Millimetre Spherical Wave Antenna Pattern Measurements at NPL. Philip Miller May 2009

Similar documents
Uncertainty Considerations In Spherical Near-field Antenna Measurements

A CYLINDRICAL NEAR-FIELD VS. SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA TEST COMPARISON

The CReSIS Anechoic Chamber is located at: The University of Kansas. M2SEC building W 15 th St. Lawrence, KS

RAYTHEON 23 x 22 50GHZ PULSE SYSTEM

ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY AND CORRECTION METHODS FOR MILLIMETER- WAVE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

A COMPOSITE NEAR-FIELD SCANNING ANTENNA RANGE FOR MILLIMETER-WAVE BANDS

WIESON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

> StarLab. Multi-purpose Antenna Measurement Multi-protocol Antenna Development Linear Array Antenna Measurement OTA Testing

Millimeter Spherical µ-lab System from Orbit/FR

System configurations. Main features. I TScan SOLUTION FOR

T- DualScan. StarLab

Keywords: cylindrical near-field acquisition, mechanical and electrical errors, uncertainty, directivity.

BROADBAND GAIN STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS MEASUREMENTS

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SELF-COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS

Project: 3.8M Series 1385 Ku-Band Rx/Tx System. General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies

33 BY 16 NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

Main features. System configurations. I Compact Range SOLUTION FOR

Accurate Planar Near-Field Results Without Full Anechoic Chamber

ANECHOIC CHAMBER DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

Antenna Measurement Theory

Gain And Arbitrary Beamwidth Measurement For Identical Test Antennas

Upgraded Planar Near-Field Test Range For Large Space Flight Reflector Antennas Testing from L to Ku-Band

Software. Equipment. Add-ons. Accessories. Services

A TECHNIQUE TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF FLEX CABLE PHASE INSTABILITY ON mm-wave PLANAR NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT ACCURACIES

ANECHOIC CHAMBER EVALUATION

Millimeter Wave Measurement System

Dr. John S. Seybold. November 9, IEEE Melbourne COM/SP AP/MTT Chapters

Implementation of a VHF Spherical Near-Field Measurement Facility at CNES

PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR PULSED ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

UNIT Explain the radiation from two-wire. Ans: Radiation from Two wire

Accuracy Estimation of Microwave Holography from Planar Near-Field Measurements

ESTIMATING THE UNCERTAINTIES DUE TO POSITION ERRORS IN SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

IMPROVING AND EXTENDING THE MARS TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE SCATTERING ERRORS

A BROADBAND POLARIZATION SELECTABLE FEED FOR COMPACT RANGE APPLICATIONS

REFLECTION SUPPRESSION IN LARGE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD RANGE

Structural Correction of a Spherical Near-Field Scanner for mm-wave Applications

GAIN COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS IN SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SCANNING

4GHz / 6GHz Radiation Measurement System

Antenna & Propagation. Antenna Parameters

ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS

Principles of Planar Near-Field Antenna Measurements. Stuart Gregson, John McCormick and Clive Parini. The Institution of Engineering and Technology

BENEFITS FOR DEPLOYABLE QUADRIFILAR HELICAL ANTENNA MODULES FOR SMALL SATELLITES

Part No. ETH-MMW-1000 (version 1A) Millimeter Measurement System Frequency Range: 18 GHz 75 GHz

Transmitarrays, reflectarrays and phase shifters for wireless communication systems. Pablo Padilla de la Torre Universidad de Granada

ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS

LE/ESSE Payload Design

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VARIOUS HEMISPHERICAL SCANNING TECHNIQUES

On the Plane Wave Assumption in Indoor Channel Modelling

AN5129 Application note

Antenna Measurement Software Features and Specifications

Antenna Engineering Lecture 3: Basic Antenna Parameters

A LABORATORY COURSE ON ANTENNA MEASUREMENT

4G MIMO ANTENNA DESIGN & Verification

Notes 21 Introduction to Antennas

CHAPTER 5 PRINTED FLARED DIPOLE ANTENNA

ANALYSIS OF LINEARLY AND CIRCULARLY POLARIZED MICROSTRIP PATCH ANTENNA ARRAY

ATCA Antenna Beam Patterns and Aperture Illumination

The CDT Ultra Wide-Band Anechoic Chamber. Félix Tercero, José Manuel Serna, Tim Finn, J.A.López Fernández INFORME TÉCNICO IT - OAN

Range Considerations for RF Networks

Mathematical models for radiodetermination radar systems antenna patterns for use in interference analyses

Radio channel measurement based evaluation method of mobile terminal diversity antennas

Characteristics of HF Coastal Radars

Using Frequency Diversity to Improve Measurement Speed Roger Dygert MI Technologies, 1125 Satellite Blvd., Suite 100 Suwanee, GA 30024

PROBE CORRECTION EFFECTS ON PLANAR, CYLINDRICAL AND SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

The first article of this two-part series explores the basic

JEM/SMILES AOPT EM, Part 2 Bandpass Characteristic and Beam Pattern after Thermal Cycling

