate human stay capability in zero/micro-g Opportunities for integrated human-robotic missions: - Real time tele-operation on Martian surface - Mars & moons sample return - Other science objectives - Technology demonstrations Demonstrate sustainable human exploration splitmission Mars concept Moons provides additional radiation protection In-situ resource utilization Validate human stay capability in low-g Opportunities for integrated human-robotic missions: - Search for signs of life - Comparative planetology - Understanding Mars climate changes - Geology/geophysics Planet provides radiation protection Entry, descent, landing EVA surface suits In-situ resource utilization Validate human stay capability in partial-g 7

Mars Split Mission Concept Using SEP for pre-emplacement of cargo and destination systems enables sustainable Mars campaign Minimizes the cargo needed to be transported with the crew on future launches Enables a more sustainable launch cadence Pre-positions assets for crew missions allows for system checkout in the Mars vicinity prior to committing to crew portion of mission 8 8

Mars Split Mission Concept DRO as an aggregation point for Mars habitation systems Provides a stable environment and ease of access for testing Proving Ground capabilities Allows for Mars transit vehicle build-up and checkout in the deep-space environment prior to crew departure Able to transfer Mars Transit Vehicle from DRO to High Earth Orbit with small amount of propellant to rendezvous with crew in Orion HEO is more efficient location to leave Earth-moon system for Mars vicinity 9 9

Mars Split Mission Concept Returning from Mars, the crew will return to Earth in Orion and the Mars Transit Habitat will return to the staging point in cis-lunar space for refurbishment for future missions 10 10

PROVING GROUND NEAR-TERM OBJECTIVES VALIDATE SLS and Orion in deep space Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) systems Long duration, deep space habitation systems Mitigation techniques for crew health and performance in a deep space environment In-Situ Resource Utilization Operations with reduced logistics capability CONDUCT EVAs in deep space, micro-g environments Human and robotic mission operations Capability Pathfinder and SKG missions 11

Mission concepts with Universal Stage Adaptor Mission concepts with 8m and 10m fairings (includes additional payload capability) Core Stage / Boosters Exploration Upper Stage Mission Elements Block 1B Configuration 30 tall x 27.6 dia Orion with EAM Orion with ARV total mission volume = ~ 400m3 total mission volume = ~ 400m3 5m fairing w/robotic Lunar Lander & EAM total mission volume = ~ 600m3 8m fairing with ATLAST 10m fairing w/notional Mars payload total mission volume = ~ 1200m3 total mission volume = ~ 1800m3 12

GER Global Exploration Roadmap (GER) outlines multi-agency plan for human exploration Includes consensus principles, notional mission scenarios, preparatory activities Two scenarios: Asteroid Next, Moon Next

SKG and GFA: Definitions 1. Strategic Knowledge Gap (SKG): The Gaps in Knowledge Needed to Achieve a Human Spaceflight Capability. 2. Gap-Filling Activity (GFA): Work that contributes to closing an SKG. GFA areas Mars flight program Flights to other places Non-flight work (models, lab experiments, field analogs, etc.) Technology demos Knowledge Gaps Knowledge we have Total knowledge needed to achieve a goal 14

SB SKG Themes and Categories SB SKGs can be organized into several themes, which can be further divided into categories: I. Human mission target iden?fica?on (NEOs). The iden-fica-on of mul-ple II. III. IV. targets for human explora-on is fundamental. Understand how to work on or interact with the SB surface. Human presence may disturb the environment in non- intui-ve ways. We need to understand how best to perform sample acquisi-on and handling, instrument placement, and proximity opera-ons. Understand the SB environment and its poten?al risk/benefit to crew, systems, and opera?onal assets. The small body environment may include dust emifed periodically (for instance via levita-on) or episodically (aier impact or spin- up events). It may enhance or screen solar radia-on. It may be gravita-onally metastable. Understand the SB resource poten?al. ISRU is considered a game changer in how humans explore the Solar System by enabling an infrastructure that allows a sustainable human presence in space. The short- stay missions likely to be in the first wave of NEO or Phobos/Deimos visits may test or prepare that infrastructure but are unlikely to take advantage of it.

