Opinion Poll. Illinois Small Business Owners Support Legislation Reforming Patent System. April 29, 2014

Similar documents
Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study

Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study

Brian J. Love Assistant Professor of Law, Santa Clara

FINANCIAL PROTECTION Not-for-Profit and For-Profit Cemeteries Survey 2000

Valerie S. Gaydos Angel Investor President, Capital Growth, Inc. How Proposed Patent Reform Increases Risk for Start-Up Investors

Massachusetts Renewables/ Cape Wind Survey

Slide 25 Advantages and disadvantages of patenting

US Patent Litigation Trends in Cloud Computing IPlytics GmbH

Copyright 2018 November 7-11, Interviews LCV CA-48 Post-Election Survey Margin of Error: +/- 4.0%

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) SME SCOREBOARD 2016

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) SME SCOREBOARD 2016

Lawyers sued over advice to board

FTC Approves Nielsen-Arbitron Transaction with Licensing and Divestiture Remedies

FOLLOW THIS LINK TO The Full 2016 ARDC Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT ATTORNEY REGISTRATION & DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION. Highlights

Before the Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC COMMENTS OF COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Hillary Clinton s Strengths: Record at State, Toughness, Honesty

1999 AARP Funeral and Burial Planners Survey. Summary Report

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

Life Sciences IP Report

Q.3 Thinking about the current path that our nation is taking, do you think our country is on the right track or headed in the wrong direction?

Gore Inches Closer, But Bush Still Leads

Standard-Essential Patents

As a Patent and Trademark Resource Center (PTRC), the Pennsylvania State University Libraries has a mission to support both our students and the

MR. SCOTT A. BARNES, CPA, CFF, CGMA

Intellectual property and competition policy

Is the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation?

Rocco E. Testani, Partner

Identifying Patent Monetization Entities

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll February 25-March 1, 2018

WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR PATENT LAWYERS

RANDI L. KARPINIA SENIOR PATENT OPERATIONS COUNSEL LAW DEPARTMENT, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.

Other than the "trade secret," the

POLL July 14-19, 2015 Total N= 1,205 Total White N= 751 Total Black N= 312

Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law. April 30, 2012

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CLARIFYING THE STANDARD FOR ASSESSING REASONABLE ROYALTY DAMAGES UNDER PATENT LAW. Everett Ehrlich, Ph.D.

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow

To the members of the IEEE Standards Association Standards Board:

What is Intellectual Property?

The Objective Valuation of Non-Traded IP. Jonathan D. Putnam

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll August 13-16, 2015

Margaret A. Clemens. Focus Areas. Overview

Q.3 Thinking about the current path that our nation is taking, do you think our country is on the right track or headed in the wrong direction?

Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

Dori K. Stibolt Partner

AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll April 3-7, 2018

Intellectual Property Policy Employees

R. Cameron Garrison. Managing Partner

PATENT AND UTILITY MODELS

GSMA ACC Europe Annual Conference, Munich. Michael Loch, Head of IP, GSMA

U.S. Patent-Antitrust Interface. Alden F. Abbott, Heritage Foundation Oxford Competition Law Centre June 28, 2014

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Turnout Key in Close Race; Young Voters Favor Kerry

Google reveal. their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy. Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google

TEC ENTERPRISES CORP.

Defend against infringement suits

the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission of South Africa (CIPC)

NATIONAL: MOST AMERICANS SAY MERRY CHRISTMAS

5/30/2018. Prof. Steven S. Saliterman Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

International Intellectual Property Practices

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

International Patent Exhaustion

Reversal of Fortune: The Edge to Al Gore

Introduction to The U.S. Patent System

Making Identity Use Predictable. UNCITRAL Colloquium on Identity Management and Trust Services 21 April, 2016

Call in toll free at and use 7-Digit Access Code

Does the US Patent System Need a Patent Small Claims Proceeding?

Clarke B. Nelson, CPA, ABV, CFF, CGMA, MBA Senior Managing Director & Founder InFact Experts LLC

Dual circulation period in Cyprus. Analytical report

How U.S. Employment Is Changing

Knowledge-Based Capital and the Patent Marketplace. Professor Colleen Chien

Network-1 Technologies, Inc.

