\ POWER l United States Patent (19) Moreira 4,994,811. Feb. 19, 1991 (ALUATING. 11) Patent Number: 45) Date of Patent:

Similar documents
Hill, N.J. 21) Appl. No.: 758, Filed: Sep. 12, Int. Cl.5... GO2B 6/00; GO2B 6/36 52 U.S.C /24; 372/30

(12) United States Patent

F1 OSCILLATOR. United States Patent (19) Masaki 4,834,701 OSCILLATOR. May 30, Patent Number:, (45) Date of Patent:

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

5,313,661. United States Patent 1191 Malmi et al. May 17, 1994

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,512,361 B1

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

United States Patent (19) Rottmerhusen

Economou. May 14, 2002 (DE) Aug. 13, 2002 (DE) (51) Int. Cl... G01R 31/08

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,436,044 B1

USOO A. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,272,450 Wisherd (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 21, 1993

HHHHHH. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,079,455. McCafferty et al. tor to provide a negative feedback path for charging the

United States Patent (19) Nonami

United States Patent (19) Ohta

United States Patent (19)

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,477,226 Hager et al. 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 19, 1995

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,557,649 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,948,658 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,937,567 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,462,700 B1. Schmidt et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 8, 2002

4,695,748 Sep. 22, 1987

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) PeSola et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,013,715 B2

United States Patent (19) Levine

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,275,104 B1

United States Patent (19) Onuki et al.

United States Patent [19] Adelson

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US B2. Chokkalingam et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 1, 2009

HII. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,087,922. Tang et al. "Experimental Results of a Multifrequency Array An

(12) United States Patent

52 U.S. Cl f40; 363/71 58) Field of Search /40, 41, 42, 363/43, 71. 5,138,544 8/1992 Jessee /43. reduced.

United States Patent (19) Wahhoud et al.

United States Patent (19) Morris

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

Hill. United States Patent (19) Martin. 11 Patent Number: 5,796,848 45) Date of Patent: Aug. 18, 1998

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

Soffen 52 U.S.C /99; 375/102; 375/11; 370/6, 455/295; 455/ /1992 Japan. 18 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets

United States Patent (19) [11] Patent Number: 5,746,354

United States Patent (19) Price, Jr.

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

United States Patent (19) Minowa

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

part data signal (12) United States Patent control 33 er m - sm is US 7,119,773 B2

-400. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1. (19) United States. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 23, 2005.

52 U.S. Cl /395 sponding ideal pulse-height spectrum. Comparison of the

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,228,693 B2

El Segundo, Calif. (21) Appl. No.: 321,490 (22 Filed: Mar. 9, ) Int, Cl."... H03B5/04; H03B 5/32 52 U.S. Cl /158; 331/10; 331/175

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,339,297 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,765,631 B2. Ishikawa et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 20, 2004

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1. T (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 27, 2012

(*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this E. E. E. " "...O.E.

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

III. I. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,121,014. Huang

rectifying smoothing circuit

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1. Alberts et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 4, 2009

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1. (30) Foreign Application Priority Data Aug. 2, 2000 (JP)...

llllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll1 llllllllllllllllllllllll

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,859,376 B2. Johnson, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 28, 2010

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

issi Field of search. 348/36, , 33) of the turret punch press machine; an image of the

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,337,722 B1

United States Patent (19) Archibald

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

United States Patent 19) 11 Patent Number: 5,442,436 Lawson (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 15, 1995

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

51) Int. Cl... G01S 1500 G01S 3/80 The acoustic elements are arranged to be driven by the

58) Field of Seash, which is located on the first core leg. The fifth winding,

United States Patent (19) Davis

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,889,643 Elms (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 30, 1999

USOO513828OA. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,138,280. Gingrich et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 11, 1992

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1. Goeke (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 24, 2014

United States Patent 19

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

% 2 22 % United States Patent (19) Cain et al. 11 Patent Number: 5,036,323 (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 30, 1991

73 Assignee: Four Queens, Inc., Las Vegas, Nev. (21) Appl. No.: 840, Filed: Feb. 24, Int. Cl... A63F1/00 52 U.S. C...

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1

United States Patent (19 11 Patent Number: 5,592,073 Redlich 45) Date of Patent: Jan. 7, 1997

