OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal. Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm PAGE 1

Similar documents
Baseline Proposal for EPoC PHY Layer

Baseline Proposal for EPoC PHY Layer IEEE 802.3bn EPoC September 2012 AVI KLIGER, BROADCOM LEO MONTREUIL, BROADCOM ED BOYD, BROADCOM

Outline / Wireless Networks and Applications Lecture 7: Physical Layer OFDM. Frequency-Selective Radio Channel. How Do We Increase Rates?

PROPOSAL FOR PHY SIGNALING PRESENTED BY AVI KLIGER, BROADCOM

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

Page 1. Overview : Wireless Networks Lecture 9: OFDM, WiMAX, LTE

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX

OFDM system: Discrete model Spectral efficiency Characteristics. OFDM based multiple access schemes. OFDM sensitivity to synchronization errors

Homeworx Lessons? What can we learn from the first deployment of OFDMA on HFC? Hal Roberts, Calix

Part 3. Multiple Access Methods. p. 1 ELEC6040 Mobile Radio Communications, Dept. of E.E.E., HKU

Fading & OFDM Implementation Details EECS 562

Lecture 13. Introduction to OFDM

EC 551 Telecommunication System Engineering. Mohamed Khedr

Practical issue: Group definition. TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Components of a digital communication system

PHY High Level Block Diagrams and First Pass Look at PHY Delays. Avi Kliger, Mark Laubach Broadcom

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing & Measurement of its Performance

IEEE P802.3bn Tutorial E P o C

Mobile & Wireless Networking. Lecture 2: Wireless Transmission (2/2)

CHAPTER 4. DESIGN OF ADAPTIVE MODULATION SYSTEM BY USING 1/3 RATE TURBO CODER (SNR Vs BER)

PHY Link Channel for EPoC TDD mode. Nicola Varanese, Qualcomm

Underwater communication implementation with OFDM

Multi-carrier Modulation and OFDM

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer

Lecture 3: Wireless Physical Layer: Modulation Techniques. Mythili Vutukuru CS 653 Spring 2014 Jan 13, Monday

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)

Basic idea: divide spectrum into several 528 MHz bands.

EPON over Coax. Channel Bonding Sub-layer

Interference management Within 3GPP LTE advanced

OFDMA Networks. By Mohamad Awad

Multi-Carrier Systems

Key words: OFDM, FDM, BPSK, QPSK.

Performance Evaluation of STBC-OFDM System for Wireless Communication

ATSC 3.0 Physical Layer Overview

SYMBOL SIZE CONSIDERATIONS FOR EPOC BASED OFDM PHY. Avi Kliger, Leo Montreuil, Tom Kolze Broadcom

ICI Mitigation for Mobile OFDM with Application to DVB-H

EPoC Downstream Pilot Proposal. Christian Pietsch, Qualcomm Avi Kliger, Broadcom

Orthogonal Frequency Domain Multiplexing

Editor: this header only appears here to set number 100 and is not to be included.

SC - Single carrier systems One carrier carries data stream

Updates to 802.3bn EPoC Upstream Framing Proposal. Avi Kliger, Leo Montreuil Broadcom

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM)

Simulative Investigations for Robust Frequency Estimation Technique in OFDM System

Topics on Channel Architecture

UNIFIED DIGITAL AUDIO AND DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING SYSTEM USING ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (OFDM) SYSTEM

EPoC Upstream Modulation Profiles Eugene Dai, PhD, Cox Communications Hal Roberts, Calix Networks

S.D.M COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

EPON over Coax. RF Spectrum Ad Hoc Status Report. Steve Shellhammer (Qualcomm)

EPoC Downstream Baseline Proposal (PLC material removed for transfer to PLC baseline)

With a lot of material from Rich Nicholls, CTL/RCL and Kurt Sundstrom, of unknown whereabouts