Enterprise Patent Portfolio Commercialization: Trends and Opportunities

Answer to Community Patent Consultation To:

America s Cooperative Electric Utilities The Nation s Consumer Owned Electric Utility Network

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

Represented publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in false advertising and trademark

The America Invents Act: Policy Rationales. Arti K. Rai Duke Patent Law Institute May 13, 2013

14A Social Games Authorization Limited.

Why patents DO matter to YOUR business

Trade Secret Protection of Inventions

Gender in Invention. Are Females Gaining Ground?

SURVEY QUESTIONS If you prefer an electronic copy of the survey please contact the Thomas Law Firm by at:

THE AP-GfK POLL August, 2012

The Inventor s Role: Understanding the Technology Transfer Process

Raising the Stakes in Patent Cases

Parliamentary Research Branch PATENT DEDICATION AND THE PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD. Margaret Smith Law and Government Division

Would the REAL President & CEO of TempWorks Please Stand Up?

MULTIPLE ENTRY CONSOLIDATED GROUP TSA USER AGREEMENT

Potential of Actuarial Approach for Patent Matters with some topics on Recent Increase of Patent Valuation Needs in Japan -

April 21, By to:

GLOBAL BANKING ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN

MSFA Releases Due Diligence Findings on Vikings Owners Finances MSFA Releases required and additional due diligence

Invest in Growth How LOT Network Addresses the PAE Problem. Ken Seddon CEO, LOT Network September 8, 2017

Alison N. Davis. Focus Areas. Overview

Sustainable Development Education, Research and Innovation

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM

Transcription:

Opinion Poll Illinois Small Business Owners Support Legislation Reforming Patent System April 29, 2014 Small Business Majority 1101 14 th Street, NW, Suite 1001 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 828-8357 www.smallbusinessmajority.org

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Main Findings... 4 Small Employers Strongly Support Proposed Changes to U.S. Patent System... 5 Conclusion... 7 Methodology... 7 Poll Toplines... 8 2014 Small Business Majority 2

Executive Summary Small business owners across Illinois are doing everything they can to fortify their businesses in our slowly recovering economy. In communities across the state, it is the jobs small businesses provide and the consumers they serve that keep our recovery moving. However, this is threatened when small businesses are faced with costly and frivolous lawsuits brought on by patent assertion entities commonly referred to as patent trolls. According to a scientific opinion poll conducted for Small Business Majority, small businesses support proposed changes to the U.S. patent system that would help prevent patent trolls from targeting small businesses. Patent assertion entities are companies that don t make or sell anything of their own; they purchase relatively ambiguous patents and then demand royalty payments for use of their technology, or immediately file lawsuits against firms they believe are infringing on their intellectual property. This situation is not just faced by companies that manufacture or sell technology: it also affects end users of common technologies, such as a coffee shop offering WiFi to their customers. Small business owners understand that in order to prevent these attacks, reform is needed to strengthen the U.S. patent system. Our polling found Illinois entrepreneurs show strong support for many proposed changes to the country s patent system. For example, Illinois small businesses believe they should be protected from patent trolls by requiring them to sue the party that is actually responsible for infringement, not the end users who had no input into the product. Two-thirds of entrepreneurs (66%) support this provision. Additionally, 67% of small business owners believe patent trolls should be deterred from attacking small businesses in the first place by penalizing them for filing fraudulent patent assertions or sending abusive demand letters. Seventy-four percent believe courts should impose financial sanctions against patent trolls that file baseless lawsuits. In the case that a small business must go to court to fight a patent troll, two-thirds (66%) support a provision that would allow courts to require the loser in a frivolous patent case to pay the winning side s fees and costs. What s more, 71% support a provision that would require more transparency in patent lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation, so that it is clear who stands to benefit financially from the lawsuit. Small employers also showed particularly strong support for a provision that would reduce the cost of discovery in patent lawsuits. Seventy-nine percent of entrepreneurs support the creation of new judicial rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, so that high legal fees do not force small businesses and entrepreneurs to settle out of court when they don t need to. Nearly half (46%) of small business owners strongly support this proposal. Small employers also agree that improvements should be made to the U.S. Patent Office in order to help prevent abuse of the system. A vast majority (63%) believes the U.S. Patent Office should be fully funded so there is closer scrutiny of patent applications. What s more, nearly eight in 10 (78%) support expanding patent review opportunities to prevent patent trolls from threatening small businesses with patents that were questionable in the first place. Nearly three-fourths (74%) support creating a system to trigger automatic reviews of patent that are commonly exploited by patent trolls. It s important to note the respondents were politically varied and don t see this issue through an ideological lens with 39% of small business owners identifying as Republican, 40% as Democrat and 17% as independent. 2014 Small Business Majority 3

