WSARA Impacts on Early Acquisition

Similar documents
DoDI and WSARA* Impacts on Early Systems Engineering

Michael Gaydar Deputy Director Air Platforms, Systems Engineering

Synopsis and Impact of DoDI

Panel: Systems Engineering Considerations in Practicing Test & Evaluation A Perspective from DoD

Test & Evaluation Strategy for Technology Development Phase

A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs

Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Business Case Considerations An Enabler of Risk Reduction

DoD Modeling and Simulation Support to Acquisition

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

An Element of Digital Engineering Practice in Systems Acquisition

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

Closing the Knowledge-Deficit in the Defense Acquisition System: A Case Study

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

Technology Transition Assessment in an Acquisition Risk Management Context

Digital Engineering (DE) and Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE)

Critical Role of Software Engineering in Development Planning and Sustainment

Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook

Digital Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS)

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) Deskbook

An Assessment of Acquisition Outcomes and Potential Impact of Legislative and Policy Changes

Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs) from a Cost Estimating Perspective

AAC/XR: Shaping Tomorrow

Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook Version 2016

TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: INCREASING THE VALUE OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT (TRA)

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Update: Overview Briefing

USAF Digital Thread Initiative Overview

2 August 2017 Prof Jeff Craver So you are Conducting a Technology Readiness Assessment? What to Know

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS (JCTD) 11 JULY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NAVSTAR Global Positioning System User Equipment Space

The New DoD Systems Acquisition Process

Challenges and Innovations in Digital Systems Engineering

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

A Review Of Technical Performance and Technology Maturity Approaches for Improved Developmental Test and Evaluation Assessment

Systems Engineering for Military Ground Vehicle Systems

Transitioning Technology to Naval Ships. Dr. Norbert Doerry Technical Director, SEA 05 Technology Group SEA05TD

An Industry Response to the Acquisition Changes

Air Force Institute of Technology. A Quantitative Analysis of the Benefits of Prototyping Fixed-Wing Aircraft

Models, Simulations, and Digital Engineering in Systems Engineering Restructure (Defense Acquisition University CLE011)

Strategic Guidance. Quest for agility, innovation, and affordability. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

TECHNICAL REPORT NO. TR

The Role of CREATE TM -AV in Realization of the Digital Thread

DRAFT. February 2007 DRAFT. Prepared by the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel Manufacturing Readiness Level Working Group

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN DOD ACQUISITION

Training Briefing for the Conduct of Technology Readiness Assessments

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

TRLs and MRLs: Supporting NextFlex PC 2.0

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

Acquisition Strategies. Tim Harp DASD(C3ISR & IT ACQUISITION)

Continuous Competition as an Approach to Maximize Performance

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

Are Rapid Fielding and Good Systems Engineering Mutually Exclusive?

Update on R&M Engineering Activities: Rebuilding Military Readiness

Click to edit Master title style. Joint Service Small Arms Technology Plan

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

Dedicated Technology Transition Programs Accelerate Technology Adoption. Brad Pantuck

RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Technology Program Management Model (TPMM) Overview

Manufacturing Readiness Assessments of Technology Development Projects

Administrative Change to AFRLI , Science and Technology (S&T) Systems Engineering (SE) and Technical Management

Advancing the Use of the Digital System Model Taxonomy

USAF T&E Community Views on T&E/SE Interactions

Space and Missile Systems Center

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

Digital Engineering. Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments OUSD(R&E)/Systems Engineering

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta

Defense Innovation Day Unmanned Systems

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Gerald G. Boyd, Tom D. Anderson, David W. Geiser

Image designed by Diane Fleischer

James Bilbro 1, Cornelius Dennehy 2, Prasun Desai 3, Corinne Kramer 4, William Nolte 5, Richard Widman 6, Richard Weinstein 7

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

Best Practices for Technology Transition. Technology Maturity Conference September 12, 2007

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (User Equipment) (SPACE) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

Air Force Research Laboratory

A Case Study to Examine Technical Data Relationships to the System Model Concept

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

Engineered Resilient Systems NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 29, 2014

Digital Engineering. Phoenix Integration Conference Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments.

