RAYTHEON 23 x 22 50GHZ PULSE SYSTEM

Similar documents
33 BY 16 NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

A LARGE COMBINATION HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL NEAR FIELD MEASUREMENT FACILITY FOR SATELLITE ANTENNA CHARACTERIZATION

ANECHOIC CHAMBER EVALUATION

Sub-millimeter Wave Planar Near-field Antenna Testing

A TURNKEY NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR PULSE MODE APPLICATIONS

A TECHNIQUE TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF FLEX CABLE PHASE INSTABILITY ON mm-wave PLANAR NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT ACCURACIES

APPLICATIONS OF PORTABLE NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS

Accurate Planar Near-Field Results Without Full Anechoic Chamber

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SELF-COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS

Upgraded Planar Near-Field Test Range For Large Space Flight Reflector Antennas Testing from L to Ku-Band

Accuracy Estimation of Microwave Holography from Planar Near-Field Measurements

MISSION TO MARS - IN SEARCH OF ANTENNA PATTERN CRATERS

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS AT UHF FREQUENCIES WITH COMPLETE UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

A COMPOSITE NEAR-FIELD SCANNING ANTENNA RANGE FOR MILLIMETER-WAVE BANDS

System configurations. Main features. I TScan SOLUTION FOR

A CYLINDRICAL NEAR-FIELD VS. SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA TEST COMPARISON

Estimating Measurement Uncertainties in Compact Range Antenna Measurements

ANECHOIC CHAMBER DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

METHODS TO ESTIMATE AND REDUCE LEAKAGE BIAS ERRORS IN PLANAR NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

Antenna Measurement Uncertainty Method for Measurements in Compact Antenna Test Ranges

High Accuracy Spherical Near-Field Measurements On a Stationary Antenna

PROBE CORRECTION EFFECTS ON PLANAR, CYLINDRICAL AND SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

HOW TO CHOOSE AN ANTENNA RANGE CONFIGURATION

GAIN COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS IN SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SCANNING

A DUAL-PORTED PROBE FOR PLANAR NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

IMPROVING AND EXTENDING THE MARS TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE SCATTERING ERRORS

Millimetre Spherical Wave Antenna Pattern Measurements at NPL. Philip Miller May 2009

DIGITAL BEAM-FORMING ANTENNA RANGE

Software. Equipment. Add-ons. Accessories. Services

REFLECTION SUPPRESSION IN LARGE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD RANGE

Characterization of a Photonics E-Field Sensor as a Near-Field Probe

PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR PULSED ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

Uncertainty Considerations In Spherical Near-field Antenna Measurements

Antenna Measurement using Vector Network Analyzer. Jong-hwan Keum Agilent Technologies

The CDT Ultra Wide-Band Anechoic Chamber. Félix Tercero, José Manuel Serna, Tim Finn, J.A.López Fernández INFORME TÉCNICO IT - OAN

Using Frequency Diversity to Improve Measurement Speed Roger Dygert MI Technologies, 1125 Satellite Blvd., Suite 100 Suwanee, GA 30024

Narrow Pulse Measurements on Vector Network Analyzers

Main features. System configurations. I Compact Range SOLUTION FOR

ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY AND CORRECTION METHODS FOR MILLIMETER- WAVE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

60 GHz antenna measurement setup using a VNA without external frequency conversion

System configurations. Main features I SG 64 SOLUTION FOR

Principles of Planar Near-Field Antenna Measurements. Stuart Gregson, John McCormick and Clive Parini. The Institution of Engineering and Technology

This paper examines Massive MIMO measurements. Massive MIMO is a technology using a very large number of antenna elements to support multi-user MIMO t

> StarLab. Multi-purpose Antenna Measurement Multi-protocol Antenna Development Linear Array Antenna Measurement OTA Testing

A BROADBAND POLARIZATION SELECTABLE FEED FOR COMPACT RANGE APPLICATIONS

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VARIOUS HEMISPHERICAL SCANNING TECHNIQUES

T- DualScan. StarLab

IMPLEMENTATION OF BACK PROJECTION ON A SPHERICAL NEAR- FIELD RANGE

A DUAL-RECEIVER METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS OF RADOME TRANSMISSION EFFICIENCY AND BEAM DEFLECTION

Keywords: cylindrical near-field acquisition, mechanical and electrical errors, uncertainty, directivity.