Main Findings The vast majority of Illinois entrepreneurs believe end users should be protected from frivolous patent lawsuits: 66% of small businesses believe they should be protected from patent trolls by requiring them to sue the party that is actually responsible for the infringement, not the end users who had no input into the product. Small businesses agree the loser in a frivolous patent case should pay the winner s fees: Two-thirds (66%) support a provision that would allow courts to require the loser in a frivolous patent case to pay the winning side s fees and costs. Small businesses agree patent trolls should be penalized for fraudulent patent assertions or abusive demand letters: More than two-thirds (67%) of small business owners believe patent trolls should be deterred by penalizing them for filing fraudulent patent assertions or sending abusive demand letters. Seventy-four percent believe courts should impose financial sanctions against patent trolls that file baseless lawsuits. Small business owners support more transparency in patent lawsuits: 71% of small employers support a provision that would require more transparency in patent lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation, so that it is clear who stands to benefit financially from the lawsuit. Entrepreneurs overwhelmingly support a provision that would reduce the cost of discovery in patent lawsuits: 79% of entrepreneurs support the creation of new judicial rules that would reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, so that high legal fees do not force small businesses and entrepreneurs to settle out of court when they don t need to. Nearly half (46%) of small business owners strongly support this proposal. Small employers support making improvements to the U.S. Patent Office: A vast majority (63%) believes the U.S. Patent Office should be fully funded so there is closer scrutiny of patent applications. Entrepreneurs support expanding review opportunities for patents: Nearly eight in 10 (78%) support expanding patent review opportunities to prevent patent trolls from threatening small businesses with patents that were questionable in the first place. Nearly three-fourths (74%) support creating a system to trigger automatic reviews of patent that are commonly exploited by patent trolls. Respondents were politically diverse: 39% identified as Republican, 40% as Democrat and 17% as independent or other. 2014 Small Business Majority 4

Small Employers Strongly Support Proposed Changes to U.S. Patent System Small businesses showed strong support for many patent reform proposals that are intended to deter malicious attacks by patent trolls. Small businesses believe they should be protected from patent trolls by requiring them to sue the party that is actually responsible for infringement, not the end users who had no input into the product. A vast 66% percent of entrepreneurs support this provision, with more than one-third (35%) who strongly support this. Additionally, more than two-thirds (67%) of small business owners believe that patent trolls should be deterred from attacking small businesses in the first place by penalizing them for filing fraudulent patent assertions or sending abusive demand letters. Seventy-four percent believe courts should impose financial sanctions against patent trolls that file baseless lawsuits. Figure 1: Entrepreneurs agree end users of common technologies should be protected from patent infringement lawsuits Strongly Somewhat Support 35% 30% 66% Oppose 12% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Figure 2: Small business owners believe patent trolls should be deterred from filing fraudulent patent assertions or sending abusive demand letters Strongly Somewhat Support 46% 21% 67% Oppose 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% In the case that a small business must go to court to fight a patent troll, 71% support a provision that would require more transparency in patent lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation, so that it is clear who stands to benefit financially from the lawsuit. Figure 3: Small employers support more transparency in patent lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to disclose information about the patent s owner Strongly Somewhat Support 44% 27% 71% Oppose 5% 10% 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2014 Small Business Majority 5