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

(12) United States Patent

PProgrammable - Programm

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

Transcription:

United States Patent (19) Moreira 11) Patent Number: 45) Date of Patent: 54 SENSITIVITY TIME CONTROL DEVICE 75) Inventor: Joao Moreira, Landsberg, Fed. Rep. of Germany 73) Assignee: Deutsche Forschungsanstalt fuer Luft - und Raumfahrt e.v., Cologne, Fed. Rep. of Germany 21 Appl. No.: 548,796 22 Filed: Jul. 6, 1990 30 Foreign Application Priority Data Jul. 7, 1989 IDE Fed. Rep. of Germany... 3922429 51 Int. Cl.... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - as a GOS 13/34 52 U.S. Cl....... 342/205; 342/92 58 Field of Search... 342/205, 92 (56 References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 3,231,889 1/1966 Layde et al.... 342/89 3,525,095 8/1970 Cordry...... 34.2/26 3,949,398 4/1976 Donahue...... 342/92 4,062,0ll 12/1977 Preston et al.... 342/94 4,370,652 1/1983 Lucchi...... 342/101 4,509,050 4/1985 Amoroso, Jr. et al.... 342/91 4,524,361 6/1985 Teulings...... 342/201 4,529,983 7/1985 Lyall...... 342/26 4,728,953 3/1988 Richmond... 342/91 OTHER PUBLICATIONS C. E. Livingstone et al., "CCRS C/X-Airborne Syn thetic Aperture Radar; An R An D Tool For The ERS-1 Time Frame', Canada Center for Remote Sens ing, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1988. M. I. Skolnik, "Radar Handbook', Naval Research Laboratory, pp 5-19 to 5-23, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1970. Primary Examiner-Thomas H. Tarcza Assistant Examiner-John B. Sotomayor Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Browdy and Neimark 57 ABSTRACT In a sensitivity time control device for an imaging radar system with an automatic gain control attenuator, a sensitivity time control attenuator and an analog-digital converter, output signals of the analog-digital converter are applied, via a device (20) generating an average value and a comparator device, to a control device, which has a ideal on-off relay connected with a device for determining its control parameter, an integrating member, switched downstream, and a device for calcu lating the operating point of the automatic gain control attenuator device. Furthermore, an n-bit digital analog converter is switched downstream of the control de vice, by means of the analog output voltage of which the sensitivity time control attenuator is controlled. It is possible, with the aid of the sensitivity time control device, to evaluate continuously the backscatter signal of an imaging radar system in real time, so that it is continuously possible in this way to determine an opti mal sensitivity time control curve. By means of such an optimal sensitivity time control it is always possible to obtain the average value of the backscatter signal out put independent of the range. 1 Claim, 2 Drawing Sheets POWER \ POWER 2 13 l - 15 a(k) ATTENUATION EVEL DEVICE FOR (ALUATING THE OPERATING POINT OF AG DEVICE FOR DETERMINING - A -

U.S. Patent Sheet 1 of 2 [[ 83080]}} 91 80]]] 130 (61-)