Near-Field Antenna Measurements using a Lithium Niobate Photonic Probe

HIGH ACCURACY CROSS-POLARIZATION MEASUREMENTS USING A SINGLE REFLECTOR COMPACT RANGE

Project: 3.8M Series 1385 Ku-Band Rx/Tx System. General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies

A HILBERT TRANSFORM BASED RECEIVER POST PROCESSOR

Agilent Antenna and RCS Measurement Configurations Using PNA Microwave Network Analyzers. White Paper

Fundamentals. Senior Project Manager / AEO Taiwan. Philip Chang

Antenna and RCS Measurement Configurations Using Agilent s New PNA Network Analyzers

The LACE Antenna Test Ranges

Implementation of a VHF Spherical Near-Field Measurement Facility at CNES

HScan. Horizontal Scanner

A LABORATORY COURSE ON ANTENNA MEASUREMENT

Millimeter Spherical µ-lab System from Orbit/FR

ICO S-BAND ANTENNAS TEST PROGRAM

Advanced Digital Receiver

A Method for Gain over Temperature Measurements Using Two Hot Noise Sources

Further Refining and Validation of RF Absorber Approximation Equations for Anechoic Chamber Predictions

Applications of Gaussian Optics. Gaussian Optics Capability

WIESON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS: A REVIEW OF CORRECTION TECHNIQUES

BROADBAND GAIN STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS MEASUREMENTS

Agilent 85301B/C Antenna Measurement Systems 45 MHz to 110 GHz Configuration Guide

A NEW WIDEBAND DUAL LINEAR FEED FOR PRIME FOCUS COMPACT RANGES

EHF Rotman Lens Fed Linear Array Multibeam Planar Near-Field Range Measurements CST 5 th NORTH AMERICAN USERS FORUM 4th FEBRUARY 2008 SANTA CLARA, CA

Antenna Measurement Theory

Introduction to Measurement Techniques

Exercise 1-3. Radar Antennas EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION OF FUNDAMENTALS. Antenna types

Structural Correction of a Spherical Near-Field Scanner for mm-wave Applications

4GHz / 6GHz Radiation Measurement System

Vehicle Level Antenna Pattern & ADAS Measurement

Advances in Antenna Measurement Instrumentation and Systems

G. Serra.

PRACTICAL GAIN MEASUREMENTS

The CReSIS Anechoic Chamber is located at: The University of Kansas. M2SEC building W 15 th St. Lawrence, KS

MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTH-OBSERVER-1 SATELLITE X-BAND PHASED ARRAY

Electronic Scanning Antennas Product Information

Gain And Arbitrary Beamwidth Measurement For Identical Test Antennas

Study of Polarimetric Calibration for Circularly Polarized Synthetic Aperture Radar

Practical Considerations for Radiated Immunities Measurement using ETS-Lindgren EMC Probes

The Importance of Polarization Purity Author: Lars J Foged, Scientific Director at MVG (Microwave Vision Group)

W-band vector network analyzer based on an audio lock-in amplifier * Abstract

Numerical Calibration of Standard Gain Horns and OEWG Probes

ESTIMATING THE UNCERTAINTIES DUE TO POSITION ERRORS IN SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

ELEC RADAR FRONT-END SUMMARY

Specification of Requirements. Request for tenders for antenna systems for Aalborg University. Side 1

INDOOR AUTOMATIC F-16 FIRE CONTROL ANTENNA AND RADOME TEST FACILITIES

Dinesh Micro Waves & Electronics

APMP KEY COMPARISON APMP.EM.RF-K3.F. Bilateral Comparison of horn antenna gain

Conventional measurement systems

Dr. John S. Seybold. November 9, IEEE Melbourne COM/SP AP/MTT Chapters

Antenna Training and Measuring System

Transcription:

