Case 1:18-cv LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Attorneys for Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:11-cv KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:10-cv D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770

Case 1:16-cv TWP-MPB Document 1 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

~ft~... J _J ~ ' ;1 '::1st~ ::i<isi~1 110.J tn Dis~~d;e ~

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company.

Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Yee ) and A.V. Jewelry Export-Import, Ltd. ( AV Jewelry ) (collectively Plaintiffs ), for their

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:14-cv AJB-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

For Orthodontists PRECISION

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

Case 3:18-cv D Document 1 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 : : Defendants. :

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

Courthouse News Service

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Invention SUBMISSION BROCHURE PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR INVENTION

Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law. April 30, 2012

Plaintiff, Defendants. undersigned counsel, for his Complaint against defendants Richard Prince ( Mr. Prince ),

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint

14:"LCA/Estate"), do. ay , 14. lit. by its undersigned attorneys, Andrews Kurth LLP, alleges as follows:

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:16-cv JAM Document 1 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 17

4. Jeffrey A. Goldberg and Andrew Federhar are attorneys who represented the Kingman Airport Authority with respect to the condemnation proceeding

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 37 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Patent Misuse. History:

Case 1:16-cv GMS Document 13 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 78 PageID #: 367 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018

Practical Guidelines For IP Portfolio Management

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 135 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:18-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

PlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern Bankruptcy Court Case No Amanda Alexx Giovanni- Adversary Proceeding. Document 1.

John Allcock, DLA Piper US, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendants.

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

Case 8:10-cv CJC -MLG Document 1 Filed 10/04/10 Page 1 of 41 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

How To Draft Patents For Future Portfolio Growth

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1400 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 26

Transcription:

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 3SHAPE A/S, Plaintiff, v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 1:18-cv-00697-LPS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff 3Shape A/S ( Plaintiff or 3Shape, by and through its undersigned counsel, for its complaint against Defendant Align Technology, Inc. ( Defendant or Align, hereby alleges and states the following: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff 3Shape is a Danish corporation with a principal place of business at Holmens Kanal 7, 1060 Copenhagen K, Denmark. 2. Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the entire right, title and interest in and to U.S. Patent No. 9,962,244 ( the 244 patent entitled Focus Scanning Apparatus Recording Color, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Align Technology, Inc. is a United States corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, with a principal place of business at 2820 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95134. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant makes, uses, sells and offers for sale in the United States and/or imports into the United States products called itero Element Scanner,

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 2 of 17 PageID #: 48 itero Element 2 Scanner and itero Element Flex Scanner (collectively the itero Element Scanners, which each embody a focus scanner. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code, 100 et seq. 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a. 7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because it has, directly or through its agents and/or intermediaries, committed acts within Delaware giving rise to this action and/or Defendant has established minimum contacts with Delaware such that the exercise of jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 8. Upon information and belief, Defendant regularly conducts business in Delaware, and purposefully avails itself of the privileges of conducting business in Delaware. In particular, upon information and belief, Defendant and/or its agents and/or intermediaries, make, use, import, offer for sale, sell and/or advertise their products and affiliated services in Delaware, including the itero Element Scanners, sufficient to give rise to jurisdiction. 9. Defendant has also purposely availed itself of the courts of this venue, having brought actions against Plaintiff in the federal courts of the District of Delaware, including the pending 17-cv-1646, -1647, -1648, and -1649 actions. The use of the courts of this jurisdiction is sufficient to give rise to jurisdiction over Align. 10. Upon information and belief, and as further described herein, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe and/or contributorily infringe the 244 patent in Delaware, which has led to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiff. Upon information and belief, 2

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 3 of 17 PageID #: 49 Defendant derives substantial revenue from the sale of infringing products distributed within Delaware and/or expects or should reasonably expect its actions to have consequences in Delaware. In addition, upon information and belief, Defendant knowingly induces, and continues to knowingly induce, infringement of the 244 patent within Delaware by offering for sale, selling, and/or contracting with others to market infringing products with the intent to facilitate infringing use of the products by others within Delaware and by creating and/or disseminating product information and other materials providing instruction for infringing use. 11. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b, (c and/or (d, and 28 U.S.C. 1400(b. THE 244 PATENT AND ALIGN S INFRINGEMENT 12. The 244 patent was duly and lawfully issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO on May 8, 2018 to listed inventors Bo Esbech, Christian Romer Rosberg, Mike van der Poel, Rasmus Kjaer, Michael Vinther, and Karl-Josef Hollenbeck. 13. Evidence of the assignment of the 244 patent to 3Shape is recorded with the USPTO at Reel/Frame 037689/0346. Plaintiff is listed on the face of the 244 patent as assignee. 14. The 244 patent is entitled Focus Scanning Apparatus Recording Color and is directed to a focus scanner for recording surface geometry and surface color of an object. 15. 3Shape sells an industry-leading intraoral scanner under the name TRIOS. The TRIOS system incorporates embodiments of the patented technologies of the 244 patent. 16. Defendant is a competitor of 3Shape in the field of intraoral scanners. 17. Defendant makes, uses, offers to sell, sells, imports, promotes and/or demonstrates versions of its itero Element Scanners, including the wand, cart, and/or related software, and other related products ( Accused Products in the United States. 3