OFDM Systems For Different Modulation Technique

3G long-term evolution

Advanced 3G & 4G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K. Jagannatham Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Performance Evaluation of OFDM System with Rayleigh, Rician and AWGN Channels

Fundamentals of OFDM Communication Technology

Study of Turbo Coded OFDM over Fading Channel

ENHANCING BER PERFORMANCE FOR OFDM

OFDM AS AN ACCESS TECHNIQUE FOR NEXT GENERATION NETWORK

LDPC FEC PROPOSAL FOR EPOC. Richard S. Prodan Broadcom Corporation

SPARSE CHANNEL ESTIMATION BY PILOT ALLOCATION IN MIMO-OFDM SYSTEMS

Resource Blocks for EPoC Considerations. Avi Kliger, BZ Shen, Leo Montreuil Broadcom

Optimal Number of Pilots for OFDM Systems

3G/4G Mobile Communications Systems. Dr. Stefan Brück Qualcomm Corporate R&D Center Germany

Wireless Medium Access Control and CDMA-based Communication Lesson 16 Orthogonal Frequency Division Medium Access (OFDM)

Performance Evaluation of Wireless Communication System Employing DWT-OFDM using Simulink Model

Error! No text of specified style in document. Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1 - CNU transmitter output signal characteristics

2.

Comparative Study of OFDM & MC-CDMA in WiMAX System

Wireless Physical Layer Concepts: Part III

Experimenting with Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing OFDM Modulation

Performance Analysis of OFDM System with QPSK for Wireless Communication

Multiple Downstream Profile Implications. Ed Boyd, Broadcom

Algorithm to Improve the Performance of OFDM based WLAN Systems

4x4 Time-Domain MIMO encoder with OFDM Scheme in WIMAX Context

Channel Model Ad Hoc. Report. Presented by Duane Remein (Huawei)

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document.

Are You Ready for DOCSIS 3.1. Presenter: Pete Zarrelli VeEX Field Applications Engineer

Feature (Claims) Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4. Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4

Fine-grained Channel Access in Wireless LAN. Cristian Petrescu Arvind Jadoo UCL Computer Science 20 th March 2012

Performance Analysis of LTE System in term of SC-FDMA & OFDMA Monika Sehrawat 1, Priyanka Sharma 2 1 M.Tech Scholar, SPGOI Rohtak

OFDMA and MIMO Notes

BER Analysis for MC-CDMA

Chapter 5 OFDM. Office Hours: BKD Tuesday 14:00-16:00 Thursday 9:30-11:30

An OFDM Transmitter and Receiver using NI USRP with LabVIEW

Adoption of this document as basis for broadband wireless access PHY

CSC344 Wireless and Mobile Computing. Department of Computer Science COMSATS Institute of Information Technology

Implementation and Comparative analysis of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) Signaling Rashmi Choudhary

Chapter 2 Overview - 1 -

ISSN: Page 320

Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Algorithm in the Presence of I/Q Imbalance in OFDM Systems

SHIV SHAKTI International Journal of in Multidisciplinary and Academic Research (SSIJMAR) Vol. 3, No. 4, August-September (ISSN )

Decrease Interference Using Adaptive Modulation and Coding

Details on Upstream Pilots and Resource Block Configuration for EPoC

FREQUENCY RESPONSE BASED RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN OFDM SYSTEMS FOR DOWNLINK

Filter Bank Multi-Carrier (FBMC) for Future Wireless Systems

Cognitive Radio Transmission Based on Chip-level Space Time Block Coded MC-DS-CDMA over Fast-Fading Channel

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING : SYSTEMS EECS 555 DIGITAL COMMUNICATION THEORY

DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND OPTIMISATION OF 4X4 MIMO-OFDM TRANSMITTER FOR

Planning of LTE Radio Networks in WinProp

3GPP Long Term Evolution LTE

IEEE ax / OFDMA

Transcription:

OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm PAGE 1

Supported by Jorge Salinger (Comcast) Rick Li (Cortina) Lup Ng (Cortina) PAGE 2

Outline OFDM: motivation and background OFDM key strengths How does OFDM work OFDM for EPoC PHY - numerology Cyclic Prefix selection Carrier spacing and symbol duration Robustness against impairments OFDMA OFDMA versus TDMA Flavors of OFDMA: Downstream and Upstream Summary PAGE 3

OFDM Motivation OFDM is widely deployed by latest communication systems, e.g.: DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-C2 LTE Wireless LAN (IEEE 802.11): a, g, n, ac Key advantages: Efficient ways to cope with channel impairments, like for example: Time dispersive channels Narrowband interference Frequency selective channel Resilience to burst noise No inter OFDM symbol interference due to cyclic prefix Reasonable computational complexity Less sensitive to time synchronization than a single carrier scheme Coexistence with legacy services while maintaining high spectral efficiency Fine frequency granularity due to subcarriers Easily adapted to available bandwidth PAGE 4

OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing OFDM is a special scheme for multi-carrier transmission for which the available spectrum is divided into narrowband orthogonal sub-channels each with flat spectral characteristics and each used for transmission of a subcarrier A high data rate stream is converted into M parallel low data rate streams, each modulating one subcarrier in the frequency domain A high spectral efficiency is achieved while allowing for a low-complex implementation since subcarrier separation is simple due their orthogonality H(f) OFDM sub-channels OFDM sub-carriers frequency PAGE 5

OFDM How It Works OFDM relies on frequency domain processing: QAM modulated symbols are placed on each subcarrier in the frequency domain QAM symbols are received on each subcarrier in the frequency domain A frequency selective channel is converted into frequency flat sub-channels: Different sub-channels may observe different channel conditions Modulation order may be adjusted according to SNR on sub-channels The OFDM symbol duration is much longer than the channel delay spread: A requirement for frequency flat sub-channels Inter OFDM symbol interference is eliminated at marginal costs The subcarriers are orthogonal: No interference between subcarriers, i.e. the QAM symbols on the subcarriers may be detected independently OFDM sub-carriers frequency PAGE 6

OFDM Block Diagram and Block Processing OFDM Transmitter OFDM Receiver add CP CP QAM symbols serial to parallel IFFT parallel to serial channel serial to parallel FFT parallel to serial QAM symbols block processing block processing Block processing at the transmitter: QAM symbols for all subcarriers are gathered prior to IFFT IFFT is carried out jointly for all QAM symbols dedicated to an OFDM symbol Block processing at the receiver: An entire OFDM symbol has to be received before processing can start All QAM symbols become available at the same time after the FFT MAC layer does not need to be aware of OFDM PHY layer block processing PAGE 7

OFDM for EPoC PHY Possible Numerology PHY Parameter Value Comments Bandwidth 120 MHz Target Bandwidth Subcarrier Spacing (f Δ ) 7.5 khz Enable low-cost implementation while incurring low CP overhead OFDM symbol duration = 1/subcarrier spacing Cyclic Prefix Duration (T CP ) QAM Modulation Orders Supported ~1 µs or ~4 µs Sufficient to cover cable plant microreflections (reflections > -40dB) 16-QAM 64-QAM 256-QAM 1024-QAM 4096-QAM Possible to support multiple CP durations for different deployments Support a range of modulation orders from 16-QAM up to 4096 QAM Selection of specific QAM-order depends on SNR achievable in the plant Different QAM-order may be used on downstream and upstream Different QAM-order could be possible to/from different CNUs PAGE 8

OFDM Cyclic Prefix (CP) The CP plays an integral role in the construction of the OFDM signal: It acts as a guard period and thus eliminates inter OFDM symbol interference It guarantees orthogonality between subcarriers of the OFDM symbol for time dispersive channels The length of the CP must be at least as long as the channel delay spread It is constructed by adding a copy of the last time domain samples of the OFDM symbol to the beginning of the OFDM symbol, see diagram below An overhead incurs due to the CP: T CP T CP +T S Longer OFDM symbols cause less overhead due to the CP cyclic prefix generation T CP T S T CP T S T CP T S time PAGE 9

