IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Similar documents
IEEE C802.16e-04/403 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

C802.16a-02/76. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Closed-loop MIMO performance with 8 Tx antennas

Proposal for Incorporating Single-carrier FDMA into m

Liaison Report from ARIB BWA Subcommittee

Effectiveness study on inter-system signaling/messaging

Proposal for Uplink MIMO Schemes in IEEE m

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Title Propose for Uplink Pilot Design in IEEE m

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Comment on Unsolicited RNG-RSP in transparent RS System

IEEE C802.16d-04/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Proposal for IEEE m Frame Structure for Single Band Operation

Proposal for IEEE m Uplink Power Control

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Proposal for Constellation Re-arrangement in IR HARQ

IEEE C802.16e-04/517 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Corrections and clarifications to the d OFDMA Channel Coding

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Voice: Fax:

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Physical Structure of UL Feedback Channels

IEEE C802.16e-04/420. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE e-03/60. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE abc-01/59. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Coverage/Capacity simulations for OFDMA PHY in with ITU-T channel model

Project. Title. Submitted Sources: {se.park,

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

IEEE abc-01/23. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Relay Combining Hybrid ARQ for j

IEEE C802.16e-04/515r3. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Considerations on the Ranging Channels (AWD / )

IEEE C /02R1. IEEE Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <

IEEE C802.16e-03/ Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon

IEEE C802.16a-02/94r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Framework for Enabling Closed-loop MIMO for OFDMA

IEEE C802.16h-06/011. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Discuss the MAC messages supporting the CSI, such as DCD, DL-MAP etc.

IEEE C802.16e-04/518r1 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Assignments of Pilots for 256 FFT OFDMA mode

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed Antenna Radiation Pattern Envelopes for Coexistence Study

: IEEE C802.16e-04/533r5. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Merging CXCC sub-channels 1-4 and CSI sub-channel into one figure

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < An Enhanced MIMO Transmission Scheme for OFDMA Systems

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer

IEEE C802.16e-04/141. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Show some simulation result for the energy pulse symbol duration

Metrics and Techniques for Evaluation of FEC Systems

Performance comparison of convolutional and block turbo codes

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE abc-01/56r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Unveiling Myths about SC-FDMA in TGm

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Adoption of this document as basis for broadband wireless access PHY

C802.16a-02/68. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/001. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/054r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < WirelessMAN coexistence function primitives consolidation

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/46. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WIMAX SYSTEM USING CONVOLUTIONAL PRODUCT CODE (CPC)

Feature (Claims) Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4. Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Additional comments to P802.16d/D2

IEEE C802.16d-04/88r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/18. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Consolidation of Uncoordinated Coexistence Mechanisms

Title: LE Task Group Report - Session #45

IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <

UCP simulation: Approach and Initial Results

John Liebetreu and Randall Scwartz

IEEE C802.16e-05/059r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Spectral Mask and Field Trials of a COFDM Modem

Slides for j (Mobile Multihop Relay) Usage Models

IEEE C802.16h-06/109. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Action Item from Session #48: UTC time stamp text remedy

IEEE C /008. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

4x4 Time-Domain MIMO encoder with OFDM Scheme in WIMAX Context

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/02. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

2 nd Generation OFDM for

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Extended IE format for concurrent transmission of bursts

C802.16g-05/039

IEEE C802.16d-04/26

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Procedure in community Entry of new BS

IEEE C802.16e-05/039. Pilot carriers can be used as secondary Fast-feedback channel or secondary UL ACK channel in OFDMA

Zion Hadad Voice: RunCom Communitcations Ltd. Fax: Hachoma st. Rishon le-zion, Israel

IEEE C802.16h-05/020. Proposal for credit tokens based co-existence resolution and negotiation protocol

IEEE C802.16d-03/24r0. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

A Mixed OFDM Downlink and Single Carrier Uplink for the 2-11 GHz Licensed Bands

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Clarification of H-ARQ Operation with Reduced AAS Private Map

FBMC for TVWS. Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone

IEEE C802.16h-07/013. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Transcription:

Project Title IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16> A New Stream Mapping Rule for Vertically-Encoded STC System in IEEE 802.16m Date Submitted Source(s) 2007-11-07 Chung-Lien Ho, Ren-Jr Chen, Chang-Lan Tsai, Chang-Lung Hsiao, Chi-Fang (Richard) Li, Ting-Chen (Tom) Song, ITRI Wern-Ho Sheen, NCTU/ITRI Voice: + 886 3 5914520 E-mail: clho@itri.org.tw richard929@itri.org.tw Re: Abstract Purpose Notice Release Patent Policy IEEE 802.16m-07/040 - Responds to Call for Contributions on Project 802.16m System Description Document (SDD) A new stream mapping rule is proposed for the vertically-encoded STC framework adopted in IEEE 802.16 to enhance the link quality performance. The basic idea is to properly allocating the relatively more important systematic part of the coded bits to the better channel. Simulation results show that the new scheme can significantly outperform the mapping rule currently being used in IEEE 802.16 especially for the case of low coding rate. For 802.16m discussion and adoption This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the Source(s) field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat>. 1

A New Stream Mapping Rule for Vertically Encoded STC System in IEEE 802.16m Ren-Jr Chen, Chung-Lien Ho, Chang-Lan Tsai, Chang-Lung Hsiao, Chi-Fang (Richard) Li, Ting-Chen (Tom) Song, 1. Summary ITRI Wern-Ho Sheen NCTU/ITRI This contribution introduces a block-wise stream mapping to enhance the error rate performance for IEEE 802.16m. Simulation results show that the new scheme provides a significant gain over the demux-based mapping currently used in IEEE 802. 16 system especially for a low coding rate. The method is simple and is easy to fit in the vertically-encoded STC framework adopted in IEEE 802.16. Proposed Text ------------------------------------------------------ Begin Proposed Text ------------------------------------------ ------------ X.X X. STC Data Stream Mapping for IEEE 802.16m <note: the block-wise stream mapping rules for vertically encoded STC should treated as an alternative to the conventional stream mapping rules. Our study shows that the performance gain using a block-wise stream mapping rules, which is listed in Table 2, was observed to be better than conventional demux-wise stream mapping rules shown in Table 1 [1].> ------------------------------------------------------- End Proposed Text ------------------------------------------- ------------ 2. Introduction This contribution describes a block-wise stream mapping rule for the vertically-encoded STC system based on the channel condition to enhance the error rate performance. The new scheme provides an attractive gain over the demuxwise mapping method currently used in the IEEE 802.16 OFDMA system. The new method can co-exist with the vertically-encoded STC framework adopted in the IEEE 802.16 OFDMA system. 2

3. Vertically Encoded STC System IEEE C802.16m-07/290 Fig. 1 is the vertically-encoded STC system with MIMO precoding adopted in the IEEE 802.16 system. The convolutional turbo code (CTC) [1] using a double binary circular recursive systematic convolutional code, as is shown in Fig. 2. The input information bits (A, B) are first encoded via CTC as the systematic bits (A, B) and parity bits (Y1, Y2, W1, W2), each of which is then individually interleaved by the interleaver shown in Fig. 3. Next, the coded sequences (i.e., systematic part and parity part) are aggregated (A, B, Y1, Y2, W1, W2) and punctured to match the desired coding rate. After puncturing, all the coded bits are modulated as complex-valued symbols. The modulated symbols are then converted to multiple transmission streams via a stream mapper. Finally, these streams are precoded by a pre-designed matrix and transmitted from the multiple antennas. Systematic Part Info. Bits CTC Encoding Puncturing (puncture parity part) Modulation Stream Mapping Precoding Antenna Ports Parity Part Fig. 1: A block diagram for vertically encoded STC systems with MIMO precoding. 3

Fig. 2: CTC encoder [1]. 4. Demux-Wise Stream Mapping Fig. 3: Block diagram of the interleaving scheme [1]. According to the current IEEE 802.16 standard, all the modulated symbols are serial-to-parallel converted to multiple streams by a demux-wise mapping (see Fig. 324 of [1]). Fig. 4 illustrates a demux-wise stream mapping example with 1/2 coding rate over a 2 2 MIMO channel. It is noticed that in the demux-wise stream mapping, the modulated symbols are alternately mapped to the two streams as listed in Table 1 [1], each of which is passed through different channel. As shown in Fig. 4 and Table 1, the systematic part of the coded bits is distributed evenly over the two channels, where one channel could be much worse the other. If this is case, the performance will be dominated by the worse one, especially half of the relatively more important systematic part of coded bits is placed on it. Raw information bits Systematic Bits (480) Parity Bits (960) CTC Encoding Systematic Bits (480) 480 Puncturing Modulation (e.g., QPSK) Stream 1 Stream 2 240 240 Better channel Worse channel 4 Stream Mapping