Ave output power ANT 1(dBm) Ave output power ANT 2 (dbm)

Time Domain Far Field Antenna Measurements Without Anechoic Chamber

A LARGE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD ARCH SCANNER FOR CHARACTERIZING LOW-FREQUENCY PHASED ARRAYS

A study of Low Sidelobe Technology of Reflector Antenna and the Experimental Result of Decreasing its Sidelobe Level

MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTH-OBSERVER-1 SATELLITE X-BAND PHASED ARRAY

System configurations. Main features I SG 64 SOLUTION FOR

GPS Active Antenna With GPRS Measurement Report

Coupled Sectorial Loop Antenna (CSLA) for Ultra Wideband Applications

APPLICATIONS OF PORTABLE NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS

Near-Field Antenna Measurements using a Lithium Niobate Photonic Probe

Chapter 5. Array of Star Spirals

INDOOR AUTOMATIC F-16 FIRE CONTROL ANTENNA AND RADOME TEST FACILITIES

Antenna Measurement Uncertainty Method for Measurements in Compact Antenna Test Ranges

Vertical or horizontal antenna for limited space

The LACE Antenna Test Ranges

A LARGE COMBINATION HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL NEAR FIELD MEASUREMENT FACILITY FOR SATELLITE ANTENNA CHARACTERIZATION

NTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. Method for Measuring Base Station Antenna Radiation Characteristics in Anechoic Chamber. 1.

HOW TO CHOOSE AN ANTENNA RANGE CONFIGURATION

TPV-SFN Series Low RFR VHF Slot Pylon Antennas

SAGE Millimeter, Inc.

APPLICATION OF THE RUZE EQUATION FOR INFLATABLE APERTURE ANTENNAS

AN3359 Application note 1 Introduction Low cost PCB antenna for 2.4GHz radio: Meander design

UNIT Write short notes on travelling wave antenna? Ans: Travelling Wave Antenna

Overview. Measurement Aspects of Mobile Terminal Antennas. Mobile communications antennas. Antenna Characteristics. Clemens Icheln.

HScan. Horizontal Scanner

Non-Ideal Quiet Zone Effects on Compact Range Measurements

ANNEX TO RESOLUTION No. 372 DATED MAY 19, 2004 CERTIFICATION AND HOMOLOGATION STANDARD FOR SECTORIAL AND OMNI- DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS

STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF INCIDENT WAVES TO MOBILE ANTENNA IN MICROCELLULAR ENVIRONMENT AT 2.15 GHz

Polarization Experiments Using Jones Calculus

Further Refining and Validation of RF Absorber Approximation Equations for Anechoic Chamber Predictions

Characterization of a Photonics E-Field Sensor as a Near-Field Probe

Estimating Measurement Uncertainties in Compact Range Antenna Measurements

Direction Finding for Unmanned Aerial Systems Using Rhombic Antennas and Amplitude Comparison Monopulse. Ryan Kuiper

Fundamentals. Senior Project Manager / AEO Taiwan. Philip Chang

Transcription:

Millimetre Spherical Wave Antenna Pattern Measurements at NPL Philip Miller May 2009

The NPL Spherical Range The NPL Spherical Range is a conventional spherical range housed within a 15 m by 7.5 m by 7.5 m temperature controlled anechoic chamber It is equipped with a HP 8510C RF system operating up to 110 GHz. This is being upgraded to an Agilent PNA-X System

The NPL Spherical Range - Layout Transmit Tower Ram Screens Receive Positioner System Range Pit Transmit Tower Rails

The NPL Spherical Range - Positioner 1m maximum with 0.6m Travel 3.7m Possesses Alignment Aids Counterbalance Adjustable Slide

The NPL Spherical Range - Photograph

Millimetre Wave Measurements Major Error Sources RF Stability Errors Equal Signal and Reference Path Lengths Temperature Controlled Chamber Stability better than 1 deg at 72 GHz Can be tracked using a Tie Scan Antenna Positioner Errors High Accuracy Positioner System Antenna Stability Errors Possibly More of a Problem in Polar Mode

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioner Errors Three Sources of Error Misalignment Errors Manufacturing Errors Positioning Errors Examine the effects of the errors on a 42 dbi directivity antenna

Millimetre Wave Measurements Misalignment Errors Bottom Turntable can be aligned to 0.003 degree Large effect due to Tower Axes can be aligned to 0.1 mm Phase error ε p = 25 sin(θ) deg at 94 GHz Reduces to 0.5 deg over main beam area (Range Length = 6 m)

Millimetre Wave Measurements Manufacturing Errors Axis Positioning Errors and Axis Tilt Errors Tilt Error (Degs) 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.001 0-0.001-0.002-0.003-0.004-0.005 Azimuth Axis Tilt Error Fully Loaded 0 90 180 270 360 Horizontal Plane Vertical Plane Tilt Error (degs) Elevation Axis Tilt Error 0.003 0.002 0.001 0-0.001-0.002-0.003-180 -120-60 0 60 120 180 Across Slide Along Slide Position (Degs) Position (degs)