OFDM Symbol Duration Subcarrier Spacing (I) Full bandwidth: 120 MHz cyclic prefix OFDM symbol Subcarrier 1 Subcarrier 2 Subcarrier 15999 Subcarrier 16000 133.33 μs Subcarrier spacing: 7.5 khz 1 2 4000 1 2 4000 137.5 μs 150 μs A cyclic prefix OFDM symbol cyclic prefix OFDM symbol cyclic prefix OFDM symbol cyclic prefix OFDM symbol 33.33 μs B 1 2 4000 1 2 4000 Relationship: f = 1/T s - OFDM symbol duration: T s - Subcarrier spacing: f (or sub-channel width) Example: Two configurations: - A: T s = 133.33 μs - B: T s = 33.33 μs - CP duration: T CP = 4.16 μs Configuration B requires 4 OFDM symbols to transmit the same amount of data as configuration A Example CP overhead: - A: 4.16μs = 3% 137.5μs - B: 4.16μs = 12.5% 33.33μs - B has (150 137.5)μs = 9% more 137.5μs CP overhead than A PAGE 10 Subcarrier spacing: 30 khz

Overhead due to Cyclic Prefix Overhead due to cyclic prefix: T CP T CP +T S The CP duration must be larger than the maximum channel delay spread (and any additional delay spread added due to filtering and inaccurate synchronization), but only a little larger than this to minimize overhead Hence, given a certain cable plant that is known to cause a certain maximal delay spread, the optimal CP length is predefined. The parameter of choice is the OFDM symbol duration, which then influences CP overhead. To minimize overhead it is essential that T CP T S PAGE 11

OFDM Symbol Duration Pros/Cons Feature Pros Cons Long OFDM symbols Small subcarrier spacing - More robust against burst noise (no additional interleaving needed) - Less CP overhead - Finer granularity for counteracting narrowband interference (e.g. notching of single subcarriers) - May impact the end-to-end delay for cases where no interleaver would be required - Larger FFT size needed for a given spectrum - Higher frequency accuracy required Short OFDM symbols Large subcarrier spacing - Could achieve a smaller endto-end delay for cases where no interleaver is required - Reduced FFT size sufficient - Reduced frequency accuracy - Less robust against burst noise, requires interleaver - High CP overhead, impacting overall spectral efficiency - Difficult or inefficient counteracting of narrow-band interference PAGE 12

Narrowband Interference and Burst Noise Subcarrier 1 Subcarrier 2 1 frequency Narrowband Interference: Affects a only few subcarriers Full bandwidth: 120 MHz 2 Modulation order can be reduced on these subcarriers or affected subcarriers can be easily blanked A smaller subcarrier spacing provides higher granularity Burst noise: Typical burst noise duration: 10 μs noise level on subcarriers Subcarrier 15999 Subcarrier 16000 133.33 μs 7.5 khz Noise level without burst noise Burst noise events: 4000 33.33 μs 30 khz time Narrowband interference: Burst noise affects all subcarriers Burst noise increases noise level on the subcarriers The longer the OFDM symbol duration the lower the increase of noise level Two alternatives for coping with burst noise: - long OFDM symbols - interleaving (see next slide) PAGE 13

OFDM Symbols Duration and Interleaving Subcarrier 1 Subcarrier 2 1 1 1 1 Each shaded area corresponds to a separate interleaving block or FEC block Full bandwidth: 120 MHz 2 2 2 2 For a certain level of resilience against burst noise, the data has to be spread across a certain period of time (e.g. 133 μs) Interleaving across multiple OFDM symbols is required for short OFDM symbols (B) Subcarrier 15999 Subcarrier 16000 7.5 khz 4000 4000 4000 4000 30 khz With long OFDM symbols no inter OFDM symbol interleaving is needed (A) 133.33 μs 33.33 μs 137.5 μs 150 μs The delay due to processing is similar for both alternatives A B PAGE 14