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 4 of 17 PageID #: 50 18. Defendant has been and is now directly infringing, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing, at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. 19. Each of Defendant s itero Element Scanners is a focus scanner for recording surface geometry and surface color of an object. 20. Upon information and belief, each of the itero Element Scanners comprises a multichromatic light source configured for providing a multichromatic probe light for illumination of an object and a color image sensor comprising an array of image sensor pixels for capturing one or more 2D images of light received from said object. 21. Upon information and belief, each of the itero Element Scanners is configured to operate by translating a focus plane along an optical axis of the focus scanner and capturing a series of 2D images, each 2D image of the series being at a different focus plane position such that the series of captured 2D images forms a stack of 2D images. 22. Upon information and belief, each of the itero Element Scanners comprises a data processing system configured to derive surface geometry information for a block of said image sensor pixels from the 2D images in the stack of 2D images captured by said color image sensor. 23. Upon information and belief, the data processing system of each of the itero Element Scanners is also configured to derive surface color information for the block of said image sensor pixels from at least one of the 2D images used to derive the surface geometry information. 24. Upon information and belief, the data processing system of each of the itero Element Scanners is configured to combine a number of subscans to generate a digital 3D representation of the object, and determine object color of a least one point of the generated 4

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 5 of 17 PageID #: 51 digital 3D representation of the object from sub-scan color of the sub-scans combined to generate the digital 3D representation, such that the digital 3D representation expresses both geometry and color profile of the object, wherein determining the object color comprises computing a weighted average of subscan color values derived for corresponding points in overlapping sub-scans at that point of the object surface. 25. These features of each of the itero Element Scanners in paragraphs 19 to 24 above correspond to those recited and claimed in at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. 26. For example, upon information and belief, Defendant describes its itero Element Scanner on an online webpage entitled Products itero Intraoral Scanner, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The webpage contains text and an image describing and showing the itero Element Scanner and that it embodies the focus scanner recited in at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. See Products itero Intraoral Scanner (2016, http://www.itero.com/enus/products/itero_element (last visited May 4, 2018 (the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage. The Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage illustrates that a focus scanner is configured for recording surface geometry and surface color of an object, as recited in claim 1 of the 244 patent. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( Color scanning gives you a significant leap forward in visualization. The color sensor is integrated in the itero Element scanner, and the patented dual-aperture lens system is designed to simultaneously capture 2D images in color with highly accurate 3D laser scanning.. Next to the above-cited text is the following image, illustrating aspects of a scanned image showing surface geometry and surface color of an object: 5

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 6 of 17 PageID #: 52 In addition, upon information and belief, Defendant illustrated the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage with the following image: The image shows that the itero Element Scanner comprises a multichromatic light source configured for providing a multichromatic probe light for illumination of the object, as recited in claim 1 of the 244 patent. This image shows a white light source, in particular a white LED (i.e., a multichromatic light source which, via a probe, illuminates the teeth (i.e., the object. 27. In addition, upon information and belief, Defendant described the itero Element Scanner as a product that comprises a color image sensor comprising an array of image sensor pixels for capturing one or more 2D images of light received from said object. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( Color scanning gives you a significant leap forward in visualization. The color sensor is integrated in the itero Element scanner, and the patented dualaperture lens system is designed to simultaneously capture 2D images in color with highly 6

