IEEE C802.16h-06/022r1

Similar documents
IEEE C802.16h-06/022

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Voice: (613) Fax: (613) {jsydor,

IEEE C802.16h-06/090

IEEE C802.16h-06/042

IEEE C802.16h-07/013. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/012. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/127. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Interference Management Procedure in the Operating Stage

IEEE C802.16h-06/109. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050

IEEE C802.16h-06/050r2

IEEE C802.16h-07/051. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Procedure in community Entry of new BS

IEEE C802.16h-07/003r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/038r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16d-04/88r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/030r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-07/085. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Discuss the MAC messages supporting the CSI, such as DCD, DL-MAP etc.

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Merging CXCC sub-channels 1-4 and CSI sub-channel into one figure

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < updating the text related to CSI under CX-Frame scheme

IEEE C802.16h-07/054r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/011. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/001. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Title: LE Task Group Report - Session #45

David Grandblaise Voice: +33 (0) Motorola Fax: +33 (0)

IEEE C802.16h-05/020. Proposal for credit tokens based co-existence resolution and negotiation protocol

John Liebetreu and Randall Scwartz

IEEE C802.16h-06/015. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

A Mixed OFDM Downlink and Single Carrier Uplink for the 2-11 GHz Licensed Bands

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Editorial correction to use of the Term-of-Art 'backbone network'

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Extended IE format for concurrent transmission of bursts

UCP simulation: Approach and Initial Results

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Define the scheduling process and parameter of CTS in one community.

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Action Item from Session #48: UTC time stamp text remedy

C802.16a-02/68. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/071. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < WirelessMAN coexistence function primitives consolidation

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Working Group Review of Working Document 802.

IEEE C802.16a-02/94r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16d-04/26

Simulating coexistence between y and h systems in the 3.65 GHz band Scenarios and assumptions

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Show some simulation result for the energy pulse symbol duration

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Common PHY & Messages for Neighbor Discovery Using CTS

C802.16g-05/039

Network Management Study Group Closing Plenary Report

IEEE C802.16h-05/039r h Networks. Voice: (613) Fax: (613) {jsydor,

IEEE C /008. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE abc-01/23. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Working Group Review of Working Document IEEE 802.

AAS Maps Format for OFDM

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Proposals for facilitating co-channel and adjacent channel coexistence in LE

IEEE C802.16e-03/ Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Additional comments to P802.16d/D2

IEEE C802.16a-02/46. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/403 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/518r1 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16maint-07/033

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed Antenna Radiation Pattern Envelopes for Coexistence Study

IEEE C802.16d-04/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-05/022r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/517 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Initial rangin clarifications for OFDMA PHY

Zion Hadad Voice: RunCom Communitcations Ltd. Fax: Hachoma st. Rishon le-zion, Israel

Montreal, a candidate for Session #33

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Messaging for Cognitive Radio Systems operating as Frequency Division Duplexing (FDD) IEEE h Networks.

IEEE C802.16h-05/044. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < P802.16h Working Document structure and purpose clarification

IEEE le-04/04. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Mesh Networks in Fixed Broadband Wireless Access

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Channel estimation issues for TDD and FDD OFDM

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed PAR to convert P802.16d from Amendment to Revision

Changes in ARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

IEEE C802.16e-04/420. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < The unified TLV encoding for DCD and UCD in OFDMA PHY mode

IEEE C802.16e-05/059r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Switched beam antennas in millimeter-wave band broadband wireless access networks

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Relay Combining Hybrid ARQ for j

IEEE C802.16d-03/24r0. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Coverage/Capacity simulations for OFDMA PHY in with ITU-T channel model

IETF Liasion Report, November 2006

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

IEEE Session #14 Opening Plenary Presentation

Mobile Multi-hop Relay Networking in IEEE

Assignments of Pilots for 256 FFT OFDMA mode

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Corrections and clarifications to the d OFDMA Channel Coding

Interpolation Effects For OFDM Preamble

Transcription:

Project Title Date Submitted Source(s) Re: Abstract Purpose otice Release Patent Policy and Procedures IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16> 2006-03-09 IBS entry process in Synchronized IEEE 802.16h Systems having a Common Profile John Sydor, Shanzeng Guo Communication Research Center 3701 Carling Ave Ottawa, O, Canada, K8H 8S2 Voice: (613) 998-2388 Fax: (613) 998-4077 {jsydor, sguo}@crc.ca Call for Comments and Contribution, IEEE 802.16 s License-Exempt (LE) Task Group, 2006-02 Item 3. This document specifies an entry process of a new BS into a Interference eighborhood and the Creation of a Coexistence Community Using GPS/UTC time Synchronization. This process applies to systems conforming to a common profile. This document specifies an entry process of a new BS into a Interference eighborhood and the creation of a Coexistence Community using GPS/UTC time synchronization. The systems conform to a common profile. The document IEEE802.16h-06_003 details a synchronized CTS (now CMI) system and describes how it is used to coordinate co-channel networks, resolve entry of new networks and undertake interference control between networks in a co-existing community as well as new interference, some of which may not be due to IEEE 802.16h systems. This is a continuation of document IEEE802.16h-06_003 and IEEE802.16h-06_010r1 This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.16. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802.16 Patent Policy and Procedures <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/policy.html>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <mailto:chair@wirelessman.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.16 Working Group. The Chair will disclose this notification via the IEEE 802.16 web site <http://ieee802.org/16/ipr/patents/notices>. 1

IBS entry process in Synchronized IEEE 802.16h Systems having a Common Profile John Sydor, Shanzeng Guo Communication Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada Insert this section at the end of Section 15.2.1.3.1 Entry of a new BS into a Interference eighborhood and the Creation of a Coexistence Community Using GPS/UTC Time Synchronization and Common System Profile. In applications where the Coexistence Messaging Intervals (CMI-see 15.2.1.1.3.1) are synchronized to a GPS (or similar precision timing reference) and are given UTC time stamps (Fig H13), entry of a new Base Station (IBS) will be undertaken in 4 steps, with the IBS: (a) Monitoring the CMI Intervals, (b) Selecting an Empty CMI interval, (c) Claiming an empty CMI interval, (d) Membership in a Coexistence Community. Prior to entry into a Community of Operating Base Stations (OBS) it is assumed that the IBS will have undertaken Candidate Channel Determination (Section 15.4.1.1) and has selected a candidate channel, is synchronized to a downlink GPS signal and can derive a UTC time stamp, and has no operational SS yet deployed. It is assumed that the IBS is deployed within an Interference eighborhood: ie: active interference from existing Operating Base Stations is present. It is also assumed that the community which entered is WirelessMA-CX compliant and uses a common (same) profile. The IBS entry process is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows aspects of the entry procedure with signalling. (a) Monitoring the CMI Having tuned to the candidate channel, the IBS monitors and determines the level of activity on each CMI by demodulating the uplink SSURF (Sec 6.3.2.3.70 TBD) messages and storing their parameters in its Base Station Information Table( See Table h2). All demodulated SSURF messages will be from SSs that will interfere with the BS on the uplink and eventually, coexistence will have to be arranged with each of the OBS controlling these SSs via the Coexistence Protocol (CP). Each CMI from CMI-ID-00 to CMI-ID-54 is monitored. Each CMI is monitored for 5 CTS cycles or minutes (TBD). If CMI-ID-54 has detectable power in it, the channel will be construed as occupied by a non-ieee 802.16 system (See 15.3.1.1.3.1) which may also be synchronized to the GPS/UTC. The channel will be abandoned if CMI-ID-54 is occupied (See 15.3.1.1.3). The signalling seen by an IBS is shown in Figure 2. (b) Selection of an Empty CMI The monitored CMI in which no (demodulated) SSURF messages are received becomes a candidate CMI, and is considered empty. Empty CMI indicate that it is still possible for the IBS to create a new Coexistence Community including the OBS (only a maximum of 9(TBD) co-channel systems can be accommodated by a single channel. Full loading is indicated when all 9 (TBD) CMI are occupied by the systems forming a Coexistence Community). During each candidate CMI a RSSI (see 8.4.11.2) will be undertaken by the IBS during the uplink duration. RSSI is undertaken to determine the presence or absence of low level (un-demodulated) uplink SSURF messages. Each candidate CMI is monitored in this manner over a duration of 10 CMI cycles or minutes (TBD). An interval will be considered as useable and chosen if the mean RSSI 2