U.S. Patent Sheet 2 of 2 TEJA]] 80]]3130

1. SENSTIVITY TIME CONTROL DEVICE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention The invention relates to a sensitivity time control device in accordance with the preamble of the claim. With imaging radar systems used today, radar pulses (k) are transmitted by means of an antenna 10, by means of which the backscatter signals e(k) are then received and forwarded to a transmitter-receiver unit 11, where they are down-mixed, as illustrated in the top part of a block diagram in FIG. 1. The Amplitude of the back scatter signals received is changed by means of two attenuators switched in series in the form of an auto matic gain control attenuator (AGC) 12 and a sensitiv ity time control attenuator 13 (or STC unit 13). A signal detector 14 is placed downstream of the sensitivity time control attenuator (STC) 13 for demod ulation and detection. The output signal of the detector 14 is digitally converted in an analog-digital (A/D) converter 15 and forwarded via a formatting unit 16 to a recording unit 17. Because the backscatter signal e(k) received by means of the antenna 10 can be large with range and may be, for example, up to 50 db, the dynamic range of the imaging radar system must be correspondingly adapted. As a rule, however, the dynamic range of such a radar system is limited by the analog-digital conversion which has been performed in the converter 15. But without a sensitivity time control by means of the STC attenuator 13, large distortions would occur in the course of ana log-digital conversion or corresponding quantization. In this case, the distortions in the course of quantization are the result of the sum of the so-called quantization noise and the saturation noise. Because there is little or no information available regarding the terrain properties to be represented, it is a disadvantage of the known sensitivity time control de vice that it is not possible to determine the sensitivity time control curve exactly in advance. The analog-digi tal converter also cannot be optimally controlled for this reason. With the known time control devices it is necessary to calculate a fresh sensitivity time control curve for each flight geometry or for each system con figuration. Because of this, particularly large expendi tures are required for the operational use of the imaging radar system over a terrain, the backscatter properties of which are still unknown. None of the existing sensitivity time control devices evaluates the backscatter signal in real time. Therefore the sensitivity time control curve is either determined in advance, if that is possible, or it must be manually set during the operation. This has been described, for exam ple, in a publication in connection with a CCRS sympo sium in Canada in 1988 as special issue 88 CH 2572-6/88/0000-0015 of IEEE. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore the object of the invention to provide a sensitivity time control device in which an optimal sensitivity time control curve is generated, so that opti mal control of the analog-digital converter(s) is possible and in which quantization can be performed with mini mal distortion. This is attained in accordance with the invention in a sensitivity time control device in accor 10 5 20 25 30 35 45 50 55 2 dance with the preamble of the patent claim by the features in its characterizing part. The object on which the invention is based is attained by a special control where the backscatter signal of the imaging radar system is continuously evaluated in real time so that it is always possible to determine an optimal sensitivity time control curve in this way. Also, because averaging of the power of the backscatter signal is per formed in accordance with the invention, the average value of the backscatter power prior to analog-digital conversion stays always constant. With an optimal sen sitivity time control, the average value of the backscat ter signal power in the invention can always be kept independent of the range. Because of the special con trol, other critical components, such as the mixers in the IF section of the detector, can be additionally sup ported. It is A particular advantage of the invention that the sensitivity time control curve is generated automati cally and, if desired, constantly, and in this way is opti mally adapted to the entire system. No Information is necessary regarding the terrain properties, the antenna diagram, the angle of incidence, the range nor regarding the loss nor the non-linearities of the imaging radar system used. The invention will be described in detail below by means of a preferred embodiment. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional imaging radar system expanded by a sensitivity time control device 2 in accordance with the invention; and FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a sensitivity time control device in accordance with the invention. DETALED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The sensitivity time control device 2, shown as a block in FIG. 1, is shown in detail in FIG. 2. The back scatter pulses e(k) received by means of the antenna 10 in FIG. 1 are amplified in the receiver device 11 and are applied via the two attenuators switched in series in the form of the automatic gain Control attenuator (AGC) 12 and the sensitivity time control attenuator (STC)13 and via the detector 14 to the A/D converter, where the backscatter signal e(k) generated from the backscat ter pulses is digitized. The digitized output values of the A/D converter 15 are averaged in a device 20 of the sensitivity time con trol device 2, which generates an average value. In this case the average value generation of the output curve of the digitized backscatter signal e(k) is carried out over several radar pulses (not over the range), so that the average backscatter signal power over the range can be estimated in this way. The average backscatter signal power then is com pared in a comparator device 21 with a reference level which corresponds to the desired nominal power. The output signal of the comparator device 21 is subse quently controlled in the control device 22; adaptive control takes place in an ideal on-off relay 221 of the control device 22. A device 224 for determining the control parameter d of the ideal on-off relay 221 is con nected with it. The following advantages are brought about with such an ideal on-off relay control. The amplification factor of the control path is not constant and can be 65