Fig. 4: A demux-wise stream mapping example for vertically encoded STC system in current IEEE 802.16 standard. Table 1: Symbol allocation for vertically encoded STC system with two transmit antennas in current IEEE 802.16 standard [1] Antenna 0 Antenna 1 Even Symbol Odd Symbol Even Symbol Odd Symbol Subcarrier 0 S0 S48 S1 S49 Subcarrier 1 S2 S50 S3 S51 Subcarrier 2 S4 S52 S5 S53 Subcarrier 3 S6 S54 S7 S55 Subcarrier 4 S8 S56 S9 S57 Subcarrier 5 S10 S58 S11 S59 Subcarrier 6 S12 S60 S13 S61 Subcarrier 7 S14 S62 S15 S63 Subcarrier 8 S16 S64 S17 S65 Subcarrier 9 S18 S66 S19 S67 Subcarrier 10 S20 S68 S21 S69 Subcarrier 11 S22 S70 S23 S71 Subcarrier 12 S24 S72 S25 S73 Subcarrier 13 S26 S74 S27 S75 Subcarrier 14 S28 S76 S29 S77 Subcarrier 15 S30 S78 S31 S79 Subcarrier 16 S32 S80 S33 S81 Subcarrier 17 S34 S82 S35 S83 Subcarrier 18 S36 S84 S37 S85 Subcarrier 19 S38 S86 S39 S87 Subcarrier 20 S40 S88 S41 S89 Subcarrier 21 S42 S90 S43 S91 Subcarrier 22 S44 S92 S45 S93 Subcarrier 23 S46 S94 S47 S95 5. Reliable Stream Mapping Rule: Block-Wise Mapping As mentioned previously, IEEE 802.16 CTC generates a block of coded sequence {A, B, Y1, Y2, W1, W2}, in which A and B are the systematic part and Y1, Y2, W1 and W2 are the parity part. This sequence imposes an important structure: the systematic part always occupies the leading part of the sequence followed by the parity part. Moreover, after the sub-block interleaving and puncturing, the coded sequence still keeps the same structure. The basic idea of the proposed block-wise mapping rule is that to allocate as many as possible the relatively more important systematic part of coded bits to the well-conditioned channel to against the destructive fading and hence enhance the error correction capability. Fortunately, the distinctive structure of the coded bits described above facilitates the development of the proposed mapping rule. With this distinctive structure, the reliable stream mapping can be easily done by directly equal-length block segmenting the punctured sequence into multiple blocks, each of which (in blockwise ) is then individually passed through the different channel, according to the channel condition. The overall design flow for the coding rate Rc = 1/2 is shown in Fig. 5 and the corresponding symbol allocation is modified in Table 2. Compared with Table 1, the label antenna has been generalized to stream in Table 2. From this example, we can see that all the systematic part indeed can be transmitted through the better channel. However, with the coding rate Rc 5

increased, the performance gain provided by the block-wise mapping mechanism diminishes. This is because that more systematic bits will be allocated into the worse channel due to equal-length block segmentation. It is evidenced by Fig. 5 that the proposed mapping rule is easily realized without significant change from the existing framework (Fig. 1); therefore, it is very suitable for use in the vertically encoded STC system (especially for MIMO precoding) adopted in the IEEE 802.16 system, if the channel state information (CSI) is available at the transmitter. Note that CSI is already available at the transmitter side for precoded system. For the non-precoded systems, only log 2 N bits are needed for CSI reporting, where N is the bit-stream number. In addition, the demux-wise stream mapping will be used if no CSI is available at the transmitter. Raw information bits Systematic Bits (480) Parity Bits (960) CTC Encoding Systematic Bits (480) 480 240 240 Stream 1 Stream 2 240 240 Modulation (e.g., QPSK) Puncturing Stream Mapping Better channel Worse channel Fig. 5: A block-wise stream mapping example for vertically encoded STC system. 6