OFDM for EPoC PHY Robustness Distortion Linear Distortion (Micro-reflections) Time-variant Channels Impulse Noise Narrowband Interference Robustness OFDM cyclic prefix (CP) addresses all linear distortions up to the length of the CP past the CP micro-reflection power shall be low To provide robustness against time-variant channels, channel coding is employed together with OFDM A Forward Error Correction (FEC) scheme is included for that Different coding rate could be used to better adjust to frequency channel conditions while maximizing the system capacity Burst noise lowers the SNR of affected OFDM symbol(s), but if the noise burst is significantly shorter than the OFDM symbol period, the degradation is small and no further interleaver is needed Additionally FEC coding provides degradation margin Narrowband interference may cause low SNR on some subcarriers: This can be addressed by adaptive modulation which does not use the same QAM-order on each subcarrier Alternatively, receiver may ignore information on certain low SNR subcarriers no information sent on those sub-carriers PAGE 15

Pilot Symbols Example At the receiver side, it is necessary for demodulation to estimate the channel For that, symbols known in advance to the receiver (called pilots) should be included into the data stream Certain subcarriers are used by pilots and reduce the spectral efficiency The number of required pilots depends on the frequency and time variability of the channel impulse response Pilots should be staggered in time and frequency Pilot structure is a design criterion Subcarrier idx 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 -8-9 -10-11 -12-13 -14-15 -16-17 -18-19 -20-21 -22 Frequency Time DC subcarrier Symbol idx 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 0 1 2 3 4 Subframe idx 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 Frame idx Frame 0 Frame 1 PAGE 16

OFDM for EPoC PHY DVB-C2 LTE EPoC example DVB-C2 (Europe) Bandwidth span (digital bandwidth) 120 MHz 8 MHz 20 MHz Symbol duration 133.33 μs 448.03μs 66.67μs Subcarrier spacing 7.50 khz 2.232kHz 15kHz LTE CP duration (typically used) 4.17 μs 7.00μs 4.76μs CP overhead 3.03% 1.54% 6.66% FFT size 16384 4096 2048 Highest modulation order 4096 QAM 4096 QAM 64 QAM Highest code rate 0.9 0.9 0.9 Maximum payload per OFDM symbol 24576 bytes 67205 bytes 9000 bytes PAGE 17

Baseline Proposal #1 Adopt OFDM as the basis for the EPoC PHY Moved by: Seconded by: Technical motion (>=75%) Yes / No / Abstain PAGE 18

How much user data does one OFDM symbol carry? If the users always get an entire OFDM symbol, only a very small amount if data per symbol would limit overhead (~70 bytes T S = 0.5 μs, which is infeasible) Assumptions: - 120 MHz bandwidth - up to 4096 QAM - include pilot/guard tones Typical amount of user data per OFDM symbol ~3000-25000 bytes But the smallest grant size should be in the range of 64 bytes to minimize overhead A better resource granularity is needed OFDMA is the answer PAGE 19

OFDMA Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access OFDMA is an access technique for OFDM to effectively achieve multiuser communication systems for which subcarriers are distributed to different users at a given point of time While with TDMA all the subcarriers are assigned to the same user at a given time, with OFDMA groups of subcarriers are allocated to different users in the same symbol see below Typically a contiguous group of sub-carrier is allocated to one user The same principle can apply for both downstream and upstream user 1 user 2 user 3 user 4 Available Spectrum. frequency PAGE 20