RAYTHEON 23 x 22 50GHZ PULSE SYSTEM Terry Speicher Nearfield Systems, Incorporated 1330 E. 223 rd Street, Bldg. 524 Carson, CA 90745 www.nearfield.com Angelo Puzella and Joseph K. Mulcahey Raytheon Electronic Systems 528 Boston Post Road Sudbury, MA 01776 angelo_puzella@res.raytheon.com and Joseph_K_Mulcahey@res.raytheon.com Abstract Nearfield Systems, Inc. in Carson, California delivered a vertical 23 by 22 (7.0m x 6.7m) near-field test range to Raytheon Electronic Systems in Sudbury, Massachusetts. This planar and cylindrical measurement system is capable of characterizing antennas of various physical sizes in continuous wave or in pulse mode from 800MHz to 50GHz. The near-field measurements are computer controlled and capable of multiple frequency, multiple beam and multiple polarization in AUT transmit or receive modes. The precision robotic system uses a Data Acquisition Controller running NSI software to provide four-axes for probe positioning and three-axes for antenna positioning. The RF subsystem is based on the HP 8530A microwave receiver, HP 83630B RF source, HP 83621A LO source and HP 85309A LO/IF Distribution Unit. The test range was evaluated using the NIST 18-term error analysis on a 45GHz 54 diameter lefthand circular polarized reflector antenna. Keywords: Antenna measurements, Facility descriptions, Measurement errors, Near-field scanners, Planar near-field, Range evaluation. 1. Introduction Nearfield Systems, Inc. delivered a turnkey antenna measurement system to Raytheon Electronic Systems in Sudbury, MA. The system supports both planar and cylindrical nearfield antenna measurements and will be used to characterize a variety of antennas with apertures up to 6m over a frequency range of 0.8GHz to 50GHz. The system is housed in a new facility that was designed especially for the system. The anechoic chamber is lined with 18-inch pyramidal cone absorber on the walls, floor and ceiling. An azimuth/elevation/azimuth positioner stage is mounted on a linear slide that is recessed below floor level. The positioner is used to align the antenna for planar near-field scans and to rotate the AUT during cylindrical scanning. The motorized slide positioner allows the AUT to be translated in the Z axis dimension (normal to the scan plane). The near-field system allows a full 23 feet of horizontal (X-axis) travel and 22 feet of vertical (Y-axis) travel for planar near-field scanning and a full 360 by 22 feet for cylindrical near-field scanning. The dual measurement capability of the system permits accurate characterization of both narrow and fan beam antennas. 2. System Overview As shown in Figure 2.1, the XY scanner is located at the end of the anechoic chamber permitting full access to the AUT. The system provides seven axes of motion: X, Y, Z, probe polarization (NSI supplied four), AUT Z-stage, and azimuth/elevation positioner (Raytheon supplied three). The scanner base rails are constructed on dual granite beams for accuracy and thermal stability. The scanner also includes an optical measurement package for precise determination of linear distance and positioning error. Measured errors are used to correct the probe position while scanning. With laser feedback, the positioning error is <0.05mm RMS or less for both the X- and Y-axes. Using the