SB SKG Themes and Categories SKG Themes I. Human mission target iden?fica?on (NEOs) SKG Categories Examples of SKGs A. Constraints on targets B. NEO orbit distribu-on C. NEO composi-on/physical characteris-cs (popula-on/ specific targets) I- A- 1. Round trip limita-ons due to radia-on exposure. I- A- 2. Reachable objects within planned architecture I- B- 1. Long- synodic period NEOs having mul-ple mission opportuni-es. I- B- 2. Number of available targets at a given -me. I- C- 1. NEO size- frequency distribu-on. I- C- 2. NEO albedos. I- C- 3. NEO rota-on state.

Venues/Contexts for Addressing SKGs Venue/ Context R&A Earth- based ISS Robo-c Descrip?on Research and Analysis Programs that support basic research, field work, and mission data analysis supported by PSD and HEOMD but in a broad programma-c context. Terrestrial loca-on for specific development and tes-ng, including ground- based telescopes. Interna?onal Space Sta?on Space- based robo?c missions which can be telescopic or a precursor mission to a small body target.

Relevance Descrip?on Venue/Context Relevancy Preferred Loca?on/Context: Provides the best loca-on or context to obtain knowledge, including actual or flight- like condi-ons, environments, or constraints for tes-ng opera-onal approaches and mission hardware. Highly Relevant: Provides highly relevant loca-on/context to obtain knowledge, including flight- like condi-ons, environments, or constraints for tes-ng opera-onal approaches and mission hardware. This venue can serve as a good tes-ng loca-on with less difficulty and/or cost than an-cipated for the preferred loca-on. Somewhat Relevant: Provides some relevant tes-ng or knowledge gain (including basic analy-cal research and computa-onal analysis). Condi-ons are expected to be not flight- like or of sufficient fidelity to derive adequate tes-ng or opera-onal performance data. Not Relevant: Not an adequate loca-on/context for tes-ng or knowledge gain.

Strategic Knowledge Gaps IV. Understand the SB resource poten?al SKG R&A Earth- Based ISS Robo?c Missions Specific Target? Narra?ve A- 3. Knowledge of extrac-ng and collec-ng water in zero- g. A- 4. Caching and preposi-oning and extracted resources. A- 5. Refining, storing, and using H & O in micro- g. No No No Techniques can be developed and tested on Earth preparing and hea-ng meteorite analog and simulants, then op-mally tested in the microgravity of ISS. Techniques best tested in microgravity Refinement tes-ng star-ng with extracted water from meteorite analogs and simulants to test processes on Earth, then deploy for tes-ng at ISS. In- situ demonstra-on needed.

Ranking Priori?es Determining a Timeline Rank Cri-cal High Enhancing Descrip?on Human explora-on cannot proceed without closing of SKG. Important for maximizing human safety and/or mee-ng mission objec-ves. Enhances mission objec-ve return. Timeframe Time Near Mid Long Descrip?on Needs to be addressed immediately or in the near- term: A target cannot be chosen without it. Needs to be addressed in the mid- term: Must be completed before launch to human mission target, May be addressed in the longer term: May be completed aier first launch.

4 potential HEO Goals in the Martian system SKGs can only be defined w.r.t. a specific goal. Goals evaluated, this study Ref. Goal MEPAG A. Achieve the first human mission to Mars orbit B. Achieve the first human mission to the martian surface C. Achieve the first human mission to the surface of Phobos and/or Deimos D. Sustained human presence on Mars Goal IV- Goal IV Goal IV+ Linkage Group A SKGs also needed Group A SKGs also needed Group A,B, (C?) SKGs also needed 21

SKGs and Decomposition We have identified 17 SKGs associated with the four HEO goals. ü Full statements of the knowledge gaps are listed in Appendix I. About 60 Gap-Filling Activities (GFAs) have been identified that would address the 17 SKGs. ü ü ü Detailed analysis of the GFAs is in Appendix II. The GFAs have different priorities and degrees of urgency (see GFA Analysis on Slides #11-12) Only about half of the GFAs would require use of the Mars flight program. 22

23

SKG Path Forward All three documents are comprehensive Goal is to revisit Are the same questions being asked by the Human Architecture Teams? Have any of the SKGs been closed by recent data analysis? Make all three SKGs consistent in format/depth 24