3 greatly changed by the received backscatter signal e(k). However, in this connection the stability of the ideal on-off relay 221 does not depend on the amplification factor. Because an integrating member 222 is switched 5 downstream of the ideal on-off relay 221 it is possible to perform discrete operations very easily and quickly. Any self-oscillation of the control value occurring in this case does not disturb the system as long as the amplitude remains sufficiently small. The adaptation is also mainly used to shorten the response time and to keep the self-oscillation as low as possible. The adaptation used is performed similar to the pro cess of successive approximation. For this purpose an n-bit digital-analog (D/A) converter 23 is switched downstream of the control device 22 or the integrating member 222, by means of which the digital signal at the output of the control device 22 is converted into an analog voltage for the control of the sensitivity time control attenuator (SIC) 13, as indicated by the curve shown at the upper left of block 23. Calculation of the parameter 'd', by means of which the ideal on-off relay 221 is controlled, is again per formed in accordance with already performed iteration steps. The integrating member 222 is initialized with 2/2, which corresponds to half the range of the n-bit D/A converter. This Means that in the first iteration step the parameter of the ideal on-off relay 221 is set to : of the n-bit range, i.e. 2/4. In the course of the foll lowing iteration steps the value of the parameter "d continues to be halved until of the n-bit range, i.e. 1, has been reached. If at this time more iteration steps are desired or required, the parameter of the ideal on-off relay 221 always remains one (1). Therefore control can be basically performed in n iteration steps(for example: 35 n=8 for an 8-bit D/A converter). Such a control is then performed in the sensitivity time control attenuator 13 for all range gates, so that as a result a sensitivity time control curve which depends on time is generated. Because in practical application the signal is still noisy after the average value genera tion in the device 20 because of the short integration time filtering is performed in the range direction before and after each iteration step in the actually employed circuit devices, however, this has not been separately shown in the block diagram of FIG. 2. The output signal of the integrating member 222 is also applied to a device 223 for calculating the operat ing point of the automatic gain control attenuator 12. By means of optimal setting of the operating point of 50 the automatic gain control attenuator (AGC) 12, corre sponding optimization of the operating point of the sensitivity time control attenuator 13 is performed. The algorithm for this can be described as follows: the sensitivity time control attenuator is initialized, i.e. 55 by means of the initialization an amplification provided for the automatic gain control attenuator (AGC) 12. Subsequently a sensitivity time control curve is gener ated, as already described above. Following each such 60 10 15 20 25 30 45 4 generation, the operational range of the attenuator in the form of the sensitivity time control attenuator (STC) 13 is checked. If the operational range of the STC-attenuator is optimal, the sensitivity time control device reports to the user that control was successful. But if the opera tional range of the STC-attenuator is not optimal, a few amplification of the AGC attenuator 12 is calculated and programmed by the device 223. It is then necessary to generate a new sensitivity time control curve, as already mentioned above. After per forming the algorithm, the operational range of the A/D converter 15 as well as of the sensitivity time control attenuator (STC) 13 of the imaging radar sys tem is optimized. It is also possible to implement the sensitivity time control device in connection with sonar or lidar. The foregoing description of the specific embodi ments will so fully reveal the general nature of the in vention that others can, by applying current knowl edge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applica tions such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adapta tions and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equiva lents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be under stood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limita tion. What is claimed is: 1. A sensitivity time control device for an imaging radar system having a transmission/receiving device for transmitting radar pulses (k) and for receiving backscat ter pulses (e(k)), having an automatic gain control atten uator (12), a sensitivity time control attenuator (13), an analog-digital converter, having a formatting unit and having a recording unit, in the above sequence: said sensitivity time control device comprising: output signals of an analog-digital converter having an output; a means for generating an average value connected to said converter output and having an output; a control means (22) comprising: a ideal on-off relay (221) connected to said compara tor device output and said ideal on-off relay having an output; an integrating member (222) connected to said ideal on-off relay (221) output, said member having an on output; means for determining (224) a control parameter (d) connected to said ideal on-off relay (221), and means for calculating (223) the operating point of said automatic gain control attenuator converter to said integrator member output; an n-bit digital analog converter (23) is connected to said control means 22 output; and the sensitivity time control attenuator (13) is con nected to an output of said analog converter (23). xx s k 65