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 7 of 17 PageID #: 53 accurate 3D laser scanning. Color scanning can make it easier to distinguish between gingival and tooth structures for a more precise clinical evaluation.. 28. Upon information and belief, Defendant describes the itero Element Scanner as having a color image sensor in a press release entitled Align Technology Announces Next Generation itero(r Element(TM Intraoral Scanner, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. See Align Technology Announces Next Generation itero(r Element(TM Intraoral Scanner (2015, http://investor.aligntech.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=900449 (last visited May 4, 2018 (the Align Technology Announces Next Generation itero(r Element(TM Intraoral Scanner webpage ( The new image sensor is engineered to enable 20X faster scan speed with color scanning to easily distinguish between gingival and dental tissue for more precise clinical evaluation.. 29. In addition, upon information and belief, Defendant in the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage describes that the itero Element Scanner is configured to translate a focus plane along an optical axis of the focus scanner and capture a series of the 2D images, each 2D image of the series is at a different focus plane position such that the series of captured 2D images forms a stack of 2D images. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( Continuous scanning design lets you scan in motion. The software automatically detects and repositions scanning start and stop points when you move to a new scanning position within the scanned segment. And while you are scanning, the itero Element scanner is engineered to simultaneously process the scan. It automatically stitches together images for rendering in the correct order, adapts to changes in positioning, and detects and removes soft tissue. Capture everything and view exactly what you need to see.. 30. Upon information and belief, the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage 7

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 8 of 17 PageID #: 54 contains text describing that the itero Element Scanner product comprises a data processing system. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( And while you are scanning, the itero Element scanner is engineered to simultaneously process the scan.. Because the itero Element scanner processes the scan, it comprises a data processing system. 31. Upon information and belief, the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage states that the data processing system of the itero Element Scanner is configured to derive surface geometry information for a block of said image sensor pixels from the 2D images in the stack of 2D images captured by said color image sensor, the data processing system also configured to derive surface color information for the block of said image sensor pixels from at least one of the 2D images used to derive the surface geometry information, as recited in claim 1 of the 244 patent. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( And while you are scanning, the itero Element scanner is engineered to simultaneously process the scan. It automatically stitches together images for rendering in the correct order, adapts to changes in positioning, and detects and removes soft tissue. Capture everything and view exactly what you need to see.... Color scanning gives you a significant leap forward in visualization. The color sensor is integrated in the itero Element scanner, and the patented dual-aperture lens system is designed to simultaneously capture 2D images in color with highly accurate 3D laser scanning. Color scanning can make it easier to distinguish between gingival and tooth structures for a more precise clinical evaluation.. 32. Upon information and belief, the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage describes the data processing system of the itero Element Scanner as further configured to combine a number of subscans to generate a digital 3D representation of the object, and determine object color of a least one point of the generated digital 3D representation of the object 8

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 9 of 17 PageID #: 55 from sub scan color of the sub scans combined to generate the digital 3D representation, such that the digital 3D representation expresses both geometry and color profile of the object, as recited in claim 1 of the 244 patent. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( And while you are scanning, the itero Element scanner is engineered to simultaneously process the scan. It automatically stitches together images for rendering in the correct order, adapts to changes in positioning, and detects and removes soft tissue. Capture everything and view exactly what you need to see.. Next to the above-cited text is the following image, illustrating aspects of a rendered image: 33. Upon information and belief, Defendant describes, in the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage, the itero Element Scanner wherein determining the object color comprises computing a weighted average of subscan color values derived for corresponding points in overlapping sub scans at that point of the object surface, as recited in claim 1 of the 244 patent. See the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage ( And while you are scanning, the itero Element scanner is engineered to simultaneously process the scan. It automatically stitches together images for rendering in the correct order, adapts to changes in positioning, and detects and removes soft tissue. Capture everything and view exactly what you need to see.. Stitching of images as described on the Products itero Intraoral Scanner webpage, upon 9

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 10 of 17 PageID #: 56 information and belief, relies on averaging overlapping sub-scans. 34. In addition, Defendant describes its itero Element 2 Scanner on an online webpage entitled itero Element 2 itero Intraoral Scanner, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D. The webpage contains text and an image describing and showing the itero Element 2 Scanner and characterizing the itero Element 2 Scanner as an improvement in terms of processing power and portability. See itero Element 2 itero Intraoral Scanner, http://www.itero.com/en-us/products/itero_element_two (last visited May 24, 2018 (the itero Element 2 itero Intraoral Scanner webpage. Defendant also describes the itero Element 2 Scanner in a press release entitled Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E. See Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability (2018, https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/04/25/1487495/0/en/align- Technology-to-Introduce-Two-New-iTero-Scanners-Featuring-Greater-Power-and- Portability.html (last visited May 24, 2018 (the Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability webpage. Upon information and belief, the improvements to the itero Element 2 Scanner described on the itero Element 2 itero Intraoral Scanner webpage and the Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability webpage do not pertain to the features of the itero Element Scanner described in paragraphs 19 to 33 above. Therefore, upon information and belief, the itero Element 2 Scanner contains the above-described features of the itero Element Scanner and embodies the focus scanner recited in at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. 35. In addition, Defendant describes its itero Element Flex Scanner on an online webpage entitled itero Element Flex itero Intraoral Scanner, a copy of which is attached 10