Table 2: A Modified symbol allocation for vertically encoded STC system with two streams if CSI is available at the transmitter (assume that transmission chain of stream 0 is more reliable). Stream 0 Stream 1 Even Symbol Odd Symbol Even Symbol Odd Symbol Subcarrier 0 S0 S24 S48 S72 Subcarrier 1 S1 S25 S49 S73 Subcarrier 2 S2 S26 S50 S74 Subcarrier 3 S3 S27 S51 S75 Subcarrier 4 S4 S28 S52 S76 Subcarrier 5 S5 S29 S53 S77 Subcarrier 6 S6 S30 S54 S78 Subcarrier 7 S7 S31 S55 S79 Subcarrier 8 S8 S332 S56 S80 Subcarrier 9 S9 S33 S57 S81 Subcarrier 10 S10 S34 S58 S82 Subcarrier 11 S11 S35 S59 S83 Subcarrier 12 S12 S36 S60 S84 Subcarrier 13 S13 S37 S61 S85 Subcarrier 14 S14 S38 S62 S86 Subcarrier 15 S15 S39 S63 S87 Subcarrier 16 S16 S40 S64 S88 Subcarrier 17 S17 S41 S65 S89 Subcarrier 18 S18 S42 S66 S90 Subcarrier 19 S19 S43 S67 S91 Subcarrier 20 S20 S44 S68 S92 Subcarrier 21 S21 S43 S69 S93 Subcarrier 22 S22 S44 S70 S94 Subcarrier 23 S23 S45 S71 S95 6. Simulation Results In this section, the proposed stream mapping rule is evaluated via the computer simulations. We consider the vertically encoded STC system in Fig. 1. The simulation parameters are given in Table 3. Table 3: Simulation parameters Parameters Value Channel model Fixed Rayleigh flat-fading channel Channel estimation Perfect estimation at TX and RX MIMO configuration 4 2 Number of streams 2 Precoding scheme Eigen-based IEEE 16e codebook-based [1] MIMO detector LMMSE 7

QPSK-1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 5/6 MCS sets 16QAM-1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 5/6 Channel coding scheme Code rate 1/3 CTC [1] Decoding scheme MAX Log-MAP algorithm Number of bits per coding block 480 The first set of simulation examines the bit error rate (BER) performance of the two stream mapping schemes for eigen-based precoding (i.e., the precoding matrix is of the right singular matrix of the MIMO channel matrix) and the results are shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 respectively for QPSK and 16QAM modulations with the coding rate being a control parameter. From Figs 6 and 7, we can see that the proposed mapping rule provides significant gain over the demux-based mappin for coding rate of 1/2. The improvement becomes smaller when coding rate becomes higher. Similar results are observed for the 16e vector codebook-based precoding scheme, as shown in Figs 8 and 9. 7. Conclusion This contribution introduces a block-wise stream mapping to enhance the error rate performance for IEEE 802.16m. Simulation results show that the new scheme provides a significant gain over the demux-based mapping currently used in IEEE 802. 16 system especially for a low coding rate. The method is simple and is easy to fit in the vertically-encoded STC framework adopted in IEEE 802.16. References [1] IEEE DRAFT P802.16Rev2/D1, Part 16: Air interface for broadband wireless access systems, October, 2007. BER 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 Demux-5/6 Block-5/6 Demux-3/4 Block-3/4 Demux-2/3 Block-2/3 Demux-1/2 Block-1/2 10-4 10-5 10-6 -5 0 5 10 15 Eb/N0 (db) 8

Fig. 6: Bit error rate performance of the two different stream mapping rules with the coding rate being a control parameter. Eigen-based precoding scheme and QPSK modulation are used. BER 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 Demux-5/6 Block-5/6 Demux-3/4 Block-3/4 Demux-2/3 Block-2/3 Demux-1/2 Block-1/2 10-4 10-5 10-6 0 5 10 15 20 Eb/N0 (db) Fig. 7: Bit error rate performance of the two different stream mapping rules with the coding rate being a control parameter. Eigen-based precoding scheme and 16QAM modulation are used. BER 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 Demux-5/6 Block-5/6 Demux-3/4 Block-3/4 Demux-2/3 Block-2/3 Demux-1/2 Block-1/2 10-4 10-5 10-6 0 5 10 15 20 Eb/N0 (db) 9

Fig. 8: Bit error rate performance of the two different stream mapping rules with the coding rate being a control parameter. 16e vector codebook-based precoding scheme and QPSK modulation are used. BER 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 Demux-5/6 Block-5/6 Demux-3/4 Block-3/4 Demux-2/3 Block-2/3 Demux-1/2 Block-1/2 10-4 10-5 10-6 0 5 10 15 20 Eb/N0 (db) Fig. 9: Bit error rate performance of the two different stream mapping rules with the coding rate being a control parameter. 16e vector codebook-based precoding scheme and 16QAM modulation are used. 10