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) requires the intelligence community. Threat Support Improvement. for DoD Acquisition Programs

SERC Technical Overview: First-Year Results and Future Directions. Barry Boehm, USC Rich Turner, Stevens. 15 October 2009

Gaining Control and Predictability of Software-Intensive Systems Development and Sustainmen

Fifteenth Annual INCOSE Region II Mini-Conference. 30 October 2010 San Diego

Final Report of the Subcommittee on the Identification of Modeling and Simulation Capabilities by Acquisition Life Cycle Phase (IMSCALCP)

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

The Drive for Innovation in Systems Engineering

Technology transition requires collaboration, commitment

Other Transaction Authority (OTA)

Development of a Manufacturability Assessment Methodology and Metric

Stakeholder and process alignment in Navy installation technology transitions

Unclassified: Distribution A. Approved for public release

Management of Toxic Materials in DoD: The Emerging Contaminants Program

An Architecture-Centric Approach for Acquiring Software-Reliant Systems

Department of Energy Technology Readiness Assessments Process Guide and Training Plan

Rapid Fielding A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Transcription:

WSARA Impacts on Early Acquisition Sharon Vannucci Systems Engineering Directorate Office of the Director, Defense Research and Engineering OUSD(AT&L) Enterprise Information Policy and DAMIR AV SOA Training Conference October 22, 2009 10/22/09 Page-1

A Little Acquisition Lifecycle History the Phantom Phases DoDI 5000.2, the Defense Acquisition Management System May 12, 2003 December 8, 2008 A B (Program Initiation) C Concept Concept Refinement System and Demonstration Production and Deployment Operations and Support Design Readiness Full-Rate Production In the 5+ years, 2003-2008:* Only 1 non-ship pre-mdap has gone through a MS A 20 MDAPs have gone through a MS B 14 MDAPs had had Nunn-McCurdy breaches Breaches COULD be indicative of insufficient technical knowledge to establish Milestone B cost and schedule baselines. *Data from Program Support s 10/22/09 Page-2 2

DoD 5000.02 and PL 111-23 the Changed Acquisition Landscape New 2366a & 2366b Certifications* MS A MS B LCSP MS C CBA ICD MDD JCIDS Process Solution Analysis CDD Engineering and Manufacturing CDR CPD Production and Deployment O&S Full Rate Production (MDD) Competitive Prototypes, Report to the MDA, and Post-- System-level CDR with an initial product baseline and a Post-CDR Report to the MDA Post-CDR by the MDA between EMD subphases Renewed emphasis on manufacturing across the lifecycle 10/22/09 Page-3 3

Concept Solution Analysis Acquisition Lifecycle Comparisons Defense Acquisition Management System, May 12, 2003 (DoDI 5000.2) Concept Refinement A B (Program Initiation) C Defense Acquisition Management System, December 8, 2008 (new DoDI 5000.02) A B (Program Initiation) C Or Engineering and Manufacturing System and Demonstration Production and Deployment Operations and Support CDR after B w/ Post- Design Readiness Post-CDR A B (Program Initiation) C Full-Rate Production Production and Deployment FRP Defense Acquisition Management System, May 22, 2009 (WSARA) Operations and Support Solution Analysis Competitive Prototyping Post- Engineering and Manufacturing CDR Post-CDR Production and Deployment FRP Operations and Support

WSARA Impact on Early Acquisition New legislation, Public Law 111-23 (WSARA) recognizes the importance of SE to weapon systems acquisition Heavy focus on starting MDAPs right: and tracking of measurable performance criteria as part of SEPs and TESs / TEMPs Requiring completion of competitive prototypes for all Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs) Requiring completion and MDA assessment of a system-level Preliminary Design () before MS B Codifying a role for SE in development planning, integration risk (delegated by the DDR&E), lifecycle management, and sustainability Yearly OSD assessment to Congress of Component capabilities for SE, development planning, and DT&E 10/22/09 Page-5 5