NSI structure monitor capability, planarity of the scan plane is correctable to within 0.05mm RMS. An overview of system capabilities is shown in Table 2.1. The NSI Data Acquisition Controller (DAC) is capable of cross-axis correction to improve overall scanner accuracy and planarity during the antenna measurement acquisition process. The patented laser system detects and corrects for small mechanical variations in the horizontal X rails that will cause the vertical tower to tilt in both the Z and X axis as it is moved along the X- axis. The correction system will dynamically compensate for tower deflection errors by adjusting the timing triggers to compensate for X axis tilt and adjusting a Z translation stage during scanner motion. This technique ensures data is spatially accurate thereby reducing or eliminating the need to apply post acquisition software error correction. Rotation and Z- translation stages for the probe are also part of the scanner. 3. RF Subsystem The RF subsystem is based on the HP 8530A microwave receiver, HP 83630B RF source, HP 83621A LO source and HP 85309A LO/IF Distribution Unit. The system supports CW and pulsed antenna measurements from 0.8GHz to 50GHz using frequency multipliers for operation above 26.5GHz. The system is capable of multiplexing up to eight AUT beams and two probe polarizations. The HP 8530A receiver provides accurate amplitude and phase measurements at a maximum rate of 2500 points per second. The HP 83630B and HP 83621B sources can switch frequencies at a rate of approximately 8msec. The SP8T AUT PIN switch and the SP2T probe PIN switch have switching speeds of approximately 1µsec. RF subsystem setup, timing and control are performed by the NSI software running on the NSI acquisition computer. The NSI software also controls the scanner, and performs all data processing functions. The RF subsystem is fully reciprocal and supports both transmit and receive from the AUT. Figure 3.1 shows the AUT transmit mode when the RF energy is being transmitted by the AUT with the probe receiving the RF energy. AUT transmit mode requires manual reconfiguration so that the RF multiplier module is located near the AUT and connected to one of the two reference mixers located near the AUT. AUT receive mode requires manual reconfiguration so that the RF multiplier module is located on the probe carriage and connected to one of the two test mixers located on the probe carriage. When pulsed mode testing is used, the software is set to enable pulse mode over all frequency ranges. The operator has full control over the pulse repetition frequency, pulse width and power. 4. Test Results This section provides a description of the antenna test results that contribute significant uncertainty values in the NIST 18-term error assessment. The parameters of interest were the on-axis gain, the relative sidelobe and the cross polarization level. The antenna used for range assessment tests was a 54 diameter reflector antenna operating at 45GHz mounted as shown in Figure 4.1. The polarization is left hand circular. The test objectives were to evaluate the total measurement system errors for gain, sidelobes and cross polarization and to determine the magnitude of the individual error sources. Sixtyone data files were acquired as part of the range assessment process. Figures 4.2 and 4.3 are the computed far-field patterns for the antenna under test. Numerous NIST terms for this particular antenna do not contribute significant errors as listed in Table 4.1. The insignificant values are: term #1 probe relative pattern, term #2 probe polarization ratio, term #4 probe alignment error, term #7 AUT alignment error, term #9 measurement area truncation error, term #10 probe X and Y position error, term #14 systematic phase error, term #15 receiver dynamic range, term #17 leakage and crosstalk and term #18 random amplitude and phase error. Probe gain measurement is NIST term #3. The probe used as part of this assessment was an uncalibrated open-ended waveguide. An analytic model that is built into the NSI software estimates its gain. The gain accuracy shown in the table is based on using a calibrated probe that would be installed for production measurements. A calibrated probe was not available at the time of tests. Normalization constant is NIST term #5. This term is estimated by using the receiver linearity test results to determine receiver error, analyzing

the method used to determine transmission line losses, and measuring changes due to cable flexing. Typical estimates of uncertainty are included in Table 4.1 assuming that the AUT input and probe output terminals are connected directly together without using a substitution cable. Impedance mismatch error is NIST term #6. This term is computed using Reflection Coefficient magnitudes for the probe, AUT, the generator, and the load as shown in Table 4.1. A predicted impedance mismatch error of 0.10dB was used. Data point spacing is NIST term #8. Because of the extremely narrow beamwidth of the AUT, the primary region of interest was within 15 degrees of the main beam. The narrow beam provides an effective band limit that allows measurements at approximately λ rather than λ/2. Using measurements at λ and λ/2, far-field patterns were compared and computed relative to its own peak value. Errors in relative quantities such as sidelobe and polarization ratio are correctly represented. The gain error is not derived from the E/S level, but is obtained from noting the changes in the peak value due to each error test. All of the tests for the other error sources were performed using data with a nearfield spacing of λ. The values for this term are shown in Table 4.1. Probe Z position error is NIST term #11. The z- position errors measured during installation and ATP testing provide the input data to estimate δ z for each sidelobe region. These planarity measurements as a function of probe X and Y position were made with reference to a vertical reference plane, and part of the z-error is due to a linear variation as a function of Y due to a small tilt of the Y-rails. The values for this term are shown in Table 4.1. Mutual coupling between the probe and the AUT is NIST term #12. The error for this term is determined by comparing a pattern taken at one z-position to a pattern where two or more z- positions have been averaged together. Table 4.1 shows results of the measurements and analysis using five z-positions. The receiver amplitude linearity is NIST term #13. Since the HP receiver error is difficult to measure, the NSI software can simulate the effect of the receiver non-linearity by applying amplitude offsets corresponding to modeled nonlinearity curves. The errors are determined by subtracting the resulting pattern from the original. The difference pattern shows a characteristic change in the main beam width and very little effect on the sidelobe or crosspolarized levels. The simulated results were compared to actual measurements by taking measurements with decreasing input power levels. As the power level was changed, the averaging was also increased to maintain an approximate constant signal to noise ratio so changes would not be due to dynamic range differences. The values of a comparison between the 0 and -6dB input levels are shown in Table 4.1. Room scattering is NIST term #16. This error is determined by pattern comparison. The first pattern is measured at an initial probe z-position and is compared to a pattern where both the probe and the AUT are moved in Z. Measurements were made with the AUT and the probe moved from the initial z=0 position to z= 5.85 inches. Subtracting the resulting far-field patterns gives a measure of the room scattering. The values for this term are shown in Table 4.1. 5. Range Summary A 45GHz LHCP 54 diameter antenna was used to evaluate the Raytheon 23' x 22' near-field measurement range for planar near-field scans. The results of the study predict a gain error of 0.23dB and a sidelobe error of 2.0dB when using a calibrated probe. 6. References 1. Demas, J. and Speicher, T., "Innovative Mechanical Designs For Scanners," AMTA Symposium, pp 366-371, November 1997. 2. Newell, A. C., Error Analysis Techniques For Planar Near-Field Measurements, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp 754-767, June 1988. 3. Slater, Dan, Nearfield Antenna Measurements. Artech House 1991.