OFDMA vs. TDMA Achieving Better Granularity OFDM with TDMA A user gets the entire OFDM symbol If the user has less data to transmit the remaining resources in the OFDM symbol are wasted large overhead frequency TDMA OFDM symbol duration time OFDM with OFDMA Multiple users share a single OFDM symbol Each user can get an amount of resources tailored to the real need, thus minimizing overheads frequency OFDMA OFDM symbol duration time Note: Each color represents a different user PAGE 21

OFDMA and MCS Further Granularity Refinement Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) describes the combination of modulation order (16-QAM, 64-QAM, etc.) and coding rate which is use to encore and map information bits into OFDM subcarriers in OFDMA The modulation order determines how many bits can be carried by an OFDM tone the bits include both information bits and parity bits Example: 4096 QAM translates in 12 bits/symbol or 12 bits/sub-carrier The coding rate determines how many parity bits are added to a given set of information bits and it is typically expressed as ratio between information bits and overall number of bits after encoding Example: coding rate 9/10 means 9 information bits encoded in 10 bits The selection of the appropriate MCS is related to the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) which is perceived over a certain link and frequency spectrum The higher the SNR, the higher can be the modulation order and the coding rate, as less protection is needed to carry the same information In the next slide an example of mapping between SNR and MCS is given PAGE 22

BER Curves for MCS Selection Example PAGE 23

OFDMA in Downstream Simultaneous Reception Multiple users multiplexed in the same OFDM symbol, whereby all CNUs can decode the entire information Same Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) used for all users Simpler but less efficient in terms of system performance Multiple users multiplexed in the same OFDM symbol, whereby it is only guaranteed that each CNU can decode data dedicated to it User dependent Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) Slightly more complex but better system performance Each FEC block can carry data for either a single CNU or for multiple CNUs that support the same MCS PAGE 24

OFDMA in Upstream - Simultaneous Transmissions OFDMA supports multiple CNUs transmitting at the same time on different subsets of subcarriers, in a flexible manner This will keep latency small and under control The CLT receives an OFDM symbol that is constructed in a distributed fashion by different CNUs Each CNU is allocated a portion of the spectrum with no overlap RTT mechanisms as in EPON ensure time synchronization at CLT The maximum number of simultaneously transmitting CNUs depends on the number of LDPC code blocks within a given OFDM symbol Since the capacity of each OFDM symbol is large many CNUs will be able to transmit simultaneously In case a single CNU has sufficient data to effectively fill an entire OFDM symbol, it is possible for a single CNU to transmit at a time PAGE 25

OFDMA Upstream Example CNU freq time freq Non-overlapping allocation and RTT compensation for correct symbol at CLT receiver time CLT CNU freq CNU freq time PAGE 26 time

Baseline Proposal #2 In the upstream each OFDM symbol may contain data from multiple CNUs The precise design solution and related details are for further study In the downstream each OFDM symbol may contain data to multiple CNUs The precise design solution and related details are for further study Moved by: Seconded by: Technical motion (>=75%) Yes / No / Abstain PAGE 27

Baseline Proposal #3 The PHY shall support multiple modulation and coding schemes (MCS) to enable adaptation to different channel conditions. Each MCS is defined by a particular modulation order and a coding rate. Moved by: Seconded by: Technical motion (>=75%) Yes / No / Abstain PAGE 28

Summary OFDM Features Wideband Flexibility Multicarrier Modulation OFDMA Key Benefits High spectral usage since guard bands are not needed between bonded channels high spectral efficiency Easily adaptable to different spectrum configurations, based on the availability of RF bandwidth Easily extendable to newly available spectrum Each subcarrier passes through a flat channel so there is no need for equalization at the receiver low complexity No inter subcarrier and no inter OFDM symbol interference High-order QAM each subcarrier modulated with a high-order QAM leading to very high spectral efficiency Adaptive modulation according to subcarrier quality Severely impaired subcarriers can be blanked avoiding the degradation of the transmission on other subcarriers Enables utilization of large bandwidths Efficient multiuser access technique Reduces latency of transmission PAGE 29

Thank you PAGE 30