Margunn Aanestad Information Systems as a research field IN5210 Information Systems 5.9.2017
Agenda for today An overview over Information Systems as a research field Historical emergence Key works and streams Exercise to map the field The Scandinavian tradition and IS at IFI 2
Sørensen, C. «The Curse of the Smart Machine» SJIS 28(2) 3 http://iris.cs.aau.dk/tl_files/volumes/volume%2028/3%2028-2-sorensen(irisweb).pdf
Technical, socio-technical, and social research Computer Science Software Engineering «INFORMATICS» Organisation and Management studies Sociology Science and Technology studies Bo Dahlbom: «The New Informatics», SJIS 8(2) http://iris.cs.aau.dk/tl_files/volumes/volume08/no2/02_dahlbom_p29-48.pdf 4
Scale (unit of analysis) Global National ICT4D Sector Organisation Information Systems Group CSCW Person HCI Timeline Idea and design Development Implementation Ongoing usage and management Obsolesence 5
Organization and Management Studies Operations Research Systems Analysis Information Science INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Software Engineering Systems Development Participatory Design Object area: Information, people and technology Methodological pluralism positivist, interpretivist, critical, design science Various «academic homes»: business schools, social science departments etc.
IS as an academic field: history and location Internationally: built from Operations Research, Systems Analysis, etc. and from Organization Studies Initially: Management Information Systems Information Systems Methodological pluralism positivist, interpretivist, critical, design science Scandinavian IS: OR/SA, but also the socio-technical tradition + «trade union projects» participatory systems development. Work place ethnographies, design-oriented research (overlap with CSCW, PD, STS, etc )
IS as an academic field: orientation Information systems in organizations (real life, not experimental/lab) Temporal scope: Design and development, Implementation (adoption, assimilation, benefits realization) Ongoing management, strategy, governance, innovation etc. Empirical focus: Individual TAM models, «technological frames» Team/group sensemaking, learning, coordination Organization implementation studies (process, learning, politics,..) Sector/domain Institutional change Central aims: The fundamental knowledge interest that underlies information system (IS) research is this: how can an IS [ ] be effectively deployed in the human enterprise? (Grover and Lyytinen, 2015)
IS as an academic field: outlets Internationally: MISQ, ISR, JIT, JSIS, EJIS, JMIS, JAIS, ISJ Information and Organization, The Information Society, IT&P, EJISDC Organization Science, Organization Studies, Organization. Conferences: ICIS, ECIS (AMCIS; PACIS), HICSS EGOS, III, Association of Information Systems (AIS) Scandinavian IS: Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems IRIS/SCIS + SWEG Norway: NOKOBIT ( NOKIOS, NEON)
Historical context (post WWII technology development) Computers as «computing machines» Computerized information systems gather, present and analyse ifnormation for managers (MIS) Computerised Numerical Control (CNC) Automation of office work Personal Computers, client-server architectures Internet, mobile, IoT «Born digital» organizations 10
A few classic works/key persons in user-oriented, interpretive IS Enid Mumford Peter Checkland Rob Kling Shoshana Zuboff Geoff Walsham Claudio Ciborra 11
Enid Mumford Human factors, sociotechnical systems ETHICS (Effective Technical and Human Implementation of Computer-based Systems) 1924-2006 12
Peter Checkland: Soft Systems Methodology Peter Checkland: Systems thinking, Systems 1930 - practice (1981) Checkland and Scholes: Soft Systems Methodology, Action research (1990) Checkland & Holwell: Information, systems, and Information systems (1998) «Hard» vs. «soft» systems thinking Hard: structured approaches, systems engineering, assumes well defined problem, predominantly technical Soft: assumes messy/ill-defined problem, consider also humans, values, politics Core concepts: Rich Pictures, Root Definitions, CATWOE (clients, actors, transformations, Weltanschauung, owner, environment), model of transformation, measure of performance (the three E s: efficacy, efficiency, effectiveness) 13
From: https://systemspractitioner.com/tools-and-techniques/ 14
From: http://systems.open.ac.uk/materials/t552/pages/rich/richappendix.html 15
16
1944-2003 Rob Kling: Social Informatics Interested in processes of computerization in organizations a social life, Attention to interactions and webs of relationships Sociotechnical interaction networks Web models/web of computing Five «big ideas»: multiple points of view, social choices, the production lattice (and its corollary, the problematization of the user), socio-technical interaction networks, and institutional truth regimes http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/095938405105846 21 Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. (1982), The web of computing: computing technology as social organization, Advances in Computers, Vol. 21, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 1-85. https://www.indiana.edu/~rkcsi/wordpress/home/samplepage/rob-kling/ 17