5' 7' Raytheon 23' x 22' Nearfield Scanner Room Layout (Not drawn to scale) Y Column Mounted on Probe Carriage: Test Mixer Rotary Joint SP2T Probe Sw 84" 12" Probe Carriage Work Station Cable Tubes 12' 12' 1" Cable Egress 22' X'- Beam X- Beam AUT Rail Trench HP Rack Mounted in Rack: HP 8530A HP 83621B Src HP 85309A DSP I/F Unit 2' 12' Cable Track RF Source Mounted near AUT: HP 83650B Src HP83050A Amp HP 87301E Coupler Ref Mixer SP8T AUT PIN Sw Lower Control Room Figure 2.1 Raytheon 23' x 22' Near-field Range Layout Parameter Specification Scan Plane Area 7m x 6.7m (23 x 22 ) Frequency Range 0.8 50 GHz planar and cylindrical Scan Plane Orientation Vertical X-position error (corrected) 0.05 mm rms X-position repeatability 0.025 mm X-position resolution 0.025 mm X-axis travel 7.0m (23') X-axis speed (max) 250 mm/s Y-position error (corrected) 0.05 mm rms Y-position repeatability 0.025 mm Y-position resolution 0.025 mm Y-axis travel 6.7m (22 ) Y-axis speed (max) 375 mm/s Planarity (rms) corrected 0.05 mm rms Z-axis repeatability 0.025 mm Z-axis resolution 0.025 mm Z-axis travel 0.25 m Z-axis speed (max) 25 mm/s Pol-axis load capacity 20 kg Pol-axis position error 0.02 deg Pol-axis repeatability 0.01 deg Pol-axis resolution 0.01 deg Pol-axis travel 360 deg Pol-axis speed (max) 40 deg/s Table 2.1 System Capability Overview

