SOCIAL INNOVATION AND SOCIAL ENTERPRISE

Similar documents
Innovation in Europe: Where s it going? How does it happen? Stephen Roper Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK

How can public and social innovation build a more inclusive economy?

An exploration of the future Latin America and Caribbean (ALC) and European Union (UE) bi-regional cooperation in science, technology and innovation

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

On Practical Innovation Policy Learning. Per M. Koch Head of the Science Policy Project

Current state of the debate regarding the role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Research and Innovation in the EU 1

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Frequently Asked Questions

Building an enterprise-centred innovation system

General Questionnaire

ASSESSMENT OF DYNAMICS OF THE INDEX OF THE OF THE INNOVATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT OF LATVIA

ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS COMMISSION PRAMONĖ 4.0 OF 2017

THE DIGITALISATION CHALLENGES IN LITHUANIAN ENGINEERING INDUSTRY. Darius Lasionis LINPRA Director November 30, 2018 Latvia

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Post : RIS 3 and evaluation

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2008: Highlights

EUROPEAN MANUFACTURING SURVEY EMS

ISSN (print) ISSN (online) INTELEKTINĖ EKONOMIKA INTELLECTUAL ECONOMICS 2011, Vol. 5, No. 4(12), p

ConstantinaMakri. Research Promotion Foundation

POSITION PAPER. GREEN PAPER From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Programme. Social Economy. in Västra Götaland Adopted on 19 June 2012 by the regional board, Region Västra Götaland

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

1H1 / European Research Area National RTD Support Scheme for Aeronautics in France

Il programma di lavoro SSH 2013

THESIS PRESENTATION. Gabriele Goebel-Heise 5617A011-4

POSITION OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ITALY (CNR) ON HORIZON 2020

Lithuania: Pramonė 4.0

Public Consultation: Science 2.0 : science in transition

National Innovation System of Mongolia

Women on Boards. Vanessa Williams Managing Director, Awen Consultants Limited Founder, Governance for Growth Director & Lawyer, Excello Law Limited

Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities. First Call for proposals. Nikos Kastrinos. Unit L1 Coordination and Horizontal Aspects

Pacts for Europe 2020: Good Practices and Views from EU Cities and Regions

OECD s Innovation Strategy: Key Findings and Policy Messages

CRC Association Conference

Economic crisis, European Welfare State Models and Inequality

Consultation on Long Term sustainability of Research Infrastructures

An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era

Minister-President of the Flemish Government and Flemish Minister for Economy, Foreign Policy, Agriculture and Rural Policy

EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake

Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Actions

Innovation policy mixes and implications on HEIs - emerging conclusions from the OECD innovation policy reviews

Use of forecasting for education & training: Experience from other countries

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

TECHNOLOGY VISION 2017 IN 60 SECONDS

EU-European Arctic Dialogue Seminar Information

Realising the FNH-RI: Roadmap. Karin Zimmermann (Wageningen Economic Research [WUR], NL)

OECD Innovation Strategy: Key Findings

Social Innovation & Social Experimentation: European strategic perspectives. Seminar of the project leaders of the PROGRESS grants

Joint statement by. 1/ We call for a new political impetus in favour of industry at European level to face these challenges

SME POLICY INDEX EASTERN PARTNER COUNTRIES. Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe. Country dissemination event

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

Data users and data producers interaction: the Web-COSI project experience

Fostering SME innovation through cross-border cooperation

Strengthening the knowledge base and reducing fragmentation

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee


Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

KNOWLEDGE & MEET EFFICIENCY SCIENCE TURNED INTO SUCCESS

S3P AGRI-FOOD Updates and next steps. Thematic Partnership TRACEABILITY AND BIG DATA Andalusia

Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska Curie. European Training Network RurAction. 10 Positions for Early-Stage Researchers 1 offered

"How to ensure a secure supply of raw materials in the global economy"

SAF RA Memorandum of Common Understanding

UEAPME Think Small Test

Original: English Rio de Janeiro, Brazil June 2012

The EU / LAC Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation (JIRI) Libardo Gutierrez Colciencias

THE LABORATORY ANIMAL BREEDERS ASSOCIATION OF GREAT BRITAIN

E Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/TDD/2017/IG.1/6 31 January 2017 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ARABIC

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

International Cooperation in Horizon 2020

Outcomes of the 2018 OECD Ministerial Conference on SMEs & the way forward

European Technology Platforms

An introduction to the 7 th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. Gorgias Garofalakis

Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2016 (OR. en)

CDP-EIF ITAtech Equity Platform

INNOSERV. An FP7 project on innovative social services

Refining foresight approaches to crisis, inertia and transition

Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe SME DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF GEORGIA

)XWXUH FKDOOHQJHV IRU WKH WRXULVP VHFWRU

EU Cohesion Policy (CP): Funding opportunities for digital cinema

A New Platform for escience and data research into the European Ecosystem.