Shoshana Zuboff Shoshana Zuboff (1988): «In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power Ethnographic studies from 8 contexts. Automated factories and offices Technology has a substantially transformative capacity. Core concepts: «Textualization», «automate and informate», «information panopticon» 1951 - See also: Burton-Jones, A. (2014) "What have we learned from the Smart Machine?." Information and Organization 24.2,71-105. 18
http://shoshanazuboff.com/ 19
Geoff Walsham: Interpretive research Important books: Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations (1993) process focus on studying organizational change (change content, social process, social context). Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context (2001) Articles: 1946- Walsham, Geoff. "Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method." European Journal of information systems 4.2 (1995): 74. Walsham, Geoff. "Doing interpretive research." European journal of information systems 15.3 (2006): 320-330. 20
Claudio Ciborra Technology-organization, change, infrastructures phenomenology Books: «From Control to Drift» - studies of information infrastructures in global companies ; Hoffmann-La Roche, Astra, IBM, SKF, Hydro, Statoil 2000 The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems: Challenging the wisdom of systems, 2002. «Risk, Complexity and ICT»: integration solution or problem? 2007 1951-2005 21
.. and now you Go to one of these sites: http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/ http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016/ Find an article you think look interesting What is the topic/focus? What do they try to find out? Who is the audience? Which research method was used? What do they claim they have found out/learnt? 22
Scandinavian IS research Articles; Bansler: three approaches Iivari and Lyytinen: broader perspective «The Collective Action» approach at IFI Kristen Nygaard s collaboration with trade unions (NJMF), others Today at IFI: Participatory Design, user-oriented IS, work/use ethnography, CSCW Studies of Information Infrastructures Globally distributed action research 23
The Trade Union projects Norway: The NJMF project 1971-1974 Kristen Nygaard and Olav T. Bergo Sweden: DEMOS 1975-1979 Demokratiske Styringssystemer (Pelle Ehn) Denmark: DUE 1977-1980 Demokrati, Udvikling og EDB (Morten Kyng) Conflict view, siding with labour against capital Harry Braverman: Labour and Monopoly Capital 1974 Automation and deskilling Technology = means of production Industrial democracy as goal Data shop stewards, legally recognized right to participation Inspiration for Participatory Design The Scandinavian Tradition
Skills projects UTOPIA 1981-1985 (Utbildning, Teknik och Produkt i Arbetskvalitetsperspektiv) Nordic Graphic Workers Union Sweden and Denmark (Pelle Ehn and Susanne Bødker) Shifting aims: From industrial democracy to fighting deskilling Professional competency, skills UTOPIA Craftwork metaphors Technology concept: Tool Oslo: FLORENCE 1983-1987 Nurses work (allergy/cardiology) Pilot systems and prototypes Mutual learning in collaborative design
Expansion of IS field Initial focus: how to design IS How to organize the design and development work? Implementation studies, organizational processes Users actions, end-user development Technological development, spread of technology, new user interfaces More systems in use over a longer time frame: Maintenance of systems over time (life cycle) Multiple systems integration, redesign Networked systems
FIRE project Functional Integration through Redesign 1992-1994 From design and development to use and maintenance Emphasised the need for redesign How to enroll users in redesign From single systems to multiple systems The user s perspective having to use multiple systems + multiple users for every system From standalone systems to interconnected systems Interorganisational networks (EDI) Internet since 1994
The Internet project 1994-2000 (?) IFI, UiO and Gothenburg University Braa, Sørensen and Dahlbom (2000): Planet Internet Understand the impact of the Internet, not just as technical connectivity, but its impact on information practices and organizations Many case studies: News agencies, public administration, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies Information Infrastructure theory, cultivation, bricolage, drift.
Spin off from this project Ciborra and Associates: From Control to Drift. The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (2000) From Control to Drift More targeted publication on information infrastructures SKF, Norsk Hydro, Statoil, IBM, Hoffman-La Roche II as unruly, emerging, drifting
- Hanseth and Ciborra (eds.) 2007: Risk, Complexity and ICT Risk, Complexity and ICT IFI/UiO and LSE researchers Telecom, global banking, oil/gas, maritime classification company, hospitals, pharmaceutical industry II as complex systems, unintended consequences
FIPP, RegCom, REACH, C3, FIGI