power measurement in it is no greater than {[] +3 db) (TBD); where [] is the thermal noise floor of the IBS receiver as determined by the Candidate Channel Determination process (See 15.4.1.1). The absence of uplink SSURFs means that the CMI is free of uplink (and possibly downlink occupancy). The particular CMI is now considered as being ready for claiming. (c) Claiming Procedure. The purpose of the claiming process is to make all adjacent OBS aware of the presence of the IBS. This process results in the delimitation of the Interference eighborhood that is, identification of all the adjacent systems that will see interference from the IBS. Claiming is undertaken by having the IBS broadcast its BSD during an empty CMI. Since all the OBS (both base stations and their SS) are silent and are monitoring the downlink on each CMI other than their own, the broadcast BSD message will likely be detected during what was previously an empty CMI (see discussion on undetected broadcasts below). To begin the claiming procedure the IBS broadcasts at maximum EIRP a BSD (see 6.3.2.3.70) message. This message, when received by SS belonging to adjacent OBS systems that form the Interference eighborhood, will result in those SS informing their home base stations (OBS) of the presence of a new base station (the IBS). The SS inform their BS of this by using a MAC message called the BS_CCID_ID (TBD). This MAC message contains the Proxy IP address of the IBS, which was extracted by the SS from the interfering BSD message. ow having the proxy IP address, the OBS respond back to the IBS via a backhaul IP link, informing the IBS that it has been detected and is a de facto interferer on the co-channel RF downlink. Having received this communication from the OBS, the IBS will now have discovered the systems in the Interference eighborhood, and as part of this discovery process now has the identities of the adjacent OBS. The OBS identities are included in the IBS Information Table (see H2). The IBS continues its BSD broadcast routine until no new OBS make themselves evident to the IBS. The IBS continues its BSD broadcasts every CMI cycle (every minute), and does so as long as it confirms to itself that it has formed a Coexistence Community with adjacent systems. (d) Membership in the Coexistence Community All of the adjacent systems with which the IBS creates or sustains interference to/from become listed in the BS Information Table (See H2) of the IBS. This table contains the BS_IDs and related IP addresses derived either from uplink SSURF messages that the IBS demodulated during its monitoring phase (above (a)) or from the BS_CCID_ID and IP messages that it received via the IP backhaul from the OBS as part of the claiming procedure ((c) above). Communication and negotiation with each OBS listed in the BS Information Table is undertaken via the {TBD} Coexistence Protocol (CP). Coexistence entails allocation of uplink and downlink transmission intervals in a manner that eliminates co-channel interference amongst users that would otherwise experience it and sustain degraded communications. This is done by parsing uplink and downlink intervals and establishing master subframes (see Sec 15.2.1.1.2). Each OBS that the IBS has listed in its BS Information Table as an interfering network must partake in such a resolution procedure. By undertaking this process the IBS thus creates a Coexistence Community for itself, and consequently becomes accommodated by the neighbouring networks of its interference neighbourhood. If the IBS for some reason cannot resolve all the interference it creates or sustains, then the entry process is repeated on a new channel taken from the rankings provided by the CCD procedures (see 15.4.1.1). In doing so the IBS would then abandon the CMI that it claimed in (c). If the CP process is successful, then the IBS (now OBS) continues its claim to the CMI, thereby now informing all other systems of its active presence in the Coexistence Community. Undetected BSD Broadcasts/Undetected Uplink SSURF messages. The BSD and SSURF messages are sent at the lowest, most robust modulation rate specified for IEEE 802.16 transmissions. However, because of the statistical variation in the propagation channel whose variance can exceed 10 db, there is a finite probability that eventually such signals shall eventually exceed demodulation threshold levels and be detected. The time to achieve this is TBD. 3

Furthermore, below threshold signals can be detected by power detectors or detection techniques that will provide indication of signals below demodulation thresholds. These techniques can be instituted either as part of the RF system or in parallel with the demodulation process.. IBS Initialization Figure 1. IBS community entry process. GPS Timing Synchronization Operational integrity check CCD: determine a candidate RF channel Wait for BS_CCID_ID msg forwarded from foreign OBS. Extract foreign BS information and build BS-information table. Monitor the candidate channel CMI occupancy: CMI_ID00, CMI_ID06, CMI_ID54 Broadcast BSD until no new BS_CCID_ID received, or timer expired? Is CMI54 occupied? For every occupied CMI, demodulate the SSURF message, extract all foreign BS information, and put them into BS-information-table. Examine BS-information-table, CP negotiation process will negotiate the co-existence of this IBS with other OBS, and determine the time sharing manner. For every unoccupied CMI measure its uplink RSSI for a duration of 10 CMI cycles Peak RSSI <= noise floor +3 db? Choose the current CMI All negotiation process complete with every OBS? IBS entry complete, coexisting community formed complete IBS broadcast its BSD using the current (chosen) CMI. IP Signaling 4 IBS3 Broadcast BSD SS BS_CCID_ID OBS1

IP Signaling BS_CCID_ID OBS2 2006-03-09 IEEE C802.16h-06/022r1 power OBS1 and OBS2 traffic BS SS DL UL BSD of OBS2 SSURF of OBS2 BSD of IBS3 Occupied CTS-ID00 of OBS1 Occupied CTS-ID06 of OBS2 Unoccupied CTS-ID12 claimed by IBS3 time Figure 2 IBS3 Entry Signalling 5