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

Baltic Sea Region Urban Forum for Smart Cities - a market place for smart solutions

The ICT industry as driver for competition, investment, growth and jobs if we make the right choices

EU Support for SME Innovation: The SME Instrument

Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework 2017

DELIVERABLE SEPE Exploitation Plan

The work under the Environment under Review subprogramme focuses on strengthening the interface between science, policy and governance by bridging

Expectations around Impact in Horizon 2020

SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE MACEDONIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND POLICY

Revista Economică 68:5 (2016) PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF THE ROLE OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION IN SOLVING THE PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED BY CONTEMPORARY ECONOMY

Universities and Sustainable Development Towards the Global Goals

FINAL ACTIVITY AND MANAGEMENT REPORT

Public Involvement in the Regional Sustainable Development

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Societal Challenge 4: Smart, Green and Integrated Transport

VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES. KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY BAROMETER Mika Naumanen Technology Studies VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CHAPTER 1 PURPOSES OF POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION

Transcription:

SOCIAL INNOVATION AND SOCIAL ENTERPRISE Session Title Social Investment and Social Innovation in Europe Early results from the InnoSI Project European welfare states were designed to offer support against 20th Century social risks. In the current and ongoing climate of political, economic and social transition which began or at least, became apparent in 2008, EU Member States will have to adopt distinctive social welfare reforms to improve their resilience and prepare for future social risks. In contrast to a straightforward redistributive approach to social policy, social investment considers welfare as entailing investments to improve prospects for future economic and social participation. The emphasis, in other words, is on investments in people to enhance their productive capacities and foster longer-term economic development. Social investment thus stresses the life course dimension of social policies and their long-term benefits for society. But how to design robust social investment strategies which can deal with emerging socio-economic challenges and the aftershocks of the crisis? What is the role of the regional context in social investment policy? Which innovative and strategic approaches to social welfare reform utilising social innovation already exist in the member states of the European Union and which outcomes are they producing? And finally: How do social innovations influence the (re-)configuration of the European welfare states? Are NPOs and other actors from civil society still players in the game or is their influence on policy making shrinking? These are the leading questions of the project Innovative Social Investment: Strengthening communities in Europe (InnoSI) which is funded by the European Union within the Horizon 2020 program and brings together researchers and impact partners from civil society located in ten European countries (see the project s website on www.innosi.eu). In the proposed panel we want to present the first results of the InnoSI-project by bringing together papers which (1) identify innovative and strategic approaches to social welfare reform through social innovation at various levels including those of the member state, region and locality, (2) assess institutional support for social progress through social investment, (3) review available macro-indicators to assess welfare performance in the light of social investment and (4) assessing the role of the social economy and civil society in social investment related to social innovation and delivering social outcomes. The methodical basis of the papers is a comprehensive policy analysis of the support for early childhood development, the support for parents labour market participation and of policy measures to address social and labour market exclusion in the ten countries grouped together in the InnoSI project (plus France), including am interview survey with more than 40 policy experts and detailed analysis of official statistics. In the open discussion the panel will discuss trends of social investments in the European Union and the change of the welfare regime. Estimated Attendance No Data Entered Additional Information