Small employers also showed particularly strong support for a provision that would reduce the cost of discovery in patent lawsuits. Seventy-nine percent of entrepreneurs support the creation of new judicial rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, so that high legal fees do not force small businesses and entrepreneurs to settle out of court when they don t need to. Figure 4: Entrepreneurs support rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, so high legal fees do not force them to unnecessarily settle out of court Strongly Somewhat Support 46% 33% 79% Oppose 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Small businesses also agree the loser in a frivolous patent case should pay the winner s fees. Two-thirds (66%) support a provision that would allow courts to require the loser in a patent case to pay the winning side s fees and costs. Small employers believe improvements should be made to the U.S. Patent Office in order to help prevent abuse of the system. A vast majority (63%) agrees the U.S. Patent Office should be fully funded so there is closer scrutiny of patent applications. Figure 5: Illinois small businesses support improving the U.S. Patent System to help prevent abuse of the system Strongly Somewhat Support 25% 37% 63% Oppose 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% What s more, nearly eight in 10 (78%) support expanding patent review opportunities to prevent patent trolls from threatening small businesses with patents that were questionable in the first place. Nearly three-fourths (74%) support creating a system to trigger automatic reviews of patent that are commonly exploited by patent trolls. Figure 6: Small business owners believe the patent review system should be expanded to prevent patent trolls from threatening small firms Strongly Somewhat Support 47% 31% 78% Oppose 12% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 2014 Small Business Majority 6

Conclusion Small businesses are the backbone of our state s economy and create the vast majority of new jobs. As these poll findings make clear, they believe patent trolls take advantage of the patent system and support many patent reform proposals that would help prevent this type of abuse. Small businesses support specific provisions within patent reform legislation because they believe it would improve the system by making patent lawsuits more transparent, protect end users of common technologies from frivolous lawsuits and deter patent trolls by penalizing them for sending abusive demand letters. Illinois entrepreneurs support changes to the patent system because it would help protect the small business community and allow them to continue to grow and create jobs, therefore helping to strengthen our economy even more. Methodology This poll reflects a telephone survey of 100 Illinois small business owners, conducted by Lake Research Partners and Chesapeake Beach Consulting for Small Business Majority with a margin of error of +/-9.8. The survey was conducted from April 7-23, 2014. 2014 Small Business Majority 7

Poll Toplines Small Business Majority Technology and Patent Poll 100 Illinois Small Business Owners 1. Just to confirm, are you the owner of a for-profit small business, who handles operations of the business or manages the employees? Owner-operator... 41 Owner-manager... 27 Both... 32 Neither... TERMINATE Don t know... TERMINATE 2. Approximately how many people work 30 or more hours per week at your company, including yourself? Please don t include contractors. 1-9 Employees... 55 10-19 Employees... 24 20-49 Employees... 18 50-99 Employees... 3 3. Which of the following categories best describes your business? Non-retail services... 24 Retail... 21 Construction... 8 Manufacturing... 13 Restaurant... 9 Real Estate... 6 Information Technology... 4 (Other: SPECIFY)... 16 (Don t know/refused)... 0 4. What is the zip code of your business? Region Illinois... 100 Kentucky... 0 Minnesota... 0 Nevada... 0 2014 Small Business Majority 8

5. Now, I'm going to read you several specific patent reform proposals. i For each, please tell me if you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose that particular proposal. Here s the first one. RANDOMIZE LIST Sorted by Strongly support 5a.Require plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation, so that it is clear who stands to benefit financially... 44 5d.Create new judicial rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, so that high legal fees do not force small businesses and entrepreneurs to settle out of court when they don't need to... 46 5i.Require courts to impose financial sanctions against PAEs that file baseless lawsuits... 49 5c.Expand patent review opportunities to prevent PAEs from threatening small businesses with patents that were questionable in the first place... 47 5f.Penalize fraudulent patent assertions or abusive demand letters... 46 5h.Protect end users from lawsuits by requiring PAEs to sue the party that is actually responsible for infringement, not the end users who had no input into the product... 35 5g.Create a system for triggering automatic reviews of patents that are commonly exploited by PAEs... 36 5b.Improve patent quality by fully funding the U.S. patent office so there is closer scrutiny of patent applications... 25 5e.Allow courts to require the loser in a patent case to pay the winning side s fees and costs... 32 2014 Small Business Majority 9