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 11 of 17 PageID #: 57 hereto as Exhibit F. The webpage contains text and an image describing and showing the itero Element Flex Scanner and characterizing the itero Element Flex Scanner as an improvement in terms of processing power and portability. See itero Element Flex itero Intraoral Scanner, http://www.itero.com/en-us/products/itero_element_flex (last visited May 24, 2018 (the itero Element Flex itero Intraoral Scanner webpage. Defendant also describes the itero Element Flex Scanner on the Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability webpage. Upon information and belief, the improvements to the itero Element Flex Scanner described on the itero Element Flex itero Intraoral Scanner webpage and the Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability webpage do not pertain to the features of the itero Element Scanner described in paragraphs 19 to 33 above. Therefore, upon information and belief, the itero Element Flex Scanner contains the above-described features of the itero Element Scanner and embodies the focus scanner recited in at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. 36. Upon information and belief, Defendant has sold and/or offered for sale its itero Element Scanner in the United States at trade shows in Chicago, IL, New York, NY and Detroit, MI. The Align Technology Announces Next Generation Itero(R Element(TM Intraoral Scanner webpage is further evidence of Defendant s sale and/or offer for sale of the itero Element Scanner product in the United States. 37. Upon information and belief, Defendant has sold and/or offered for sale its itero Element 2 Scanner in the United States at trade shows in Washington, DC. The Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability webpage is further evidence of Defendant s sale and/or offer for sale of the itero Element 2 Scanner product in the United States. 11

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 12 of 17 PageID #: 58 38. Upon information and belief, Defendant has sold and/or offered for sale its itero Element Flex Scanner in the United States at trade shows in Washington, DC. The Align Technology to Introduce Two New itero Scanners Featuring Greater Power and Portability webpage is further evidence of Defendant s sale and/or offer for sale of the itero Element Flex Scanner product in the United States. 39. Defendant thus directly infringes, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringes, at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. COUNT 1: DIRECT INFRINGEMENT 40. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1.-39. 41. Defendant directly infringes, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents at least claim 1 of the 244 patent. 42. Align possesses knowledge of, and is aware of, the 244 patent. 43. On information and belief, Defendant intends to, and continues to intend to, directly infringe the 244 patent through the sale of the Accused Products. 44. On information and belief, Defendant knew or should have known of the 244 patent and its infringement of the 244 patent, and has acted and continues to act, in an egregious and wanton manner by infringing the 244 patent. 45. On information and belief, despite knowing that its actions constituted infringement of the 244 patent and/or despite knowing that there was a high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of the patent, Defendant nevertheless continued its infringing actions, and continues to make, use, and sell, the Accused Products. 46. Align s acts of infringement have injured and damaged 3Shape and will continue to injure and damage 3Shape. 12

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 13 of 17 PageID #: 59 47. Align s action have caused 3Shape to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights and the loss of its ability to exclude others from the market. Upon information and belief, Align will continue these infringing acts unless enjoined by this court. COUNT 2: INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT BY INDUCEMENT 48. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 42 above as if fully set forth herein. 49. Defendant is liable for inducing infringement of the 244 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(b by having knowledge of the 244 patent and knowingly causing or intending to cause, and continuing to knowingly cause or intend to cause, direct infringement of the 244 patent, with specific intent, by its customers. 50. Specifically, Defendant actively induces infringement of the 244 patent by, inter alia, training its customers on the use of the Accused Products and/or promotion, sales, and/or importation of the Accused Products including the infringing itero Element Scanners to Defendant s customers including, but not limited to, resellers and end users for their use of the focus scanner claimed in the 244 patent. 51. Defendant s customers for the Accused Products directly infringe the 244 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the itero Element Scanners. 52. For example, Defendant actively induces infringement of the 244 patent, because Defendant has knowledge that end users of Defendant s itero Element Scanners including, but not limited to, dentists and technicians, use Defendant s infringing itero Element Scanner product in the United States, and because Defendant encourages such acts resulting in direct patent infringement, by, inter alia, training, promotion, sales, and/or importation of the infringing itero Element Scanners to Defendant s customers including, but not limited to, resellers and end users for their use of the focus scanner claimed in the 244 patent. 13