The proposed session would also nicely fit in the major topic The Third Sector and the Welfare State. Since Session Chair Matthias Freise is participating in the ISTR s PhD Dissertation Network as a facilitator it would be helpful if the session would not be scheduled for the first paper session. Participants Defining social innovations and social investments - some conclusions from a scientific literature review Title () Defining social innovations and social investments - some conclusions from a scientific literature review Aldona Wiktorska-Święcka, aldona.wiktorska@uni.wroc.pl; Uniwersytet Wrocławski / Wroclav University (Presenter) Monika Klimowicz, mk_klimowicz@wp.pl; Wroclav University (Presenter) Małgorzata Michalewska-Pawlak, malgorzata.michalewska@uni.wroc.pl; Wroclav University (Presenter) Aim of the presentation is to provide the definitions of social innovations and social investment as they exist in the scientific literature. We are going to present the list of sources which contain all relevant definitions, like: monographs, academic journals and reports and evaluate them critically. The considered sources will be in the national languages of the ten InnoSI project partners. Time period of used sources is from 2000 to the first half of 2015. The thematic fields of literature analysis will be the following: early childhood development, parents labour market participation, combating social and labour market exclusion, social services for the persons seeking employment. Furthermore, we will summarise and synthesize the ideas and arguments about social innovations and social investment and seek to find the answer for the question if any national differences in approach to social innovations and social investment exist in examined scientific literature. Where s the Innovation? Social investment old and new

Title () Where s the Innovation? Social investment old and new Gavin Bailey, g.bailey@mmu.ac.uk; Manchester Metropolitan University (Presenter) Stephen Barnett, Stephen.Barnett@euclidnetwork.eu; Euclid Network (Non-Presenter) While the Social Investment agenda is new, the impetus to invest in people in order to assist them to have a better future has been with us since the beginning of the welfare state. Novelty, however, comes with two twinned desires. The first is the impetus to provide a transparent justification for investment, both with regards to why welfare conceived as investment is a social good to be supported, and why any social investment uses particular methods. The second, following, is the desire to change how the welfare state works in order to a) create greater efficiencies through changes in structures, b) justify ways of working through better measurement of outcomes, and so create new solutions to social problems. This paper draws upon analysis of the policy and practice of social investment across the ten nations of the InnoSi project, examining commonalities and differences in innovation in social investment. In particular, it will ask where and when the reconfiguration of the welfare state truly deserves the description of social innovation. Social Investment and Welfare Performances: Trends and Challenges at EU Level Title () Social Investment and Welfare Performances: Trends and Challenges at EU Level Andrea Bassi, andrea.bassi7@unibo.it; University of Bologna (Presenter) GIULIO ECCHIA, giulio.ecchia@unibo.it; DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA (Presenter) Riccardo Prandini, riccardo.prandini@unibo.it; University of Bologna (Non-Presenter)

European countries are implementing welfare policies that can be related to the so-called social investment paradigm. The aim of the paper is to provide a comparative overview on available macro-indicators to assess welfare performance in the light of social investment at EU level across 28 countries. In the first part, we present national data on social investment concerning three areas: support for early childhood development, support for parents labour market participation, policy measures to address social and labour market exclusion. The comparison covers the period from 1995 to 2012-2013 distinguishing three stages: pre-lisbon, Lisbon era, 2008 crisis and following years. The data regards all 28 EU countries with a special focus on the ten project countries of the InnoSI project. In the second part of the paper, following 2015 ESPN Report on Social Investment, we analyse the main policy-making trends in relation to social investment. In particular, we also utilise regional data originally collected for the InnoSI project. Moreover, we discuss the possible links between social expenditure and socio-economic outcomes for the ten countries of the InnoSI project. Coherence or hotchpotch? The social investment agenda and social economy in Europe after the financial crisis Title () Coherence or hotchpotch? The social investment agenda and social economy in Europe after the financial crisis Matthias Freise, freisem@uni-muenster.de; University of Muenster (Presenter) The European welfare states developed very different strategies to cope with the effects of the financial crises. While some governments pursue a strategy of strict austerity and state limitation others have expanded public programs to mitigate the social decline. However, in almost all European countries we can discover a general trend moving away from mere redistributive approaches to social investment programs aiming to strengthen the human capital of the citizens. Therefore, many models are possible depending upon how policy, social and managerial roles are distributed between the public, private and third sectors and the specific legal frameworks that are used. In the paper we will give a comparative overview how the social investment agenda has effected the configuration of the social economy in the ten project countries of the InnoSI project (Sweden, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Greece, Poland, Spain, The Netherland, United Kingdom, and Italy) and France. In this context we show how the importance of state, private, and non-profit actors is changing in the investigated policy fields: child care, family benefits and active labour market policy. The study is based on a comprehensive interview survey with more than 40 social policy experts. Its aim is to portray trends in European welfare production based on the tool of social investment. The paper further illustrates the various trends in the cooperation of state, private sector and civil society in the implementation of theses

policies.