a.require plaintiffs to disclose who the owner of a patent is before litigation, so that it is clear who stands to benefit financially Strongly support... 44 Somewhat support... 27 Somewhat oppose... 10 Strongly oppose... 5 (Don t know)... 14 Support... 71 Oppose... 15 b. _ SSA: Improve patent quality by fully funding the U.S. Patent Office so there is closer scrutiny of patent applications Strongly support... 25 Somewhat support... 37 Somewhat oppose... 9 Strongly oppose... 12 (Don t know)... 16 Support... 63 Oppose... 21 c. _ SSB: Expand patent review opportunities to prevent PAEs from threatening small businesses with patents that were questionable in the first place Strongly support... 47 Somewhat support... 31 Somewhat oppose... 4 Strongly oppose... 9 (Don t know)... 10 Support... 78 Oppose... 12 d. _ SSA: Create new judicial rules to reduce the costs of discovery in patent litigation, so that high legal fees do not force small businesses and entrepreneurs to settle out of court when they don t need to Strongly support... 46 Somewhat support... 33 Somewhat oppose... 5 Strongly oppose... 0 (Don t know)... 16 Support... 79 Oppose... 5 2014 Small Business Majority 10

e. _ SSB: Allow courts to require the loser in a patent case to pay the winning side's fees and costs Strongly support... 32 Somewhat support... 34 Somewhat oppose... 8 Strongly oppose... 10 (Don t know)... 16 Support... 66 Oppose... 19 f. _SSA: Penalize fraudulent patent assertions or abusive demand letters Strongly support... 46 Somewhat support... 21 Somewhat oppose... 11 Strongly oppose... 4 (Don t know)... 18 Support... 67 Oppose... 15 g._ssb: Create a system for triggering automatic reviews of patents that are commonly exploited by PAEs Strongly support... 36 Somewhat support... 38 Somewhat oppose... 5 Strongly oppose... 6 (Don t know)... 15 Support... 74 Oppose... 11 h._ Protect end users from lawsuits by requiring PAEs to sue the party that is actually responsible for infringement, not the end users who had no input into the product Strongly support... 35 Somewhat support... 30 Somewhat oppose... 7 Strongly oppose... 5 (Don t know)... 22 Support... 66 Oppose... 12 i._require courts to impose financial sanctions against PAEs that file baseless lawsuits Strongly support... 49 Somewhat support... 25 Somewhat oppose... 9 Strongly oppose... 7 (Don t know)... 11 Support... 74 Oppose... 15 2014 Small Business Majority 11

The few remaining questions are for statistical purposes only. 6. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an independent, or something else? IF INDEPENDENT: Would you say that you lean more toward the Republicans or more toward the Democrats? Republican... 30 independent - lean Republican... 8 Republican... 39 independent... 17 Democrat... 40 independent - lean Democratic... 8 Democrat... 32 (Don t know/refused)... 4 7. What is your age? 18-24... 1 25-29... 1 30-34... 4 35-39... 13 40-44... 9 45-49... 21 50-54... 11 55-59... 5 60-64... 19 65-69... 5 70-74... 5 75 and over... 2 (Refused)... 3 8. (RECORD GENDER) Male... 68 Female... 32 9. For statistical purposes only, which of these categories best describes the gross revenue of your business in 2013? Less than $100,000... 7 $100,000 to under $250,000... 11 $250,000 to under $500,000... 16 $500,000 to under $1 million... 17 $1 million to under $2 million... 10 $2 million or more... 19 (Don t know/refused)... 19 2014 Small Business Majority 12

10. For how many years have you been the owner of your current business? Less than 1 year... 3 1-2 years... 6 2-5 years... 12 6-10 years... 17 11-20 years... 26 More than 20 years... 32 (Don t know/refused)... 4 i Respondents were provided with the following description of patent assertion entities prior to this question: Now, as you may know, patent assertion entities sometimes called PAEs or patent trolls are companies that don't make or sell anything of their own; they just own patents. They often purchase vague or generalized patents covering commonly used technology such as Wi-Fi, scanners, or e-commerce tools, and then demand annual fees for use of that technology or immediately file lawsuits against companies they claim have infringed on their intellectual property. This is a situation that an end user of technology can face, such as a coffee shop offering Wi-Fi to their customers, not just faced by companies that manufacture and sell technology. 2014 Small Business Majority 13