CR02 HP 8530A Microwave Receiver HP Receiver AD11, AD12 BNC(f,f) AD15 2.4mm(f,f) HP 85320A H50 Test Mixer & SP2T Mounted on probe carriage Test Mixer RJ W12, 3' CFE, 3' DP Bypass RJ & CFE, 3' Probe SP2T for (CFE) Operation above HP 85331A 40 GHz SP2T PIN Switch Raytheon Provided (CFE) DP Probe Cables (2) AUT b2 W13, 4' A19 a1 W10, 35' SR05 AD17 3.5mm(f,f) AD18 N(m) to SMA(f) HP IF Jmpr SR06 SR04 AD1 3.5mm(f,f) J8 J9 W22 LO Source HP83621B Microwave Frequency Synthesizer RF Out J1 W21 A25 Ref Test W20 AD AD IF IF 24 23 AD22 J6 J3 Test LO J2 Ref LO HP85309A LO/IF distribution unit Det In Ref IF In RF Source HP83630B Microwave Frequency Synthesizer RF Out AD20 W15, 70' LDF2-50 W01, UFA-210C, 35' AD2 3.5mm(f,f) W11-1, 35' W16, 70' RG-58 W10-1, 35' W11, 35' W01-1, UFA-210C, 35' AD7, 2.4(f,f) AT2, 20 db, 2.4mm(m,f) Attenuator HP 85320B H50 Ref Mixer IF LO Det AD21 2.9mm(f) IN WR22 X4 FREQ MPY Ref Mixer, Amp, coupler, Mpy Mounted on Plates near AUT W09, UFA-125A, 3' 2.4mm(f) OUT 40-50 GHZ HP 87301E Coupler W06, UFA-125A, 1.5' Raytheon Provided Direct Connect Cable (Direct Gain Measurement) AD10 2.4mm(f) to 2.9mm(m) W04, UFA-125A, 6' Raytheon Provided 6' AUT Cables (8) (Only 1 used in Tx mode) W23, 1' W24, 1' AUT Az Stage RJ HP 85332A, H08 SP8T PIN Switch (Not used in AUT Tx Mode) X-Cable Track RF Cables 9 - W10-1,, 0.293" 10 - W25, UFA 210C, 0.210" 11 - A17, HP 85383 SCU, 0.464 Y-Cable Track RF Cables 8 - W10, UFB 293, 0.293" 9 - W25-1, UFA 210C, 0.210" 10 - A21, HP 85384A PIN, 0.250 RF Cable Diagrams: PG1: AUT Tx, 0.8-3.0 GHz PG2: AUT Rx, 0.8-3.0 GHz PG3: AUT Tx, 2-26.5 GHz PG4: AUT Rx, 2-26.5 GHz PG5: AUT Tx, 26.5-40 GHz PG6: AUT Rx, 26.5-40 GHz PG7: AUT Tx, 40-50 GHz PG8: AUT Rx, 40-50 GHz Figure 3.1 AUT 40 to 50GHz Transmit Mode RF Cable Diagram Figure 4.1 7.0m x 6.7m Vertical NF Scanner Testing 54" Reflector Antenna

Far-Field Pattern of Antenna used in Validation Tests Far-Field Pattern of Antenna used in Validation Tests 0 Main, LHCP Cross, RHCP 0 Main, LHCP Cross, RHCP -10-10 -20-20 -30-30 Amplitude (db) -40-50 Amplitude (db) -40-50 -60-60 -70-70 -80-7.5-5.0-2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 Azimuth (deg) Figure 4.2 H-Cut Far-field pattern of antenna through beam peak. -80-7.5-5.0-2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 Elevation (deg) Figure 4.3 V-Cut Far-field pattern of antenna through beam peak. # Item Gain Error (db) -30dB Sidelobe Error ( db) On Axis Cross Polarization Error (db) 1 Probe relative pattern 0.00 0.01 0.00 2 Probe polarization ratio 0.00 0.00 0.45 3 Probe gain measurement 0.10 0.00 0.00 4 Probe alignment error 0.00 <0.001 0.00 5 Normalization constant 0.15 0.00 0.00 6 Impedance mismatch error 0.10 0.00 0.00 7 AUT alignment error 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 Data point spacing (aliasing) 0.02 0.15 0.80 9 Measurement area truncation 0.003 0.30 0.09 10 Probe Y position errors 0.002 0.01 0.004 11 Probe Z position error 0.02 1.60 0.04 12 Mutual coupling (Probe/AUT) 0.05 0.10 0.80 13 Receiver amplitude linearity 0.05 0.15 1.30 14 Systematic phase error 0.004 0.09 0.09 15 Receiver dynamic range 0.01 0.15 0.30 16 Room scattering 0.04 1.00 0.80 17 Leakage and crosstalk 0.04 0.53 0.67 18 Random amplitude/phase errors 0.003 0.09 0.04 Total (rss) 0.23 2.0 2.1 Table 4.1 Raytheon 45GHz Antenna NIST Error Budget