New Emphasis on Planning and Early SE A B C CBA ICD MDD Solution Analysis CDD Engineering and Manufacturing CDR CPD Production and Deployment FRP DR O&S Planning DP DT&E SE LCS DP: Planning DT&E: al Test and Evaluation LCS: Life Cycle Sustainment SE: System Engineering CBA: Capabilities Based CDD: Capability Document CPD: Capability Production Document ICD: Initial Capabilities Document MDD: 10/22/09 Page-6 6

Planning and Early SE Critical Activities A B CBA ICD MDD Solution Analysis CDD SE Input to MDD CONOPS Awareness of Strategic Context Engagement with S&T Engagement with JCIDS Guidance Prototyping & Risk Reduction Prototyping ( and Design) CTE TRL Maturation Trade Studies SE Support for Risk Reduction Oversight of Competitive Designs Risk Engagement in AoA Engineering Analysis Plan Analysis Activity Report Consideration of SOS/Interdependency, Interoperability Context SEP for Milestone A Input to TDS (CTE, CPI), TES, CCE Input to Acquisition/ Planning, CARD, Budget & Other Evidence of Strong SE Activity SE in Contract Requirements SE into the Report to MDA, Acquisition Strategy, TEMP, CARD, and ICE and Report and Technical s up to and including Systems Engineering Plan Strong Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) SE in TD Contract Requirements System Requirements Definition Tech s (ASR, Early SE Requirements) Inputs to Requirements RAM and Sustainability Requirements Traceability Matrices Translation of Requirements to Contract *Reference DAG Sections 4.3.1 and 4.3..2 Capability Document (CDD) 10/22/09 Page-7 7

New Challenges for Program Managers Need for Program Office formation and PM skill-sets after MDD and prior to MS A Increased importance of the Strategy (TDS) (as a surrogate Acquisition Strategy) at MS A Schedule and funding shifts left from EMD to TD Earlier engagement with industry and different contracting strategies for technology maturation, competitive prototyping, data rights, before MS B, etc. Explicit need for earlier, formal SE process application (e.g., data, configuration, and risk management) New MS A cost and schedule baselines with breach penalties and MDA certifications for MDAPs Additional MS B MDA MDAP certifications including formal post- assessment that the program demonstrates a high likelihood of accomplishing its intended mission 10/22/09 Page-8 8

The Milestone A Planning Challenge Documents / activities / data requiring technical input from the Program Office before Milestone A: Analysis of Alternatives Strategy Critical Program Information Maturation plans Competitive Prototyping plans Net-Centric Data Strategy Market Research Data Management Strategy Component Cost Estimate Systems Engineering Plan Test and Evaluation Strategy The PM s Dilemma: Where to find the data!? 10/22/09 Page-9 9

Why is this hard? Program offices (both government and contractor) have very little experience with pre-ms B acquisition activities, particularly competitive prototyping and before MS B The DAG guidance is voluminous online resource with over 750 printed pages with relevant, phaserelated guidance sprinkled throughout Program offices have limited understanding about these interdependencies within the DAG guidance New implementing policy and DAG guidance in response to PL 111-23 will not be available immediately 10/22/09 Page-10 10

Why WSARA: Driving Risk out of MS B s... Agreement to pursue a materiel solution Uncertainty MDD Preferred System Analysis AoA MS A Selection of a preferred solution Preferred System Concept Engineering Support Maturation and Prototyping Business s System Level Specs Preliminary Design P--A MS B Program Initiation CDR Completed Design Solution Analysis Knowledge-based Making... making acquisition decisions when you have solid evidence and acceptable risk 10/22/09 Page-11 11