Millimetre Wave Measurements Manufacturing Errors Uncertainty Budget Error Quantity Uncertainty in Horizontal Plane Positional Uncertainty in Horizontal Plane, mm Azimuth Position Wobble 0.004 deg 0.070 Azimuth Positioner Radial Runout 0.025 mm 0.025 Azimuth Positioner Axial Runout 0.008 mm 0.008 Elevation Position Wobble 0.0025 deg 0.131 Elevation Positioner Radial Runout 0.05 mm 0.050 Elevation Positioner Axial Runout 0.02 mm 0.017 95% Probability 0.32

Millimetre Wave Measurements Manufacturing Errors Error Model Largest Major Frequency Component = 3 * θ Error Bounded by 1 mm in Azimuth Error Bounded by 2 mm in Elevation ( 3φ + φ ) sin( θ ) + 22*sin( 3* ( θ ) + ) Pherror = 11*sin 0 90 θ0 degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Errors Positioning Errors are due to two effects: - Stopping Window of Uncertainty when a Positioner is Sent to a Point Trigger Timing Error when Acquiring with a Moving Positioner For the Scan Axis Bus Delay = 15 ms corresponding to an 0.075 deg uncertainty For Step Axis Positioning Uncertainty = 0.005 deg

Millimetre Wave Measurements Antenna Near-Field Amplitude Data R = 5 m Near Field Theta Cut - Amplitude -10.00-20.00-30.00 Level db -40.00-50.00-60.00-70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Antenna Near-Field Phase Data R = 5 m Near-Field Theta Cut - Phase 0.00-100.00-200.00 Phase Degrees -300.00-400.00-500.00-600.00-700.00-800.00-900.00-1000.00 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 Angle Degrees Rate of Change of Phase = 70 deg/deg at 1 deg Shows a 36 mm offset at 94 GHz

Millimetre Wave Measurements Error Analysis Techniques Transform Data with and without Errors Calculate the effective error signal from ε ( ) ( θ,φ) = 20.*log 10^ ( P ( θ,φ) /20) 10^ ( P ( θ,φ) /A /20) Re-pointing carried out using Lagrange Interpolation N PN(θ,φ) is the magnitude of the normalised error free pattern Pe(θ,φ) is the magnitude of the non-normalised pattern with errors Ae is the normalising amplitude constant chosen to minimise the peak error signal e e

Millimetre Wave Measurements Manufacturing Errors Phi Plane Manufacturing Errors Phi - Null on Boresight 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Error Case Error Signal Error Signal Repointed -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 70 90 110 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Manufacturing Errors Theta Plane Manufacturing Errors Theta - Null on Boresight 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Error Case Error Signal Error Signal Repointed -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 70 90 110 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Alignment Errors Phi Plane Alignment Error Phi 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Errors Error Signal -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Alignment Errors Theta Plane Alignment Error Theta 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Errors Error Signal -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Errors Large Error Case Modelled as a Timing Error between 0 to 15 ms at an axis speed of 5 deg/s Errors assumed to a have a Rectangular Distribution Both Amplitude and Phase Errors Modelled Small Error Case Limited to 0.005 degree equivalent to Step Acquisition Case

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Large Errors Phi Plane Timing Errors Phi - Large Errors 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Errors With Errors Error Signal -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degress

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Large Errors Theta Plane Timing Errors Theta - Large Errors 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Errors With Errors Error Signal -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Small Errors Phi Plane Timing Errors Phi - Small Errors 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00 No Errors Error Signal -60.00-70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Small Errors Theta Plane Timing Errors Theta - Small Errors 0.00-10.00-20.00 Level db -30.00-40.00-50.00-60.00 ` No Errors Error Signal -70.00-80.00 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Errors Observations The Error Signal should reduce by ε red = 20.*log(.075/.005) = 24dB Actual Reduction Phi Cut reduction = 24 db to 55 db Theta Cut reduction = 11 db to 50 db (Possible Correlation between Successive Cuts)

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Errors Observations Actual Phi Positioning Errors Step Case Phi Angle Error Distribution 0.07 0.06 0.05 Probability 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0-0.002-0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 Error Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Errors Observations Actual Theta Positioning Errors Step Case Elevation Theta Angle Setting Accuracy Case -0.003-0.0035-0.004-0.0045 Error Degrees -0.005-0.0055-0.006-0.0065-0.007-0.0075-0.008 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Theta Angle Degrees

Millimetre Wave Measurements Positioning Errors Conclusions Receiver Timing Error Largest Source of Uncertainty In Step Scan Mode errors at 100 GHz Gain Uncertainty better than 0.05 db Sidelobe Uncertainty better than 0.4 db at 40 db NPL is Upgrading its Receiver to an Agilent PNX reducing Timing Error from 15 ms to 60 μs. Range could give Excellent Result up to 300 GHz