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 14 of 17 PageID #: 60 53. On information and belief, Defendant intends to, and continues to intend to, indirectly infringe the 244 patent through inducement of the sale and use of the Accused Products. 54. On information and belief, Defendant knew or should have known of the 244 patent and has acted, and continues to act, in an egregious and wanton manner by infringing the 244 patent. 55. On information and belief, despite knowing that its actions constituted inducement infringement of the 244 patent and/or despite knowing that there was a high likelihood that its actions constituted inducement infringement of the patent, Defendant nevertheless continued its infringing actions, and continues to make, use, and sell, the Accused Products. 56. Align s acts of infringement have injured and damaged 3Shape and will continue to injure and damage 3Shape. 57. Align s action have caused 3Shape to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights and the loss of its ability to exclude others from the market. Upon information and belief, Align will continue these infringing acts unless enjoined by this court. COUNT 3: INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT BY CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT 58. 3Shape repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 to 52 as if fully set forth herein. 59. Defendant is liable for contributory infringement of the 244 patent under 35 U.S.C 271(c by having sold or offered to sell, and continuing to sell or offer for sale the itero Element Scanners within the United States and/or by importing the itero Element Scanners into the United States because the itero Element Scanners constitute a material part of the invention embodied in the 244 patent, which Defendant knows to be especially made and/or especially adapted for use in infringement of the 244 patent, and which is not a staple article or commodity 14

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 15 of 17 PageID #: 61 of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. 60. Defendant is liable for contributory infringement by having knowledge of the 244 patent and knowingly causing or intending to cause, and continuing to knowingly cause or intend to cause, direct infringement of the 244 patent by its customers including, but not limited to, resellers and end users of the itero Element Scanners. 61. Specifically, Defendant contributes to infringement of the 244 patent by, inter alia, promotion, sales, and/or importation of the infringing itero Element Scanners to Defendant s customers including, but not limited to, resellers and end users for their use of the focus scanners claimed in the 244 patent. Those customers directly infringe the 244 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the itero Element Scanners. For example, Defendant is liable for contributory infringement by having knowledge of the 244 patent and knowingly causing or intending to cause, and continuing to knowingly cause or intend to cause, end users of Defendant s itero Element Scanners including, but not limited to, dentists and technicians, to directly infringe the 244 patent by using Defendant s itero Element Scanners in the United States. 62. Defendant s past and ongoing infringement of the 244 patent has and will continue to irreparably harm 3Shape. 63. Defendant s past and ongoing infringement of the 244 patent has and will continue to cause 3Shape damages. 64. Defendant s past and ongoing infringement of the 244 patent, upon information and belief, has been knowing and willful. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury for all issues so triable. 15

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 16 of 17 PageID #: 62 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter: A. A judgment in favor of Plaintiff that Defendant has infringed the 244 patent, directly, jointly, and/or indirectly by way of inducing and/or contributing to the infringement of the 244 patent; B. An order of this Court permanently enjoining Defendant and its officers, directors, agents, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others in active concert therewith from infringing, including inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of, the 244 patent; C. A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay Plaintiff its damages, costs, expenses, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest for Defendant s infringement of the 244 patent, as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284; D. A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay treble damages as provided under 35 U.S.C. 284; E. A judgment and order finding that this is an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285, and awarding to Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees; and F. Any and all other relief to which Plaintiff may show itself to be entitled and/or as the Court may deem just and proper. 16

Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 17 of 17 PageID #: 63 Dated: May 24, 2018 /s/ Geoffrey G. Grivner Geoffrey Grivner (DE Bar No. 4711 BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC 919 North Market Street, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: (302 552-4207 Fax: (302 552-4200 geoffrey.grivner@bipc.com S. Lloyd Smith (pro hac pending David W. H. Leibovitch (pro hac pending Kimberly Coghill (pro hac pending BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC 1737 King Street, Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 22314-2727 Tel: (703 838-6514 Fax: (703 836-2021 lloyd.smith@bipc.com david.leibovitch@bipc.com kimberly.coghill@bipc.com Philip L. Hirschhorn (pro hac pending BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC 640 Fifth Avenue, 9 th Floor New York, NY 10019-6102 Tel: (212 440-4470 Fax: (212 440-4401 philip.hirschhorn@bipc.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 3Shape A/S 17